Project management fundamentals PM_Auc_2015.pptx

mnassar75g 33 views 191 slides Jul 17, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 191
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100
Slide 101
101
Slide 102
102
Slide 103
103
Slide 104
104
Slide 105
105
Slide 106
106
Slide 107
107
Slide 108
108
Slide 109
109
Slide 110
110
Slide 111
111
Slide 112
112
Slide 113
113
Slide 114
114
Slide 115
115
Slide 116
116
Slide 117
117
Slide 118
118
Slide 119
119
Slide 120
120
Slide 121
121
Slide 122
122
Slide 123
123
Slide 124
124
Slide 125
125
Slide 126
126
Slide 127
127
Slide 128
128
Slide 129
129
Slide 130
130
Slide 131
131
Slide 132
132
Slide 133
133
Slide 134
134
Slide 135
135
Slide 136
136
Slide 137
137
Slide 138
138
Slide 139
139
Slide 140
140
Slide 141
141
Slide 142
142
Slide 143
143
Slide 144
144
Slide 145
145
Slide 146
146
Slide 147
147
Slide 148
148
Slide 149
149
Slide 150
150
Slide 151
151
Slide 152
152
Slide 153
153
Slide 154
154
Slide 155
155
Slide 156
156
Slide 157
157
Slide 158
158
Slide 159
159
Slide 160
160
Slide 161
161
Slide 162
162
Slide 163
163
Slide 164
164
Slide 165
165
Slide 166
166
Slide 167
167
Slide 168
168
Slide 169
169
Slide 170
170
Slide 171
171
Slide 172
172
Slide 173
173
Slide 174
174
Slide 175
175
Slide 176
176
Slide 177
177
Slide 178
178
Slide 179
179
Slide 180
180
Slide 181
181
Slide 182
182
Slide 183
183
Slide 184
184
Slide 185
185
Slide 186
186
Slide 187
187
Slide 188
188
Slide 189
189
Slide 190
190
Slide 191
191

About This Presentation

Project management fundamentals


Slide Content

Project Management 2015

Introduce Your Self

Why Project Management

Module Evaluation Item Grade Group Presentation (25%) 25% Assignment and class quizzes (15%) 15% Class Participation (20 %) 2 % Final Project (40%) 40% Total 100

Module Plan

Module Plan

Project management history

In late 19 th century, in the United States, large-scale government projects were the impetus for making important decisions that became the basis for project management methodology such as the transcontinental railroad, which began construction in the 1860s. Suddenly , business leaders found themselves faced with the daunting task of organizing the manual labor of thousands of workers and the processing and assembly of unprecedented quantities of raw material .

By the mid Twentieth century, the Manhattan project was initiated and its complexity was only possible because of project management methods. The Manhattan project was the codename given to the Allied effort to develop the first nuclear weapons during World War II. It involved over thirty different project sites in the US and Canada, and thousands of personnel from US, Canada and UK. Born out of a small research program that began in 1939, the Manhattan Project would eventually employ 130,000 people and cost a total of nearly 2 billion USD and result in the creation of multiple production and research sites operated in secret. The project succeeded in developing and detonating three nuclear weapons in 1945 .

The 1950s marked the beginning of the modern Project Management era. Two mathematical project-scheduling models were developed: The Program Evaluation and Review Technique or PERT, developed by Booz-Allen & Hamilton as part of the United States Navy’s (in conjunction with the Lockheed Corporation) Polaris missile submarine program. Pert is basically a method for analyzing the tasks involved for completing a given project, especially the time needed to complete each task, and identifying the minimum time needed to complete the total project .

PM Methodology Methodology

Definitions

Project Is It A Project ?

Project Management

Triple Constraint

Projects, Programs and Portfolios

Project Management Environment

Project Management Environment

Projects ….Where they come from?

Why we do projects ?

Strategic Management

Project Life Cycle

Project Management Processes Initiating Process Planning Process Executing Process Closing Process

Project Management Processes

Project Management Processes

Project Cycle Time Cost & Staffing Level Initiation Planning Execution Monitoring and controlling Closing

Project Cycle Project Time Degree Low Stakeholder influence, risk, and uncertainty Cost of changes

Quiz

Project Management Environment

Role of a Project Manager

Key General Management Skills

Leadership

Leadership

Communication Receiver Decoding Reaction Feedback Message Channel Sender Encoding

Communication

Negotiation

Problem Solving

PMO

PMO

Project Management Environment

Functional Organization Project Coordination Level

Projectized Organization Project coordination level

Weak matrix Co ordination Level

Balanced matrix Co ordination Level

Strong matrix Co ordination Level

Organization Influence

Project Management Environment

Stake Holders

Stake Holders

Stake Holders Keep Satisfied Manage Closely Monitor Keep Informed Interest Power

Selecting Projects Strategically

Strategic Management

Selecting Projects Strategically

Ranking and prioritizing projects

Ranking and prioritizing projects

Payback Period Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Income 1000 5000 7000 9000 9000 Expendutuer 5000 4000 3000 1000 1000 1000 Net -5000 -3000 2000 6000 8000 8000 Cunulative Net -5000 -8000 -6000 8000 16000

Payback Period

Net Present Value

DR = Discount Rate T = Time Period(s)

Ranking and prioritizing projects

Project A Time Period Project A (DR + 1) ^ T NPV (1,000,000.00) - (1,000,000.00) 1 450,000.00 1.08 416,666.67 2 400,000.00 1.17 342,935.53 3 350,000.00 1.26 277,841.28 4 300,000.00 1.36 220,508.96 5 250,000.00 1.47 170,145.80 750,000.00 428,098.23

Project A Time Period Project A (DR + 1) ^ T NPV IRR (1,000,000.00) - (1,000,000.00) (1,000,000.00) 1 450,000.00 1.08 416,666.67 1.25 360,000.00 2 400,000.00 1.17 342,935.53 1.56 256,000.00 3 350,000.00 1.26 277,841.28 1.95 179,200.00 4 300,000.00 1.36 220,508.96 2.44 122,880.00 5 250,000.00 1.47 170,145.80 3.05 81,920.00 750,000.00 428,098.23 25% -

Case Study Time Period Project A Project B (1,000,000.00) (1,000,000.00) 1 450,000.00 250,000.00 2 400,000.00 300,000.00 3 350,000.00 350,000.00 4 300,000.00 400,000.00 5 250,000.00 450,000.00 In group kindly identify : Which project can be chosen based on financial returns ??

Project B Time Period Project B (DR + 1) ^ T NPV IRR (1,000,000.00) - (1,000,000.00) (1,000,000.00) 1 250,000.00 1.08 231,481.48 1.20 208,836.09 2 300,000.00 1.17 257,201.65 1.43 209,340.06 3 350,000.00 1.26 277,841.28 1.72 204,016.22 4 400,000.00 1.36 294,011.94 2.05 194,770.05 5 450,000.00 1.47 306,262.44 2.46 183,037.58 IRR 20% 366,798.79 -

Time Period Project A (DR + 1) ^ T NPV IRR Time Period Project B (DR + 1) ^ T NPV IRR (1,000,000.00) - (1,000,000.00) (1,000,000.00) (1,000,000.00) - (1,000,000.00) (1,000,000.00) 1 450,000.00 1.08 416,666.67 1.25 360,000.00 1 250,000.00 1.08 231,481.48 1.20 208,836.09 2 400,000.00 1.17 342,935.53 1.56 256,000.00 2 300,000.00 1.17 257,201.65 1.43 209,340.06 3 350,000.00 1.26 277,841.28 1.95 179,200.00 3 350,000.00 1.26 277,841.28 1.72 204,016.22 4 300,000.00 1.36 220,508.96 2.44 122,880.00 4 400,000.00 1.36 294,011.94 2.05 194,770.05 5 250,000.00 1.47 170,145.80 3.05 81,920.00 5 450,000.00 1.47 306,262.44 2.46 183,037.58 IRR 25% 428,098.23 - IRR 20% 366,798.79 -

Compare Year A B -250 -50 1 35 18 2 80 22 3 130 25 4 160 30 5 175 32

Year A B - - 250 - 250 - 50 - 50 1 35 32 18 16 2 80 66 22 18 3 130 98 25 19 4 160 109 30 20 5 175 109 32 20 330 164 77 44 28% 37%

Project Management Knowledge Areas

Project Scope Management

Collect Requirements

Mind Mapping Six Thinking Hats

Define Scope

Project Scope Statement

Project Statement

Create W.B.S.

Define Activities

Define Activities

WBS Sample

WBS Sample Touristic Villa Villas Type A Sub Structure Excavation Foundations Backfilling Super Structure Ground Floor Columns Slabs First Floor Columns Slabs Finishes Type B Sub Structure Super Structure Finishes Chalets Services Boundary Walls

Time Management

Estimate Activity Resources

Estimate Activity Resources WBS Activity Qty . Manpower Machinery Material Money 1.1.2.1.1 Columns 20 M3 4 C 2 M3 Shuttering 8 H 10 Kg Nails

Estimate Activity Durations

Estimation Tools

Estimation Tools

Estimation Tools

Estimation Tools

Sequence Activities

Dependencies

Dependencies

Dependencies

Leads and Lags

Dependencies A B Finish to Start F.S.

Dependencies A B Start to Start S.S.

Dependencies A B Finish to Finish F.F.

PDM / AON

Schedule Development

Schedule Development

CPM

Forward Scheduling

Backward Scheduling

Cost Management

Cost Estimate

Risk Management Project Risk Management includes the processes of conducting risk management planning, identification , analysis , response planning, and monitoring and control on a project. The objectives of Project Risk Management are to increase the probability and impact of positive events, and decrease the probability and impact of negative events in the project.

Plan Risk Management

Identify Risks

Risk Identification Tools

Risk Identification Tools

Design Review Ok Revise Yes No

Risk Identification Tools

Risk Identification Outputs

Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis

Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis Tools

Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis Tools

Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis Tools

Perform Quantitative Risk Analysis

Perform Quantitative Risk Analysis Tools

Quiz

Perform Quantitative Risk Analysis Output

Plan Risk Responses is the process of developing options and actions to enhance opportunities and to reduce threats to project objectives

Strategies for Negative Risks or Threats

S trategies for Positive Risks or Opportunities

Plan Risk Response Outputs Identified risks Risk owners and assigned responsibilities Outputs from the Perform Qualitative Analysis process Agreed-upon response strategies Specific actions to implement the chosen response strategy Triggers , symptoms, and warning signs of risks’ occurrence Budget and schedule activities required to implement the chosen responses Contingency plans and triggers that call for their execution Residual risks that are expected to remain after planned responses have been taken, as well as those that have been deliberately accepted Secondary risks that arise as a direct outcome of implementing a risk response Contingency reserves that are calculated based on the quantitative risk analysis of the project and the organization’s risk thresholds.

Communication Management

Stake Holders

Stake Holders Keep Satisfied Manage Closely Monitor Keep Informed Interest Power

Plan Communications

Communication Methods

Communication Management Plan

Communication Management Plan

Manage Stakeholder Expectations

Project Monitoring & Control

Scope Control

Control Scope

Control Schedule

Performance reporting

Performance reporting

Performance Assessment Earned Value Planned Value Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS)

Performance Assessment Earned Value Earned Value (EV) Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP)

Performance Assessment Earned Value Actual Cost (AC) Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP)

Performance Assessment Earned Value

Performance Assessment Earned Value

Performance Assessment Earned Value