Pvd Soil Consolidation Design

10,047 views 14 slides Mar 02, 2010
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 14
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14

About This Presentation

Some information and design guide about prefabricated vertical drains


Slide Content

Page 1 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
Prefabricated vertical drains for
Soil Consolidation
Vertical drain design
Technical Presentations

Page 2 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
What is a PVD
•Prefabricated Vertical Drain - PVD
•Typically 95 -100 mm wide by 3 - 5 mm thick
•Synthetic core wrapped with geotextile
•Many types of core

Page 3 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
PVDs shorten drainage path
• 90% Consolidation time reduced from >15 years to 1 year

Page 4 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
Why use PVD over sand drain
•Installation of PVDs typically 6,000 linear meters per day and result in
a lower project cost.
•No risk of PVDs breaking during installation - sand drains can have
discontinuities if mandril is withdrawn too fast.
•No risk of shear failure of PVDs during settlement - sand drains are
vulnerable to shear failure during settlement.

Page 5 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
Why use PVD over sand drain
•PVD’s have high discharge capacities, typically 30 x 10
-6
m
3
/sec to
90 x 10
-6
m
3
/sec compared to a Æ 0.35 sand drain with a discharge
capacity of 20 x 10
-6
m
3
/sec (Van Santvoort, 1994).
•When installed with purpose designed mandril, smear effects are much
smaller for PVDs than for the large diameter sand drains. Zone of
smear is directly proportional to the diameter of mandril used for
installation.
•PVD’s are consistent factory produced whereas sand drains are
subject to quality variance of naturally occurring sands.

Page 6 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
Vertical drain design
•Terzaghi T
90
time factor = 0.848 while assuming soft clay with c
h
= 2 m²/year:
•without PVD settlement for U = 90%:
T
90
d
2
0.848 x 10²
t = ------------ = ------------------ = 42 years
c
v
2

Page 7 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
Vertical drain design
• by using:
- Colbonddrain CX1000
- 1.6 m triangular centers

90% consolidations
in 12 months.

Page 8 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
Equivalent PVD diameter
•calculation assumes PVD cylindrical and draining effect dependent on
periphery
•PVD effective periphery is 2 x width x f, where f is a correction factor
allowing for:
- less favorable inflow to possible disturbance &
smear effect to soil during installation
p
•Delft laboratory finds f = -------
4
2b p b
=> d = ------ x ------ = ----
p 4 2

where d = equivalent diameter of PVD
b = width of PVD

Page 9 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
Drain spacing
•triangular spacing standard
p D
2
1
---------- = ---- S
2
Ö 3
4 2
2 Ö 3
D = S --------- = 1 . 05 S
p
•for a square grid :
D = 1.128 S
Ö

Page 10 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
Kjellman formula
D
2
D 3 1
•t = --------- ln ( ---- ) - ---- ln ----------
8 C
h
d 4 1 - U
h
•where:
t= consolation period (years)
D= diameter of drained soil cylinder (m)
d= equivalent diameter of drain (m)
C
h
= horizontal consolidation coefficient
(m
2
/year)
U
h
= average horizontal consolidation degree
[ ]

Page 11 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
Discharge capacity
•maximum flow observed from PVD = 5 x 10
-6
m
3
/s = 158 m
3
/year.
Hydraulic gradient approximately 0.1
•reduction in discharge capacity from :
– deformation and creep of filter into core
– permeability reduction due to clogging of filter and core
– bending and kinking of PVD during settlement
– pressure on PVD

Page 12 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
Discharge capacity
•q
w
= Q / i Darcy’s Law (valid for laminar flow only)

where q
w
is constant: q
w
³ 140 x 10
-6
m
3
/s from test ASTM D4716

Page 13 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
Q
q
w
= --------- Maximum actual gradient 0.1
i
Discharge capacity
• Effect of i on q
w
: plot of discharge against hydraulic gradient at 360 kPa
confining pressure for filament core PVD.
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
,
Q

(
m
l
/
s
)
Hydraulic gradient, i

Page 14 of 14
www.geosyntheticsworld.com
Disclaimer
The technical data set forth in this slideshow reflect our
best knowledge at the time of issue. The slideshow is
subject to changes pursuant to new developments and
findings, and a similar reservation applies to the
properties of the products described. We do not
undertake any liability for results by usage of these
products and information. We do not take any
responsibilities. This slideshow is only for general
information.