NBA_Workshop_Lecture_With_Handout_Recap.pptx

NBA workshop

1. NBA Workshop Lecture Abbreviations & Criterion Summary with Case Study

2. Lecture Objectives Understand NBA abbreviations Learn the 9 criteria for accreditation See criteria marks distribution Case study on mock accreditation

3. Importance of NBA Accreditation Ensures quality of technical education Improves employability of graduates Facilitates global recognition Drives continuous improvement

4. Why Abbreviations? Used throughout SAR Ensure consistency Save time during evaluation

5. Key Abbreviations NBA – National Board of Accreditation SAR – Self-Assessment Report PEO – Program Educational Objectives PO – Program Outcomes PSO – Program Specific Outcomes

6. Key Abbreviations CO – Course Outcomes CAY – Current Academic Year CAYm1, CAYm2 – Previous Academic Years LYG – Last Year Graduates API – Academic Performance Index

7. Key Abbreviations SFR – Student–Faculty Ratio FQI – Faculty Qualification Index FYSFR – First Year Student–Faculty Ratio STTP/FDP – Short Term Training Program / Faculty Development Program SDG – Sustainable Development Goals

8. Activity Identify abbreviations in sample SAR Discuss meaning and use

9. NBA Criterion Framework 9 Criteria – 1000 marks Covers program & institution Focus on outcomes

10. Criterion Summary 1. Outcome-Based Curriculum – 120 2. Outcome-Based Teaching Learning – 120 3. Outcome-Based Assessment – 120

11. Criterion Summary 4. Students’ Performance – 120 5. Faculty Information – 100 6. Faculty Contributions – 120

12. Criterion Summary 7. Facilities & Technical Support – 100 8. Continuous Improvement – 80 9. Student Support & Governance – 120

13. Criterion Summary Total = 1000 Marks

14. Charts: Criterion Marks Distribution

15. Case Study: XYZ Dept. Preparing SAR for NBA Abbreviations applied Criteria applied

16. Case Study Data CAY = 2024-25 API (1st Yr) = 72% SFR = 18:1 FYSFR = 1:20 FQI = 0.85

17. Criterion Evaluation (Part 1) Curriculum: 110/120 Teaching: 100/120 Assessment: 95/120 Students’ Performance: 105/120 Faculty Info: 85/100

18. Criterion Evaluation (Part 2) Faculty Contributions: 95/120 Facilities: 80/100 Continuous Improvement: 60/80 Student Support: 115/120

19. Case Study Result Total = 845/1000 Accredited for 6 years Strengths: Curriculum, Support Weakness: Continuous Improvement

20. Lessons Learned Abbreviations clarify SAR Criteria show strengths Scoring guides improvement

21. Key Takeaways Abbreviations vital in SAR 9 criteria backbone of NBA Marks distribution shows focus Case study links theory to practice

22. CO–PO Mapping & Attainment (Introduction) NBA emphasizes Outcome-Based Education (OBE). Every question paper must align with COs and map to POs/PSOs Constructive alignment of teaching, learning, and assessment Helps measure attainment and identify gaps Drives improvement in teaching-learning process

23. Sample Question Paper (DSP Example) Q1. Define Sampling Theorem. (CO1 → PO1, PO2) Q2. Explain FFT algorithm with example. (CO2 → PO3, PO4) Q3. Design a digital filter for given specification. (CO3 → PO5, PO12) Q4. Case study on signal compression. (CO4 → PO6, PO7, PSO2)

24. Mapping Table Question CO Mapped PO/PSO Mapped Bloom’s Level Marks Q1 CO1 PO1, PO2 Remember/Understand 10 Q2 CO2 PO3, PO4 Apply/Analyze 15 Q3 CO3 PO5, PO12 Apply/Create 20 Q4 CO4 PO6, PO7, PSO2 Analyze/Evaluate 15

25. Attainment & Improvements Attainment Calculation: e.g., 70% students score >60% in Q3 → CO3 attained Observations: Some POs under-addressed, certain COs not fully evaluated Improvements: Add design-oriented questions for higher COs Corrections: Ensure all COs appear at least once Balance: Maintain syllabus coverage across all units

26. Final Recap – The Big Picture Key connections in NBA Accreditation: Abbreviations → Simplify SAR documentation & communication Criteria (1000 marks) → Define evaluation framework & focus areas Case Study (XYZ Dept.) → Demonstrated practical scoring & accreditation outcome Question Paper Analysis → Linked COs with POs/PSOs, attainment & improvements Together → Drive Continuous Quality Improvement in Education