dentification and examination of the ethical issues
facing a profession is an important activity1 and is
considered a mark of professionalism. During the
past 20 years, there has been an increased interest
in ethical issues. With this increase in interest, there has
been a concurrent increase in publications relating to
medical ethics. Much of this literature has related to
medicine and nur~ing.~ Only in the last few years have
other health professions begun to address the ethical
issues specific to their professions. The need for these
other health professions to address their unique ethical
issues has become more urgent as these professions have
expanded their scope of responsibilities, placing practi-
tioners into positions in which ethical decisions must
frequently be made.
In recent years, the profession of physical therapy has
increased its autonomy in decision making and has
expanded its role in patient care.3 These changes can be
seen by examining the changes that have been made in
the practice acts of nearly every state to give physical
therapists some degree of autonomy in practice. This
increase in autonomy has increased the ethical consid-
erations for physical therapists and has served to focus
more clearly the responsibility of physical therapists to
identify and discuss ethical questions that arise in the
practice of physical therapy.
An example of this change
can be observed by examining the increased role that
physical therapists now have in the supervision of
sup
port personnel. Physical therapists are required to super-
vise a larger number and a more diverse group of
assistants, aides, and related health care professionals.
With this increase in the supervisory role come addi-
tional questions of authority, professional autonomy,
responsibility, and quality of care. Other examples can
be seen in the variety of business opportunities available
to physical therapists. These business arrangements
introduce a number of questions relating to patient
autonomy, utilization of services, and equity in billing.
Any change in practice creates a new set of ethical
considerations.
In response to these recent changes in practice, there
has been an increased interest in ethical issues facing
physical therapists and in ethical decision making. Prior
to 1970, there were only a handful of articles that
broadly considered the responsibility of physical thera-
pists to the physician and the patient.4-8 The concepts of
ethics described in these articles were represented in
terms of appropriate professional behavior and etiquette
rather than considerations of ethical decisions or issues.
These articles defined good professional behavior for
that period in the history of physical therapy, but they
did not address how to approach ethical decision mak-
ing or what ethical issues are associated with the practice
of physical therapy. The first cod^ of Ethics for the
American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) was
developed in 1935.Y The establishment of a code as well
as subsequent articles in the 1940s and 1950~,-'-~ how-
ever, indicated that the profession believed ethical
behavior should be expected of its members. The
responsibility of physical therapists to behave in an
ethical manner was emphasized in subsequent litera-
t~re.~-]~ This more recent literature identified physical
therapists as professionals who were responsible for
making ethical decision^'^^.^^.^^.^^ and who needed to
understand the ethical principles involved in such deci-
sions.12 This perspective was presented by Guccione, in
1980, when he stated
The need to identify and clarify ethical issues within a
health profession increases as the profession assumes
responsibility for those areas of direct patient care in its
domain
.... The physical therapist today, in defining the
limits of his legal and professional autonomy, must examine
the practice of his profession from an ethical point of
vieW,17(p1264)
Purtilo, in 1979, also emphasized the changing role as
she stated
In short,
nonphysician health professionals are involved in
ethic decision-making processes and increasingly will b:
asked to participate in determining moral p~licv.'*(p~~~)
In 1980, Guccione17 reported on a survey of 450 APTA
members in New England in which he identified
7
primary and 11 secondary ethical issues in physical
therapy. Identification of issues facing physical therapists
helped to identify physical therapy as a profession with
issues particular to itself and placed additional respon-
sibility on the profession to address these issues.
Guc-
cione indicated in his conclusions that he wanted to
establish priorities for action by APTA and encourage
discussion, promote study, and direct education for
physical therapists. No follow-up articles were written on
HL Triezenberg, PhD, PT, is Associate Professor and Chair, Department of Health Promotion and Rehabilitation, Central Michigan University,
134 Pearce
Hall, Mt Pleasant,
M1 48059 (USA) (
[email protected]).
This study was approved by the institutional review board at Michigan State University.
This article was submitted St=plembm 19, 1995, and was accepld May 21, 1996.
1
1098 . Triezenberg Physical Therapy . Volume 76 . Number 10 . October 1996
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article-abstract/76/10/1097/2632960 by guest on 27 June 2020