A thermoplastic synthetic polymer-
based root filling material to
replace gutta-percha
BONDS WITH REALSEAL SEALER WHICH BONDS TO
THE CANAL WALL, CREATING A SEAMLESS SEAL
AND ROOT STRENGTHENING.
WHAT IS RESILON
®
?
BASED ON POLYMERS OF POLYESTER
RESILON CONTAINS: BIOACTIVE GLASS,
CA(OH)2, AND RADIOPAQUE FILLER
“State of the art”
Gutta-percha
•Entomb existing bacteria
•Prevent coronal leakage
•Strengthen the root
Radiopacity
ACID
Smear Layer
Demineralized Dentin
Exposed Collagen
1
2
P
I
C
Acid-Etching
Dentinal tubules after shaping with files, smear layer removal, (smear clear)
exposes collagen and demineralizes dentin which allows the bond between
the real seal to bond to the dental structure.
Factors Influencing Radiographic Periapical Status of
Endodontically Treated Teeth
CategoryNumber % of Total% Success% Failure
Good Endo
& Resto
330.5 32.7 91.4 8.6
Poor Endo
& Resto
213 21.1 18.1 81.9
Good Endo
Poor Resto
164.5 16.2 55.9
Poor Endo
Good
Resto
302 30.0 30.4
44.1
69.6
DR MARTIN TROPE
RealSeal & Resilon work together to give you a ‘restoration-like’ seal
from crown to apex – unrestored cases obturated with RealSeal &
Resilon
October 05Sept 05 Sept 08
Tooth fractured in 05
Dr Martin Trope
April 04 April 04 November 08
Temporary in place for 4 years, Tooth broke 1 year previously
Dr Martin Trope
November 03 April 07
Temporary for 3.5 years, unknown when tooth fractured
Dr Martin Trope
February 05 January 07
Fractured “almost immediately after RCT”
Dr Martin Trope
Primer
Bonding Resin
43
C
Resin Penetration
Primer and Sealer bonding together in dentinal tubules
Non-toxicNon-toxic
Non-mutagenicNon-mutagenic
Significantly less leakage than gutta-perchaSignificantly less leakage than gutta-percha
Increased fracture resistanceIncreased fracture resistance
RetreatableRetreatable
RealSeal
Warm Vertical
Obturation
Dr. Martin Trope and Dr. Fred Barnett
•Choose a standardized ISO Sized
point with the appropriate taper.
•Obtain “tugback”, and the
remove .5mm of the apical
portion of the point.
•Insert the narrow posterior heat
carrier (.5mm tip) from your warm
obturation unit.
•Pre-fit it to its binding point and
adjust the rubber stopper to this
point.
•The RealSeal primer and or
RealSeal sealer is placed in the
canal.
•The apical 4 mm of the master
cone is buttered lightly with
RealSeal sealer and using gentle
pressure, the cone is seated to
place.
•The heat carrier is driven
through the center of the
RealSeal cone in a single
motion to a point 3 to 4 mm
shy of its apical binding point.
•While maintaining pressure on
the heat carrier, the ring switch
is released and the heat carrier
slows its apical movement as
the carrier tip cools and
approaches the apical binding
point.
•Pressure is sustained on the
carrier for five seconds to
minimize shrinkage on cooling.
•The omni-directional ring
switch is activated again for a
separation heat burst.
•The heat carrier is removed and
the surplus RealSeal material will
come out with it leaving a clean
canal space.
•A quick separation burst of heat is
advisable in order to prevent
reheating the apical mass.
•In ovoid or canals that join in the middle or apical
thirds, a secondary RealSeal cone is placed against
the master cone short of the canal terminus and
wedged to place with a finger plugger or spreader to
avoid venting of surplus RealSeal during the heat
carrier downstroke.
•RealSeal sealer is applied to the
walls of the canal before beginning
to backfill.
•The applicator tip of the Obtura
II™ thermoplasticized delivery
system is inserted into the coronal
aspect of the apical plug.
•It is allowed to warm the RealSeal
and a 4 mm increment is delivered.
•Prefit Schilder or Buchanan
pluggers are now used to
condense the thermosoftened
RealSeal.
•Slow measured delivery
ensures the densest mass of
material.
•The condensing cycle begins
with the smaller plugger and
the increase in size with the
application of each increment.
•The entire canal space should
be sealed initially regardless of
whether or not a post is
planned.
•Lateral canals are present
throughout the furcation and
interfurcal region of all multi-
rooted teeth.
It is recommended that the RealSeal sealer be
light-cured for 40 seconds & in all multi-rooted
teeth that the floor of the chamber space be
sealed with a combination of dentin adhesive,
flowable composite and GIC material.
Real Seal with Resilon
12-9-03
7-15-04
Joseph D
Maggio
Temp out 4+ months
Note: healing without coronal restoration
– RealSeal truly seals the canal
Dr. Fred Barnett
(RealSeal) Cases; PacMac @20,000 RPM
Dr. Fred Barnett
(RealSeal) Cases; PacMac @20,000 RPM
Dr. Fred Barnett
(RealSeal) Cases; PacMac @20,000 RPM
Dr. W. Watson Jr.
Dr. Fred Barnett
Non-toxicNon-toxic
Non-mutagenicNon-mutagenic
Significantly less leakage than gutta-perchaSignificantly less leakage than gutta-percha
Increased fracture resistanceIncreased fracture resistance
RetreatableRetreatable
No Primer Needed!No Primer Needed!
Feature Benefit
Self-Priming Time Saving
Less Technique
Sensitive
Short Learning Curve
Easy transition from
other brands &
techniques
Root Canal Dentin
Root Canal
Dentin
RealSeal Filler
RealSeal SE
Sealer
Dentin
RealSeal 1
Bonded Obturator
17 mm
20 mm
22 mm
24 mm
18 mm
•Each stripe is 1mm wide
•Each gap is 1mm wide
•Stripes are very visible
•No stop =
•Better visibility for insertion into canal
•Clear shot for light curing sealer
No Need For Stops
Feature
•Resilon adheres to the core
•Sealer adheres to the core
•Resilon bonds to the RealSeal sealer
•RealSeal sealer bonds to the dentin
•Obturators are injection molded
•Core has contrasting radiopacity
•Readily retreatable
•Same technique as ‘carrier-based’ systems
RealSeal 1
Bonded Obturator
The RealSeal 1 Technique
Make sure you have an adequate access opening to
facilitate obturation
.08
Correct Incorrect
Step One
Step Two
Insert verifier to identify accurate apical canal size. It is essential that the size verifier fits loosely in the canal.
If the verifier sits too snug, go one size smaller.
Correct Incorrect
Step Three
Put in RealSeal Self Etch Sealer but do not flood the canal.
Correct Incorrect
Step Five
Insert the Bonded Obturator into the root canal. It is very important that the
Obturator be placed in the canal within 6-10 seconds of removing it from the oven.
Correct
<10 Sec
Incorrect
>10 Sec
Step Six
For short canals you may want to cut off approx 2mm of Resilon
material from the coronal portion of the obturator.
2 mm
Before After
RealSeal 1
Bonded Obturator
Dipped (Thermafil) vs Molded, Quality You Can See…
Thermafil
Gaps between
carrier/Gutta Percha
Between GP/Sealer
and canal wall
Stripped carrier against
canal wall with gap.
Carrier
•No bonding capable
•Multiple entryways for leakage
RealSeal 1
Resilon
Canal Wall
Core
RealSeal SE
sealer
•Complete bonding
•No entryways for leakage
Thermafil
No bond
Carrier
Gutta
Percha
•No bonding evident
•Leakage possible between GP and carrier
RealSeal 1 Bonded Obturator
Gapless
Core
Resilon
•Complete bonding between core and Resilon
•No entryways for leakage
Core
Carrier
Gutta Percha
Resilon
Gapless Interface
Gap InterfaceThermafil
RealSeal 1
Bonded
Obturator
T. Malmsten, R. Yapp, J.M. Powers, unpublished report to SybronEndo, May 2009
Core
RealSeal 1
Bonded Obturator
All together now!
RealSeal sealer dentin
Resilon RealSeal sealer dentin
Thermafil
1mm from apex
• No bonding
• Multiple entryways for leakage
Sealer?
Carrier
RealSeal 1 Bonded Obturator
1mm from apex
•Bonding (in apical 3
rd
!)
•No entryways for leakage
Resilon
Dentin
Sealer
Benefit
•Less difficult to remove
–Fewer unhappy specialists
–Peace of mind for the GP
–Easier on the patient
RealSeal 1
Bonded Obturator
Readily retreatable
Results: Histologic evidence of
periapical inflammation was
observed in 29% of the Thermafil
group and in 9%of the RS-1 group.
Histologic evidence of bacterial
penetration was present in 9% of
the RS-1 group and in 70% of the
Thermafil group.
Conclusions: RS-1
appeared to resist bacterial
penetration more
effectively
than Thermafil under the
conditions of this study.
(J Endod 2009;35:852–857)
Newest Research
BENEFIT: Reduces gaps and chance
for leakage
Microleakage study, Dr Gianluca Gambarini
University of Rome
0
,005
,01
,015
,02
,025
,03
,035
,04
C
e
ll M
e
a
n
Microliter/Min
thermafill
onestep
Exp_Group
Cell Bar Chart
Split By: Groups
Error Bars: ± 1 Standard Error(s)
2 ,006 ,00312,123 <,000124,246 ,997
55 ,014 2,632E-4
DFSum of Squares Mean Square F-ValueP-ValueLambdaPower
Groups
Residual
ANOVA Table for Microliter/Min
-,015 ,010 ,0028S
-,026 ,011<,0001S
-,011 ,011 ,0684
Mean Diff.Crit. DiffP-Value
Exp_Group, onestep
Exp_Group, thermafill
onestep, thermafill
Fisher's PLSD for Microliter/Min
Effect: Groups
Significance Level: 5 %
1
0
Pie Chart for Infiltr_Par
Split By: Groups
Cell: Exp_Group
1
0
Pie Chart for Infiltr_Par
Split By: Groups
Cell: onestep
1
0
Pie Chart for Infiltr_Par
Split By: Groups
Cell: thermafill
10
17,241
8
33,333
1
5,000
1
7,143
48
82,759
16
66,667
19
95,000
13
92,857
58
100,000
24
100,000
20
100,000
14
100,000
Total Count
Total Percent
Exp_Group Count
Exp_Group Percent
onestep Count
onestep Percent
thermafill Count
thermafill Percent
0 1 Total
Frequency Distribution for Infiltr_Par
Split By: Groups
Leakage Test
RealSeal 1 vs Thermafil/Softcore
Dr. Stephen Davis
VA Hospital, Long Beach, CA
microL/min (cumulative avg.)
Water Leakage
Mean Water Leakage
microL/min (cumulative avg.)
Mean Water Leakage
230% greater than RS1
203% greater than RS1
0
,005
,01
,015
,02
,025
,03
,035
,04
C
e
ll M
e
a
n
Microliter/Min
thermafill
onestep
Exp_Group
Cell Bar Chart
Split By: Groups
Error Bars: ± 1 Standard Error(s)
967% higher than RS1
600% higher than RS1
Dr Gianluca Gambarini Results
Results
•Dr Davis results support Dr Gambarini results
•Dr G results are more dramatic
–Almost double pressure used in G experiment
–Both experiments used pressures much higher than those in the oral cavity
April 4, 2008
Pentron Technologies
Re: Resilon-based carrier root filling system
We have completed our in-vtiro retreatment study on the Resilon-based carrier system:
Protocol: Fifty-two extracted human teeth with single canals and curvature less than 20 degrees were
used for this study. The teeth were decoronated at the CEJ perpendicular to the long axis of the root, so
that each root was approximately 12 mm in length.
Instrumentation: The working length of each canal was established with a #15 K-file 0.5 mm short of the
visible apical foramen. The canals were instrumented using a crown-down technique with Profile or K3
NiTi rotary instruments. Fianl apical file size was ISO #40/.04 for all canals. Instrumentation was carried
out under copious irrigation with 6% NaOCl. The smear layer was removed by irrigating the canals with 5
ml of 17% EDTA, followed by 5 ml of 6% NaOCl; a final rinse of 5 ml of sterile water was used. The
canals were then dried with sterile paper points.
The teeth were randomly divided into two groups of 26 teeth each to receive either the Resilon Obturator
or Thermafil obturator, as the root filling material. All root fillings were performed according to
manufacturers instructions. Each canal orifice was then surface-sealed with 2 mm of an etched and bonded
composite resin material. Specimens were stored at 37°C in 100% humidity for 2-3 wk to allow for
completed setting of all materials.
Retreatment: All roots had 3 mm of filling material removed from around the carriers using a SystemB
device to create a reservoir for chloroform solvent. 0.2-ml chloroform was introduced in each canal to
soften the filling material. Increments of 0.05ml of chloroform were placed into each canal to facilitate the
removal root filling material.
During the retreatment, root canals will be constantly irrigated with 6% NaOCl. In all cases, the canals
were instrumented to two sizes larger than the original master apical file used; size #50/.04. The criteria
for completion of retreatment was the removal of the carrier and root filling material, as verified by
radiographs. If these requirements are not met, the canals will be further instrumented with files until the
criteria are fulfilled. After final instrumentation, all canals will be irrigated with 5.0 ml of 6% NaOCl and
dried with paper points. The duration of retreatment was recorded to the nearest second with a stopwatch.
Results:
Average time to retreat Thermafill obturators: 7.76 minutes.
Average time to retreat Resilon obturators: 6.23 minutes.
Frederic Barnett, DMD
Chairman and Program Director
IB Bender Division of Endodontics
Department of Dental Medicine
Thermafil Carrier 15 minutes – No Change
Cores in Chloroform with agitation
(From Fred Barnett)
RealSeal 1 – 3 minutes
Completely dissolved
Thermafil
Gutta Percha Crumbles
Flash
Core not centered
Molded Obturator – no flash
core centered-
Resilon will not crumble
nor strip
Confocal Microscope Images
RealSeal penetration in
tubules
Dr Ronald Ordinola Zapata
Brazil
RealSeal penetration in
tubules – higher mags
Bifurcated Tubules Filled With RealSeal
Dr Ronald Ordinola Zapata
Brazil
Previous experiences - problems
Lateral compaction -Sealapex
void
Excess of sealer in the root canal
Penetration is not
Constant, here we
don´t have any
penetration
void
Irregular canals are not
Well filled
Penetration is not
Constant, here we
don´t have any
penetration
Dr Ronald Ordinola Zapata
Brazil
void
Single Cone or Lateral Condensation
Dr Ronald Ordinola Zapata
Brazil
Lateral compaction -Sealapex
Lateral compaction –sealer26
Dr Ronald Ordinola Zapata
Brazil
Poor fillings in irregular
canals
Dr Ronald Ordinola Zapata
Brazil
artifact
No voids
RealSeal 1
Dr Ronald Ordinola Zapata
Brazil
RealSeal 1
Dr Ronald Ordinola Zapata
Brazil
Good flow of Resilon
Dr Ronald Ordinola Zapata
Brazil
RealSeal 1
Dr Ronald Ordinola Zapata
Brazil
Thermafil
Dr Ronald Ordinola Zapata
Brazil
FEATURE: Resilon-based Sealer, Resilon and
Core bond together
Dentin
(Section 3mm from apex)
Core
Resilon
RealSeal SE sealer
RealSeal 1
Resilon
Canal Wall
Core
RealSeal SE
sealer