Radiography in the Initial Diagnosis of Primary Bone tumors.pptx

hulkie8606 7 views 24 slides Oct 07, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 24
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24

About This Presentation

The use of conventional radiograph as a screening for the diagnosis of primary bone tumors.
Plain radiograph and normal xrays as a initial radiological investigation.


Slide Content

Radiography in the Initial Diagnosis of Primary Bone Tumors AJNR online, Vol 200 ,issue 1 January 2013

Introduction advantage of radiographic technique is to collapse the density of all points in the imaging plane into a 2D image. The resulting unique anatomic information allows the efficient evaluation of characteristics that reflect the biologic activity or growth rate of primary bone tumors such as lesion margins, periosteal reaction, cortical expansion, thinning, and destruction.

Imaging Features Undiagnosed lesions are best divided into biologically aggressive or nonaggressive categories. Biopsy is indicated if the lesion is aggressive. Otherwise, watchful waiting with follow-up imaging  Aggressive features - appearance of the margin, cortical expansion, and periosteal reaction

Margins indicator of the growth rate of the lesion

Cortical expansion most commonly seen with benign tumors that grow slowly enough to allow the cortex to remain completely or partially intact reflective of the growth rate of the lesion Lesions that produce mild cortical expansion are typically well marginated and show IA margins Lesions that produce a larger degree of cortical expansion - pathologic fracture cortical expansion can produce severe local bone deformity or destruction, even if benign

Periosteal reaction reflect the biologic potential of tumors Highly aggressive tumors often result in interrupted or multilaminar periosteal reactions, and the mass effect of the tumor can produce a triangular interface with the periosteum that is termed a “Codman’s triangle” Less-aggressive processes typically produce a unilaminar periosteal reaction high-grade sarcomas may produce unilaminar or no detectable periosteal reaction

Matrix and tumor mineralisation Osteoid, chondroid, and fibrous lesions often produce characteristic mineralization of matrix Matrix is located in the extracellular space between tumor cells useful in identifying the histologic type of the tumor

Each type of matrix mineralization shows a spectrum of radiographic appearances. Osteoid matrix may be fluffy and cloudlike or ivory and dense. Cartilaginous matrix may produce arcs and rings that form around globular cartilage lobules, or it may be stippled in appearance. Fibrous lesions may show a slightly increased radiographic density, moderate ground-glass appearance, or dense mature mineralization that can be uniform or heterogeneous

Advantages and pitfalls of radiography affordability, accessibility, and a concise method by which to assess the lesion on a limited number of images. perceived quality of depth that results from collapsing a 3D structure onto a 2D image Deficits of radiography include anatomic overlap that can obscure abnormalities and a limited capacity to evaluate soft tissue

Conclusion Radiography helps in establishing the initial differential diagnosis of primary bone tumors Evaluation of the margins is the greatest contributing factor to radiographic assessment of the biologic potential of the lesions cortical expansion and periosteal reaction, provide additional clues as to whether immediate biopsy is indicated mineralized matrix may help to noninvasively identify histologic type