Power transformers rating

Rated power and voltages

1. Angelo Baggini, [email protected], Bergamo University - Engineering Department
Via Marconi 5, 24044 Dalmine (BG) – Italy


Power Transformer rating

2. Power Transformer rating
1.Rated power
2.Rated voltages
3.Tapping
4.Short circuit voltage
5.No-Load and Load losses
6.Clock hour figure

7.Liquid immersed and dry type

3. Min Input data
•Load power and location
•Network Voltage level
•Short circuit level
•Reliability and continuity of electrical service
•Fire and environmental
safety issues

3

4. Power Transformer rating
Rated power
… and number of units
… and cooling mode

5. Rated power

Load to be supplied or generated power*
•Analytical calculations
•Usage and contemporaneity factors
•Measurements, Hystorical data and trends
•Resilience in case of fault
•Energy efficiency
•Future needs


* Not just at the rated frequency but taking into account the spectrum

6. Rated power
… in case of harmonics
Voltage distortion → NO load losses
Current distortion → Load losses

Oversizing needs

7. Rated
Analytical calculation

8. Load type k
u
Lamps 1
Motors 0,5 - 2 kW 0,7
Motors 2 - 10 kW 0,75
Motors > 10 kW 0,8
Induction and resistence ovens 1
Rectifiers 1
Weldings 0,7 ÷1
Electrical heaters 1
Tools and transporters 0,6 ÷ 0,8
Elevators 0,8 ÷ 1
Pumps and ventilators 1
Rated power

Analytical calculations – Usage factors

9. Load type Number k
C
Ovens Up to 2 1
Motors 0,5 - 2 kW Up to 10 0,6
Up to 20 0,5
Up to 50 0,4
Motors 2,5 - 10 kW Up to 10 0,7
Up to 50 0,45
Motors 10 - 30 kW Up to 5 0,8
Up to 10 0,65
Up to 50 0,5
Motors > 30 kW Up to 2 0,9
Up to 5 0,7
Up to 10 0,6
Rectifiers Up to 10 0,8
Weldings Up to 10 0,4
Elevators Up to 4 0,75
Up to 10 0,6
Ligthing 0,8
Rated power

Analytical calculations – Contemporanity factors

10. Number of loads k
C
1 1
2 ÷ 4 0,8
5 ÷ 10 0,6
11 and more 0,4
Rated power

Analytical calculations – Contemporaneity factors

11. Type of activity Factor

Hotels, colleges 0,6 ÷ 0,8
Hospitals 0,5 ÷ 0,75
Shopping Malls 0,7 ÷ 0,9
Schools 0,6 ÷ 0,7
Rated power

Analytical calculations
To be applied to the aritmetical sum of rated powers

12. Rated Power
Measurements, Hystorical data
and trends

13. Type of activity Power (VA/m
2
)

Paper industry 120
Textile industry 100
Electronic industry 90
Mechanical industry 80
Wood industry 70
Rated power

Measurements, Hystorical data and trends

14. Type of activity Power (VA/m
2
)

Offices 70
Schools 50
Hospitals 60
Hotels 80
Residential 40
Rated power

Measurements, Hystorical data and trends

15. Rated Power
Resilience in case of fault

16. Rated power
16
Resilience in case of fault

17. Rated Power
Energy efficiency

18. Rated Power
Energy efficiency
18
* Usually 40–50%
)(
2
0 kr
r
PxPxP
xP
++
=
η
k
P
P
x
0
=
Energy efficiency (%)
Load (%)
100
0 20 40 60 80 100

19. Rated Power
Future needs

20. Rated power
Future needs
•Oversize*
•Possibility of overloading*
•At design stage: possiiblity to add a busbar

* coherent sizing of LV section
20

21. Rated power
LV section sizing
21
Ref. 400 V 3f 4% up to 630 kVA 6% upper 630 kVA

22. Rated power
Preferred values (kVA) (Renard R5 60%)
22
25 50 63 100
160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1000
1250 1600 2000 2500 3150
Ref. EU practice

23. Power Transformer rating
Rated voltages

24. Rated voltages
to be selected on the basis
of the voltages of the served networks

25. Rated voltages
for winding with U
m > 1,1 kV

Highest voltages for equipment
3,6 kV– 7,2 kV – 12 kV – 17,5 kV – 24 kV – 36 kV

National practices may require the use of highest voltages for equipment up to (but not including) 52 kV,
when the rated voltage is less than 36 kV (such as U
m = 38,5 kV or U
m = 40,5 kV).
Insulation levels and dielectric test shall be in accordance with the requirements of IEC 60076-3 .
Ref. EN 50588-1

26. Rated voltages
for winding with U
m ≤ 1,1 kV

Rated voltages
400 V – 410 V – 415 V – 420 V – 433 V – 690 V

National practices may require the use of highest voltages for equipment up to (but not including) 52 kV,
when the rated voltage is less than 36 kV (such as U
m = 38,5 kV or U
m = 40,5 kV).
Insulation levels and dielectric test shall be in accordance with the requirements of IEC 60076-3 .
Ref. EN 50588-1

27. Ref. IEC 60071- 1

28. Ref. IEC 60071- 1

29. Power Transformer rating
Tappings

30. Tappings
DETC: De-energised tap changer
Preferred tapping ranges
•± 2,5 % with 3 tap positions
•± 2 x 2,5 % with 5 tap positions
On special request ±4 x 2,5 % with 9 tap positions can be provided. Tapping ranges greater than ±
10 % or with more than 9 tap positions are unusual and subject to specific agreement.

OLTC: On load tap changer
•smaller than ± 15 % with a maximum of 17 tap positions.
Tapping ranges greater than ± 15 % or with more than 17 tap positions are unusual and subject to
specific agreement.

Tapping ranges outside the above definitions have to be specified by agreement between
manufacturer and purchaser.

Ref EN 50588- 1

31. Power Transformer rating
Short circuit impedance

32. Shortcircuit impedance
1.Reactive power: directly prop (cost of PFC)
2.Voltage drop: directly prop
3.Shortcircuit current: inverserly prop (cost of LV system)
The Minimum value compatible with shortcircuit needs
•Loads subdivision (single TR power decreasing)
•Distribution scheme (NO TR in parallel)
•Different voltage value
I Z
V
I
V

33. Shortcircuit impendance
Scheme’s effects on the the shortcircuit current
Trip time (s)
TRs in parallel TRs working separtely
Section (mm
2
)
0,04 50 25
0,1 70 35
0,4 150 70

34. Shortcircuit impedance
Standardized values
EU practice fro MV transformers
4% ≤ 630 kVA
6% ≥ 630 kVA

35. Shortcircuit impedance
Transformer in parallel
Z
V
V
Z
CCA
21
AZ
VV
I
•
••
•
−
=
CCB
21
BZ
VV
I
•
••
•
−
=
Same:
•Turn ratio
•Clock hour
figure
•vcc

36. Power Transformer rating
Load and no-load losses

37. Power transformer losses
P = P
0 + x
2
P
k
Losses:
No-Load (P
0)
•Mainly into the magnetic circuit

Load losses (P
k)
•Mainly into the windings

Forced cooling system consuptions


37

38. New EN 50588- 1
Oil immersed 1,1-24 kV
Excluding pole mounted
TIER 1 - July 1
st
2015
Sr AAAo AAo Ao
kVA W W W
25
35 63 70
50 45 81 90
100 75 131 145
160 105 189 210
250 150 270 300
315 180 324 360
400 220 387 430
500 260 459 510
630 300 540 600
800 330 585 650
1000 390 693 770
1250 480 855 950
1600 600 1080 1200
2000 730 1305 1450
2500 880 1575
1750
3150 1100 1980 2200
Sr Vcc Ak Bk Ck
kVA % W W
25
4
600 725
50 750 875
100 1250 1475
160 1700 2000
250 2350 2750
315 2800 3250
400 3250 3850
500 3900 4600
630 4 or 6 4600 5400
800
6
6000 7000
1000 7600 9000
1250 9500 11000 13500
1600 12000 14000 17000
2000 15000 18000 21000
2500 18500 22000 26500
3150 23000 27500 33000
NO load losses
Load losses
EN50588-1

39. Total Owning Cost




(€/kW year)



(€/kW year)



(capitalisation factor)
k0l
PBPAC ⋅+⋅=
()
c
r
L
e F
S
S
hCB ⋅








⋅⋅=
2
()
()
n
n
ii
i
Fc
+⋅
−+
=
1
11
( )
ced
FCCA ⋅⋅+⋅= 876012

40. Load from 150 to 600 kVA
Analyzed cases:
•2 x 400 kVA
•2 x 500 kVA
•2 x 630 kVA
•1 x 800 kVA
40
Example
A00
–A00AK
–A00BK
A0
–A0AK
–A0BK
–A0CK

41. 41
200 kVA

42. 42
200 kVA

43. 43
250 kVA

44. 44
300 kVA

45. 45
350 kVA

46. 46
400 kVA

47. 47
450 kVA

48. 48
500 kVA

49. 49
550 kVA

50. 50
600 kVA

51. Power Transformer rating
Clock hour notation

52. Clock hour notation

53. Power Transformer rating
Liquid immersed
and dry type

54. Liquid immersed and dry type
Risks in case of fire
A B
SAFE AREA SAFE AREA


Cost comparison A – liquid immersed B – Dry type
Unitary cost minor greater
Transformer losses minor greater
Installation costs ? ?
MV cable cost and installation minor greater
V cable cost and installation greater minor
Cable losses greater minor

55. Power Transformer rating
1.Rated power
2.Rated voltages
3.Tapping
4.Short circuit voltage
5.No-Load and Load losses
6.Clock hour notation

7.Liquid immersed and dry type

56. Thank you
| Presentation title and date
For more information please contact

Angelo Baggini
Università di Bergamo
Dipartimento di Ingegneria
Viale Marconi 5,
24044 Dalmine (BG) Italy
email: [email protected]

ECD Engineering Consulting and Design
Via Maffi 21 27100 PAVIA Italy