smLecture7 Calculation of Settlement.pptx

AlemiHerbert 119 views 72 slides May 01, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 72
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72

About This Presentation

Calculation of settlement


Slide Content

Calculation of Settlement

H z x Settlement of a single layer

H z x (1) Settlement of a single layer e e zz v S H e e = = = - + D D 1

H z x (1) Settlement of a single layer e e zz v S H e e thus S e H e = = = - + = - + D D D D 1 1

sub-layer 1 sub-layer 2 sub-layer n Soil profile divided into a number of sub-layers =

Thus For sub layer i S e H e i i i i - = - + D D 1 Soil profile divided into a number of sub-layers

(2) Thus For sub layer i S e H e so that Total Settlemen t S S e H e i i i i i n i i i n - = - + = å = - + å D D D D 1 1 1 1 [ ] Soil profile divided into a number of sub-layers

5m 4m 4m Gravel Clay A B Layered soil deposit 2m Example of Settlement Calculation W.T.

5m 4m 4m Gravel Clay A B Layered soil deposit 2m Stress increase at A=100 KPa Stress increase at B= 60 KPa Example of Settlement Calculation W.T.

Properties: Gravel Relatively incompressible Example of Settlement Calculation

Properties: Gravel Relatively incompressible Clay e = 0.8 G s = 2.7 C c = 0.20; C r = 0.05 ; Example of Settlement Calculation s pc =120 kPa at A

Voids V s = 1 m 3 Distribution of Volume Example of Settlement Calculation V v = e V s = 0.8 m 3 Skeletal material

Voids V s = 1 m 3 Distribution of Volume Distribution of Weight Example of Settlement Calculation V v = e V s = 0.8 m 3 Skeletal material

Voids V s = 1 m 3 Distribution of Volume Distribution of Weight Example of Settlement Calculation g sat w s v s W W V V kN m kN m = + + = + + = 7 84 26 46 8 1 19 06 3 3 . . . / . / V v = e V s = 0.8 m 3 Skeletal material

Voids V s = 1 m 3 Distribution of Volume Distribution of Weight Example of Settlement Calculation g g g sat w s v s sat s w W W V V kN m kN m or G e e kN m = + + = + + = = + + = 7 84 26 46 8 1 19 06 1 19 06 3 3 3 . . . / . / ( ) . / V v = e V s = 0.8 m 3 Skeletal material

The next step is to calculate the initial and final effective stress at the centre of each sub-layer Example of Settlement Calculation

The next step is to calculate the initial and final effective stress at the centre of each sub-layer Example of Settlement Calculation · Initial State at A Total stress s zz = 2 ´ 18 + 3 ´ 22 + 2 ´ 19.06 = 140.12 kPa

The next step is to calculate the initial and final effective stress at the centre of each sub-layer Example of Settlement Calculation · Initial State at A Total stress s zz = 2 ´ 18 + 3 ´ 22 + 2 ´ 19.06 = 140.12 kPa Pore water pressure u w = 5 ´ 9.8 kPa = 49 kPa (3a)

The next step is to calculate the initial and final effective stress at the centre of each sub-layer Example of Settlement Calculation · Initial State at A Total stress s zz = 2 ´ 18 + 3 ´ 22 + 2 ´ 19.06 = 140.12 kPa Pore water pressure u w = 5 ´ 9.8 kPa = 49 kPa (3a) Effective stress s ¢ zz = s zz - u w = 140.12 - 49 = 91.12 kPa

The next step is to calculate the initial and final effective stress at the centre of each sub-layer Example of Settlement Calculation · Initial State at A Total stress s zz = 2 ´ 18 + 3 ´ 22 + 2 ´ 19.06 = 140.12 kPa Pore water pressure u w = 5 ´ 9.8 kPa = 49 kPa (3a) Effective stress s ¢ zz = s zz - u w = 140.12 - 49 = 91.12 kPa Notice the initial effective stress is less than s ¢ pc =120 kPa thus the clay is initially over-consolidated.

Example of Settlement Calculation · Final State at A Total stress s zz = 100 + 2 ´ 22 + 3 ´ 22 + 2 ´ 19.06 = 248.12 kPa

Example of Settlement Calculation · Final State at A Total stress s zz = 100 + 2 ´ 22 + 3 ´ 22 + 2 ´ 19.06 = 248.12 kPa Pore water pressure u w = 7 ´ 9.8 kPa = 68.6 kPa (3b)

Example of Settlement Calculation · Final State at A Total stress s zz = 100 + 2 ´ 22 + 3 ´ 22 + 2 ´ 19.06 = 248.12 kPa Pore water pressure u w = 7 ´ 9.8 kPa = 68.6 kPa (3b) Effective stress s ¢ zz = s zz - u w = 248.12 - 68.6 = 179.52 kPa

Example of Settlement Calculation · Final State at A Total stress s zz = 100 + 2 ´ 22 + 3 ´ 22 + 2 ´ 19.06 = 248.12 kPa Pore water pressure u w = 7 ´ 9.8 kPa = 68.6 kPa (3b) Effective stress s ¢ zz = s zz - u w = 248.12 - 68.6 = 179.52 kPa Notice that the final effective stress exceeds the initial preconsolidation stress and thus the clay moves from being initially over-consolidated to finally normally consolidated.

Example of Settlement Calculation · Settlement of the first sub-layer The soil in the first sub layer moves from being over-consolidated to normally consolidated and so the calculation of the change in voids ratio must be made in two stages.

ESTIMATION OF CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT BY USING OEDOMETER TEST DATA Settlement calculation from e- logp curves A general equation for computing oedometer consolidation settlement may be written as follows. Normally consolidated clays Over consolidated clays for P o + Δ p < p c

If the thickness of the clay stratum is more than 3 m the stratum has to be divided into layers of thickness less than 3 m. Further, e is the initial void ratio and p Q , the effective overburden pressure corresponding to the particular layer; Δ p is the increase in the effective stress at the middle of the layer due to foundation loading which is calculated by elastic theory. The compression index, and the swell index may be the same for the entire depth or may vary from layer to layer. Settlement calculation from e-p curve Eq. (13.35) can be expressed in a different form as follows: where m v = coefficient of volume compressibility

SKEMPTON-BJERRUM METHOD OF CALCULATING CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT (1957) In a oedometer test the lateral yield remains constant. In view of the lateral yield, the ratios of the minor and major principal stresses due to a given loading condition at a given point in a clay layer do not maintain a constant Ko. By the one-dimensional method, consolidation settlement S oc is expressed as By the Skempton-Bejerrum method, consolidation settlement is expressed as

Example of Settlement Calculation · Settlement of the first sub-layer The soil in the first sub layer moves from being over-consolidated to normally consolidated and so the calculation of the change in voids ratio must be made in two stages. e log s ’ Slope C r Slope C c

Example of Settlement Calculation Stage 1 Soil over-consolidated ( s ¢ < s ¢ pc (initial) ) D e 1 = - C r ´ log 10 ( s ¢ pc (initial) / s ¢ I )

Example of Settlement Calculation Stage 1 Soil over-consolidated ( s ¢ < s ¢ pc (initial) ) D e 1 = - C r ´ log 10 ( s ¢ pc (initial) / s ¢ I ) Stage 2 Soil normally consolidated ( s ¢ = s ¢ pc ) (3c) D e 2 = - C c ´ log 10 ( s ¢ F / s ¢ pc (initial) )

Example of Settlement Calculation Stage 1 Soil over-consolidated ( s ¢ < s ¢ pc (initial) ) D e 1 = - C r ´ log 10 ( s ¢ pc (initial) / s ¢ I ) Stage 2 Soil normally consolidated ( s ¢ = s ¢ pc ) (3c) D e 2 = - C c ´ log 10 ( s ¢ F / s ¢ pc (initial) ) e log s ’ Slope C r Slope C c D e 1 D e 2 s ¢ pc

e e Example of Settlement Calculation Now: D D S H = - + 1

e e Example of Settlement Calculation Now: D D S H = - + 1

120 91 4 1 . e e Example of Settlement Calculation Now: D D S H m = - + = ´ = + ´ 1 8 120 05 00 12 0911 2 179 52 00 10 10 [ . log ( . . ) . . log ( . . ) ] (3d)

Settlement of the second sub-layer is calculated in similar fashion to the settlement of the first sub-layer Example of Settlement Calculation e log s ’ Slope C c

Settlement of the second sub-layer is calculated in similar fashion to the settlement of the first sub-layer The settlement is then the sum of the settlements of each of the sub-layers Example of Settlement Calculation e log s ’ Slope C c

Calculation of Settlement To calculate the settlement it is necessary to find the initial and final effective stress. The initial stress can be calculated from a knowledge of the overburden (the weight of the overlying soil). The initial and final pore pressures can be determined from the positions of the water table. In order to find the final total stress it is necessary to find the increase in total stress due to the applied loads. Under many circumstances this can be adequately approximated using the theory of elasticity.

Point load of magnitude P z x Point load on an elastic half-space Useful Elastic solutions for Soil Mechanics

(6) Boussinesq’s solution

5m p=100 kPa z r A 2m B 5m Circular loaded area on a deep elastic layer

(7a) (7b) p = 100 kPa a = 2.5m z = 2m Formula for Stress increase on the centre-line of the loaded area Data Stress increase at A (Note stress increase is independent of elastic parameters) Circular loaded area on a deep elastic layer

Circular loaded area on a deep elastic layer Note that this result can also be obtained from the chart giving the influence factors for a uniformly loaded circular area (Figure 7). In this case r/a = 0, z/a = 0.8, and hence I s = 0.8

10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 1 2 4 6 8 10 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.25 1.00 0.0 z/a Values on curves are values of r/a z/a=2/2.5=0.8 r/a=0/2.5=0.0 p=100 kPa

Circular loaded area on a deep elastic layer Note that this result can also be obtained from the chart giving the influence factors for a uniformly loaded circular area (Figure 7). In this case r/a = 0, z/a = 0.8, and hence I s = 0.8 For the stress increase at B analytical solutions are not avaliable. The chart must be used. In this case r/a = 2, z/a = 0.8, and hence I s = 0.03

10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 1 2 4 6 8 10 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.25 1.00 0.0 z/a Values on curves are values of r/a z/a=2/2.5=0.8 r/a=5/2.5=2.0 p=100 kPa

A B D C Stress increase below a rectangular loaded area Elevation Plan q

Point of interest A B D C z Stress increase below a rectangular loaded area Chart gives the stress at a distance z, beneath a corner of a rectangular loaded area Elevation Plan X q L B

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 2.0 3.0 8 10 1 0.1 0.01 (n=L/z) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 Note m & n are interchangeable (m = B/z)

Point of interest O A B D C X Y Z T z Stress increase below an interior point Chart gives the stress at a distance z, beneath a corner of a rectangular loaded area Must use Superposition O Elevation Plan

O A B D C X Y Z T 2m 3m 3m 2m Example For rectangular loading OZCT m = L/z =1 n = B/z =1

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 2.0 3.0 8 10 1 0.1 0.01 (n=L/z) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 Note m & n are interchangeable m

O A B D C X Y Z T 2m 3m 3m 2m Example For rectangular loading OZCT m = L/z =1 n = B/z =1 thus I s = 0.175 and so D s zz = p I s = 100 ´ 0.175 = 17.5 kPa (9a)

Determination of stress below an exterior point Area ABCD has uniform stress q Stress required at depth z below point O, exterior to loaded region. A B D C O (q)

Stage 1 +q on OXAY A B D C X Y Z T O (q) (q) (q) (q) Determination of stress below an exterior point Area ABCD has uniform stress q Stress required at depth z below point O, exterior to loaded region. A B D C O (q)

Stage 2 +q on OZCT A B D C X Y Z T O (q) (q) ( q) (2q) Determination of stress below an exterior point

Stage 2 +q on OZCT A B D C X Y Z T O (q) (q) ( q) (2q) Stage 3 -q on OZBY A B D C X Y Z T O (q) (q) (0) (q) Determination of stress below an exterior point

Stage 2 +q on OZCT A B D C X Y Z T O (q) (q) ( q) (2q) Stage 3 -q on OZBY A B D C X Y Z T O (q) (q) (0) (q) Stage 4 -q on OXDT A B D C X Y Z T O (0) (q) (0) (0) Determination of stress below an exterior point

Determination of stress below an arbitrary shape Newmark’s Chart 1. The scale for this procedure is determined by the depth z at which the stress is to be evaluated, thus z is equal to the distance OQ shown on the chart.

O Q z z

Determination of stress below an arbitrary shape Newmark’s Chart 1. The scale for this procedure is determined by the depth z at which the stress is to be evaluated, thus z is equal to the distance OQ shown on the chart. 2. Draw the loaded area to scale so that the point of interest (more correctly its vertical projection on the surface) is at the origin of the chart, the orientation of the drawing does not matter

O Q z z

Determination of stress below an arbitrary shape Newmark’s Chart 1. The scale for this procedure is determined by the depth z at which the stress is to be evaluated, thus z is equal to the distance OQ shown on the chart. 2. Draw the loaded area to scale so that the point of interest (more correctly its vertical projection on the surface) is at the origin of the chart, the orientation of the drawing does not matter 3. Count the number of squares (N) within the loaded area, if more than half the square is in count the square otherwise neglect it.

Determination of stress below an arbitrary shape Newmark’s Chart 1. The scale for this procedure is determined by the depth z at which the stress is to be evaluated, thus z is equal to the distance OQ shown on the chart. 2. Draw the loaded area to scale so that the point of interest (more correctly its vertical projection on the surface) is at the origin of the chart, the orientation of the drawing does not matter 3. Count the number of squares (N) within the loaded area, if more than half the square is in count the square otherwise neglect it. 4. The vertical stress increase D s zz = N ´ [scale factor(0.001)] ´ [surface stress (p)]

O Q 4m Loaded Area