ROSE CASE SPINAL SBRT BY DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO

kanhucpatro 339 views 51 slides May 16, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 51
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51

About This Presentation

ROSE CASE SPINAL SBRT BY DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO


Slide Content

R ADIATION O NCOLOGY S IMULATION TO E XECUTION ROSE CASE SPINAL SBRT 16-May-24 1 Dr Kanhu Charan Patro MD,DNB(Radiation Oncology),MBA,FICRO,FAROI(USA),PDCR,CEPC Clinical Director, HOD (Radiation Oncology) ISRo - I nstitute of S tereotactic R adiation o ncology Mahatma Gandhi Cancer Hospital & Research Institute, Visakhapatnam [email protected] /M- +91-9160470564/ www.drkanhupatro.com

Case scenario 45-year-old female, who has been treated for Her2+ve carcinoma left breast around 2020. She presented to our OPD with c/o backache. The patient was diagnosed with a sclerotic lesion over L1 vertebra.

Treatment objectives GOAL OF TREATMENT CHOICE OF TREATMENT DEPENDS ON Achieving maximum pain control Structural and neurological preservation and restoration Prevention of pathological fracture/ skeletal related events Local control of disease Performance status Biology and extent of disease Life expectncy Quality of life

Treatment consideration- NOMS N Neurologic assessment O ncologic assessment M echanical assessment S ystemic assessment

Neurological Assessment Bilsky Grading system No epidural disease Epidural impingement, No deformation of thecal sac Epidural impingement., Deformation of thecal sac Epidural spinal ord compression , No visible CSF Epidural spinal cord compression, Visible CSF present Deformation of thecalsac, Abutment of spinal cord

Oncological assessment Radiation Sensitivity Tumor Histology Sensitive Myeloma Lymphoma Moderately Sensitive Prostate Breast Moderately Resistant Colon NSCLC Highly Resistant Thyroid Renal Sarcoma Melanoma

Mechanical assessment SPINE INSTABILITY NEOPLASTIC SCORE SYSTEM (SINS) Tallied score from 6 components Stable Potentially Unstable Unstable 0-6 7-12 13-18 13-18 requires surgical stabilization

Systemic assessment All treatment decisions are predicted on the patient’s ability to tolerate the treatment based on Systemic co-morbidities General tumor burden [Extraspinal (visceral and bone) metastatic disease] General Frailty Physiological age/ Performance status

Current NOMS decision framework

Indication for SBRT

MODIFIED WEINSTEIN-BORIANI-BAIGINI SYSTEM Sector 1 : V ertebral body S ector 2 : L eft pedicle S ector 3 : L eft transverse process and lamina S ector 4 : S pinous process S ector 5 : R ight transverse process and lamina S ector 6 : R ight pedicle.

Contouring guideline

MRI

GTV

CTV Delineation Should contain GTV and invlude bony CTV expansion to account for subclinical spread. Includes abnormal marrow signal suspicious for microscopic invasion. Circumferential CTVs encircling the cord should be avoided except, If vertebral body,bilateral pedicle/ lamina and spinous process are all involved If extensive metastatic disease along the circumference of epidural space present without spinal cord compression

GTV involvement ISRC GTVanatomic classification ISRC bony CTV recommendation CTV description Any portion of the vertebral body 1 1 Include the entire vertebral body

GTV involvement ISRC GTVanatomic classification ISRC bony CTV recommendation CTV description Lateralized within the vertebral body 1 1,2 Include the entire vertebral body and the ipsilateral pedicle/transverse process

GTV involvement ISRC GTVanatomic classification ISRC bony CTV recommendation CTV description Diffusely involves the vertebral body 1 1,2,6 Include the entire vertebral body and the bilateral pedicles/transverse processes

GTV involvement ISRC GTVanatomic classification ISRC bony CTV recommendation CTV description Vertebral body and unilateral pedicle 1,2 1,2,3 Include entire vertebral body, pedicle, ipsilateral transverse process, and ipsilateral lamina

GTV involvement ISRC GTVanatomic classification ISRC bony CTV recommendation CTV description Vertebral body and bilateral pedicles/transverse processes 6,1,2, ± 3, ± 5 1,2,3,5,6 Include entire vertebral body, bilateral pedicles/transverse processes, and bilateral laminae.

GTV involvement ISRC GTVanatomic classification ISRC bony CTV recommendation CTV description U nilateral pedicle 2 2,3, ± 1 Include pedicle, ipsilateral transverse process, and ipsilateral lamina ± vertebral body.

GTV involvement ISRC GTVanatomic classification ISRC bony CTV recommendation CTV description U nilateral lamina 3 2,3,4 Include lamina, ipsilateral pedicle/transverse process, and spinous process .

GTV involvement ISRC GTVanatomic classification ISRC bony CTV recommendation CTV description S pinous process 4 3,4,5 Include entire spinous process and bilateral laminae

CTV =GTV+ Include the entire vertebral body

PTV Uniform expansion around the CTV (1.5-2.5 mm margin) Should contain entire GTV and CTV. PTV margin adjacent to crtical structures may be modified to allow spacing at discretion of treating physician unless GTV compromised. Never overlap with cord/ cord avoidance structure. To allow for unavoidable underdosing of PTV in close proximity to spinal cord, while maintaining consistency in the treatment prescription PTV-Cord PRV is done

PTV =CTV+2mm

Dosage

Plan Evaluation D100% 103% D98% 104% D95% 105% Dmax 116% V100% 100% V110% 45.4% GTV

D100% 97.9% D98% 101.5% D95% 102.3% Dmax 116% V100% 99.85 V110% 35.1% CTV

D100% 87.7% D98% 98.3% D95% 99.8% Dmax 116% V100% 94.6% V110% 24.4% Dose given 27Gy/3Fr PTV

OAR Dose Coverage Structures Desirable (Gy) Achieved(Gy) Spinal cord 20.3 21 B/L Kidney 16 4.95

Conformity Index 0.89 Homogeneity Index 1.2 Target Coverage Isodose lines Pink 100% Isodose Line Green 80% Isodose Line Brown 60% Isodose Line Light blue 40% Isodose Line

Isodose lines Volume Radius 100% 26.9cc 1.86cm 80% 52.4cc 2.32cm 60% 88.1cc 2.76cm 40% 205.1cc 3.66cm Gradient Index Equivalent Radius D/b Isodose Line Desirable Achieved 80% and 60% <2mm 4mm 80% and 40% <8mm 13mm

BEV REV Beam Arrangements

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

PREMEDICATION Tab. Dexamethasone 4mg thrice daily starting day before Tab. Pan 40 once daily starting day before Diabetes care if Taper the steroid over 3 weeks PPI Peri medication 16-May-24 42

Response assessment: SPINO ( SPI ne response assessment in N euro- O ncology) Focus on p ain control and imaging based local tumor control Pain response Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) preferred (assessment based on worst pain score) International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints (ICPRE) should be adopted as standard guidelines for pain response Time of assessment: 3 months after SBRT Imaging follow-up frequency - Spine MRI preferred e very 2-3 months for first 12-18 months Every 3-6 months thereafter

Imaging-based local tumour response MRI preferred RECIST criteria not optimum Local control Local progression Absence of progression within the treated area on serial imaging (2 or 3 consecutive MRI scans 6-8 weeks apart) Gross unequivocal increase in tumor volume or linear dimension Any new or progressive tumour within the epidural space Neurological deterioration attributable to pre-existing epidural disease with equivocal increased epidural disease dimensions on MRI

Pseudoprogression, necrosis: interval imaging, occasionally biopsy needed. Difficulties in interpretation MRI signal changes confined within bone segment (in high-dose volume) without epidural or paraspinal progression. Coincident vertebral compression fracture

The superior and inferior extent of CTV is determined by the vertebral levels. (Exception: If GTV involves any part of the S1 ala, CTV commences from the superior aspect of the S1 ala ). At the level of S1–S2 (but occasionally S3), lateral surfaces of the sacrum (alae) can be identified as having an anterior and posterior section due to the fusion of two separate ossification centers during development. Inferiorly (S3–S5), the alae develop from one ossification center. If including the alae prophylactically in the CTV as the adjacent marrow space to the compartment containing the GTV, the ossification line (if visible) can be used to contain the overall size of the CTV Ossification lines are not typical barriers to spread; therefore, if the GTV involves any portion of the ala, it is not advisable to use these lines to limit the CTV volume
Tags