Prostho Rehab of CP with andrews bridge final.pptx

DrKainatSaleem1 28 views 32 slides Mar 04, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 32
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32

About This Presentation

prosthodontic rehab with andrews bridge


Slide Content

1

Lt.Col Muhammad Sajjad HoD Prosthodontics Dr.Kainat Saleem FCPS Resident Prosthodontics Prosthodontic Rehabilitation of a Cleft Palate Patient with Andrews Bridge: A Case Report Rachana Chaudhary , PG Resident, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Army Dental Centre, Research and Referral, Delhi Cantt-110010, Delhi, India,

3 CRITICAL APPRAISAL TITLE Prosthodontic Rehabilitation of a Cleft Palate Patient with Andrews Bridge: A Case Report AUTHORS Rachana Chaudhary * , Dinesh Kumar, Amit Khattak , R K Yadav , Anup Gopi and Dhruv Sharma JOURNAL International Journal of Oral and Dental Health Chaudhary et al. Int J Oral Dent Health 2020, 6:107 METHODOLOGY Case Report

OUTLINE

CASE REPORT

Name : XYZ Age : 25 years Gender : Male Chief complaint : Missing upper front teeth Medical history : Operated for cleft lip and palate 6 HISTORY

M issing teeth 22 , 23,24 & 25 with a nterior ridge defect . INTRAORAL EXAMINATION

Partially Dentate Maxillary arch with Kennedy’s class III S eibert's class-III ridge defect on left maxillary anterior region DIAGNOSIS

9

After discussing all possible treatment options with the patient a treatment plan was formulated and it was decided to rehabilitate the patient with fixed-removable Andrews bridge prosthesis. . TREATMENT PLAN

1st Visit Complete oral prophylaxis was carried out Diagnostic impressions were made with irreversible hydrocolloid TREATMENT STEPS

Lab Steps: Impressions were disinfected Diagnostic cast was prepared by using type 3 dental stone Interim acrylic partial denture was fabricated

2 nd Visit: Tooth preparation was done on 11, 12 and 26 to receive PFM crowns that will be connected with bar attachment

Final impression was recorded with two stage putty wash technique using polyvinyl siloxane impression material

Temporization with tooth colored acrylic I nterim RPD was inserted

Lab Steps: Fabrication of master cast with type 4 dental stone Wax up was done on 11, 12 and 26 for PFM crown & connected with prefabricated plastic bars Bar placed parallel to the ridge Casting was done Finishing and polishing Metal framework trial on the master cast

3 rd Visit: Intraoral trial of Metal framework Shade selected

Lab Steps: Ceramic layering was done according to the selected shade

4 th Visit: FDP cementation with luting GIC. Blocking out the under surface of the bar Impression recorded with alginate to fabricate removable component of the prosthesis

Lab Steps: Fabrication of master cast with type 4 dental stone Removable component of Andrews bridge was made

5 th Visit: Under surface of the bar was blocked and clips were attached to the bar Picked up with autopolymerising PMMA into the removable p rosthesis

Final insertion and adjustment of removable prosthesis was done Post insertion instructions were given Recalled for regular follow up

DISCUSSION

A fixed-removable prosthesis that was first introduced by Dr . James Andrews It permits the replacement of the lost teeth and supportive structures . It offers both function and aesthetics 24 Andrews Bridge

25

The support mechanism is shared by the teeth, and the tissues to some extent The bar serves as a retentive and stabilizing tool for the removable segment The acrylic prosthesis can be removed by the patient when desired for hygienic access 26

Large ridge defect (due to congenital reasons, trauma or surgery) Short Edentulous span When the fabrication of a conventional fixed dental prosthesis is excluded because of the large ridge defect. Where abutments are capable of supporting a fixed partial denture Cleft palate patients (with congenital or acquired defects) INDICATIONS OF ANDREWS BRIDGE

Better aesthetics Better adaptability Better phonetics Hygienic Comfortable Economical No palatal extension required The taste perception is unaltered ADVANTAGES

W earing away of the plastic clip A dditional lab steps N eeds meticulous planning during the placement of the bar to prevent tissue impingement If used for long spans , there will be increased flexure of the metal bar and will lead to failure of the prosthesis DISADVANTAGES

The post surgical rehabilitation of ridge defects in aesthetic zone is always a challenging situation for dental practioners . Andrews bridge is a good treatment option to rehabilitate patients with ridge defects providing optimum asthetics and function with enhanced patient adaptability and comfort. CONCLUSION

William L McCracken (1965) Partial denture construction. (2 nd   edn ), The CV Mosby Company, St. Louis. Van den Bergh JP, Ten Bruggenkate CM, Tuinzing DB (1998) Preimplant surgery of bony tissues. J Pros Dent 80: 175-183. Robert J Everhart, Edmund Cavazos Jr (1983) Evaluation of a fixed removable partial denture: Andrews bridge system. J Pros Dent 50: 180-184. Hickey AJ, Salter M (2006) Prosthodontic and psychological factors in treating patients with congenital and craniofacial defects. J Prosthet Dent 95: 392-396. Ozlem A, Burcak K, Muhammet S, Bulem Y (2013) Prosthodontic rehabilitation of cleft lip and palate patients with conventional methods: A case series. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 3: 120-124. Rathee M, Sikka N, Jindal S, Kaushik A (2015) Prosthetic rehabilitation of severe Siebert's Class III defect with modified Andrews bridge system. Contemp Clin Dent 6: 114-116. Prasan KK, Joshi S, Shalini BN, Sowjanya K, Jessudass G (2014) Achieving esthetics with Andrews bridge. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 4: 127-130. Muthuvignesh J, Bhuminathan S, Egammai S, Narayana RD (2013) Improving facial esthetics with Andrews' bridge: A clinical report. Int J Multidiscip Dent 4: 884-887. DeBoer J (1993) Edentulous implants: Overdenture versus fixed. J Prosthet Dent 69: 386-390. Finley JM (1998) Restoring the edentulous maxilla using an implant-supported, matrix-assisted secondary casting. J Prosthodont 7: 35-39. Cura C, Saraçoglu A, Cötert HS (2002) Alternative method for connecting a removable gingival extension and fixed partial denture: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 88: 1-3. Immeleus JE, Aramany M (1975) A fixed-removable partial denture for cleft palate patients. J Prosthet Dent 34: 286-291. Cheatham JL, Newland JR, Radentz WH, O'Brien R (1984) The 'fixed' removable partial denture: Report of case. J Am Dent Assoc 109: 57-59. REFERENCES

32 Thank You