pavlov theory of classical conditioning/experimental theory

Classical conditioning theory

1. (Classical Conditioning : Paradigm and Phenomenon)
3T. Î. taa (I.P. Pavlov ) U5 t yrn atf-# ( physiologist ) * fir-a î gfT
fty zT f 1904 & 34* fs 3¢ tg yreR (Nobel prize ) ît fzt TrTI farga r
(incidentally ) taGT A 5 37444 r RHY 3gt ( salivary conditioning) TA
3gaf 3ga fGA ( COnditioned response theory ) ET IGT 4yg HE HT4
(salivary conditioning ) 3ATT 1899À T E3T T IT 3iTYST (Wolpson ) AÍ.
yie ( Ph. D. thesis ) fsHT V0GA RYY IT I THUCObservation upon salivary secretions
sHt T 3ETY# (stimuBus ) rT 465T
(Lefrancois, 1983) # 344TT 344H VG T ufhr
( response ) a vG HRTd (association ) IfYT aat }I tA Mg 34 344 f4AA
AIât 34g44 E(Classical conditioning theory ) | HfAATT 3ggA NI-T ( Respondent
Ar 3fra fr raTa T 3HT ufr u arYfAG 31164T (natural response ) #
TY 3ET4E ( neutral stimnulus ) -r 3fYA fE4T GNAT HS YAT ( trials )* < 3R TET

2. 352
f T f yfz eT 3ÇYs ( neutral stimulus ) à f
( natural stimulus ) TT I-A fT STaI e 3¥v
(response ) T
àaAT fF AE 34Y
AR 3T IAT ATI pS Y4THd ( trials ) aE H
4 qT
.5Ug 3f 400 T
ft
IR Ta (34aHT ) T HETÝ (
association ) 144 T4T f
gT (
conditioning
)
K 3T (
components ) t SH VR
(t) T AHTfas
( )
H ( s0gnal ) HIHaT $& ie 48 3¢ 3vE 3rfy (
stimulus
stimulus learning ) hI 3IEUT TGT
(i) aAfah 3ya (
Unconditional or
Unconditioned stimulus : UCs )arfrch syh a4
( ii ) aTfas fahT (
Unconditioned response : UCR )aTf* 3feA| aît 3fehqr
AgafAT 3ETYS (conditioned stimulus ) H 3<|Ey I
-( iüi ) Hafu s­ys ( Conditional stimulus or Conditioned stimulus : CS )-4af 3TE,
( conditioned response ) Â 3<|3U
(iv ) Haf rfar ( Conditioned response : CR )-HgafA 3ÁTE(CS ) aHfa TITa (unconditioned stimulus ) HY HTT (paired ) t4I GII F T44 arz H4afrr

3. 1. 3t T A4 (Law of excitation )-$ frqH ARI qE qaI dI f fe Te 34G
(CR) * fs YT SIT
2. 311-afG 31ae aT MH ( Law of internal inhibition )-gg g fry fr
353
3. a1g HTTY AT fr4 ( Law of external inhibition ) 3T (Houston, 1976 )* r AT
fs 3qá ( inhibited ) It 34 TKE AI 34GT ( inhibition ) f ò fG qIT 3ÁNG
4. TAfas sáya TUI AGafad syca aT fer% hH ( Temporal sequence of conditional
stimulus and unconditioned stimulus ) trE faIT d HTH TErTYf R6 gafT 34T
E17ET ( Hergrenhahn, 1988) dT, T T HT f3T E IGT s (Gordon,
tagg TeT 35 fTHfhd TRE FifTG GH ( temporal sequence) 3G 4T
(i) HHfUres Htfrs hH (Stimultaneous temporal sequence ) TRE 4 3gafra
1. "External inhibition refers to the fact that a new stimulus introduced during acquisition along with the
-Houston: Theories of Learning, 1976, p. 61
CS will slow the acquisition process.
(conditioned response ) IGT (strength ) t freta
aT,TE3ra s¥NG ()

4. 354
AgqAA (
conditioning )
qHfTS AgaT
(stimultaneous
conditioning ) ·I
IT }I
(ii) faafiat atfta hH ( Delaved temporal sequence
(fii) ht afA hH ( Trace temporal
(
temporal
sequence ) *
3TTIfT
Tdd AfeG HH ( trace temporal sequence ) 5ET ITT T SA TTE H mIRG 34
HO 3T ( trace conditioning) heT GIT }I
(iv) gaTt atfrG aH ( Backuard temporal sequence )E HT JTR TfT fa a
HCG EA TGT EI AÀT TT frer ( Wasserman & Miller, 1997 ) TAATf CS-UCS
foR AgATA (conditioning ) THfad t fr (Kamin, 1965 ) TTT ger CS
Aa TATetog 4ZT ( traumatic event ) e H AR 3nfz 3¥vG HZAeT À HIEaft
T HHI STT RAT TAT Er4fetT (Garcia & Koelling, 1966 ) * aR fayga I
5. 3ây HIAÁa(Ur (Stimulus generalization )ArGA # AH
TZIT f fÆ Hd 3fT 3T4G ( original conditioned stimulus )
HHÍGHUJ HT GTÁt à E3tT ( Houston, 1976 ) s
elicited by other similar stimuli."
4rAT ( trials ) T T
afd à YT¯è rf â
grT A Gri 4 1000 Hertz tone or Hz
1. "Stimulus generalization refers to the fact that a response conditioned to one
stimulus will tend to be -Houston: Theories of
Learning, 1976, p. ol

5. 1000 Hz ât 31aT (original
conditioned
stimulus )
3A1EU a 37 E
34(conditioning ) du a yH 1200 Hz, 1100 Hz, 900 Hz, TT S00Hz ds
generalization ) á A SIâ tag( Pavlov. 1927 ) TT I ( Moore, 1972 ) rq y
3er 48 TATIf ga 3au 3áya ( original conditioned stimulus)
T 3T5 R UG T f 900 Hz â 3TT H afA (1000 Hz ) 3TG HHT
6. Tatea (Discrimination )fae
generalization ) SE fayûa Z
geA ( phenomenon) 3VG HITEU ( stimulus
- fu à aI TUrt (trial ) t I
3E14T ( similar stimuli ) g gg q fate ta3H yfuTA EAT Wroft f HcT
355
T( response ) t1 34 HHTA 3VG 900 Hz, 110OHz, 31f T¾ TI FT-H Z
HtàyIfat yrTE, 44gfapfr (experimental neurosis ) t t t
7. JTT-h1f
frgAAI TeT
T uf
AA (Higher-order conditioning )-tafe4t 3e
fs ff t 3gfrt 3TE (conditioned stimulus )
aHIfE 3q* ( unconditioned stimulus ) *T
T¢r TT 3TeNYE
4E Z FY A
3geYA ( conditioning )
ym fsT T HGT
AIf 3 T TGT SA -e 37e ( second-order conditioning ) t GI rTI
nfs 3gT ( Conditioned response ) ft TifA qft TàI
tere AE Z
(phenomernon )
s. fatuA, aT: yef, ag HaTT-frarUt Tr yrfgagT (Extinction, Spontaneous
recovery, External disinhibition and Reconditioning GGEA 34 4T 4I fE rît ( organism )
ay (extincion ) t HA â A}z T 34
1.
"Spontaneous recovery is a partial recovery in the strength of an extinguished (really partially
-Sartain et al., : Psychology. 1978. p. 367
extinguished)
conditioned response after a rest interval."
(test stimuli ) ft f HHHGT ( stimulus ) ~é, uît GIT G 3U5 # d
HET ( Sartain et al: 1973 ) E f yéT ( reinforcement ) 3qufef Ì qara

6. (general
excitability
)
Afrs
ar
pseudoconditioning) * 3AIBU
(
conditioning
)
E
TAT
10
37THTt
ge
(Pseudoconditioning
)
r
Gr
TT
E
T
TU
(organism
)
Jufa
f
TGTr
at
vffr
e
3TvE
(
neutral
stimulus
)
34
Te
3AY;
&
T
et
7-2R
s
*
yTdA
(primary
reinforcement
)
HT
G
(
paired
)
ruft
t
(conditioned
response
)
t
ufuiftT
(recovery
)
oft
t
à
&
TE
uT
ÀI
3Hd
fayT
(extinction
)
*
rE
CS-UCS
qur
(pairings
)
ufT
34TT
gh4T
yHge
(reconditioning
)
AA:
gTaT
(spontaneous
recovery
)
#

faca-gt
3gIT
IGT
y:
e
IIït,ÁI
3À
ïsofett
aa
fraR
(external
disinhibition
)
(partially)
yTG0T
(recovery
)
recovery
)
Ì
$
YGR
YfrfT
(R
HHY
aIG
CS
fafya
CR
( spontaneous
CS(t ) fe-T,
0NT5
5Y
t
faYA
TE
4T:
YHT(
spontaneous
recovery
ruft
(F)
fs
CR
(partial exinction )
phenomenon
)
fH
f
dgfrot
3e5
TA
SII
tay
( extinction
)
HT response
)
a-R
Tt
t
À
356
g4T
(conditioned

7. (
structure ) f
gEF (
cerebellum )ha
HqT À
HEYTT (Thompson et. al, 1997 ) afg HgT
ch 1anl er ( neural basis )
( reinforcement ) I ET 3fMar S HAdgufa
1. taefg y 3V3g6h4T yráT fRGI-TaIa (
stimulus-response reinforcement theorist )
ydr (reinforcement ) ât 3TaYYATI TÊT Erát ti
357
(Steinmetz, 1996 ) v¢ yrHA TT 36
KAITÁ ay (eye-blink classical
, rgr TT HNE (Tolman & Honzik,
fGT fT f 3T aT YYI AGT
( taste aversion ) t 34-T fe t 5& TE At ZRAKGT TATE US-UCS gRefT TT
(
mechanical ) arát f
teHE rqt
fae t
1930 ) ya E (BlÍdgett, 1929 ) E R HT

8. 358
stimulus ) faft AMfaE sfvs (
unconditioned stimulus )
(Importance of Classical
Conditioning)
1. 1920 aTeHG TT tR (Watson & Raynor ) v fayg YuT H 4E fgT TE4T E t
2. s3T TT T (Ader & Cohen, 1993 ) T 4ã f
arZ (health )
Pelser & Groen, 1957 ) 3T4 37444 3TR E YE THIAT f S yG 3HnTT ( alergic
( drug)
Gi Tarfaa 34h
(Unconditioned Stimulus or
(sweetened
water ) t
(Unconditioned Response or UCR ) ErTT

9. 4. GS t^IYTNAT (stress-induced analgesia ) t t
IIVTT T 1T ÁI HIR VG fA (Maier & Keith. 1987 ) gt
3A1qT (expose) Et f À Zt 3âyat (painful stimnuli )
fHt 3aYT
YE VGT TEI t a
sfr HdeVîtra
YT
359
T HHH
( conditioned stimulus ) f 318Ta ( electric shock ), IT aR BfT HAA TNG
6. T5 3to ( sexual arousal) â I IHA
(Rachman, 1966 ) T ft Ts 3r4t TE Hz F3T f af
GHt 3T IT
S1aTT f4T GT HHAT }, hH I 3 ftat frt freatf5 ( chronic pain )
Hdftea fr I tei
3rT5 T ( nonsexual
orant conditioning )