Research-Methodology-A-Mixed-Methods-Study-in-Nineveh.pptx

klllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllmo;lk knjnk;ml/

1. Research Methodology: A Mixed-Methods Study in Nineveh IMG query="University students in Nineveh, Iraq, balancing books and work tools, warm lighting, determined expression." This presentation outlines the methodology employed in a recent mixed-methods study conducted in Nineveh, Iraq, focusing on university students juggling academic responsibilities with work commitments. The research combines quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to provide a comprehensive understanding of their experiences. We will explore ethical considerations, study design, data collection, and analysis methods used to ensure the reliability and validity of our findings. Our ultimate aim is to shed light on the challenges and coping strategies of these students. by Ali Aldoory

2. Ethical Considerations: Safeguarding Participants' Well-being Ethical approval was secured from the relevant institutional ethics committee, ensuring adherence to established research guidelines. Prior to participation, all students and their guardians received thorough information about the study's objectives, procedures, and their right to withdraw without any consequences. Informed consent, whether written or verbal, was diligently obtained to confirm their voluntary participation. Strict confidentiality and anonymity measures were enforced, with all collected data securely stored and utilized solely for research purposes. Furthermore, the study strictly adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, prioritizing the safeguarding of participants' rights and overall well-being.

3. Study Design and Setting: A Mixed-Methods Approach Study Setting The study took place in the vibrant city of Nineveh, Iraq, a setting characterized by unique challenges and opportunities for university students who balance academic pursuits with the necessity of work. This specific context provided a rich environment to examine the complexities of their experiences. Mixed-Methods Approach The study employed a mixed-methods approach, strategically combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews. This comprehensive design allowed us to gather both measurable data and in-depth narratives, providing a holistic understanding of students' work-study balance and its effects.

4. Study Sample: Selection Criteria and Size The study focused specifically on university students in Nineveh, Iraq, who are actively managing both academic responsibilities and work commitments. A stratified random sampling method was employed to ensure a diverse and representative sample, encompassing students from various academic disciplines, years of study, and work backgrounds. The study included a sufficient number of participants to ensure statistical reliability and meaningful insights. Inclusion criteria included current enrollment in academic programs and engagement in part-time or full-time work, while students not employed or declining participation were excluded.

5. Validity: Expert Evaluation of the Tool's Content A panel of ten experts from diverse specialties conducted a thorough evaluation to ensure the tool's content validity. The experts meticulously assessed clarity, relevance, and applicability, confirming that the tool effectively measured the intended parameters within the unique context of the study. This rigorous process ensured that the research instrument accurately captured the essence of students' work-study experiences.

6. Reliability: Enhancing Data Consistency and Accuracy To ensure the reliability of the study, several measures were implemented to enhance the consistency and accuracy of the data collection process. A pilot study, conducted prior to the main research, involved a group of 20 students purposely selected from university students’ Nineveh. These participants shared similar characteristics to those in the final sample but were excluded from the primary study to prevent any bias in the primary data collection. This preliminary phase allowed for refinement of the research instruments and procedures.

7. Data Collection Methods: Gathering Quantitative and Qualitative Insights Surveys (Quantitative Method) Structured questionnaires with closed-ended questions, Likert scale ratings, and demographic questions were used to collect measurable data on students' work-study balance, time management, coping strategies, and the impact of work on academic performance. These surveys were distributed electronically or in person to university students in Nineveh who met the inclusion criteria, aiming to identify patterns and trends related to work-study balance and gather statistical data on students' challenges. Interviews (Qualitative Method) Semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions provided in-depth insights into students' personal experiences, exploring the emotional, mental, and social impacts of balancing studies and work, and understanding contextual factors influencing this balance. A selected group of students from the survey sample participated in interviews for a deeper qualitative perspective.

8. Data Analysis: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches The study employed a combination of quantitative and qualitative data analysis methods to ensure a comprehensive understanding of students' experiences. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize and describe the characteristics of the survey sample, while inferential statistics identified significant relationships between work-study balance, academic performance, and coping strategies. Data were analyzed using statistical software like SPSS or Excel. Thematic analysis was used to identify common themes and patterns in students' personal experiences from interview transcripts. The interview data were coded to categorize responses into relevant themes such as time management, stress, and institutional support.