Presentation.pptx12345678910111213141516

.

1. PEER BASED REMEDIAL TEACHING SESSIONS SUBJECT – VERB AGREEMENT OF THE GRADE 11 TVL-SMAW LEARNERS

2. Table 1 Academic Performance of The Grdae 11 TVL Smaw Learners Before The Peer Remedial Teaching Sessions _____________________________________________________-- Score Frequency Descriptive Evaluation Percentage __________________________________________________________________________ 0-10 5 poor 16.1 11-20 26 satisfactory 83.9 21-30 0 0utstanding 0 Total: 31 100% Mean: 14.29 Standard deviation: 2.87 __________________________________________________________________________

3. CONCLUSIONS: As revealed by the data presented, the survey asks the respondents to asses the Performance of the Grade 11-TVL SMAW Learners Before the Peer Remedial Teaching Sessions terms of scoring 0-10 (Poor), 11-20 (SATISFACTORY) and 21-30 (OUTSTANDING). The majority of the respondents scored 11-20 (Satisfactory), who are 26 or 83.9%, while other respondents scored 0-10 (Poor), who are 5 or 16.1%. In addition, no one scored 21-30 (Outstanding ).

4. Table 2 Academic Performance of The Grade 11 TVL Smaw Learners After The Peer Remedial Teaching Sessions _____________________________________________________________________________ Score Frequency Descriptive Equivalent Percentage _____________________________________________________________________________ 0-10 1 Poor 3.2 11-20 26 Satisfactory 83.9 21-30 4 Outstanding 12.9 Total 31 100% Mean: 19.2 Standard Deviation: 3.04 ______________________________________________________________________________

5. Conclusion : Table 2, shows the Academic Performance of the Grade 11-TVL SMAW Learners After the Peer Remedial Teaching, the researchers use the same scoring whereas, 0-10 (POOR), 11-20(SATISFACTORY), 21-30(OUTSTANDING). The respondent perceived it, and the majority scored 11-20 (Satisfactory), whoare 26 or 83.9 % and others scored 21-30(Outstanding) who are 4 or 12.9 %. The least score 0-10(Poor),who were 1 or 3.2, which corresponds that it has change after the Remedial Teaching.

6. Table 3 Difference on The Performance of The Grade 11 TVL Smaw Learners Before and After The Peer Remedial Teaching Sessions __________________________________________________________ N Mean Standard Deviation T Sig __________________________________________________________ 31 14.29 2.875 19.2 3.044 8.3 0.001 __________________________________________________________

7. data in the table shows that there was a statistically significant difference in their mean scores before and after the peer-based remedial teaching sessions to the Grade 11 TVL Smaw learners. This is because the computed value t-value is 0.1558 while the p-value is _1.23e-9_ which means that the result is significant at p<_0.001___. Thus, there is a significant difference in the academic performance of the Grade 11 TVL Smaw learners before and after the peer-based remedial teaching sessions.