Ontogeny and Phylogeny

Taqiahmad007 5,069 views 45 slides Mar 10, 2015
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 45
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45

About This Presentation

No description available for this slideshow.


Slide Content

Ontogeny
and
Phylogeny

In biology, epigenesis has at least two distinct meanings:
the unfolding development of an organism, and in particular
the development of a plant or animal from an egg or spore
through a sequence of steps in which cells differentiate and
organs form;
the theory that plants and animals develop in this way,
in contrast to theories of preformation.
From Wikepedia
More than this!
Epigenesis implies that, at every time point, development
is a consequence of the confluence of genes and prior
experience, which in turn alters the subsequent expression
of genes and their interactions with the environment

Rousseau
Preformationist; adult determined in egg, simply unfolds
Locke
Tabula rasa; blank slate upon which experience writes
Preformationism was the answer to the difficult question of how
a complex adult can arise from the simple gametes; the
preformed embryo was complete and a direct result of
evolution.

Closely associated with the preformationist view is
the notion that ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny.
What does this mean?
Ernst Haeckel was principal advocate of the principle
that evolution occurred through changes
introduced into the adult;
ontogenies were simply the reflection of prior
evolutionary change, which became
compressed in time with evolution
thus, evolution was the cause of ontogeny
served to curtail research into developmental
biology

Laws of von Baer (1828)
2. From the more general characters develop the less general
and finally the special characters (e.g., differentiation of
wings and forelimbs from primitive limb buds)
1. During development, general characters appear
before special characters; e.g., those of phylum before
those of class (e.g. notochord before limbs).
3. Animals of different species become increasingly
different as they develop.
4. Young stages do not resemble the adult stages of
ancestors, but resemble the young of those ancestors

Eight ways altered ontogeny can produce
phylogenetic change (deBeer)
1. caenogenesis—addition of characters in youthful stages
e.g., amnion of vertbrates

Eight ways altered ontogeny can produce
phylogenetic change (deBeer)
1.caenogenesis
2. adult variation—new characters expressed in adulthood
e.g. species-specific plumage in birds after final molt

Eight ways altered ontogeny can produce
phylogenetic change (deBeer)
1.caenogenesis
2.adult variation
3.deviation—developmental alterations persist in adults
e.g. gill slitsgills in fish,
gill slitsEustacian tubes in mammals

Eight ways altered ontogeny can produce
phylogenetic change (deBeer)
1.caenogenesis
2.adult variation
3. deviation
4.reduction—developmental loss of a character
e.g. tails of tadpoles, human fetuses

Eight ways altered ontogeny can produce
phylogenetic change (deBeer)
1.caenogenesis
2.adult variation
3. deviation
4. reduction
5.retardation—delay in the development of a character
e.g. “wisdom teeth” of humans

Eight ways altered ontogeny can produce
phylogenetic change (deBeer)
1.caenogenesis
2.adult variation
3. deviation
4. reduction
5. retardation
6.neoteny—retention of immature characteristics
e.g. vertical face of humans; also plumage of flightless
birds (e.g. ostrich)

Eight ways altered ontogeny can produce
phylogenetic change (deBeer)
1.caenogenesis
2.adult variation
3. deviation
4. reduction
5. retardation
6. neoteny
7. acceleration—characters develop at earlier stages
e.g. development of heart in avian embryos; calluses on
the knees of ostriches

Eight ways altered ontogeny can produce
phylogenetic change (deBeer)
1.caenogenesis
2.adult variation
3. deviation
4. reduction
5. retardation
6. neoteny
7. acceleration
8. hypermorphosis—prolongation of developmental period
ontogeny gets longer as special characters are added
during evolution.

Eight ways altered ontogeny can produce
phylogenetic change (deBeer)
1.caenogenesis
2.adult variation
3. deviation
4. reduction
5. retardation
6. neoteny
7. acceleration
8. hypermorphosis
deBeer, G. (1958) Embryos and Ancestors. Oxford:
Clarendon Press.

Eight Principles of de Beer Simplified
to Two by Stephen Jay Gould
1.Acceleration
2. Retardation
Changes in the relative timing of developmental events
more generally known as heterochrony.

What is meant by
homology?
analogy?
a character in two species is homologous if that
SAME character is present in a common ancestor
a character in two species is analogous if it
serves a similar function but was not present in
a common ancestor
arises from parallel or convergent evolution

These structures are homologous as forelimbs, as are bird wings (not
shown). However, bird wings and bat wings are NOT homologous as
wings.

acceleration
retardation
Evolutionary changes in
ontogenetic timing os
capable of producing
morphological evolution
i.e., by changing the
timing of tissue induction,
the number and quality of
cells induced may be
modified

How can one determine homology of
brains and parts of brains?
Problem: No fossil record of brains
Similarity of nuclear groups—cell types
Physical resemblance
Similarity of connnections—afferent and efferent
Biochemical similarity—e.g. neurotransmitter used
Functional similarity
• minuteness of detail in similarities important
• continuance through species of intermediate classes
Similar ontogenetic development

Related problem:
How does one distinguish between
primitive and derived characters?
Primitive: of two characters, the one that has
evolutionary precedence is the primitive character
Derived: of two characters, the one appearing later
is the derived character

A B B A
Leftmost in each diagram: out-group
Center in each diagram: sister group
Rightmost in each diagram: target
Which is the primitive condition, A or B?
Out-group analysis
A or B? A or B?

B A B
Left-most in each diagram: out-group
Center in each diagram: sister group
Rightmost in each diagram: target
Out-group analysis
B
A B A
A

Out-group Analysis
Applied to Development
Terminal Addition or Paedomorphosis
i.e., is B added in one species, or lost in the other?
some species: AB
other species: A (throughout life)
A A AB
A
terminal addition
AB AB A
AB
paedomorphosis

Encephalization
as an
Ontogenetic
and
Phylogenetic Principle

How do brains evolve?
Evolution is a consequence of natural
selection.
Selection acts on the phenotype,
not the genotype, although
transmission is primarily genetic.
Natural selection selects against
characters, not for them.

How do brains evolve?
What are the sources of selection
pressures on the brain?
Natural selection acts principally on
behavior, not directly on the brain

How do brains evolve?
Two general mechanisms
Addition of new projections and
targets (invasion hypothesis)
Progressive differentiation of
previously undifferentiated tissue
(parcellation hypothesis).

Effects of periphery on brain
organization.
Motor systems
Sensory systems

Finally, why do
most long connections in
the nervous system
decussate?

What about Behavior?
If natural selection acts on brains by
selection of behavior, then does it make
sense to talk about behavioral
homologies?
If so, how does one determine
behavioral homology?
Tags