Rajagiri Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty.pptx

drlibinthomas 280 views 70 slides Oct 13, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 70
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70

About This Presentation

A discussion in alignment philosophies as it relates to Total knee arthroplasty


Slide Content

ALIGNMENT IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY Libin Thomas Manathara

INTRODUCTION Dissatisfaction following TKA is a well documented phenomenon Most important factors- implant stability and implant alignment Of these alignment- the gold standard has been Mechanical Alignment (MA)

INTRODUCTION What is MA? Achieve a neutral mechanical axis by implanting the femoral and tibial components perpendicular to it Allowed the bone- prosthesis interface to have reduced shear and bending forces and thus increased longevity

INTRODUCTION However MA ignored the anatomy of the native joint leading to significant mismatch Hence there is an increased reliance on soft tissue releases to achieve this well balanced joint

INTRODUCTION So this clash between the native knee and prosthetic knee kinematics has been blamed for persistent pain, stiffness, instability and dissatisfaction following TKA Hence more soft tissue friendly alternatives have been sought leading to these new types of alignment

THE NATIVE KNEE- coronal plane Has an oblique joint line in the coronal plane in bipedal stance This joint line becomes parallel to the floor in walking or running This is achieved by the distal femur having slight valgus (0 to 4 degrees) and the proximal tibia having slight varus (1 to 5 degrees)

THE NATIVE KNEE- coronal plane So resultant limb alignment is in slight varus Though there is considerable variation

THE NATIVE KNEE- Sagittal alignment The proximal tibia tends to have a posterior slope (1 to 9 degrees) whereas the distal femur has alignment in 0 to 3 degrees of flexion

THE NATIVE KNEE- Sagittal alignment In conclusion, the changes in tibial slope affect anteroposterior stability in the knee especially in the absence of cruciates

THE NATIVE KNEE- Axial alignment Axial target of the knee joint corresponds to the flexion axis of the knee joint It lies in the distal femur and approximated to the sTEA (surgical trans epicondylar axis) A line connecting the sulcus of the ME and apex of the LE The tibial axial axis has less of a role in TKA success

THE NATIVE KNEE- Rotational alignment The optimal rotation axis may be approximated to the Akagi line

THE NATIVE KNEE- Rotational alignment In 2004, Akagi et al. described an axis connecting the centre of the posterior cruciate ligament (c-PCL) to the mb- ATT (medial border of the tibial tuberosity) and reported that this ‘Akagi line’ accurately represents the perpendicular to the sTEA (surgical trans-epicondylar axes)

MECHANICAL ALIGNMENT Implanting both tibial and femoral components perpendicular to the limb’s mechanical axis, thus achieving a neutral overall alignment Considering a varus knee we will remove more bone from the lateral tibia than the medial tibia more bone from the distal medial femoral condyle (MFC) than lateral femoral condyle (LFC) more bone from the posterior MFC than the posterior LFC

ANATOMIC ALIGNMENT Hungerford and Krackow first described this method of recreating the oblique joint line seen in native knees By a process of measured resection, the native femoral anatomy could be recreated David S Hungerford Kenneth A Krackow

ANATOMIC ALIGNMENT By introducing a fixed 3° of femoral valgus and 3° of tibial varus, the need to externally rotate the femoral component to balance the flexion gap was obviated

ANATOMIC ALIGNMENT Thus, the femoral component was aligned to the posterior condylar axis (PCA)

ANATOMIC ALIGNMENT The concept was criticized on the basis of the technical difficulties in performing the varus cut on the tibia in a precise and reproducible way So it was abandoned (This AA can be seen as a precursor to KA)

KINEMATIC ALIGNMENT First coined by Howell et al, this technique seeks to recreate the anatomy of the native knee Stephen M Howell

KINEMATIC ALIGNMENT The surgeon carries out symmetrical resections of the medial and lateral femoral condyles, and medial and lateral tibial plateaus, having compensated for wear The tibial slope is matched to the patient’s native slope

KINEMATIC ALIGNMENT The axial rotation of the femur is set according to the PCA, having compensated for wear The axial rotation of the tibia is set perpendicular to a line drawn from the centre of the medial and lateral tibial plateaus In this manner, minimal soft tissue releases are required

KINEMATIC ALIGNMENT However, the coronal position ignores overall limb alignment, potentially exposing patients with substantial deformities to the risk of alignment-related early failure, although this was not shown in recent studies of component migration and load distribution

FUNCTIONAL ALIGNMENT With the use of computer navigation and robotic-assisted TKA, resection thickness, joint gaps, and limb alignment can be assessed during surgery The additional precision offered by these techniques means that non-neutral limb alignment targets can be achieved more reproducibly This technique has elements of both measured resection and gap-balancing techniques

FUNCTIONAL ALIGNMENT The limb alignment is assessed intraoperatively once osteophytes have been removed, allowing coronal correction to be carried out through a manually-applied varus or valgus force to correct the deformity This allows the software to generate the size of the potential gaps, both in extension and in 90° of flexion

FUNCTIONAL ALIGNMENT With functional alignment, the gaps can be balanced by changing the implant targets in all three planes Thus, a smaller medial extension gap can be balanced by placing the tibial component in up to 3° of varus

FUNCTIONAL ALIGNMENT A tighter lateral flexion gap can be balanced by internally rotating the femoral component These targets are individualized to the patient’s knee and gaps

FUNCTIONAL ALIGNMENT Valgus correction can be applied to the distal femoral resection and varus correction to the tibial resection In such a manner, the obliquity of the joint line is restored

FUNCTIONAL ALIGNMENT By avoiding over-resection of the distal femur, the height of the joint line is maintained, avoiding the potentially difficult problem of mid-flexion instability associated with raising the joint line By the same token, avoidance of under-resection of the distal femur avoids attempts to compensate for a tight extension gap by using a thinner polyethylene insert, thereby inducing flexion instability

FUNCTIONAL ALIGNMENT This description emphasizes the coronal plane, but the goal of functional alignment is to position the components in the position that least compromises the soft tissue envelope of the knee, and hence to restore the plane and obliquity of the joint to that which the soft tissues dictate If there are fixed deformities, ligament release may be required to balance the gaps, although the extent and frequency of such releases is smaller when compared with the standard mechanical alignment technique

THANK YOU Libin Thomas Manathara, Rajagiri