THEORY BARTHES points out that meaning is created by signs through connotation, which may naturalize dominant values and ideologies, reflecting social conventions. The establishing shot of the Wheeler house in the opening sequence is an example of the way signs work as myths. It suggests ideas of family and home, that construct the myth of the nuclear family as a social norm. TODOROV would argue that this is established as the social norm because it represents equilibrium, and that the disruption to this equilibrium reinforces the social anxiety around the perceived breakdown of the nuclear family represented by Will’s kidnapping. BARTHES can also be applied to the way that myths about gender are constructed. For example, in the sequence that introduces Hopper, the signifiers such as his badge, gun, uniform, and the empty beer cans all suggest values and ideological messages around power and masculinity. BAUDRILLARD theorises that simulations lead to a state of hyperreality. Stranger Things relies on signifiers (mise en scene and music) to construct its hyperreal diegesis, even using Leica Summilux -C lenses to recreate the visual style of Spielberg’s late 20th-century classics (Goonies, E.T. etc). One of the pleasures of watching Stranger Things is nostalgia, but it is nostalgia for the simulacrum of family, adventure, camaraderie, the Spielbergian American Dream. There is no attempt to present realistic representation of 1980s America, so any social commentary can only really be read as symbolic. Applying GERBNER might lead us to conclude that ‘Stranger Things’ reflects a range of social values in relation to areas such as gender roles and the family and that its depiction of social norms can be seen as an example of mainstreaming although the complexity of representations and the different ways in which audiences may engage with these representations would arguably limit their impact upon the audience. Indeed, GAUNTLET would likely point out that the variety of different representations across a range of ages, genders, ethnicities and sexualities means that audiences may use the show to help them construct their own identities. Indeed, this is a significant factor in most LFTVDS; as the long form drama as the genre lends itself to large and varied ensemble casts. He would likely point out that the representation of 1980s society may suggest that identities were more fixed in the past than they are in contemporary society, especially around the depiction of patriarchal power and entrenched gender norms. However, we could argue that the representation of some social groups suggests identities are less fixed and communicates contradictory ideas about identity. Consider the contrasting representations of masculinity and male identity through characters such as Hopper, Mr Wheeler, Mr Clark, Jonathan, Steve, and Will. BUTLER helps us to notice that Eleven does not conform to gender norms and is initially mistaken for a boy; because she has been raised in isolation, she has not learned how to perform a normative gender role, which supports Butler’s idea that there is no essential gender identity. As she becomes more socialised across the narrative of season one her performance of gender norms increasingly conforms to social norms. Will is also represented as not conforming to masculine gender roles as he is described by Joyce as being more sensitive and feminine. Both characters can be seen as examples of what Butler calls ‘gender trouble’ as they do not conform to gender norms. The way other characters react to them shows how gender norms are policed and reinforced in the historical setting (e.g. Will being bullied). This exploration of 1980s attitudes to gender performativity may, by contrast or by recognition, shine a light on contemporary social ideas around gender and sexuality.