RGP Complications

hiranathdahal 40,318 views 88 slides Jun 10, 2015
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 88
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88

About This Presentation

Contact Lens Complications


Slide Content

Common RGP Complications Hira N ath D ahal 3 rd year B. Optometry

Objectives Complications related to Inflammation and Staining Oedema and Hypoxia Mechanical and Pressure Vision Complications Lens and Fitting Introduction Conclusion References

Introduction Contact lenses are used to correct refractive error , improve visual acuity , and enhance appearance for cosmetic reasons . Improper use of contact lenses can cause numerous complications, which are manifested in various clinical signs and symptoms . About 4% of patients suffering from ophthalmic problems bear contact lens complications http://www.contactlensesus.com/contact-lens-complications.html

Causes of CLs complications Sleeping wearing the contact lenses when guidelines do not permit extended use. Not adhering to replacement schedule and stretching contact lens usage longer than they are designed for. Purchasing contact lenses from unauthorized sources. Sharing contact lenses. Not following proper cleansing and sterilization instructions

Inflammation and Staining Related

CLPC 3 & 9 O’Clock Staining Corneal Dellen Corneal Staining Corneal Ulceration Vascularized Limbal Keratitis (VLK )

Contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) I mmunological inflammatory disease of superior/inferior tarsal conjunctiva associated with lens deposits , sutures , prostheses , corneal glue , or any persistent mechanical irritation of the conjunctiva SCLs > RGP lenses

At biopsy, Mackie and Wright (1978) found hyperplasia of the epithelium with many ‘ downgrowths ’ into the stroma , occasional inclusion cysts containing goblet cells, and eosinophilic infiltration of the epithelium and stroma . Goblet cell and basophil numbers were also higher than normal . They concluded that CLPC was an allergic reaction Mechanical interaction between the contact lens front surface and the palpebral conjunctival tissue and allergy

Management • Minimize wear, or discontinue temporarily • Determine cause - deposits/care and maintenance - edge shape (apex position) Therapeutic - mast cell stabilizer - combination stabilizer & antihistamine - mild steroid

3 & 9 O’clock staining Staining occurs as an arcuate band on the peripheral cornea between 3 and 5 o’clock and 7 and 9 o’clock Staining occurs in the area not covered by the lens so sometimes referred to as exposure staining Usually present both nasally and temporally Accompanied by conjunctival hyperaemia Most persistent RGP after care problems More prevalent in RGP EW than in DW

May develop in two forms: Without infiltrates With infiltrates The first type has a 2-3 mm diameter fluorescein staining adjacent to the sclera but no infiltrates Cessation of lens wear usually results in resolution in two to three days leaving no trace of existence The second type is an infiltrated lesion that affects both the stroma and epithelium. The affected tissue is elevated above the corneal surface and may subsequently ulcerate and become vascularized. This form takes longer time to resolve and leave a permanent scar First sign: punctate or granular fluorescein staining in the 3 and 9 o’clock zones, usually accompanied by local ciliary injection

Symptoms Mild forms of 3 & 9 0’clock staining are asymptomatic Greater levels of staining are often associated with symptoms such as ocular dryness , itching , and increased lens awareness .

An inhibition of blinking leading to blinks that are incomplete and a reduced blinking is the primary cause of 3 and 9’O clock staining This leads to disturbance of the tear layer that results in corneal and conjunctival desiccation Aetiology

Peripheral desiccation 3 & 9 o’clock staining Incomplete blinking Discomfort Blinking inhibition Increased Tear Evaporation Lens- Limbus Bridging by lid margin dryness Thinned tear film Decreased tear mucus

Causes Patient factors Irregularities of the conjunctiva, e.g. pinguecula , may assist in bridging of conjunctival areas by upper lid margin. Tear film abnormalities include lipid contamination, mucin deficiency, and an inadequate aqueous layer

Lens factors edge lift of 0.08 mm was unlikely to cause 3 & 9 staining while lifts of 0.10 to 0.12 mm were almost certain to cause 3 & 9 staining. Environmental influences Examples include: wind and air-conditioning.

Management Early detection important to initiate an appropriate management plan Schnider et al.(1997) showed that large diameter ( TDs of 9.6 & 10.2 mm) lenses were better as long as a moderately wide tear reservoir could be maintained at the lens edge .

• Dictated by cause • Early phase: - patient education - use of tear supplements - improve blinking - redesign lens to improve fitting - maximize lens wettability - minimize surface deposits

Josephson (1986) stated that 3 & 9 o’clock staining left unchecked could lead to: A breakdown of elastic tissue locally. Conjunctival epithelial hypertrophy. Dellen -like changes in the cornea, with or without vascularization.

Corneal Dellen D escribed as very localized areas of peripheral corneal thinning with a sharp demarcation. Dimples or saucer-like excavations at the corneal margin that are usually elliptical in shape and parallel to the limbus

Fluorescein and Rose Bengal pool in the dellen , there is no true staining because the epithelium in the depression remains intact

Symptoms Dellen usually occur in absence of discomfort or pain, or only slight discomfort with the decrease in corneal sensitivity in the depression itself ( Insler etal , 1989 ) Vague irritation or photophobia may be reported ( Gutner , 1989) Visual acuity is not affected because only the peripheral cornea is involved.

Etiology Dellen formation is secondary to a localized breakdown of the tear film’s lipid layer followed by corneal surface evaporation and dehydration The resulting desiccation produces localized thinning of the underlying tissue. C ontinued inability of the upperlid to resurface the mucin layer of the cornea adequately, plays a crucial role in the process leading to dellen formation

Management As dellen don't occur in isolation, it is important that the underlying cause be determined. Any 3 & 9 O’clock staining should be minimized, and the RGP lens fitting characteristics should be optimized Temporary discontinuation of lens wear allows the cornea to recover to normal thickness by re-epithelialization

Baum et al.(1968, cited in Robin et al., 1986) suggest that rapid rehydration may lead to complete resolution and that delayed rehydration may result in permanent local thinning. The risk of serious corneal sequelae is low but can include : Vascularization . Cicatrization . Stromal inflammation. Stromal degeneration leading to corneal thinning ( Insler , 1990 ) Chronic marginal keratopathy . Secondary infection.

Corneal Ulceration Ulceration of the cornea is rare with RGP lens use Corneal ulceration may involve either the central or peripheral cornea Ulceration may be associated with dense 3 & 9 O’clock staining The infiltrate typically appears as a dense focal zone surrounded by diffuse cellular accumulation. The epithelial defect overlies this infiltrate.

When the epithelium is damaged, the risk of an opportunistic bacterial invasion increases. Microbial contamination in RGP lens wear: Acanthamoeba

Corneal staining Common finding in contact lens wear Indicates cell damage, weakened attachment, or cell loss Staining has also been referred to under various names by different authors, e.g. superficial punctate staining, superficial punctate keratitis or Superficial punctate keratopathy

Classified by: type depth location It is likely that staining with RGP lenses is greater than SCLs because of the incidence of 3 & 9 o’clock staining with RGP lenses

Foreign body induced epithelial damage is normally characterized by being coarse and track like in either a random or orbital pattern and is usually unilateral. Profuse tearing and hyperemia may result

RGP lens adherence produces both true epithelial staining and tear pooling in the depression giving the appearance of circular ‘ pseudostain ’ The true staining may be in the form of central patch inside the indentation ring and peripheral arcuate staining

Corneal staining resulting from excessive lens movement is usually limited to the peripheral area traversed by the lens edge over time and is arcuate (incomplete circle) or full circle (doughnut-like) in appearance The stained area is normally outside the ‘average’ centered location of the lens, i.e. the cornea normally located under the centered lens is neither exposed nor traumatized by the lens edge and hence sustains no damage

Vascularized limbal keratitis Rare superficial vascularized lesion bridging conjunctiva, limbus and cornea Sequelae to chronic 3 and 9 O’clock staining Usually in RGP EW

The elevated nodule is located some 0.25-0.5mm from the limbus usually at 3 & 9’o clock or 4 & 8’o clock The lesion’s properties includes: Vascularized superficially or deeply Exhibits extensive staining of the cornea and less extensive staining of the conjunctiva Associated with limbal edema Has ill defined diffuse borders Has moderate to severe accompanying conjunctival injection

Principal cause of VLK: Mechanical insult to the limbal region by the edge of RGP lenses Repeated lens adherence in extended wear may also play a role in the development of VLK

Clinically divided into 4 stages: Stage-I Mild and asymptomatic Conjunctival hyperemia is apparent Stage –II A response that is presumed to be inflammatory with hyperemia, peripheral staining and infiltrates Mild ocular irritation reported along with increased lens awareness. At this relatively early stage, VLK responds rapidly to suitable treatment given

3 . Stage –III Moderate conjuncatival hyperaemia More infiltrates More severe staining A vascular tuft emanating from the conjunctiva and reaching across the limbus leads to and terminates in an epithelial mass Wearing time decreases 4. Stage –IV An alarming increase in symptoms including photophobia, significant discomfort and possibly pain whenever the lens encroaches onto the raised lesion Mass visible to the wearer and is likely to be reported Corneal hypoesthesia may be detectable

Oedema and Hypoxia related complications

Corneal oedema incomplete corneal coverage inherent in an RGP lens fitting: Advantageous Tear exchange <2% with SCLs and 10-20% with RGPs

Corneal oedema is very subtle with RGP materials Negligible with DW EW Greater overnight corneal swelling Striae may be visible Folds/black lines unlikely Rapid recovery following eye opening

E tiology can occur as a result of eyelid closure, RGP contact lens wear ( Dk /t ), or a combination of both due to insulating effects of the lens on cornea & reduced evaporative cooling brought about by evaporation occurring at front surface of lens rather than the cornea. Other contributing factors due to stimulated tear production at least in the early phases of RGP lens wear Mechanical effects Hypotonicity ↑Temperature corneal hypoxia (most contributing factor)

Management Maximize the oxygen availability to the eye By optimizing the level of oxygen transmissibility provided by the lens fitting characteristics such as movement In cases of EW, reduce the wearing time so that the adverse effects are minimized

Corneal vascularization Conspicious sign of poor corneal physiology less likely to occur as a result of RGP lens wear because the corneal periphery/ limbus remains uncovered by the centred, well fitted lens

Mechanical and pressure related complications

Lens adherence Observed almost from commencement of overnight rigid lens wear 48% of RGP lens EW wearers, however when flat fitting lenses are applied, the incidence of lens adherence rise to 84% While RGP lenses adhere to the cornea at any position, it most commonly occur in the nasal direction

Signs that may accompany a bound lens: Corneal indentation (96%) Localized corneal distortion (88%) Central patch staining (76%) Peripheral arcuate staining (17%)

Lens adherence is an adverse response of rigid lens wear that can have dramatic and serious consequences if not properly managed. Although the phenomenon has historically been more common with overnight wear, it does occur with daily wear. Tear film debris: Debris beneath the lens showed the classic fern-like pattern characteristically observed in rigid lens adherence

Etiology: the “thin-film” theory Extensive data presented by Swarbrick and colleagues suggests that rigid lens adherence in daily wear is most commonly observed with fitting relationships that create minimal post-tear lens thickness profiles, such as those seen with an alignment fitting or flat and decentered lenses . Swarbrick’s “thin-film theory” is based on the principle that when two surfaces of similar radii of curvature come into close contact with one another, a thin film is created between the surfaces. In the presence of aqueous tear film abnormalities, this thin layer between surfaces can become viscous and mucoid , which increases the possibility of adhesion . Swarbrick HA, Holden BA. Rigid gas permeable lens binding: significance and contributing factors. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics. 1987;64:815. Swarbrick HA, Holden BA.

Management Patient education Assess lenses each morning Use ocular lubricants Mobilize lens with lid pressure Lens fitting Increase tear volume Fit with slight apical pooling Reduce total diameter

Corneal warpage " Warpage " of the cornea refers to a distortion in the shape of the cornea, usually due to the use of rigid contact lenses, and especially poorly fitting rigid lenses . The type of lens most notorious for this is the "hard" type of lens, which is a non-gas-permeable lens made of a plastic called PMMA .

Signs Keratometer mire distortion is one obvious clinical sign of corneal warpage . Irregular retinoscopic reflexes A detailed slit lamp examination is likely to show posterior stromal hazing or opacities Indecisive subjective refraction end point

Symptoms Usually , asymptomatic - otherwise minimal if lens is comfortable Significant ‘spectacle blur’ Corneal shape may be influenced by lens back surface design Vision often reduced significantly upon lens removal Effects likely to span weeks or months

Etiology While apparent cause of corneal warpage with rigid lens is mechanical, the underlying cause is poor physiology (inadequate lens Dk /t) . The resulting corneal (mainly stromal) edema would appear to be root cause. However edema cannot be the sole cause of these changes because edema resolves very quickly whereas refractive and/or topographical changes resolves more slowly ( Wilson et al ., 1990B , Lowther, 1994)

Other contributing factors Ill fitting lenses Eccentric location Localized heavy bearing Excessive movement Lid pressure translated to the cornea

Management Because of individual differences corneal warpage needs to be managed on a case by case basis Improve physiology (change to lenses with ↑ transmissibility Cessation (to permit cornea to return to its original shape)

c. Programmed withdrawal: Arner (1977) studied abrupt cessation of lens wear and found severe corneal deformations and loss of visual acuity. As a result, he advised a gradual reduction of lens wear over several weeks as a way of reducing the effects of eventual cessation

Vision complications Usually the result of shortcomings of lens design, material selection, tear film and/or lens wettability issues, or disturbances of the cornea Because vision problems discourage contact lens wear, attention to visual performance with contact lens is important

Caused by: Poor lens wettability Lens surface crazing Spectacle blur Dimple veiling Flare

1. Poor lens wettability Rapid drying/thinning of tear film - BUT < 5 sec at any position on the surface or repeatable locations Aqueous fringes (thin-film interference) Haze and hydrophobic spots Vision clear immediately after blink & deteriorates very quickly subsequently

E tiology Environment factors Heat, wind & low humidity Formation of front surface deposits on the lens Hydrophobic surface Tear break up times (BUTs) are shorter

Management Improved lens care to minimize deposits Polishing the surface to remove tenacious deposits Refitting with different materials Changing the patients environment to minimize the effects of surface dehydration

2. Lens surface crazing Fissure widths range from 1 to 8 micron The anterior central zone of the lens is affected at first but ultimately, the whole lens surface is involved Onset can range from 3 to 24 months multiple cracks or a mesh like lattice of fissures with ‘frosting’ of the ‘islands’ between fissures

Possibilities include: Flaws inherent in manufacturing process Stresses introduced during lens fabrication Excessive localized heating during surfacing Susceptibility of particular polymers to normal surface heating Inadequate annealing of rod or button lens blanks Hydration-dehydration cycles may play a role Lens flexure Temperature variation Exact cause is unknown

M anagement Replace problem lens Change lens material Maintain lens physiology check/change lens care products

3. Spectacle blur Reduced spectacle vision immediately following removal of RGP lenses Normal v ision cannot be restored by altering the spectacle Rx May improve over time (hours) or after a period of sleep

Blurred vision with spectacles after wearing RGP lenses may be due to: Change in corneal shape &/or Corneal Edema

Management Improve lens fitting characteristics Minimize bearing Maintain lens mobility Increase lens Dk /t significantly Educate wearer

4. Dimple veiling Small, hemispherical pits form in the epithelium, resulting in an irregular corneal surface With lens removed, pooling of sodium fluorescein in theses pits presents Gas bubbles trapped in post-lens tear film Bubbles act more like solid than gases Seen in the cases with excessive corneal clearance Toric cornea with spherical RGP

The dimple reduces the cornea’s optical efficacy and reduced vision results If the dimples are located centrally (within the entrance pupil zone), and are significant in number, vision may be affected Alter lens design Decrease clearance Central edge

5. Flare Subjective phenomenon

M anagement Optimize fitting characteristics Improve centration Decrease lens movement The use of continuous aspheric back surface design that has no distinct BOZD. The lack of a distinct transition reduce the magnitude of any flare resulting

Lens and fitting related problem

Blink related problem RGP lenses modify blinking esp. in neophyte wearers Lens edge awareness Dry eyes Tired eyes Transient disturbances of vision Discomfort Burning

Management Optimize lens edge profile or fit Improve comfort, lens centration As a last resort – SCLs Consider the effect of lens geometry, lid position, an lid lens interaction before fitting rigid lenses For high riding lenses, thickness and diameter should be increased For low riding lenses, a change of material (to one of lower specific gravity) and an increase in diameter are effective

Lens flexure Unwanted, unaccounted for, lens shape change that occurs in situ Usually transient, doesn't exceed lens elastic limits, Flexing: toric cornea > spherical cornea

When a rigid lens is fitted to the toric cornea the influence of lid pressure, blinking and capillary attraction combine to induce some level of conformity of the lens to the cornea Flexure depends largely on the physical properties of the lens materials , lens thickness and the fitting relationship

When strictly applied the term rigid is probably a misnomer since all lenses exhibit some flexibility regardless of thickness and material properties Lens flexure will induce a plus cylinder whose axis is aligned with flattest corneal meridian If corneal astigmatism > total astigmatism and both are WTR, then lens flexing will decrease the amount of residual astigmatism

S ign Decreased and/or variable visual acuity Cylinder over-refraction Change in residual astigmatism S ymptoms Vision Variable Reduced quality Decreased comfort Reduced lens intolerance Decreased wearing time

Etiology Lens flexure is related to the lens material, lens design (especially thickness), and the lens fitting characteristics ( esp if fitted steeply) If the lens is unable to withstand the forces applied by the upper lid, it is forced to closer alignment with cornea

Centre of the lens too thin Material characteristics Large BOZD High minus BVP Corneal toricity Lid force on blinking Possibly a low lid position Steep central fitting

M anagement Increase lens thickness Seek alignment or a slightly flat fitting Choose a newer material E.g. higher Dk with greater rigidity Decrease the BOZD Fit a back surface toric or a bitoric lens

Lens warpage Irregular mires Focimeter / lensometer keratometer Over-refraction No precise end point Irregular or inexplicable result Altered lens fit/fluorescein pattern

Aetiology Most common cause: inappropriate lens handling Typically lens warpage occurs in wearers who clean lens between their thumb and fore finger

Lens case issues: Flat base Smooth walls (eccentric storage) Dry storage Allowed to dry out Thin lens design

Once RGP lens warps, it is usually not possible to restore lens to its original shape. A new lens of appropriate lens design, probably in a different more rigid, more stable material, is required.

Conclusion Contact lens complications can affect the contact lens corrected visual acuity (VA), the lens comfort and wearing time and lens condition . The problems arising can cause disturbances to the eyelids and ocular surfaces that can result in long-term changes and reduction in contact lens tolerance.

The clinician should try to help the patient overcome the lens-related problems, not only to promote satisfactory lens wear and to prevent the patient giving up contact lenses, but to prevent future ocular infections, inflammation and eyestrain.

THANK YOU!!!
Tags