OER RADIATION ONCOLOGY ; OXYGEN ENHANCEMENT RATIO

dranjalikrishnanp 298 views 176 slides Mar 11, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 381
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100
Slide 101
101
Slide 102
102
Slide 103
103
Slide 104
104
Slide 105
105
Slide 106
106
Slide 107
107
Slide 108
108
Slide 109
109
Slide 110
110
Slide 111
111
Slide 112
112
Slide 113
113
Slide 114
114
Slide 115
115
Slide 116
116
Slide 117
117
Slide 118
118
Slide 119
119
Slide 120
120
Slide 121
121
Slide 122
122
Slide 123
123
Slide 124
124
Slide 125
125
Slide 126
126
Slide 127
127
Slide 128
128
Slide 129
129
Slide 130
130
Slide 131
131
Slide 132
132
Slide 133
133
Slide 134
134
Slide 135
135
Slide 136
136
Slide 137
137
Slide 138
138
Slide 139
139
Slide 140
140
Slide 141
141
Slide 142
142
Slide 143
143
Slide 144
144
Slide 145
145
Slide 146
146
Slide 147
147
Slide 148
148
Slide 149
149
Slide 150
150
Slide 151
151
Slide 152
152
Slide 153
153
Slide 154
154
Slide 155
155
Slide 156
156
Slide 157
157
Slide 158
158
Slide 159
159
Slide 160
160
Slide 161
161
Slide 162
162
Slide 163
163
Slide 164
164
Slide 165
165
Slide 166
166
Slide 167
167
Slide 168
168
Slide 169
169
Slide 170
170
Slide 171
171
Slide 172
172
Slide 173
173
Slide 174
174
Slide 175
175
Slide 176
176
Slide 177
177
Slide 178
178
Slide 179
179
Slide 180
180
Slide 181
181
Slide 182
182
Slide 183
183
Slide 184
184
Slide 185
185
Slide 186
186
Slide 187
187
Slide 188
188
Slide 189
189
Slide 190
190
Slide 191
191
Slide 192
192
Slide 193
193
Slide 194
194
Slide 195
195
Slide 196
196
Slide 197
197
Slide 198
198
Slide 199
199
Slide 200
200
Slide 201
201
Slide 202
202
Slide 203
203
Slide 204
204
Slide 205
205
Slide 206
206
Slide 207
207
Slide 208
208
Slide 209
209
Slide 210
210
Slide 211
211
Slide 212
212
Slide 213
213
Slide 214
214
Slide 215
215
Slide 216
216
Slide 217
217
Slide 218
218
Slide 219
219
Slide 220
220
Slide 221
221
Slide 222
222
Slide 223
223
Slide 224
224
Slide 225
225
Slide 226
226
Slide 227
227
Slide 228
228
Slide 229
229
Slide 230
230
Slide 231
231
Slide 232
232
Slide 233
233
Slide 234
234
Slide 235
235
Slide 236
236
Slide 237
237
Slide 238
238
Slide 239
239
Slide 240
240
Slide 241
241
Slide 242
242
Slide 243
243
Slide 244
244
Slide 245
245
Slide 246
246
Slide 247
247
Slide 248
248
Slide 249
249
Slide 250
250
Slide 251
251
Slide 252
252
Slide 253
253
Slide 254
254
Slide 255
255
Slide 256
256
Slide 257
257
Slide 258
258
Slide 259
259
Slide 260
260
Slide 261
261
Slide 262
262
Slide 263
263
Slide 264
264
Slide 265
265
Slide 266
266
Slide 267
267
Slide 268
268
Slide 269
269
Slide 270
270
Slide 271
271
Slide 272
272
Slide 273
273
Slide 274
274
Slide 275
275
Slide 276
276
Slide 277
277
Slide 278
278
Slide 279
279
Slide 280
280
Slide 281
281
Slide 282
282
Slide 283
283
Slide 284
284
Slide 285
285
Slide 286
286
Slide 287
287
Slide 288
288
Slide 289
289
Slide 290
290
Slide 291
291
Slide 292
292
Slide 293
293
Slide 294
294
Slide 295
295
Slide 296
296
Slide 297
297
Slide 298
298
Slide 299
299
Slide 300
300
Slide 301
301
Slide 302
302
Slide 303
303
Slide 304
304
Slide 305
305
Slide 306
306
Slide 307
307
Slide 308
308
Slide 309
309
Slide 310
310
Slide 311
311
Slide 312
312
Slide 313
313
Slide 314
314
Slide 315
315
Slide 316
316
Slide 317
317
Slide 318
318
Slide 319
319
Slide 320
320
Slide 321
321
Slide 322
322
Slide 323
323
Slide 324
324
Slide 325
325
Slide 326
326
Slide 327
327
Slide 328
328
Slide 329
329
Slide 330
330
Slide 331
331
Slide 332
332
Slide 333
333
Slide 334
334
Slide 335
335
Slide 336
336
Slide 337
337
Slide 338
338
Slide 339
339
Slide 340
340
Slide 341
341
Slide 342
342
Slide 343
343
Slide 344
344
Slide 345
345
Slide 346
346
Slide 347
347
Slide 348
348
Slide 349
349
Slide 350
350
Slide 351
351
Slide 352
352
Slide 353
353
Slide 354
354
Slide 355
355
Slide 356
356
Slide 357
357
Slide 358
358
Slide 359
359
Slide 360
360
Slide 361
361
Slide 362
362
Slide 363
363
Slide 364
364
Slide 365
365
Slide 366
366
Slide 367
367
Slide 368
368
Slide 369
369
Slide 370
370
Slide 371
371
Slide 372
372
Slide 373
373
Slide 374
374
Slide 375
375
Slide 376
376
Slide 377
377
Slide 378
378
Slide 379
379
Slide 380
380
Slide 381
381

About This Presentation

OER


Slide Content

OER / RBE / LET Dr ANJALIKRISHNA NP PG RESIDENT RADIOTHERAPY

OXYGEN ENHANCEMENT RATIO

OXYGEN EFFECT Cells are much more sensitive to radiation in the presence of oxygen The formation of RO2·, an organic peroxide, represents a non restorable form of the target material; that is, the reaction results in a change in the chemical composition of the material exposed to the radiation. This reaction cannot take place in the absence of oxygen. Oxygen fixes ( ie , makes permanent ) the damage produced by free radicals . In the absence of oxygen , damage produced by the indirect action may be repaired .

The oxygen fixation hypothesis . About two-thirds of the damage produced by x-rays is by indirect action mediated by free radicals. The damage produced by free radicals in DNA can be repaired under hypoxia but may be “fixed” (made permanent and irreparable) if molecular oxygen is available .

To produce its effect , molecular oxygen must be present during the radiation exposure or at least during the lifetime of the free radicals generated by the radiation . Ie , Oxygen effect is time dependent . O2 needs to be present during radiation . or O2 has to be present within milliseconds after radiation . Radiation - ion pairs - free radicals 0.01 msec. OXYGEN IS NATURAL RADIOSENITIZER .

If molecular oxygen is present, DNA reacts with the free radicals (R·). The DNA radical can be chemically restored to its reduced form through reaction with a sulfhydryl (SH) group. SULFHYDRIL group is a natural radio protector which exert their effect by scavenging free radicals . Oxygen and sulfhydryl only acts on indirect action and they do not have any effect on direct action of radiation to DNA .

RADIOSENSITIVITY & O2 CONCENTRATION

Very little change upto 20 mmHg. Sharp fall in sensitivity and reduces to half at around 3 mmHg. Maximum radio resistance at 1/100 mm of Hg . Oxygen tension in most of tissue is similar at venous blood O2 tension , ie 20-40 mmHg .So , MOST OF THE NORMAL TISSUES HAVE GOOD SENSITIVITY TO RADIATION.

EFFECT OF O2 on cell survival curve .

So , to get the same surviving fraction , dose of RT to be increased with decreasing oxygen tension . The ratio of RT to get the same SF in hypoxic cells to oxic cells is known as OXYGEN ENHANCEMENT RATIO (OER). OER = DH / DO = D hypoxic/D aerobic Ratio of doses administered under hypoxic to aerated condition needed to achieve the same biological effect is called oxygen enhancement ratio .

For sparsely ionizing radiations, such as x- and γ-rays, the OER at high doses has a value of between 2.5 and 3.5. For a densely ionizing radiation, such as low-energy α-particles , the survival curve does not have an initial shoulder; which means that all hits results into cell kill and no sub lethal damage to be fixed by oxygen .we can say , α-particle radiation is as effective for hypoxic cells as for oxic cell . Intermediate value for fast neutrons , the OER for neutrons is about 1.6. For radiations of intermediate ionizing density, such as neutrons, the survival curves have a much reduced shoulder

Survival curves for mammalian cells exposed to x-rays in the presence and absence of oxygen are illustrated here;

High dose region ; predominant process of cell kill is by accumulation of sublethal damage ( cell killing by multiple hit event –MHE ) which can be repaired ,so oxygen fix it and repair slows down . Low dose region ; cell killing is predominantly by single hit event –SHE ,no sublethal damage to be fixed up by oxygen ; so , in low dose region OER = 2 ( x ray or gamma ray )

Cells are much more sensitive to x-rays in the presence of molecular oxygen than in its absence (i.e., under hypoxia). The ratio of doses under hypoxic to aerated conditions necessary to produce the same level of cell killing is called the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER). It has a value close to 3.5 at high doses (A) But may have a lower value of about 2.5 at x-ray doses less than about 2 to 3 Gy (B).

OER varies slightly during cell cycle . Cells in G1 phase have a lower OER than those in S, and because G1 cells are more radiosensitive, they dominate the low-dose region of the survival curve. S PHASE > G1 PHASE > G2/M PHASE . OER OF S PHASE = 2.8 - 2.9 OER OF G2/M PHASE = 2.3 -2.4

CLINICAL IMPORTANCE Various experimental solid tumors in animals have shown to have hypoxic contents between 10 to 40 %, which limits the radio curability However , it should be remembered that even a minute proportion of hypoxic cells will limit the radiocurability if treated with large single fraction . There are abundant evidences to support the existence of hypoxic cells in human tumour .

TUMOR HYPOXIA & DFS IN CA CERVIX

HYPOXIA & local tumor control in HEAD & NECK CANCER

LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER Linear energy transfer (LET) is the energy transferred per unit length of the track. The special unit usually used for this quantity is kiloelectron volt per micrometer (keV/ μm ) of unit density material. The LET (L) of charged particles in medium is the quotient of dE /dl. dE is the average energy locally imparted to the medium by a charged particle of specified energy in traversing a distance of dl . L= dE /dl

Typical Linear Energy Transfer Values

Linear energy transfer (LET) is the average energy deposited per unit length of track. The track average is calculated by dividing the track into equal lengths and averaging the energy deposited in each length. The energy average is calculated by dividing the track into equal energy intervals and averaging the lengths of the track that contain this amount of energy. The method of averaging makes little difference for x-rays or for monoenergetic charged particles, but the track average and energy average are different for neutrons. In the case of either x-rays or monoenergetic charged particles, the two methods of averaging yield similar results. In the case of 14-MeV neutrons, by contrast, the track average LET is about 12 keV/ μm and the energy average LET is about 100 keV/ μm . The biologic properties of neutrons tend to correlate best with the energy average.

RELATIVE BIOLOGIC EFFECTIVENESS (RBE) The amount or quantity of radiation is expressed in terms of the absorbed dose, a physical quantity with the unit of gray ( Gy ). Absorbed dose is a measure of the energy absorbed per unit mass of tissue. Equal doses of different types of radiation do not produce equal biologic effects. For example, 1 Gy of neutrons produces a greater biologic effect than 1 Gy of x-rays. The key to the difference lies in the pattern of energy deposition at the microscopic level.

OPTIMAL LET

why radiation with an LET of about 100 keV/ μm is optimal in terms of producing a biologic effect ? LET of about 100 keV/ μm is optimal in terms of producing a biologic effect . At this density of ionization , the average separation in ionizing events is equal to the diameter of DNA double helix (i.e., about 20 Å or 2 nm) which causes significant DOUBLE STRAND BREAK . DSB are the basis of most biological effects . The probability of causing DSBs is low in sparsely ionizing radiation . The LET at which the RBE reaches a peak is much the same (about 100 keV/ μm ) for a wide range of mammalian cells, from mouse to human, and is the same for mutation as an end point as for cell killing.

Variation of relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) with linear energy transfer (LET) for survival of mammalian cells of human origin. The RBE rises to a maximum at an LET of about 100 keV/ μm and subsequently falls for higher values of LET. Curves 1, 2, and 3 refer to cell survival levels of 0.8, 0.1, and 0.01, respectively, illustrating that the absolute value of the RBE is not unique but depends on the level of biologic damage and, therefore, on the dose level.

In the case of x-rays, which are more sparsely ionizing, the probability of a single track causing a DSB is low, and in general, more than one track is required. As a consequence, x-rays have a low biologic effectiveness. At the other extreme, much more densely ionizing radiations (e.g., with an LET of 200 keV/ μm ) readily produce DSBs. But energy is “wasted” Because, the ionizing events are too close together. RBE is the ratio of doses producing equal biologic effect , this more densely ionizing radiation has a lower RBE than the optimal LET radiation. The more densely ionizing radiation is just as effective per track but less effective per unit dose.

The most biologically effective LET is that at which there is a coincidence between the diameter of the DNA helix and the average separation of ionizing events. Radiations having this optimal LET include neutrons of a few hundred kiloelectron volts as well as low-energy protons and α-particles.

RBE depends on the following : Radiation quality (LET) (The type of radiation and its energy, whether electromagnetic or particulate, and whether charged or uncharged) Radiation dose & Number of dose fractions (The shape of the dose– response relationship varies for radiations that differ substantially in their LET). Dose rate (The slope of the dose–response curve for sparsely ionizing radiations, such as x- or γ-rays, varies critically with a changing dose rate. In contrast, the biologic response to densely ionizing radiations depends little on the rate at which the radiation is delivered) Biologic system or end point (RBE values are high for tissues that accumulate and repair a great deal of sublethal damage and low for those that do not)

x-rays, which are sparsely ionizing, have a low LET, and consequently exhibit a large OER of about 2.5 .

Neutrons, which are intermediate in ionizing density and characteristically show an OER of 1.6.

2.5-MeV α-particles, which are densely ionizing and have a high LET; in this case, survival estimates, whether in the presence or absence of oxygen, fall along a common line, and so the OER is unity.

Variation of the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) and the relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) as a function of the linear energy transfer (LET) of the radiation involved . The rapid increase in RBE and the rapid fall of the OER occur at about the same LET, 100 keV/ μm .
Tags