Pilon fracture

AnshulSethi7 1,628 views 46 slides Jul 26, 2020
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 46
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46

About This Presentation

Fracture of distal 3rd of the tibia involving tibial plafond


Slide Content

PILON FRACTURES Dr. Anshul Sethi PG student Dept of orthopaedics

What is Pilon fracture ? All the fractures of the distal tibia involving the distal articular surface should be classified as pilon fractures except medial, lateral & tri-malleolar fractures where the posterior malleolus is< 1\3 of the articular surface If isolated fracture of the posterior malleolus which is more than 1/3 of articular surface should also called as pilon fracture.

ANATOMY TIBIAL PILON: Distal end of Tibia including articular surface Proximal limit of tibial pilon ; 8 to 10 cm from the tibial articular surface EXCLUDING BI-MALLEOLAR &TRIMALLEOLAR fractures

EPIDIOMOLOGY Accounts for approximately 5-7% of all tibial fractures Accounts for <1% of all lower extremity fractures Average age ;35-40 years rare in children and elderly Common in men than women; (3:1) High energy fractures 25 to 50% of the patients have additional injuries

MECHANISM Pilon fractures are most often caused by axial loading (high energy impacts) such as fall from height motor vehicle accident - leads to high degree of disruption of articular surface and soft tissue affection It may be caused by shear loading (rotational or lower energy impacts) Leads to less degree of disruption of articular surface

EVALUATION OF PILON FRACTURES Presentation of patient Physical examination Imaging

Clinical Presentation Immediate and severe pain Swelling Bruising Tenderness

Inability to bear weight on lower limb Angular deformity

EXAMINATION Sign of vascular injury Swelling Fracture blister Soft tissue crushing Compartment syndrome

IMAGING ROUTINE X RAYS – Anterio -posterior Lateral Mortise view Ct scan – to know the fracture pattern and intra-articular involvement.

CT Scan Extent of articular involvement Orientation of fracture Extent of comminution or impaction of fracture Surgical decision making

The classic articular components of pilon fractures Anterolateral ( chauput fragment) Medial fragment bearing medial malleolus Posterior malleolus Die punch fragment

Classification

AO\OTA CLASSIFICATION Three main subgroups A) Extrarticular (4,3-A) B) Partial articular (4,3-B) C) Intra aricular (4,3-C ) These fractures are further divided in to sub-groups depending upon the comminution Most of B- type fractures are torsional injuries and C-type of fractures are high energy compressive injuries

Associated injuries Because of their high energy nature, these fractures can be expected to have specific associated injuries like Calcaneal fractures Tibial pleatue fractures Pelvic fractures Vertebrae fractures

MANAGEMENT

Surgical treatment of tibia pilon fractures is challenging because of articular comminution, metaphyseal bone loss and serious soft tissue injury. Management of this injury must include articular surface and metaphysis reconstruction as well as treatment of injured soft tissue envelope. Timing of surgery is crucial in pilon fractures because of extensive soft tissue damage . Main target of treatment is preserving the function of the ankle

Goals of surgical treatment To obtain anatomical articular alignment Restore axial alignment Achieve joint stability Regain pain-free and functional mobility Avoiding INFECTIONS

Treatment challenges Difficult to get anatomical restoration of joint Instability of ankle -ligament and soft tissue injuries High soft tissue complication Open surgery –high incidence of poor wound healing,infection,delayed union and non-union

Three important anatomical zones to be considered in the decision making treatment and prognosis Articular surface Metaphysis Fibula

Treatement options NON -SURGICAL SURGICAL

Non-surgical Undisplaced fracture and debilitated patients A1,B1 and C1 Long leg cast for 6 weeks fallowed by brace and ROM excercises Disadvantages ; Loss of reduction Inability to monitor soft tissue status in the cast

Surgical Factors determining the surgical treatment BONY FACTORS SOFT TISSUE FACTORS

Types of surgical treatment 1 . ORIF , Open Reduction Internal ‘‘rigid’’ Fixation 2 External Fixation with minimal osteosynthesis 3 Closed Reduction Internal ‘‘biological’’ Fixation. (MIPPO Technique) 4. Intramedullary nailing 5.Two stage protocol

1 . ORIF, Open Reduction Internal ‘‘rigid’’ Fixation Reudi & Allower …… type 1 AO\OTA………………………. A1, A2 type C-Fractures not advocated

Closed Reduction Internal ‘‘biological’’ Fixation (MIPPO Technique) Ruedi & Allgower type 1&2 AO\OTA a1 b1 & c1

Pre op Post op

.4 Intramedullary nailing YES –A1,A2,& C1, C2

TWO STAGE PROTOCAL All B3 and C type 0f AO/OTA Ruedi & Allgower type 3

First step 1. Fix the # fibula(90%) through postero lateral approach to regain the correct length of the tibia and facilitate three dimensional view of the fracture 2 .External fixator- a)Ankle Spanning b) Non spanning - illizarov -hybrid

Second stage After 10-14 days average(10 days) Remove the Ex Fix Through antero lateral incision Articular reduction & fixation with pre countered plate and screws Additional antero medial incision may require to fix MM or large medial fragment Two incision required- maintain not<6-7 cm between two incision

Open Pilon Fracture Usually –C fractures meticulous debridment+Ex Fix soft tissue cover(plastic surgery) delayed definitive ORIF

Complications Wound dehiscence / Skin necrosis Malunion Delayed / Non Union Post-traumatic Arthritis

THANK YOU
Tags