Satellite Cell

surfrsg 1,513 views 28 slides Mar 18, 2010
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 28
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28

About This Presentation

Point: Counter Point debate presentation on Satellite Cell function in Muscle Hypertrophy


Slide Content

SATELLITE CELL
ADDITION IS/IS NOT
OBLIGATORY FOR
SKELETAL MUSCLE
HYPERTROPHY

Nuclear Domain:
• Constant ratio
• Myonuclei/cell volume
HYPERTROPHY
At myofiber:
 Cross-sectional area
 Mass
 Protein content
 Cytoplasm volume
 Myonuclei #

Satellite cells:
• Progenitor cells
• Similar to stem cells
• Muscle precursor cells
• Location:
• Basal lamina
• Myofiber membrane
• Function:
• Muscle growth
• Muscle regeneration

During postnatal growth:
Satellite cell role Þ
• Myonuclear addition
• Myofiber formation

Synergist ablation
› surgical removal of
synergistic muscle
Testosterone
Clenbuterol
›β- Adrenergic agonist
Stretch Overload
Exercise
Satellite Cell
ACTIVATION
+
PROLIFERATION
Type I and Type II
Myofiber(s)
Ý TRANSCRIPTION
Ý TRANSLATION

?

Inhibition of myonuclear addition prevents
hypertrophy
Satellite cell ablation by local gamma irradiation
Assessing hypertrophy
›Muscle mass or myofiber cross-sectional area is
measured
Assessing satellite cell activity
›Enumeration, bromodeoxyuridine labeling, myoD
expression, and increases in myonuclear number

Lesions on satellite cells
Affects non-muscle cells that may prevent factors
that regulate satellite cell activity
Totally prevented local hypertrophy in adult rodents
after synergist ablation
Does not effect adaptive changes in myosin heavy
chain expression
Also, gamma irradiation used in the studies cited
does not meet levels commensurate with damage
and necrosis

Important: Multiple time points are necessary to
determine the roll of satellite cells!
›Many studies did not use later time points
“Myonuclear domain ceiling”
›Small increments may not change satellite cell #
›But additional increases may elicit satellite cell
proliferation

Satellite cell addition is NOT obligatory for
skeletal muscle hypertrophy (O’Connor &
Pavlath)
“Obligatory” =
›Mandatory, necessary, or essential
Provide evidence of skeletal muscle hypertrophy
in the absence of satellite cell addition

Investigated the effect of
1. Administered pharmacological agent
2. Contraction induced
3. Gamma irradiation
Induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy in the
absence of any increase in DNA content
OR increases in myonuclear number

Cimaterol/ clenbuterol
Administered via oral and intravenous
›Stimulates lipolysis
›Stimulates protein synthesis
›Stimulates blood flow
›Increases acute mobilization of nitrogen
›Increases amino acid uptake in the muscles

Conclusions
Examined:
›Whole body weight
›Muscle weight
›Fiber diameter
›Myonuclei number
Induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy without any
increase in satellite cells or increase in myonuclear
number
Increase in protein synthesis (RNA increase)

Sedentary Control No Reps
Mod Freq/Mod
Resistance
24 Reps, 500 gms
High Freq/ Low
Resistance
192 Reps, 0 gms
High Freq/ High
Resistance
192 Reps, 800-1100 gms
Wong & Booth, 1990

Results:
›Mod/Mod- No difference after acute exercise bouts
›High Freq/Low Resistance - Protein synthesis
increased 38%
›High Freq/High Resistance- No further increase in
protein synthesis over low resistance group
Wong & Booth, 1990

Exercise Protein
Synthesis
DNA Content Muscle
Hypertrophy
Concentric Increase Increase None
Eccentric Increase No IncreaseIncrease
Results:

Electrical stimulation alone did not cause muscle
hypertrophy
Combined with static stretch, protein synthesis
increased.
Increase rates of ribosomal capacities
Increase in RNA
No change in total DNA per muscle
Goldspink et al., 1995

Satellite cell addition does not occur as
measured by DNA content or nuclear number
Inhibition of satellite cell proliferation does not
inhibit skeletal muscle growth
Increase in hypertrophy due to increase in
protein synthesis

The following conditions need to be addressed:
›Analysis of time points (early and late) after
application of a hypertrophic stimulus
›Sufficiently large increases in myofiber cross-
sectional area or diameter
›Identify myonuclear number using a method to
clearly depict the sarcolemma
›To show cause and effect rather than correlation
after satellite cell removal

Various models of hypertrophy fail to satisfy one
or more of these criteria
›Do not provide conclusive evidence against the
necessity for satellite cells in hypertrophy
Satellite cell addition is obligatory, but set in
later stages due to a “myonuclear domain
ceiling”

Satellite cell and muscle regeneration well documented
Satellite cell role with hypertrophy debated
Timing of myonuclei addition unknown
Multiple time points required to determine satellite cell
role in hypertrophic model
Acute response:
›Enhanced transcription by myonuclei
Hypertrophic response may depend on the stimulus
Tags