Post analytical variables in Laboratory

5,019 views 28 slides Mar 17, 2021
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 28
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28

About This Presentation

Post analytical phase is the reflection of Pre-analytical and Analytical phase. Post analytical procedure described in details.


Slide Content

Dr Kamlesh Patel MBBS MD DCP Post analytical variables in diagnostic laboratory

Preanalytical Phase (40- 60 %) Analytical Phase (7-15 %) Post-analytical Phase (18-30 %) Postanalytical errors occur with entry, manipulation, and reporting or releasing report or due to improper TAT . Laboratory testing cycle: 3 Phases

Post analytical phase can be further divided into two phases: Phase inside the laboratory P hase outside the laboratory (post-post-analytical phase) : It is not covered in the present recommendations. Refers to procedures in which a physician makes medical decisions based on laboratory test reports. Post-analytical can be further divided:

1 . Evaluation of test results 2. Decision to release test results 3. Preparation of the laboratory test report 4. Release of the laboratory test report 5. Reporting of test results 6. Sample storage and disposal 7. Archiving of laboratory documentation 8. Post-analytical quality indicators. P rocedures of the post-analytical phase

All test results before release must be evaluated through two mutually independent activities: A. Review of test results: This includes 1.1. Comparison with reference intervals 1.2. Comparison with previous results 1.3. Additional procedures B. Confirmation of test results. PROCEDURE 1: Evaluation of test results

1.1. Comparison with reference intervals: Reference intervals or relevant limits according to age and gender have to be present.(Mandatory) If reference interval can not be defined it has to indicated in the “Comments” area. Reference interval is defined as the central 95% interval bounded by the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles for a reference population. PROCEDURE 1: Evaluation of test results

1.2. Comparison with previous results T he testing of the difference between two consecutive results (delta check) (if previous result available) Difference between successive results may indicate: A significant change in the patient’s clinical condition, or A problem with the sample. PROCEDURE 1: Evaluation of test results

1.2. Comparison with previous results 1.2.1. Reference change value(RVC %) It is useful to assess the significant change in serial results from one individual using the reference change value (RCV). It can different for every test. Every lab should define reference change value in %. 1.2.2. Delta check PROCEDURE 1: Evaluation of test results

Methods of performing the delta check: Delta difference: Current value – previous value Delta percent change [(Current value – previous value) / previous value] x100 Delta check is a post-analytical method, every laboratories should define methods to perform the delta check as well as actions to be taken when the delta check exceeds the laboratory-specified limits because it can be very useful to check overall quality of pre analytical and analytical phase. PROCEDURE 1: Evaluation of test results

Delta check Recommended actions: a) Clinical detail: clinical diagnosis, therapeutic interventions, contacting a physician b) Retesting the current and previous sample (if available) c) Checking for the presence of haemolysis, lipemia, icterus, clot d) Error in tube labelling of the previous and current sample. PROCEDURE 1: Evaluation of test results

1.3. Additional procedures 1.3.1. Sample dilution 1.3.2. Repeat testing 1.3.3. Communication with a physician/clinical department 1.3.4. Reflex testing: Automated by machine itself as per defined criteria. 1.3.5. Reflective testing: Non-automated procedure in which laboratory experts add additional tests and/or comments to the original request. PROCEDURE 1: Evaluation of test results

This decision is made based on all factors that may have influenced the results, including clinical condition and diagnosis, treatment procedures, as well as pre-analytical and analytical factors. 2.1. Competences of decision-making laboratory personnel These personnel must hold master’s degrees in medical biochemistry and laboratory medicine for the authorisation. PROCEDURE 2: Decision to release test results

A laboratory test report has to meet the minimum content requirements: 3.1. Content and layout of the laboratory test report Use of recommended, standardised language. Presence of all administrative and patient identification data. Measurement results and confirmation data. Where appropriate, the report should also include comments necessary for interpretation. PROCEDURE 3: Preparation of the lab test report

Minimum required content of a laboratory test report Administrative data: Detail of the testing laboratory Patient identification information* and barcode Attributes of measures: Result, reference range, comments, methods, sample type etc. Confirmation of data: Checked by, authorised by etc. Comments: PROCEDURE 3: Preparation of the lab test report

Electronically or in printed form. Electronically released laboratory test reports must be in a “read-only” format that permits no alterations. If releasing laboratory test reports includes sending them electronically to the patient or the requesting physician via e- mail, the laboratory must receive signed consent from the patient or physician. Results released orally must be documented by the lab. The laboratory should record policies and procedures about releasing reports, including details about who releases reports and to whom. PROCEDURE 4: Release of the lab test report

Each laboratory must define how it reports test results. 5.1. Reporting of critical results: The Lab must have critical limits of laboratory test results. (Define policy and documentation must) Critical results have to be reported within 30 minutes of confirmation. Only authorised personnel can report critical results. PROCEDURE 5: Reporting of test results

PROCEDURE 6: Sample storage and disposal The laboratory must have a documented procedure for storing and safe disposal of biological samples. Primary samples must be stored after analyses to ensure their availability for re-testing or additional testing. The laboratory must define durations of storage for biological samples. Optimal storage conditions and duration depend on the type of sample, analyte stability and analyte half-life.

Generally, serum or plasma can be stored for 4 hours at room temperature in primary uncapped tubes, 48 hours at 4 ºC in primary capped tubes, and several days to several months at - 20 ºC in secondary capped tubes. When a requesting laboratory sends a sample to a referral laboratory, the shipment should be documented, and an aliquot of the sample should first be removed and stored at - 20 ºC. If an institution archives samples for education, research, or other public health interests, Must define and document Samples must be disposed safely. PROCEDURE 6: Sample storage and disposal

Recording and maintenance of medical documentation is a general (public) duty of health care professionals. Archiving of laboratory documentation means storing all important and meaningful data and notifications in a format that is dated and certified and can protect the data for a minimum period of time.These minimum storage periods vary with the type of document. the archiving system must protect against documentation loss or damage. If the LIS is linked to the HIS, each employee using the HIS system should be assigned an account. PROCEDURE 7: Archiving of lab documentation

The importance of personal data (name, address, email address, IP address and access point (MAC), global positioning system (GPS) location, telephone number, video recordings of individuals, identification number, biometric data (genetic data, educational and professional information, health data, sexual orientation). PROCEDURE 7: Archiving of lab documentation

PROCEDURE 8: Post-analytical quality indicators Minimum recommended quality indicators for the post-analytical phase are: turnaround time (TAT), percentage of incorrect laboratory test reports, and notification of critical results. 8.1. Turnaround time Turnaround time (TAT) is the time interval from the time when the laboratory receives the sample until the time the test results for that sample are validated and released. Monitoring of turnaround time can be expressed in terms of percentage of tests not performed within a given time.

PROCEDURE 8: Post-analytical quality indicators 8.2. Errors during transcription of results/ incorrect laboratory reports The percentage all laboratory test reports that are incorrect is another essential quality indicator in the post-analytical phase 8.3. Notification of critical results All procedures related to the reporting of critical results have to be recorded and the data periodically analysed (number or proportion of critical results reported within a defined period of time).

Methods to minimise the post analytical errors Adherence to the guidelines and proper staff training may reduce the post analytical errors.

Take home message Post analytical phase is the reflection of Pre analytical and analytical phase. Quality starts from the patient himself, patient has to choose right lab or service before seeking quality. I am thankful to Croatian Chamber of Medical Biochemists (CCMB)

Big Thanks to you