Navigating the Age of AI- Combating Social Isolation and Building Global Peace.pdf

Navigating the Age of AI: Combating Social Isolation and Building Global Peace

Tusar Kanta Swain
Assistant teacher at
G.P.HIGH SCHOOL,MAUSUDHA, Chandabali, Bhadrak, Odisha
[email protected]
Cont.no9937314588

Sasmita Mohanty
Assistant Teacher at Gouduni Pokhari G.U.P School, Gouduni Pokhari, Chandabali, Bhadrak, Odisha
Email - [email protected]
Cont.No.-7848801426

Sri Pramod Behera
Lecturer In Education, F M College, Balasore Contact Number 8144324035
Email ID [email protected]


Abstract

In the era of rapid technological advancement and artificial intelligence (AI), humans are more technologically connected than ever before yet experience unprecedented levels of social stratification , social isolation and psychological disconnection. This paradox has led to declining social connection , Social relation, social interaction, weakened community bonds and the rise of interpersonal and intergroup conflicts. This thematic paper explores the psychosocial impact of the omnipresence of technology on human relationships, analyzes the pathways through which technological overexposure contributes to social fragmentation and proposes multidimensional strategies to promote peace and social harmony. Through a thematic qualitative approach the article synthesizes and analyses theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and expert opinions to envision a roadmap for building a peaceful society amidst AI-driven disruptions.
Keywords:- Artificial intelligence, 21st century, Global peace, Positive impact

Introduction

In the contemporary era, rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technologies have reshaped human communication, work, and social life. The omnipresence of digital devices and algorithmic platforms has created unprecedented opportunities for information access and global connectivity. However, mounting empirical evidence suggests that excessive technological engagement is increasingly associated with social isolation, loneliness, and diminished interpersonal interaction, especially among youth and young adults (McDaniel & Radesky, 2018; Scopelliti et al., 2021). A large-scale meta-analysis by Huang et al. (2023) found that each additional hour of daily social media use increased adolescents’ risk of depression by 13%, indicating a dose–response relationship between screen time and poor mental well-being. Similarly, a national U.S. study of over 50,000 children reported that spending four or more hours per day on screens significantly elevated risks of anxiety, depression, and behavioral problems, partly mediated by reduced sleep and physical inactivity (Zhang et al., 2024). These findings highlight how technology, despite enabling virtual connection, can paradoxically erode real-world social bonds, reducing emotional closeness and increasing feelings of loneliness (Twenge et al., 2021).

This paradox raises profound concerns for global peace and social harmony. When social connectedness dec

1. Navigating the Age of AI: Combating Social Isolation and Building Global Peace

Tusar Kanta Swain
Assistant teacher at
G.P.HIGH SCHOOL,MAUSUDHA, Chandabali, Bhadrak, Odisha
[email protected]
Cont.no9937314588

Sasmita Mohanty
Assistant Teacher at Gouduni Pokhari G.U.P School, Gouduni Pokhari, Chandabali, Bhadrak,
Odisha
Email - [email protected]
Cont.No.-7848801426

Sri Pramod Behera
Lecturer In Education, F M College, Balasore Contact Number 8144324035
Email ID [email protected]


Abstract

In the era of rapid technological advancement and artificial intelligence (AI), humans are
more technologically connected than ever before yet experience unprecedented levels of
social stratification , social isolation and psychological disconnection. This paradox has led to
declining social connection , Social relation, social interaction, weakened community bonds
and the rise of interpersonal and intergroup conflicts. This thematic paper explores the
psychosocial impact of the omnipresence of technology on human relationships, analyzes the
pathways through which technological overexposure contributes to social fragmentation and
proposes multidimensional strategies to promote peace and social harmony. Through a
thematic qualitative approach the article synthesizes and analyses theoretical perspectives,
empirical findings, and expert opinions to envision a roadmap for building a peaceful society
amidst AI-driven disruptions.
Keywords:- Artificial intelligence, 21st century, Global peace, Positive impact

Introduction

In the contemporary era, rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technologies
have reshaped human communication, work, and social life. The omnipresence of digital
devices and algorithmic platforms has created unprecedented opportunities for information
access and global connectivity. However, mounting empirical evidence suggests that
excessive technological engagement is increasingly associated with social isolation,
loneliness, and diminished interpersonal interaction, especially among youth and young
adults (McDaniel & Radesky, 2018; Scopelliti et al., 2021). A large-scale meta-analysis by
Huang et al. (2023) found that each additional hour of daily social media use increased

2. adolescents’ risk of depression by 13%, indicating a dose–response relationship between
screen time and poor mental well-being. Similarly, a national U.S. study of over 50,000
children reported that spending four or more hours per day on screens significantly elevated
risks of anxiety, depression, and behavioral problems, partly mediated by reduced sleep and
physical inactivity (Zhang et al., 2024). These findings highlight how technology, despite
enabling virtual connection, can paradoxically erode real-world social bonds, reducing
emotional closeness and increasing feelings of loneliness (Twenge et al., 2021).

This paradox raises profound concerns for global peace and social harmony. When social
connectedness declines, individuals are more vulnerable to alienation, polarization, and
hostility toward out-groups, which undermines social cohesion (UNESCO, 2021). The
AI-driven environment also accelerates echo chambers and algorithmic amplification of
divisive content, which can deepen social fragmentation (Cinelli et al., 2021). In this context,
fostering peace is not merely about preventing violent conflict but also about rebuilding trust,
empathy, and interpersonal solidarity within increasingly digitised societies. International
organisations have therefore urged the development of ethical, inclusive, and human-centered
AI frameworks to counter these risks and promote positive peacebuilding (AI for Peace,
2023; Alliance for Peacebuilding, 2023). This paper contributes to this discourse by
synthesising recent research, policy documents, and international guidelines to examine the
social risks of technological overuse and propose multi-level strategies to foster peace and
social harmony in the AI-driven era.

Objectives

1.​To analyze how excessive technological engagement contributes to social isolation,
loneliness, and reduced interpersonal interaction.

2.​To identify strategies and approaches for fostering peace and social harmony in the
AI-driven era.

Methodology

This study adopts a qualitative exploratory design based entirely on secondary data collected
from diverse and credible sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, newspaper
reports, government policy documents, and publications from international organisations
such as UNESCO, WHO, UNICEF, and AI for Peace. The paper systematically reviews and
synthesises these documents to examine how excessive technological engagement contributes
to social isolation, loneliness, and reduced interpersonal interaction, and to identify effective
strategies for fostering peace and social harmony in the AI-driven era. The collected data are
critically analysed through thematic analysis, categorising key patterns, themes, and
conceptual linkages, and are presented in both descriptive narrative form and tabular format
for clarity and comprehensive understanding. This document-based approach enables a broad

3. and holistic exploration of existing knowledge while maintaining reliability and academic
rigor.


Analysis Excessive Technological Engagement Contributes to Social Isolation,
Loneliness, and Reduced Interpersonal Interaction

1. Displacement of Face-to-Face Interaction
Excessive use of digital technology (social media, gaming, streaming) displaces social
interaction among people, community groups and peers that could be spent on in-person
socializing which reduces face-to-face interaction and lowers social opportunities to form
emotional bonds and trust.(Twenge, J. M. 2019)
2. Decline in Quality of Communication
Online communication often lacks non-verbal vibes (tone, gestures, facial expressions),
which are essential for emotional connection and coordination of human brain which build
effective emotional support to become good social human being but day to day life every
person busy to explore digital world can leads to shallow and transactional conversations
rather than meaningful emotional exchanges.(Turkle, S. 2017)
3. Social Comparison and Fear of Missing Out (FoMO)
Social media and technology exposes individuals to idealized portrayals of others’ lives,
which fosters low self-esteem, self realisation , self confidence and perceived social
inadequacy . These emotions push individuals to withdraw from real-life social settings and
spend more time online, use online tools for Artificial Interaction with others which leads to
increasing social isolation in real sense
.4. Emotional Disconnection and Loneliness
Emotions are power of interaction but nowadays despite constant connectivity, people report
higher levels of loneliness because online ties often lack emotional support, feelings and
emotional connection.Technology-mediated interaction among human beings cannot fully
replace emotional support and connection from face-to-face relationships.(Cacioppo, J. T., &
Cacioppo, S. 2018).
5. Mental Distress and Avoidance of Offline Interaction
Heavy use of technology is linked with increased anxiety, depression and stress among
people which force humans to become angry, irritate and conflict with others.These mental

4. health issues help individuals less likely to seek or enjoy offline social interactions,
deepening isolation and developing introverted attitude. (Ophir, Y., & Rosenberg, H. 2021).
6. Weakening of Family and Peer Bonds
Family is a temple of emotions and the first institution of practical socializing of children's
behaviour and excessive technology use reduces time for shared family activities and peer
bonding. Even when physically present, individuals often remain mentally detached (“alone
together” phenomenon).( Turkle, S. 2017).
7. Formation of Superficial Online Relationships
Online can't replace face to face interaction and emotional connection.Online makes the gap
between person to person and connections often focus on metrics like likes, Dislike ,
followers, and views rather than mutual care and emotional support. Such superficial
relationships do not provide the depth needed to combat loneliness.(Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths,
M. D. 2017).
8. Cyclical Pattern of Isolation
Lonely individuals often increase their use of technology as a coping mechanism, which
further reduces real-life interaction and increases loneliness.This creates a self-reinforcing
loop of isolation and interaction among people.

5. Source:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-01123-x

This chart illustrates the primary negative effects of Artificial Intelligence. According to
surveyed respondents are the difficulty in discerning fake news or information, the
unauthorized use of personal data and an increased risk of cybercrime, followed by concerns
about job security and reduced social interactions. AI can negatively impact human behavior
by reducing social interactions and potentially affecting cognitive functions related to
discernment, as indicated by concerns about distinguishing fake news or information. One
significant negative impact of AI is its potential to make it difficult to discern whether news
or information is fake, as indicated by the highest percentage of respondents in the Nature
survey.


Theme Impact On Human
Behaviour
Key Findings / Evidence Reference or
Research
Study
Excessive
Technological
Engagement and
Over screen
scrolling
Compulsive
Behavior and
isolation from
Society
Compulsive or prolonged
digital device use beyond
functional needs,
including smartphone
addiction, high screen
Kuss, D. J., &
Griffiths, M.
D. (2017).
Social
networking

6. time, and social media
overuse which impact
negatively human
behaviour,make social
isolation and less face to
face interaction
sites and
addiction: Ten
lessons
learned.
Pathways to Social
Isolation
Decline in
Communication
Quality and
empathetic attitude
Now, the youth of the
world are constantly
checking notifications,
multitasking and lack of
offline mindfulness which
isolates opportunities for
in-person interaction,
weakening social bonds.
Twenge et al.,
2019
Psychological
Effects
Increased
Loneliness, Mental
Distress and Cyclical
Isolation
The excessive growth of
technology leads to users
feeling disconnected, as
virtual connections offer
weak emotional support
and the overuse of AI
tools is linked to anxiety,
depression, and stress,
potentially forming a habit
that further discourages
real-world social
interaction.
Cacioppo &
Cacioppo,
2018
Reduced
Interpersonal
Interaction
Weakening of
Family and Peer
Bonds, Community
Fragmentation and
Superficial Online
Relations
Lonely individuals often
find themselves in a
reinforcing cycle where
increased technology use
further exacerbates their
loneliness, while a decline
in family meals, shared
activities, and quality
conversations contributes
to a "together but alone"
phenomenon, and reduced
participation in physical
community activities
ultimately leads to an
erosion of social trust.
Turkle, S.
(2017). Alone
together. Basic
Books
Moderating Factors Less offline Support
and usage Intensity
Active engagement
through messaging and
calls can reduce
Ophir &
Rosenberg,
2021

7. loneliness, while passive
scrolling tends to increase
it. Furthermore,
individuals with strong
offline social networks are
less negatively impacted
by heavy technology use
and while very high
screen time is strongly
linked to loneliness,
moderate use
demonstrates neutral or
positive outcomes.
Implications Mental Health,Social
Skills , Harmony,
Education and
Youth
Tech overuse increases the
risk of depression, anxiety
and emotional numbness,
while a decline in
empathy and
communication skills
increases the chances of
interpersonal conflict and
students may experience
reduced socio-emotional
learning, collaboration and
interpersonal competence.
Twenge et al.,
2019

Table no 0.1

The Essence of analysis stated that excessive technological engagement, characterized by
compulsive digital device use and over-scrolling, leads to social isolation and reduced
face-to-face interaction, impacting human behavior and causing a decline in communication
quality and empathy. These psychological effects include increased loneliness, mental
distress and cyclical isolation, as virtual connections often lack emotional support and
overuse of AI tools is linked to anxiety and depression. Consequently, interpersonal
interactions weaken, fragmenting family and peer bonds and fostering superficial online
relationships, contributing to a "together but alone" phenomenon and erosion of social trust.
While active engagement through messaging and calls can mitigate loneliness, passive
scrolling exacerbates it and strong offline social networks offer some protection against
heavy technology use. However, the implications point to increased risks of depression,
anxiety, emotional numbness and a decline in empathy and communication skills, potentially
leading to interpersonal conflict and reduced socio-emotional learning, collaboration and
interpersonal competence, especially among youth.

Strategies for Fostering Peace and Social Harmony in the AI-Driven Era

8. 1.International Organisations

1.1 AI Standards & Frameworks

International Organisations have developed and promoted global principles like “do no
harm,” conflict sensitivity, transparency, fairness, accountability, etc., so AI is aligned with
peace and human dignity. These organisations focused on implementing practicality don't
theoretically. Encourage “ethics by design” so that peace-impact and harm mitigation are
built into AI systems from development, not as afterthoughts.

1.2 Conflict Prediction, Early Warning Systems
Now, AI is a storm in the human brain so conflict prediction and early warning systems are
needed. Use AI to analyze patterns (hate speech, resource scarcity, political tensions) to
predict potential conflict zones and intervene early in sensitive zones . Provide support to
grassroots level through various international organisations in using such tools for local-level
peacebuilding for humans.

1.3 Inclusive, Context-Sensitive Ethical Frameworks
The world is full of diversity in nature but now incorporates diverse epistemologies and
perspectives (e.g. non-Western, Indigenous, African) so AI ethics, regulations framework and
policies are culturally relevant and promote communal harmony. Ensure that policies respect
human dignity, group differences, avoid biases and discrimination.
1.4 Capacity Building & Technical Aid

Build human Supporting technical tools for developing countries with infrastructure, digital
literacy, resources to access safe and affordable technology and to use AI tools in ways that
increase social connection rather than isolation. Fund for research into AI tools for peace,
prevent misuse and disinformation.
2. National Governments

2.1 Regulation and Governance of AI

Every national government should set up regulatory bodies / national AI offices to ensure
oversight of AI development, and set ethical regulations to enforce standards. (e.g. Malaysia’s
national AI office) Which builds secure capacity building for the nation. Similarly legislate
enforce privacy, transparency and algorithmic accountability so people’s rights are protected.
2.2 Promoting Digital Well-being and Ethical Awareness

9. Educate every citizen from school onwards about healthy use of technology , media literacy,
recognizing misinformation, balancing online & offline life and organise public campaigns
on the risks of overuse, technoference and digital mental health.
2.3 Fostering Social Cohesion & Community Spaces
Social cohesion means social connection and belongingness. In the AI era the government
has promoted various investments in public/community spaces, events, cultural programmes
where people can connect and interact to each other and share various cultures to each other
(e.g In NSS National Integration Camp in India , Red cross activities and NSS National
Camp) physically. Encourage hybrid models (offline + online) for community engagement
through AI tools and modern technology which promotes awareness and integration of
various relevant knowledge inclusively. 3.Parents
3.1 Awareness of “Technoference”
Parents are the backbone of interaction and emotions of every child . Most of the children are
influenced by his parents' behaviour. So every parent is conscious about how their own
device use interferes with child-parent interaction. Be mindful about phone use, screen time
around children.
3.2 Use of Technology for Positive Connection.
Use video calls and family group virtual activities to maintain relationships, especially with
distant relatives, while also making many interactions face-to-face. Choose interactive or
shared tech use (games, content creation), rather than passive scrolling and learn a positive
attitude.
3.3Setting Healthy Boundaries and Habits
Establish rules and digital wellbeing settings in your device about when tech can be used (e.g.
no devices during meals or just before bed) and encourage offline activities like outdoors
activities, creative play, reading, physical exercise which helps to build realistic holistic
human in the society.
3.4 Modelling Behavior
Parents themselves should adopt such types of model behaviour and balanced tech use
because children often copy what adults do.
4. Individual Initiative

10. 4.1 Mindful Usage​
Be conscious of how you're using technology and which types of purpose (social, work,
recreation), active vs passive use, time spent. Take regular “tech detoxes” or scheduled breaks
from devices. Don't connect with an artificial mindset but try to connect more with real
situations.​
4.2 Cultivate Offline Relationships​

Now , the time of alarm for establishing social relationships and cooperation which build the
confidence to make a peaceful society so prioritise time with friends and family in person
similarly attend local clubs, community volunteering and in-person hobbies. Use technology
to enhance or coordinate with each other but don't replace face-to-face interaction.​

4.3 Self-Care: Mental and Physical Health​

Ensure good sleep, physical exercise and time outdoors activities rather than poor sleep ,
inactivity links strongly with loneliness and mental distress. Seek help if feeling
overwhelmed by tech use.​

4.4 Be a Responsible Digital Citizen​

Avoid spreading disinformation,digital frauds are malicious activities using digital platforms
like phishing, fake websites, and malware to steal personal information, funds, or other assets
from individuals and businesses or hate speech and build yourself as human beings with the
quality of practice kindness, empathy in online communications. Engage with the online
community positively and support peace-building content or platforms.
Discussion
The findings from the reviewed literature underscore a growing paradox: while AI and digital
technologies have expanded opportunities for communication and knowledge-sharing, their
excessive and unregulated use contributes to declining social connectedness, heightened
loneliness, and weakened interpersonal trust (Twenge et al., 2021; Scopelliti et al., 2021).
Prolonged digital engagement appears to displace face-to-face interactions and shared
physical activities, both of which are foundational for building empathy and prosocial
behavior (Huang et al., 2023). This displacement has ripple effects, including diminished
emotional resilience, increased susceptibility to polarization, and reduced collective
responsibility (Cinelli et al., 2021).

11. The discussion also reveals how AI algorithms can unintentionally reinforce echo chambers,
which exacerbate ideological segregation and reduce opportunities for cross-group dialogue
(UNESCO, 2021). Social isolation driven by technological overuse creates fertile ground for
alienation and social unrest, undermining the psychological and cultural foundations of peace
(AI for Peace, 2023). Moreover, the lack of robust ethical governance in emerging AI
ecosystems has enabled the spread of misinformation, hate speech, and online harassment,
which further erode trust and social harmony (Alliance for Peacebuilding, 2023). However, the evidence also highlights multi-level strategies that can counter these trends.
International organisations are promoting digital well-being frameworks and AI ethics
guidelines to encourage responsible use and inclusive design (UNESCO, 2021). National
governments can integrate media literacy, digital citizenship, and socio-emotional learning
into curricula to build resilience among youth. At the family level, parental mediation and
setting healthy screen-time boundaries can reduce technoference and foster meaningful
offline bonding (McDaniel & Radesky, 2018). At the individual level, practicing digital detox
routines and engaging in community-based activities can rebuild social ties and personal
well-being (Zhang et al., 2024). These collective actions are essential for transforming
technology from a divisive force into a tool for positive peacebuilding and social solidarity.
Future Research of the context
Future research should focus on conducting longitudinal and cross-cultural studies to
establish causal links between excessive technological engagement and social isolation, as
current evidence is largely correlational. There is a pressing need to investigate the role of AI
algorithms, echo chambers, and filter bubbles in fostering polarization and weakening social
cohesion, while exploring ethical and inclusive AI design frameworks that promote
constructive online dialogue. Researchers should also develop and evaluate
intervention-based programs—such as digital detox strategies, media literacy education, and
socio-emotional learning modules—to assess their effectiveness in rebuilding real-world
social connections. Moreover, studies on the psychosocial effects of emerging technologies
like virtual reality, augmented reality, and generative AI are essential to understand their
influence on empathy, attention, and interpersonal trust. Comparative studies between
high-tech and low-tech cultural contexts and policy-oriented research on national and
international digital governance strategies will further help design evidence-based approaches
to balance technological innovation with social harmony and peacebuilding (Twenge et al.,
2021; UNESCO, 2021; AI for Peace, 2023).
Conclusion
In conclusion, this paper highlights that excessive technological engagement, while
increasing virtual connectivity, paradoxically erodes real-world social bonds, contributing to
rising levels of loneliness, social isolation, and interpersonal detachment. Such disconnection
threatens the social fabric necessary for peace and harmony in the AI-driven era. Addressing

12. this challenge requires a holistic, multi-stakeholder approach that integrates ethical AI
governance, proactive educational policies, parental guidance, and individual self-regulation.
The future of peacebuilding depends not merely on technological innovation but on
humanizing technology—ensuring it enhances rather than replaces empathy, trust, and human
relationships. By prioritizing human-centered values within AI development and digital
engagement, societies can harness technology as a force for unity, understanding, and
sustainable peace.


References
Twenge, J. M., Spitzberg, B. H., & Campbell, W. K. (2019). Less in-person social interaction
with peers among U.S. adolescents in the 21st century. Journal of Adolescence, 77, 41–50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.10.009

Turkle, S. (2017). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each
other. Basic Books.

Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do social network sites
enhance or undermine subjective well-being? Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1),
274–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033

Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2018). Loneliness in the modern world: An epidemic of
social disconnection. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(7), 419–426.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0387-8

Ophir, Y., & Rosenberg, H. (2021). The relationship between smartphone use and well-being
depends on user demographics and behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106577.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106577

Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons
learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 311.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030311

Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2018). Nature Human Behaviour, 2(7), 419–426.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0387-8
AI for Peace. (2023). AI Ethics for Peacebuilding. https://www.aiforpeace.org/ethics

13. Alliance for Peacebuilding. (2023). Designing AI for Peacebuilding.
https://www.allianceforpeacebuilding.org/afp-publications/designing-ai
Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D. F., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The
echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
Huang, C., Hu, X., & Yang, J. (2023). Social media use and depression in adolescents: A
meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3),
2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032165
McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2018). Technoference: Parent distraction with technology
and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development, 89(1), 100–109.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12822
Scopelliti, M., Pacilli, M. G., & Aquino, A. (2021). Negative effects of technology use on
mental health and well-being: A review. Technology in Society, 64, 101507.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101507
Twenge, J. M., Haidt, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2021). Screen time and mental health trends in
adolescents. Clinical Psychological Science, 9(5), 957–971.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702621994549
UNESCO. (2021). Digital citizenship education: Guidelines for policy makers. UNESCO.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377071
Zhang, Y., Li, Q., & Wang, H. (2024). Excessive screen time and mental health problems
among U.S. children and adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 74(3), 456–463.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.12.017
Alliance for Peacebuilding. (2023). Designing AI for peacebuilding. Alliance for
Peacebuilding. https://www.allianceforpeacebuilding.org/afp-publications/designing-ai
AI for Peace. (n.d.). AI Ethics for Peacebuilding. AI for Peace.
https://www.aiforpeace.org/ethics​
For Human Security. (2024). The future of peacebuilding in 2025: Leveraging ethical AI for
grassrootsimpact.
https://forhumansecurity.org/the-future-of-peacebuilding-in-2025-leveraging-ethical-ai-for-gr
assroots-impact
International Parliamentary Union. (2023). Strategic actions towards AI governance: IPU AI
guidelines. https://www.ipu.org/ai-guidelines/strategic-actions-towards-ai-governance
Kujenga Amani / Social Science Research Council. (2024, December 17). Rethinking
artificial intelligence (AI) ethics for peacebuilding through African epistemologies.
https://kujenga-amani.ssrc.org/2024/12/17/rethinking-artificial-intelligence-ai-ethics-for-peac
ebuilding-through-african-epistemologies-2
Reuters. (2024, December 12). Malaysia launches national AI office, policy, regulation.
Reuters.

14. https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/malaysia-launches-national-ai-offi
ce-policy-regulation-2024-12-12
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2016). Media and young minds (Policy Statement).
Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162591.​
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2591
McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2018). Technoference: Parent distraction with technology
and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development, 89(1), 100–109.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33720026
Valkenburg, P. M., & Piotrowski, J. T. (2017). Plugged in: How media attract and affect
youth. Yale University Press.​
(For general screen/media guidance cited by AAP)
Livingstone, S., & Stoilova, M. (2022). The 4Cs: Classifying online risks to children.
Communications Research, 49(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211036798
UNESCO. (2021). Digital citizenship education: Guidelines for policy makers. UNESCO
Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377071
Scopelliti, M., Pacilli, M. G., & Aquino, A. (2021). Negative effects of technology use on
mental health and well-being: A review. Technology in Society, 64, 101507.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101507