Overview of translocation(Phloem transport)

14,402 views 21 slides Apr 07, 2020
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 21
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21

About This Presentation

This slideshow describes translocation (phloem transport), path of translocation, its evidences, rate of phloem transport and its mechanism.


Slide Content

Overview of Translocation ( Phloem transport) Dr. Anil V Dusane Sir Parashurambhau College Pune, India [email protected] 1

Introduction Translocation is the transport of sugar through sieve tubes. It is also called as phloem transport as it mainly takes place through phloem. Definition: The movement of organic solutes (sugars and other organic substances) from one part of a plant to the other through phloem (sieve tubes) is called as translocation. In simpler words, translocation is the transport of sugar from source (site of production) to the sink (site of utilization). 2

Path of translocation Many physiologists consider that vascular tissues (xylem and phloem) are involved translocation. Following are the evidences in favour of phloem being the path of translocation. Structure of phloem (anatomical studies) Ringing experiment Chemical analysis of cell sap Use of radiotracer technique 3

Evidences for Phloem transport Evidences from structure of phloem In order to understand the mechanism of phloem transport, it is essential to know the detail structure of phloem. The Phloem is made up of four components. Sieve elements Companion (albuminous) cells Phloem parenchyma Phloem sclerenchyma/ fibre cells i ) Sieve elements: These are elongated cells usually 100-150 μ m long and connected end to end. Actual transport takes place through sieve tubes. Continuity of sieve elements is established by plasmodesmata that runs from cell to cell through sieve pores. It has been observed that sieve tubes have high Turgour Pressure (T.P.) than that of surrounding tissues. Sieve elements are mainly involved in the transport of organic solutes. 4 Sieve elements

Evidences for Phloem transport ii) Companion cells (in angiosperms) or Albuminous cells (in gymnosperms): These are the living cells which are closely associated with sieve elements. Sieve elements are connected to companion cells through plasmodesmata. Function: It provides energy to the sieve tubes. iii) Phloem parenchyma: These are thin walled and similar to other parenchyma Function: Storage and lateral transport of water and solutes. iv)Phloem sclerenchyma: It is thick-walled. Function: Provides strength to phloem tissues. Thus the sieve tubes form continuous system through out the plant and help in conducting the solutes. Long sized sieve tube in large fruit trees is an additional evidence for phloem being involved in translocation. 5

Evidences for translocation Evidences from Ringing experiment: This experiment involves selective removal of stem tissues in form of a ring in A and B plants. In Plant A (only xylem removed) and Plant B(only phloem removed). Plant A shows elongation of stem and thus shows that the movement of solutes takes place through phloem while Plant B does not show elongation due to stoppage of movement of solutes due to removal phloem. Evidences from chemical analysis of phloem cell sap: Several plants have shown that sieve tubes are having higher concentrations of carbohydrates (sucrose) and organic nitrogen compounds than that of vessels (xylem). Concentration of sugar in sieve elements is very high compared to what is necessary for the maintenance of normal osmotic relationship with adjacent cells. This clearly indicates that phloem tissues are involved in translocation. 6

Evidences for Phloem transport Evidences from radiotracer technique: The use of radioisotopes viz. carbon ( 14 C) and phosphorus ( 32 P) has provided direct evidence for transport of carbohydrates through phloem. Burr and others (1945) allowed bean leaf to photosynthesize in an atmosphere of 14 C. They observed that labeled sugar moved through phloem. Experiment of Biddulph and Markle (1944): They studied translocation of radioactive isotopes of phosphorus ( 32 P ) after it had been introduced into the leaves of cotton plants. They made a slit in bark below leaf to which they applied 32 P. They separated xylem and phloem tissues at a particular place by introducing a wax paper so as to prevent lateral conduction. After a short period, they found the presence of greater amount of 32 P in phloem tissue. These results clearly indicate that the downward movement of P 32 P labelled organic compounds occurred in the phloem. This had supported that the translocation takes through the phloem. Radioautography technique has conclusively proved that,path of translocation is phloem. 7

Rate of Phloem transport Photosynthates are translocated from the site of production (source) to the site of storage or utilization (sink). Flow rate is proportional to the gradient of pressure in the phloem. Different substances are translocated at different rates. Phloem sap concentration from source to sink is the important factor for phloem transport. The quantity of dry matter transport per unit time per cm2 of phloem is termed as specific mass transfer . Specific mass = transfer of dry matter ( wt ) per unit time/Cross sectional area of phloem. 8

Direction of phloem transport Several experiments have shown that the direction of phloem sap is governed by following rules. Mature leaves always act as source and never behave as sink (immature leaves act as sink). Upper leaves translocate solutes towards stem apex, lower leaves translocate solutes down wards (to the root) while the leaves in middle portion translocate solutes to both directions i.e. up and downward through bi-directional movement. Active sinks are fed by nearest source. Solutes travel in straight line along the phloem, with very little side-ways spread i.e. scanty lateral movement. The pattern of movement can be changed by removal of source or sink. 9

Types of translocations Based on direction of sap flow there are three types. Unidirectional translocation : In this type, solute travels in one direction, from source to sink. Example- leaf to stem. Bi-directional translocation: In this organic solutes move in both directions i.e. upward and downward. There is possibility that some sieve tubes are involved in upward direction while others in downward direction. The possibility of movement of solutes in both directions simultaneously in the same sieve tube can not be ignored completely. 10

Types of translocations Bidirectional translocation: A leaf in the middle portion transports the food in both directions. Experiments carried on Vicia faba using 14C have supported bi-directional transport. Some physiologist claim that bi-directional flow occurs as a result of maturing of leaves that changes from sink to a source as the leaves matures. Lateral translocation: In general, solutes travel in a straight line, with very little lateral movement. Radiotracer techniques have supported this type of translocation movement. 11

Mechanism of translocation Diffusion theory, Activated diffusion theory, electro-osmosis theory and Pressure flow or mass flow theory has been put forth to explain the mechanism of translocation. Diffusion Theory: Many physiologists are of opinion that the solute moves from source to sink due to the simple physical process of diffusion. Objections: The rate of flow of solute in sieve tube is at least 40,000 times higher than what is possible by diffusion. Respiratory inhibitory chemicals affect the rate of flow of solutes. This clearly indicates that translocation is a physiological process. 12

Mechanism of translocation 2. Activated Diffusion Theory: Manson and Phillis (1936) proposed this theory. According to this theory, solute transport in sieve tube is an activated process and normal rate of diffusion is greatly enhanced due to protoplasmic properties of sieve tube. Objections: Activation requires energy but sieve tube elements do not possess any metabolic machinery. The known rate of translocation is very high and even activated diffusion is not enough for transport of solutes at that rate. Experimental evidence does not support this theory. 13

Mechanism of translocation 3. Mass flow/pressure flow/Munch hypothesis: It is proposed by German scientist Munch (1930). According to this hypothesis translocation is a physical phenomenon. Assumptions of hypothesis: According to this hypothesis, turgor pressure (TP) gradient exist in between the source and sink, and the translocation takes place passively in response to turgor pressure gradient. This hypothesis assumes that, sieve tubes are connected to one another by means of cytoplasmic connections forming a continuous system called ‘ Symplast ’ . At the utilization end (sink) water diffuses into xylem of leaf and continuous system is established. There is unidirectional flow of solute in phloem. Water and solutes moves together in same direction and at same rate. . 14

Mechanism of translocation Mechanism of Mass flow/pressure flow/Munch hypothesis: The principle of mass flow can be illustrated with the help of simple model. Two chambers A and B with selective permeability are connected by tube c. Here A (osmometer) is filled with highly concentrated sugar solution and this corresponds to the source (Mesophyll cells). B (osmometer) is filled with less concentrated solution (of sugar) than A but still higher than it’s surrounding. It corresponds to sink (root cells). ‘c’ corresponds to longitudinal system of sieve tubes, connecting leaf and root cells. ‘T’ represents xylem vessels, water from B returns to A through this tube. 15 ‘c’ c T Mesophyll cell Root cell

Mechanism of translocation ‘A’ contains higher concentration of sugar. It absorbs larger quantity of water and develops higher Turgor Pressure. The solution will flow (mass flow) from A to B via c under pressure gradient. The flow will be continuous until the concentration of both osmometers is equalized. If a continuous addition of sugar at A and it’s removal at B is arranged then there will be a continuous mass flow from A to B and a continuous passage of water from B into outer vessel (pure water) would be established. 16

Mechanism of translocation Evidences to support Mass flow/pressure flow/Munch hypothesis: This hypothesis assumes that there should be a pressure gradient (from source to sink) along the sieve tubes. This was supported by experiments of H.T. Hammel (1968). He took direct measurements of sieve tubes TP in Oak ( Quercus rubrum ) with a special microneedle. The values (Pressure gradient, 0.03-0.05 Mpa /mt) he obtained at two different points are similar to the values that Munch model predicts. Active loading and unloading of sucrose favours pressure flow hypothesis. This hypothesis assumes that water and solutes should move together in same direction at same rate along sieve tubes. Though (tritium) 3 H-water moves fast than 14 C-sugar. But it may be due to more permeability of H 2 O to sieve tubes than that of sugar. 17

Mechanism of translocation Evidences to support Mass flow/pressure flow/Munch hypothesis: This hypothesis assumes that solute is unidirectional in sieve tubes. Though some physiologists claimed bidirectional flow, but this flow appears due to a result of maturing leaves that change itself from sink to source. 18

Mechanism of translocation Objections to Mass flow/pressure flow/Munch hypothesis: Munch hypothesis believes that translocation is a purely physical process but rate of flow of solute is affected by ‘translocation inhibitory chemicals’. This clearly indicates that translocation is a physiological process. Bidirectional flow can not be explained by this theory. Mass flow is possible only when sieve pores are not plugged but sometimes mass flow takes place though the sieve tubes are plugged. According to this hypothesis there should always be a ‘+ ve gradient’ between source and sink. However, it has been observed that a ‘+ ve gradient’ always does not exist but still mass flow takes place. 19

Questions Q1. Discuss the various hypotheses put forward to explain the translocation of organic solutes in plants. Q2. Define translocation. Explain any one type of the mechanism of translocation. Q3. Describe in brief the use of tracer techniques in establishing the pathway of translocation. Q4. Enumerate various theories so explain the mechanism of translocation in detail (any two). Q5. Critically evaluate the various hypotheses regarding translocation of organic solutes. Q6. Short notes: i ) Ringing experiments ii) Much hypothesis iii) Bidirectional translocation of phloem transport iv) Phloem transport. 20

Thanks Dr. Anil V Dusane Sir Parashurambhau College, Pune, India [email protected] 21