Religions Around the Globe and Basic Approach.pptx

krentznacionales1 22 views 33 slides Aug 04, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 33
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33

About This Presentation

A basic and direct approach on the different types and Kinds of religion around the world and their agendas and basic ideas to be considered in research


Slide Content

Do you BELIEVE that there is GOD? Or there is an existence of GOD?

 W or d  De finition  Re li g ion  - is a s e t o f be li e fs an d pra cti c e s t ha t is o ft e n f o c u s e d o n  on e o r m or e de ities o r god s  S p irit ua lity  - in v o l ve s t h e re c ogn ition o f a f ee li n g o r s en se o r be li e f  t ha t t her e is s o m e t h ing grea t e r t ha n m y s e lf, s o m e t h ing  m or e to be ing hu m a n t ha n s en s or y e x per ie n c e , an d  t ha t t h e grea t e r w ho le o f w h i c h w e ar e par t is c o s m ic o r  d i v ine in na t ure . (D r M a y a S pen c er )  W or ld v iew  - is a c o ll e ction o f be li e fs abou t life an d t h e un i ver se  be ing he ld b y peop le.  Th e o lo g y  - is t h e st ud y o f re ligi o u s f a it h , pra ctic e , an d e x per i en ce  e s pe cially t h e st ud y o f G o d an d o f G od 's re lation to t h e  w or ld.  E a st er n B e li e f  - t h is inclu de s t h e E a st Asian re li g io n s ( S h int o i s m , Sin do i s m , Ta o i s m an d Con f u cia n i s m ) , I nd ian re li g io n s  (H in du i s m , B uddh i s m , Si k h i s m an d J a inis m )  ( W i k ip ed ia)  W e st er n Beli e f  - re li g io n s t ha t or igi na t e d w it h in w e st er n c u lt ure . The  t er m A braha m ic re li g io n s ( Isla m , Chr i s tia n it y , an d  J uda i s m ) is o ft e n u s e d to re f e r to t h i s . ( W i k i ped ia)

I t i s the me n t a l mo d el of re a l i ty that s i gn i fies a com p rehe n s i ve fr a mework of i d eas att i t u d e s a b o u t the wor l d , ourse l ve s , l i f e , a syst e m of beli e f s , a system of p e rs o nal l y custom i zed t h e o r i e s a b o u t t h e wor l d a n d h o w i t wo r k s .

BE L I EF S Y S T EM _ ., I t refers to a set of p r i n ci p l es that he l p i n i n terpreti ng o u r d a i l y real i t y . Th e se b e l iefs are sha p ed a n d i n flu e n ced b y d i fferent factors such as: h ow we know th i ngs h ow we were ra i sed p eer p ressure a m ong o thers

1 K i n d s D e scr i , p t i on Po l ythe i sm T h ere i s no re a l d i s t i n ction b e tween god a n d t h e u n i verse T h e b el i ef a n d wors h ip of many go d s T h e d octri n e o r bel i ef i n o n e s u p reme god D i sbel i e f or in d e n i al of t h e exi s te n ce of a p erso n al god god ca n n ot b e known M o nism M o nothe i sm Atheism Agnost i cism

• T h eism - is a belief in the e x iste n ce of o n e I • god v iewed as the c r e a tiv e sour c e of t h e h um a n r a ce a nd the w or l d w ho t ranscends yet is imm a ne n t i n the w orld. • M on o the i stic re l igions c l aim t h a t t h ere is only one G od w ho cou l d h a v e designed a n d c re a ted t h e u n iverse or may have d irected a l l e v ents th a t l e d to the c re a tion of everyt h i n g. The r e i s one supreme G od w ho i s b o t h person a l a n d mora l, a n d w ho se e ks a total a n d u n qualif ied response f rom h u ma n s . (Ju d a i sm, Christian i ty a n d I s l am)

De f ining Religion  Religion commonly refers to an ins t itu t ion t hat has a s et of organi z ed pra c ti c es and a s t ru c ture d belief s y s t em s hared by and among tho s e who are members of the ins t itu t ion. Their belie f s, whi c h are of t en t ran s cenden t al, are pas s ed on f rom members to con v ert s , and are based on eit her a f ormally documen t ed c r eed or es t abli s hed cu l tura l p r ac t ic es.

Edward B ur n ett T y l or (183 2 - 191 7 ) J a m es G e orge F razer (1854-19 4 1 ) B r o n i s l aw K a sp e r M a l i n ows k i ( 1 884- 1 94 2 ) Da v i d E mi l e D u r k he i m (18 5 8 - 19 1 7) E n g l i sh a nthropo l og i st; fo u nd i n g figure o f the sc i e nce of soc i al a nthr o po l ogy Scott i sh soc i a l a nthr o po l og i st ; o n e o f t he fo u nd i n g figur e s o f mod e rn a nthr o po l ogy An e m i n e n t 2Q 1 h-ce n t u ry Pol i sh a n thr o p o l og i s t F re n ch soc i o l ogi s t; F a ther o f soc i o l ogy T h e be l i ef i n s p i r i t u al be i n gs A pro p i t i at i on or c o nc i li a t i o n o f pow e rs sup e r i o r to m a n wh i ch are bel i e v e d to co n trol a nd d i re c t the course of n ature a nd human l i fe A body o f s e l f -conta i n e d a c ts b e i ng t h emse l ves the f u l fil l ment of t h e i r p u rpose; a n affa i r of all, wh i ch e v e ryo n e takes an a c t i ve a nd e q u i va l e n t part A u n i fied system o f bel i e f s a nd pra c t ices re l a ti ve to sacred t h i ngs

Be l i ef i n De i ty ( h ow we wo rshi p ) A Doctr i n e of S a l v a t i on (wh a t we b elieve) A Co d e of Co n d u ct ( h ow we l i ve) The be l i evers 4. Commun i ty 1 . Cu l t 2. Creed 3. Co d e

· T 1 h e o 1 ry P ropo n e n t E xp l a n a t i on E d ward B u rn e tt T y l or Pr i m i t i ve peo p le b el i eved in so u l s or a n i ma fo u n d in peop l e (seen in drea m s) a n d in all na ture a n d t h ey pr a y a nd offer s a cr i fices to the s e spir i ts. All e a r ly people be g a n t h eir re l i g i on in cogn iz a n ce of m a n a , a myster ious force th a t i n h a b i ted a ll of n a ture. T h e d estr u c t i veness of the m a n a can b e avo i d ed by e s t a bl i shi n g t a boo s . A n i m i s t i c T h e o r i es R o b ert H e n ry Co d r i n gton

T heory Prop o n , e n t E xp l a n a t i on 1 N a tu r e Wors h i p T heory H um a n be i n gs first develo p ed the i r re l igion s from t h e i r observ a t i o n s of the forces of na ture. Pr i m i tive peop l e i d e n t i f i ed a nd perso n i fied t h em a n d cre a ted myt h s a bo u t the regu l a r i ty of t h e seaso n s , t h e ph a ses of t h e m oon a n d the t i d es. Ori g i nally there h a d been o ne gre a t god a bove all others b u t h e went aw a y a n d h a d l i ttle cont a ct w i th the world t h a t resu l ted i n m a jor i ty of a tte n tjon a n d wors h i p to local de i t i es. Theory of O r i g i n al M o n ot h e i sm W i l he l m Sch m i dt

T 1 he o _ , ry P rop o n e , n t : W i sh F u l fi l l me n t Th e ory L udw i g An d reas v o n F e u er b ach People h a d g one three p h a ses of deve l opme n t co n cer ni n g the sp i r i t wo r J d: (1) prjmit i ve m a g i c ; ( 2 ) re l i g i on; a nd (3) sc i ence There were n o go d s a nd t h a t beJief in go d s w a s si m p l y wish fu l fillment. Troubled people who c o u l d n ot cope w i th t h e d i ff i cu l t i es i n l i fe projected their w i shes a n d deve l oped go d s a n d rel i gio n s. M ag i c Theory J a m e s Ge o rge F r a zer

K a rl H einrich M arx R el i g i o n s were deve l o p ed by the f ew as a m ea n s to co ntrol the m a sses a n d s u p pre s s revolution a s a resu l t of the co n t i nu i ng stru g gle b e tween classe s . M a sses were persu a ded to a cc e p t poverty a n d be obedie n t to inher i t bl i ss in a n other life. R e l i g i on or i g i n a t e d from the gu i l t t h a t i n div i du a l s su p p osedly feel i n h a ti n g the i r f a t h ers. As a resu l t of h i s subconsc i ous h a tred a nd e n sui n g gui l t , a gre a t father im a ge w a s projected i n t h e sky c a lled Go d . Wish F u l fillme n t Theory S i g m und Freud

De f ining Spir i tuality  Sp i rit u al i ty is a b o u t o n e's soul a n d i n n er self. Be i ng spirit u al invo l ves h o ld i ng o n e's p e rsonal set of b e li e fs a n d p ractices a n d se a rching for the p u rp o se of lif e . Each p e rson's own d e fi n iti o n o f spir i tu a lity can vary thr o u g h o ut th e ir l i fe t im e , a d a pt i ng to i n divi d u a l exp e rie n ces thr o u g h p e rsonal study a n d sel f -ref l ecti o n. T h e g o al o f sp i rit u a l ity is to r e a l ize o n e's i n h e re n t p ow e r to com b at all of li f e's cha l le n g e s, a n d co n n e ct with som e th i ng gr e at e r th a n o n esel f .

Refers to a n y s et of a tt i tude s , bel i efs a n d pr a ctices concerni n g a s u per n a tural powe r . I t is t h e purs u i t of tr a n sfo r m a t i on gu i ded by a s a cred belief syste m . Ref J ects on e J s i n tegr a t i ve v i ew of life whi l e a ff ect i ng the h um a n so u l De a ls w i th t h e study of t h e n a ture a n d purpose of god t h a t m a y b e u n dert a ken us i n g a p a rticul a r perspective. De a ls w i th i ss u es l i k e t h e a n a lysis on the ex i ste n c e of a d i v i n e b ei n g or on s a cred texts

 A major di f ference between re l igion and spir i tuality is belie v ing versus bei n g . Relig i on emphasizes the content of follo w ers' beliefs and how tho s e beliefs play out in their ever y day li v es. On the other hand, the focus of spiritual i ty is on the process of be c oming attuned to one's i nner self.

 Where the two overlap is each person's individual experiences that i mpact how t hey think, feel, and ac t .  Are you more spiritual or religious? W e’d love t o hear your answers, so f eel free to share your thoughts in the comme n t section belo w .

CONCLUSION  In seeking the divi n e—whe t h e r from a ch u rch p e w on a Su n d a y o r on top of a rid g e lo o king at a g lor i o u s su n ris e — we i ncre a se o u r f e e l i n gs o f h a p p i n e ss, p e ace, a n d a p pr e ciati o n for the li f e th a t we h ave. Reli g ion a n d spirit u al i ty are n e it h er the same th i ng n o r com p le t ely sep a ra t e fr o m o n e a n o t h e r . I n spiri t u a li t y , o ne m ay p o n d e r , “Where do I f ind m e a n ing in li f e, a n d w h at are my true valu e s?” M e a n whil e , in re l ig i o n , c o m m o n q u esti o ns mi g ht be “W h at is t h e tr u t h ?” a n d “Wh a t is ri g ht a nd wro n g ? ” 

Tha n k you so much  Sou rc e s :  Po w e r p o int Pre s entations: Ms. Jo Marie Nel C. Gar c ia  Y outub e : y outube . com/wat c h ? v = 3 -x Q X im Y Mk