Sexual selection

17,689 views 36 slides Jan 25, 2016
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 36
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36

About This Presentation

13D


Slide Content

Evolutionary explanation of relationships Sexual Selection

Sexual Selection The process through which males and females attempt to maximise their chances of reproductive success

Sexual Selection There are 2 different types of Sexual Selection 1. Intrasexual Selection 2. Intersexual Selection

Intra sexual Selection Mate Competition Members of one sex compete against each other to attract members of the opposite sex Usually this is between 2 or more males

Inter sexual Selection Mate Choice Females choose between male mates. ‘Between sexes’

Gender differences in Reproductive Behaviour in humans Differences in Quantity of mates Differences in Longevity of mates Differences in Sexual Jealousy Differences in Sexual Fantasies

Inter sexual Selection In most Mammal species, the female invests heavily in the offspring Especially in species where females have limited reproductive opportunities Thus females need to be picky and make the right selection of male A wrong choice for a female is much more serious than for a male – this leads to intersexual selection

Females Choosiness For a female it pays to be choosey due to investment The genetic quality of your mate will determine half the genetic quality of your offspring Selection for ‘Good Genes’ and ‘Good Parents’ Will the mate survive and be able to provide for, protect and support their offspring?

TASK: Intersexual selection What characteristics would indicate good resources? What characteristics would indicate good genes? What characteristics would indicate good parents? Economic & financial security, good job, well educated, interpersonal skills, status, etc Good health i.e. skin , hair, weight, facial symmetry, BUT also traits that are disadvantaged ( peacock’s tail) Good skills, caring , affectionate, strong, protective, ability to provide, nurture, etc

Short & Long term mating strategies Males: Short term strategy = casual sex sought as early as possible in the relationship Explains why males may lower their standards prior to sex then lose interest quickly after sex Females: Long term strategy = men who are resourceful and protective are preferred. Males who show potential to be a good parent (caring, affectionate)

Short Term vs. Long Term strategies Clear differences have been found in the behaviour of men and women in terms of short term strategies . Clark and Hatfield (1990) conducted a study where male and female experimenters approached members of the opposite sex with the following statement : ‘Hi, I’ve noticed you around campus and I find you very attractive’. They then asked them either: (1 ) ‘Would you go on a date with me?’ ( 2) ‘Would you go back to my apartment with me?’ ( 3) ‘Would you have sex with me’.

Clark & Hatfield (1990) 50% of both men and women agreed to go on a date Of the females asked, 0% agreed to have sex, compared to… 75 % of males approached! Demonstrates intersexual sexual selection differences in males and females

Mate Preference Males are also picky as they will ultimately have to provide many resources to the female and offspring Men have evolved to prefer females who display fertility Optimum waist-hip ratio Large breasts Youthfulness Baby-faced features (large eyes/small nose)

Buss (1989) Demonstrated gender differences in modern relationships 37 cultures in 6 continents 10,000+ participants Questionnaire on mate preferences

Buss (1989) Across all cultures… Women showed a preference for males with resources or possessing characteristics that would translate to resources (intelligence/ambition) Women preferred a high-status male on average 5 years older than themselves

Buss (1989) Across all cultures… Men placed more emphasis on physical attractiveness (indication of woman’s health/fertility) Men desired a partner who was younger than themselves Both sexes wanted kind, dependable partners

Buss (1989) Findings represent a clear illustration of evolved sex differences based on sexual selection Show cultural universals = likely to have evolved across the human species as a whole

Buss (1989) – Criticisms…  Self – report data  Lacks Validity…  Buss conducted a study on marriages in 29 cultures and found men do marry younger women… and remarry even younger ones!

AO2 – Mate preferences Waynforth and Dunbar (1995) Analysed Lonely Heart adverts Found that adverts reflected evolutionary pressure to promote reproductive success

Waynforth and Dunbar (1995 ) Found that men indicated material wealth in their descriptions of themselves twice as often as women Women demanded wealth in a potential parter 4.5 times more often than men Females twice as likely to provide information about their physical appearance

Female Fertility Many animals have ways of demonstrating fertility to males Women have also evolved this, but it is mostly subconscious

Women are at their most fertile in the 2 nd week of their cycle Research has shown that women’s faces and scent becomes more attractive during this time Women also become more confident

Miller et al (2007) Measured lap dancer’s tips of dancers on and off the pill (fertile/infertile) During non-fertile stages, both sets earned similar tips During ‘fertile’ stages, the non-pill dancers received significantly more in tips

Female Fertility Women’s choice in men also changes throughout the menstrual cycle…

Penton et al (1999) Women attracted to more masculine looking men during their most fertile time Preference for more feminine looking men during less fertile times

Penton et al (1999) Less-masculine men = better long term partner (kinder/cooperative) But women may benefit from being unfaithful during the fertile phase with a strong/healthy child with a more masculine looking man

AO3 Gender Reductionist Ethical Guidelines? Nature vs. Nurture Animal Studies Determinsm vs. Free Will Ethnocentricism

Gender Bias Short term mating should not occur amongst females as it is not evolutionary beneficial to us Females do still engage in casual, short term relationships. The theory doesn’t account for wide use of contraceptives which reduce female risk yet go against the key principle of evolution It can therefore be seen as a reductionist theory, limiting human relationship behaviour to merely procreating

AO3 Gender Reductionist Ethical Guidelines? Nature vs. Nurture Animal Studies Determinsm vs. Free Will Ethnocentricism

Deterministic All evolutionary theories assume that human behaviour is driven by primitive forces that we have no free will to change The theory doesn’t account for individuals who do not want to procreate It also does not account for homosexuality

AO3 Gender Reductionist Ethical Guidelines? Nature vs. Nurture Animal Studies Determinsm vs. Free Will Ethnocentricism

Nature/Reductionist Only considers the ‘nature’ side of the argument Doesn’t take into account environmental factors which may influence mate preferences Methods used to collect data (i.e. self-report) may not reflect actual mate choices

AO1 Sexual Selection Intra sexual selection – Mate Competition Inter sexual selection – Female Choice Reproductive Behaviour Short/Long term mating strategies

AO2 Buss (1989) Clark & Hatfield Waynforth & Dunbar Miller Penton

AO3 Gender Reductionist Ethical Guidelines? Nature vs. Nurture Animal Studies Determinsm vs. Free Will Ethnocentricism
Tags