both health and financial costs.
For certain patients, such as the elderly
or immunosuppressed, effective infection
control can, at its most extreme, be life-
saving; it can also certainly ensure shorter
hospital stays and reduced use of
antibiotics.
For healthcare workers, minimising
cross-infection ensures a decreased
workload in the treatment of unnecessary
infections; patients are also more mobile
and require less assistance. In addition,
staff are healthier and require fewer
‘sick days’.
Minimising the risk of HAIs thus directly
reduces costs, due to decreases in
nursing time and use of antibiotics, as
well as through the avoidance of total
ward shutdowns when an infection cycle
needs to be broken. The risks and costs of
not undertaking effective infection control
are evident; it is therefore critical that any
measures employed are undertaken
properly. Within a sluice room, effective
decontamination is key to delivering good
hygiene, and thus sound infection control.
What is decontamination?
Decontamination involves the removal of
hazardous substances (bacteria,
chemicals, radioactive material) from
people’s bodies, clothing, equipment,
tools and/or sites – to the extent necessary
to prevent the occurrence of adverse
health and/or environmental effects. It
should also be noted that the
decontamination of reusable medical
equipment is all about acceptable risk,
and falls into different bands. For example,
it would be lethal to merely wash surgical
instruments in hot water and detergent,
whereas sterilising a bedpan for an hour
in an autoclave would be highly
impractical and costly.
As a result there are differing defined
levels of decontamination which enable
decisions to be made on the procedures
that should be carried out – see Table 2.
The decontamination procedures that are
undertaken within a sluice room,
therefore, fall within the medium and low
risk levels, which generally require
disinfection and cleaning – see Table 3.
Since it is a process that reduces the
number of microorganisms to a level at
which they are not harmful, although
spores will not usually be destroyed,
disinfection is the most used
decontamination process within a sluice
room to ensure effective infection control.
Sluice room design
As previously discussed, inadequate
decontamination can result in the transfer
of infections to patients and health
workers; consequently, every location in
which decontamination procedures are
undertaken should be properly designed,
maintained, and controlled.
To achieve this within a sluice room,
there are a number of essential and useful
features to be considered, as follows:
Fixtures
nAn extractor fan, to eliminate
unpleasant odours.
nSealed floor covering (vinyl or similar)
suitable for washing in the event of
spillage from utensils.
nFluorescent lighting, with ceiling-
mounted string pull switch.
nTiled walls or, better still, aseptic
laminate walls to make the sluice
room easier to clean.
nFire doors (depending on local
regulations).
Fittings – essential
nA washer-disinfector for reusable
bedpans or commode pots and/or
a macerator for disposable bedpans.
nA wall-mounted rack, for temporary
storage of disinfected utensils before
returning them to rooms.
nAn incontinence pad macerator or
foot-operated clinical waste bin.
nA stainless steel handwash basin, with
lever or sensor-operated taps.
nA paper towel dispenser.
nA pedal bin.
Fittings – useful
nA disposal hopper, for back-up in the
event of power or mechanical failure.
nA deep stainless steel sink, for general
washing and rinsing purposes.
nFacilities for filling and emptying
cleaners’ buckets.
nWork surface.
nStorage cupboards.
Disinfect or dispose?
Key considerations include the selection
of the disinfection and/or disposal
equipment to be used, in addition to the
way the room is laid out to ensure that
workflow is safe, clean, and efficient. One
key question is whether to ‘disinfect or
dispose?’ In recent years there has been
an ongoing evolution of the types of
disinfection and disposal procedures used
within a sluice room – largely driven by
mounting evidence in scientific literature,
and the subsequent introduction of new
directives and regulations.
For example, in the UK the Department
of Health (DH) issued two important
infection control documents in 1991; these
subsequently became stringent
regulations. The initial documents gave
evidence-based guidance on the
decontamination of utensils that have
been fouled by body fluids, urine, and
faeces. Within the documents there was a
Table 1 - Excerpt from eight-hour study of sluice room activity in a cardiac ward at Leicester Royal Infirmary – 20 bed ward
Tasks Observed Number of times Main equipment/
tasks observed furniture used/involved
Leaving dirty linen 3 Dirty linen bin, yellow bag bin, handwash basin
Disposing of patient’s urine or used urine bottle 10 Sluice/sink, yellow bag bin, macerator, handwash basin
Measuring a patient’s urine to check fluid balance 12 Cabinet/shelf, sluice, sink, yellow bag bin, handwash basin,
Disposing of used bedpan 3 Sluice, yellow bag bin, macerator, handwash basin
Returning used commode chair 4 Sluice, yellow bag bin, macerator, handwash basin, sink
Washing plastic wash bowl 4 Sink, yellow bag bin, handwash basin, worktop
Washing and disposing of alcohol gel bottles 1 Yellow bag bin, handwash basin, shelf
Collecting patient’s stool sample and measuring Cabinet/shelf, sluice, sink, yellow bag bin,
the patient’s urine to check fluid balance 1 handwash basin, macerator
Disposing of bladder wash-out 1 Sluice, sink, yellow bag bin, handwash basin
Disposing of patient’s stool 2 Sluice, sink, yellow bag bin, handwash basin, macerator
Undertaking a patient’s pregnancy test 2 Cabinet/shelf, sluice, yellow bag bin, handwash basin, macerator, worktop
Traditional top and front-loading
washer-disinfectors.
ppDDC HEJoct15 reprint.qxp_Layout 1 13/10/2015 16:32 Page 112