by defining service levels for accrual inputs, cutoffs, and variance explanations. Where
possible, use rule-based validations to flag outliers before period end so teams fix issues
in-flight, not after the deadline.
Orchestrate the Close with Clear Accountability
Effective governance turns standards into results. Use RACI matrices to assign who
prepares, reviews, and approves each deliverable. Run daily war rooms during close with
exception dashboards that highlight overdue tasks, high-risk accounts, and long-aged
recon items. Escalate systematically, not ad hoc. After close, conduct root-cause
reviews and feed corrective actions into the next cycle’s plan, creating a virtuous loop of
continuous improvement.
Leverage Technology Without Losing Discipline
Automation, workflow, and analytics can compress cycle times and reduce manual
risk—if layered on top of a solid process design. Automate recurring journals, matching,
and tie-outs; centralize supporting documents; and implement dashboards that surface
anomalies by entity, account, or preparer. Use predictive and variance analytics to focus
human review on material exceptions. Technology should amplify standardization, not
mask underlying process defects.
Measuring Success and Sustaining Momentum
Define outcome metrics that matter: days to close, on-time task completion, recon
aging, number of late adjustments, and audit findings. Publish results, celebrate
improvements, and hold owners accountable for regressions. Organizations that also tap
specialized record-to-report services often accelerate standardization, gain scalable
governance, and sustain compliance across growth and change.
Conclusion
R2R excellence is a system: clear standards, embedded controls, quality data,
accountable governance, and targeted automation. Get these right, and the close
becomes faster, cleaner, and more resilient—delivering the trustworthy insights leaders
need to steer the business with confidence.