PPT Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only)

Powerpoint 231 Encino

1. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Presented by:
Lety Hernandez
Director
ARB CASE NO. 914F
231 ENCINO AVE
ITEM # 4
APRIL 29, 2024

2. PROPERTY
SF-A
East side of Encino
between
Mayflower St and
Mary D Ave
100% demolition
of existing single-
family residence

3. SUMMARY
Demolition Review
Significance Review
Removal or encapsulation of more than twenty-five
(25) percent of the framed structure of exterior walls
facing public streets, or a street-facing elevation if the
tract of land is landlocked
Removal/encapsulation of more than fifty (50) percent
of the framed structure of all exterior walls and/or
roofs.

4. BACKGROUND
Architectural Review Board
January 16, 2024 – The board voted unanimously to
declare the main structure as significant and recommended
denial of the demolition as requested.
City Council
February 12, 2024 – Council voted to enact the 1
st
90-day
delay. Demolition delay expires May 12, 2024.
April 29, 2024 - Project required to return to Council for
reconsideration prior to expiration of the current delay.

5. SURVEY

6. EXISTING CONDITIONS (MAIN)

7. POLICY ANALYSIS
Applicant has actively marketed the property
since the initial delay.

8. POLICY ANALYSIS
City Council has authority to:
Enact 2
nd
90-day delay with maximum delay not
exceeding 180 days from date of action designating the
structure as significant.
Approve demolition request if city is satisfied that there
is no reasonable likelihood that either the owner or some
other person is willing to purchase, preserve, rehabilitate
or restore such structure, or when additional information
warrants a termination of the demolition delay.

9. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Postcards - mailed to property owners
within a 200-foot radius
Notices posted - City website and on
property
Responses received within 200ft:
Support: (1) Neutral: (0)
Oppose: (8)
Responses received outside 200ft:
Support: (0) Neutral: (1)
Oppose: (11)