Obstetric brachial plexus injury (OBPI)

AsirJohnSamuel 21,800 views 81 slides Sep 07, 2012
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 81
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81

About This Presentation

My seminar While Pursuing Master of Physiotherapy (MPT) at Manipal University


Slide Content

D.A.ASIR JOHN SAMUEL., ( Paed.Neuro)
Final Yr MPT
Under,
Mr. M.MANIKANDAN., MPT (Neuro)
Associate Professor

*Definition
*Incidence
*Risk factors
*Classification
*Investigation
*Management
*Prognosis

*Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy is defined as a
flaccid paresis of an upper extremity due to traumatic
stretching of the brachial plexus received at birth,
with the passive range of motion greater than the
active range of motion

Arch Dis Child Fetal neonatal Ed 2003;88:F185-9

*Brachial palsy is a paralysis involving the muscles
of the upper extremity that follows mechanical
trauma to the spinal roots of C5 to T1 (the brachial
plexus) during birth

*Injuries are transient, with full return of function
occuring in 70-92% of cases¹
1.Plas Reconstr Surg 1994;93:675-80

0.38 – 3 / 1000 (2001)
0.19 – 2.5 / 1000
Due to Advances in obstetrics
Indian journal obstetrics 2009;43:236-46

*The risk factors for brachial plexus palsies may
be divided into three categories:
1.Neonatal
2.Maternal
3.Labor-related factors

*High birth weight ( > 4 kg )
*Low APGAR score at 1 min, 5 min & 10 min
*Breach fetal position

Pediatr Neurol 2008;38:235-242

*Age ( > 35 years )
*Cephalo-Pelvic Disproportion
*Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ( results in Macrosomia )
*BMI
*Post date gestation

Pediatr Neurol 2008;38:235-242

*Increased duration of 2
nd
stage of labour
*Induction of labour
-Oxytocin augment
*Operative vaginal deliveries
-Vacuum extraction
-Direct compression of fetal neck during
delivery by forceps
Pediatr Neurol 2008;38:235-242

*Based on,
1.Severity
2.Anatomical location
3.Clinical findings

*Avulsion
*Rupture
*Neuroma
*Neuropraxia

1.Proximal or Duchenne-Erb’s paralysis (Injury to C5 &
C6, most common)
2.Intermediate paralysis ( Injury to C7 )
3.Distal or Klumpke’s paralysis ( injury to C8 & T1,
extremely rare)
4.Total brachial plexus paralysis ( more often than the
Klumpke type)
Duchenne-Erbs type > Total brachial type > Klumpke type

*Group I, C5-C6 – paralysis of shoulder & biceps
*Group II, C5-C7 – paralysis of shoulder, biceps &
forearm extensor
*Group III, C5-T1 – Complete paralysis of limb
*Group IV, C5-Th1 – Complete paralysis of limb with
Horner’s syndrome

*In 1874, Wilhelm Heinrich Erb described isolated upper
brachial plexus palsy
*The site of damage localized to the junction of C5 & C6
*Due to,
-Breech presentation with arms extended over the head
-Excessive traction on the shoulder
-# clavicle during vaginal delivery

1.Deltoid
2.Supraspinatus
3.Infraspinatus
4.Rhomboids
5.Clavicular head of pectoralis major
6.Teres minor
7.Biceps
8.Brachialis
9.Extensor carpi radialis longus & brevis

*Arms hangs by the side with,
*Shoulder – internaly rotated
*Elbow – extension
*Forearm – pronated with palm facing backwards (tips
position)
*Hand & finger functions - preserved

*Baby’s arm is positioned in,
*Shoulder – abduction & external rotation
*Elbow – flexed
*Forearm – supinated
*Wrist – behind the neck
*This position prevents contracture of Subscapularis,
Pectoralis major
*Passive stretching

*Isolated injuries to the distal or lower portion of the brachial
plexus is described by Klumpke
*The site of damage localized to the junction of C8 & T1
*Due to,
-Stretching of lower plexus N. under and against coracoid
process during forceful elevation or abduction of the arm
-Excessive traction on the trunk

1.Flexors of wrist
2.Flexors of fingers (FDS & FDP)
3.Intrinsic muscles of hand
*If sympathetic trunk is involved results in
ipsilateral Horner’s syndrome ( ptosis,
hypohirdosis, miosis & enopthalmos)
*Associated with delayed pigmentation of iris

*Involves injury to all the roots / trunks / cords of
the brachial plexus
*It is of 2 types depending on the level,
1.Pre-ganglionic
2.Post-ganglionic

*Traction injury resulting in the avulsion of Pre ganglionic
level of all the roots C5 to T1
*If T1 root at Pre ganglionic level is affected results in
Horner’s syndrome ( ptosis, hypohirdosis / anhidrosis,
miosis & enopthalmos)
*Serratus anterior & Rhomboids muscles are paralysed
*Lesion is irrecoverable
*Limb is functionless

*Post ganglionic level lesion at all roots C5 to T1
*Serratus anterior & Rhomboids muscle functions
are preserved
*If lesion is axonotmesis – recovery is possible
*If lesion is neuronotmesis – surgical exploration &
repair may be needed

Gravity Eliminated
No contration 0
Contraction, no motion 1
Motion ≤ ½ range 2
Motion >½ range 3
Full motion 4
Against Gravity
Motion ≤ ½ range 5
Motion >½ range 6
Full motion 7

Journal of the American society for surgery of the hand 2003; 3:1, 41-54

Modified Mallet classification

S0 – No reaction to painful or other stimuli
S1 – Reaction to painful stimuli, none to touch
S2 – Reaction to touch, not to light touch
S3 – Apparently normal sensation

APMR,59:458-464,1978

M0 – No contraction
M1 –Contraction with out movement (shoulder,
elbow, wrist); slight movement of digits
M2 – Incomplete movement when suppressing, weak
complete movement of digits
M3 – complete movement with apparently normal
force

APMR 1978,59:458-464

*Chest X-ray – to rule out Phrenic N. palsy
*CT with metrizamide (CT-myelogram)
*MRI – integrity of nerve roots
*Electromyography
-48 hrs within delivery distinguishes b/w prenatal &
OBPI
-Detect signs of reinnervation
-Root avulsions (80% accuracy)

*Nerve Conduction Studies (NCV)
-Sensory nerve conduction but absence of motor
nerve conduction at 3 months – Avulsion injury
*SSEP & MEP denotes the integrity of sensory &
motor fibres

*EMG
-Fibrillation potential
-motor unit action potential (MUAP)
*Nerve Conduction Studies
- Sensory nerve action potential (SNAP)
-Compound muscle action potential (CMAP).

*Fibrillation potential appear about 3 weeks after
motor nerve injury
*Minimal degree of nerve lesion – innervation ratio
*MUAP loss occur immediately – moderate lesion


Neurol Clin N Am 20 (2002) 423–450

*Absolutely abnormal – less than age based laboratory
control values
*Relatively abnormal - < 50% than the amplitude of
homologous response recorded from contralateral side
*Wallerian degeneration apparent 2-3 days on NCS

Neurol Clin N Am 20 (2002) 423–450

*SNAPs & CMAPs are spared – minimal lesion

SNAP amplitude decrease ( moderate)


CMAP amplitude decrease (severe)

Neurol Clin N Am 20 (2002) 423–450

*CMAP amplitudes are the most useful for quantifying the amount
of axon loss suffered by a nerve
*Prior to reinnervation, the CMAP amplitudes are the most reliable
indicator of the amount of axon loss present, and the relationship is
roughly one to one.
*For example,
*CMAP amplitude from symptomatic side – 5mV
*CMAP amplitude from asymptomatic side – 10mV
Neurol Clin N Am 20 (2002) 423–450

*CMAP amplitudes begin to decrease on day 2 or 3 and reach
their nadir at day 7
*SNAP amplitudes begin to drop on day 6 and reach their
nadir around day 10 or 11
*Fibrillation potential after day 21
*MUAP loss occurs immediately - at least moderate in degree
*Prolonged duration, increased polyphasia and, occasionally,
heightened amplitude – during reinnervation (MUAP)
Neurol Clin N Am 20 (2002) 423–450

*The length of nerve between the lesion site and the
denervated muscle fibers
*Advancement occurs at a rate of about 1 in/month
*Denervated muscle fibers survive for approximately 18 to 24
months.
* After this period of time has elapsed, the muscle fibers
undergo degeneration and, from that point onward, can no
longer be reinnervated
Neurol Clin N Am 20 (2002) 423–450

1.Supporting structures are spared
2.Distance between the lesion and the denervated
muscle fibers is short
3.Lesion is incomplete

Neurol Clin N Am 20 (2002) 423–450

*End organs of the sensory nerve fibers do not undergo
degeneration,
*There is no time limit on sensory nerve fiber regeneration.
*If it requires more than 2 years for the sensory fibers to
reach their end organs, reinnervation can still be successful

Neurol Clin N Am 20 (2002) 423–450

*Conduction slowing
-Neuropraxia
-Axonotmesis
*Conduction block
-Neuronotmesis

Neurol Clin N Am 20 (2002) 423–450

*No SNAP domain
*CMAP domain includes,
*Musculocutaneous NCS recording Biceps (Musc-
biceps)
*Axillary NCS recording deltoid (Ax-deltoid).
*EMG domain includes those muscles contained
within the C5 myotome.

* SNAP- lateral antebrachial cutaneous NCS (LABC; 100%)
-Median NCS recording from first digit (Med-D1; 100%),
second digit (Med-D2; 20%) & third digit (Med-D3; 10%)
sensory NCS.
-Superficial radial NCS (S-Radial; 60%)
*CMAP – Biceps & Deltoid
*EMG domain includes those muscles belonging to the C6
myotome.

*SNAP
-Med-D2 (80%)
-Med-D3 (70%)
-S-Radial (40%)
*CMAP – EDC (Radial)
*EMG domain includes muscles belonging to the C7 myotome

Neurol Clin N Am 20 (2002) 423–450

*SNAP domain of the C8 APR includes Uln-D5
*CMAP domain Ulnar NCS, recording abductor digiti minimi
(Ulnar-ADM) and first dorsal interosseous (Uln-FDI)
-Radial NCS, recording Extensor indicis proprius (Radial-EIP)
motor NCS
-To a lesser extent, the median NCS, recording abductor
pollicis brevis (Median-APB)
*EMG domain consists of those muscles belonging to the C8
myotome

*CMAP domain -Abductor pollicis brevis, the Median-APB NCS
is a more reliable
*EMG domain consists of those muscles belonging to the T1
myotome.
* Abductor pollicis brevis
*Flexor pollicis longus muscles are the most helpful in its
assessment

*Fracture Pseudoparalysis
*Congenital Varicella of the Upper Limb
*Cerebral Palsy (Monoplegia)
*Intrauterine Upper-Limb Nerve Compression by
the Umbilical Cord or Amniotic Bands
*Intrauterine Maladaption Palsy

*Surgical management

*Conservative management

*Pediatric neurosurgeon

*Plastic reconstructive surgeon

*Pediatric orthopaedic surgeon

*Thomas and Dargassie developed towel test
*Lefevre and Diament called it as hand to face test
*In supine, the child face is covered with towel
*Shoulder flexion, elbow flexion and extension and finger
flexion and extension are needed for the test.
*He/she passes the test if he/she then removes the towel from
the face.

Journal of Hand Surgery,2004,29B:2:155–158 – LOE-3B

*Absence of biceps recovery by 3 months of age is an
indication of surgery
*The infants that did not pass the towel test At 6 months also
did not pass it at 9 months are the potential candidates for
surgery



Journal of Hand Surgery,2004,29B:2:155–158

*Surgical exploration should be done within 6 months of life
*Exploration and nerve grafting or neurotization if there is a
complete plexus palsy at 3 months or if there is a C5-C6 palsy
with absence of biceps at 3 months
*Failure of recovery of elbow flexion and shoulder abduction
from the 3
rd
to the 6
th
month of life

Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2004;113: 54e-67e

*Nerve transfer/neurotization
-Intercostal N.
-Ulnar N.
-Sural N.
-Suprascpular N.
-Axillary N.
*Nerve anastomosis
*Nerve reconstruction

*Neurolysis
*Neuroma resection
*Neurorrhaphy

*Internal rotation contracture
-subscapularis release
-Latissimus dorsi infraspinatus

*Improving abduction
-Trapezius / latissimus dorsi trasnfer to humeral
head

*Improving forearm pronation
-Flexor-pronator transfer (steindler procedure)

*Improving elbow extension (in lower plexus injury)
-Latissimus dorsi transfer

*Improving elbow flexion
- Flexorplasty – triceps, PM, Lats

*Immobilization
-Cast 3-6 weeks
-Night splint 3-6 months
*Scar management
-Tendon gliding
-US massage

*Muscle reeducation
-cues to perform previous action of transferred
muscle
-Taping / vibration over muscle belly
-Biofeedback
-NEMS-after 6 weeks
*Functional performance

*Maintain
-PROM
-Supple of muscle
-Muscle strength
*Stretch muscle groups to prevent contracture

*Initial rest period of 7-10 days – to allow for
reduction of hemorrhage & edema around the
traumatized nerves
*No ROM or other interventions are initiated
*The involved UL is positioned across the abdomen
*Avoid lying on the involved limb
*Baseline examination – after initial period of
immobilization

Maintain ROM
-Facilitates normal movement patterns while inhibiting
substitutions
-Lift 10 toy/ball & put in doll house/basket – shoulder F.
-Paralysis & contracture of Rhomboids disturbs normal
6:1 humeroscapular rhythm in first 30º of shoulder mvt.
-Stabilize the scapula & assist active F as child reaches for
a toy
Developmental Medicine & child Neurology 2001,43:419-426 – LOE-4A

-Hand to mouth
-Transferring objects
-Weight shifting on propped UE in prone & quadruped
-Sitting with hands in front or back
-Creeping
-Reaching for toys placed at variety of angles & heights

Developmental Medicine & child Neurology 2001,43:419-426 – LOE-4A

-In side-lying on uninvolved arm to avoid stresses on
involved arm & to free the weak arm to reach & play
with toys in front of them
-Joint compression in weight bearing
-Restraining uninvolved arm & encouraging involved
arm

-Up to 65% of children with incomplete OBPI have limited
ROM (Dev Med & Child Neurol 2004,46:76-83)
-Prevent Scapulohumeral adhesion by restraining/stabilizing
the scapula during reaching & allowing muscles to stretch in
initial 30º of Abd.
-Beyond 30º scapula must rotate along with humeral ER
-Botox improves AROM & benefits lasted upto 6 wks
Pediatric Rehabilitation 2001,4:29-36 – LOE-2B

-Sensory loss can lead to neglect or self-mutilation
-Parents should be cautioned about risk of self mutilation such as
biting an insensate area
-Sensory perception can be enhanced by placing objects of
different textures & temperatures in hand
-Playing games such as finding toys under sudsy water/rice/sand
-Blindfolding & having her name familiar objects placed in hand

-Arm is positioned toward Abd, ER, elbow F &
forearm Supination on a pillow to child’s side –
during sleeping

-Resting night splints – prevent wrist & finger F
contracture
-Wrist cock-up – maintain neutral wrist alignment
(Klumpke’s Paralysis)
-Statue of liberty splint – prevent Add & IR
contracture

*Air splints – restraining uninvolved UE to
encourage involved UE
*Aeroplane splint – Erb’s palsy

*ES of denervated muscles prevents muscle atrophy
*May be used after neurosurgery


Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1998,79:458-464 – LOE-4A

*The upper plexus palsies are generally less severe
*Poor prognostic factors include
-total or lower plex-opathy
-Horner’s syndrome
-Root avulsions and
-Associated fractures (e.g., ribs, clavicle, humerus)
-Group IV ( according to Naraks grading)
Clin Plast Surg 1984;11:181-7 – LOE -3A
Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;264:39-47

*Spontaneous recovery in 70-95% by 3–4 months of life
*At 3 months, the predictive value of regained elbow flexion for
complete recovery was 100%
* 99% of shoulder ER
*96% of forearm supination


Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology; Jun 2010; 52, 6;529-534 – LOE-2B

*Physical Therapy for Children – 3
rd
Ed
*Suzan K. Campel

*Physiotherapy in Paediatrics – 3
rd
Ed
*Roberta B. Shepherd