Speech and Language disorders anatomy and localization .pptx

Speech and Language disorders anatomy and localization

1. Speech & Language Disorder Dr. Md. RAKAN UZ ZAMAN MBBS, FCPS(Medicine), MD(Neurology) Consultant Neurologist Department of Intervention Neurology National Institute of Neurosciences & Hospital

2. INTRODUCTION Speech Speech is the vocalization form of human communication Speech is the highly evolved function of human cerebral cortex by which though processes are symbolically expressed It includes Language production Phonation And articulation

3. INTRODUCTION Language Language is the symbolization of ideas It’s the ability to convert thought into comprehensive words It consists of five components Speaking Hearing Repeating Reading Writing

4. INTRODUCTION FIVE COMPONENTS OF LANGUAGE Semantics Function

5. LINGUISTIC COMPONENTS Phonemes are the smallest meaning-carrying sounds Morphology is the use of appropriate word endings and connector words Semantics refers to word meanings Lexicon is the internal dictionary Syntax is the grammatical construction of phrases and sentences . Discourse refers to the use of these elements to create organized and logical expression of thoughts. Pragmatics refers to the proper use of speech and language in a conversational setting including pausing while others are speaking, taking turns properly, and responding to questions

6. Classification Disorders of Language- Aphasia Disorders of speech include D ysarthria, D ysphonia (voice disorders) Stuttering Speech apraxia

7. Disorders of speech Dysarthria are disorders of articulation of single sounds. Dysarthria may result from mechanical disturbance of the tongue or larynx or from neurological disorders

8. Disorders of speech Apraxia of speech syndrome of misarticulation of phonemes, especially consonant sounds. Dysarthria - certain phonemes are consistently distorted. A praxia of speech - inconsistent distortions and substitutions of phonemes. The disorder is called an apraxia because there is no primary motor deficit in articulation of individual phonemes. speech- apraxic patients produce inconsistent articulatory errors, usually worse on the initial phonemes of a word and with polysyllabic utterances.

9. NEURO ANATOMICAL BASIS

10. The inferior parietal lobule , especially the supra marginal gyrus, involved in P honeme processing in language comprehension Phoneme production for repetition and speech. Reading R equires the perception of visual language stimuli by the occipital cortex. F ollowed by processing into auditory language information, via the association cortex of the angular gyrus. Writing Involves the activation of motor neurons projecting to the arm and hand. In addition, other cortical centers involved in cognitive processes project into the primary language cortex, influencing the content of language

11. ROLE OF SUBCORTICAL STRUCTURES Thalamus: relay for the reticular activating system. appears to alert the language cortex. lesions of the dominant thalamus frequently produce fluent aphasia. Nuclei of the basal ganglia Especially the caudate nucleus and putamen, participate in expressive speech.

12. BEDSIDE LANGUAGE EXAMINATION D. Frank Benson and Norman Geschwind popularized a bedside language examination of six parts, updated by Alexander and Benson (1997).

13. Spontaneous speech: Fluent speech flows rapidly and effortlessly. Non fluent speech is uttered in single words or short phrases, with frequent pauses and hesitations. 1 st observe the elementary characteristics such as initiation difficulty, articulation, phonation or voice volume, rate of speech, prosody or melodic intonation of speech, phrase length.

14. Spontaneous speech: 2nd the content of speech utterances should be analyzed in terms of the presence of word-finding pauses, circumlocutions, and errors such as literal and verbal paraphasias and neologisms.

15. Naming: Tested by asking the patient to name objects, object parts, pictures, colors, or body parts to confrontation. A few items from each category should be tested. Proper names of persons are often affected severely. The examiner should ensure that the patient recognizes the items or people that he or she cannot name.

16. Auditory comprehension: Is tested by asking the patient to follow a series of commands of one, two, and three steps. An example of a one-step command is “stick out your tongue”. a two-step command is “hold up your left thumb and close your eyes.” Successful following of commands ensures adequate comprehension but not vise versa.

17. Auditory comprehension: The patient must hear the command, understand the language the examiner speaks, and possess the motor ability to execute it, including the absence of apraxia. Because apraxia is difficult to exclude with confidence, it is advisable to test comprehension by tasks that do not require a motor act, such as yes- no questions

18. Repetition: Dysarthric patients have difficulty with rapid sequences of consonants. Aphasics have special difficulty with grammatically complex sentences. Often, aphasics can repeat familiar phrases much better than unfamiliar ones.

19. Reading: Should be tested both aloud and for comprehension. The examiner should carry a few printed commands to facilitate a rapid comparison of auditory to reading comprehension. Examiner must have some idea of the patient’s pre morbid reading ability

20. Writing: A writing specimen may be the most sensitive indicator of mild aphasia, and it provides a permanent record for future comparison. Spontaneous writing, such as a sentence describing why the patient has come for examination, is especially sensitive for the detection of language difficulty. When spontaneous writing fails, writing to dictation and copying should be tested.

21. Finally, combine the results of the bedside language examination with those of the rest of the neurological examination. These “associated signs” help to classify the type of aphasia and to localize the responsible brain lesion

22. SYMPTOMS AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF DISORDERED LANGUAGE Muteness - a total loss of speech: May represent severe aphasia. Severe form of dysarthria. Frontal lobe dysfunction with akinetic mutism. Severe extrapyramidal system dysfunction, as in Parkinson’s disease Non- neurological disorders of the larynx and pharynx. Psychogenic syndromes, such as catatonia. A good rule of thumb is that if the patient can write or type and the language form and content are normal, the disorder is probably not aphasic in origin.

23. Anomia: inability to produce a specific name. generally a reliable indicator of language disorder. it may also reflect memory loss. Paraphasic speech: refers to the presence of errors in the patient’s speech output. literal or phonemic errors: involving substitution of an incorrect sound (e.g., shoon for spoon), verbal or semantic errors: involving substitution of an incorrect word (e.g., fork for spoon).

24. Perseveration: The inappropriate repetition of a previous response. Neologisms: aphasic utterances involve non existent word forms. A pattern of paraphasic errors and neologisms that so contaminate speech that the meaning cannot be discerned is called jargon speech.

25. Aphasia Aphasia is defined as an acquired impairment in the use of language due to damage to certain parts of the brain This damage could be caused by injury, stroke, or seizures The language deficits include difficulties in language comprehension and execution

26. Aphasia In right-handed aphasics Left hemisphere lesion in 99% of the cases The other 1% are crossed aphasics. In left-handed aphasics 60 % had lesions of the left hemisphere. 40 % had lesions of the right hemisphere. There may be a degree of mixed dominance for language in non-right-handed individuals. Aphasia may tend to be less severe in left handers and recovery better.

27. Major Divisions of Aphasias All aphasias can be classified into two groups Fluent aphasias – The inability to understand the language of others and the production of less meaningful speech then normal Non-fluent aphasias – Difficulty producing fluent, articulated, or self- initiated speech

28. Types of Fluent Aphasias Wernicke’s aphasia – People with this type of aphasia have difficulty or inability understanding others speech, and produce meaningless speech – They generally do not realize their speech is meaningless and are surprised when others cannot understand them – They may demonstrate paragrammatical speech, which means they use inappropriate morphemes. For instance a person my say to you instead of for you or substitute the word pork for fork – This type of aphasia is produced by damage to Wernicke’s area of the brain

29. Wernicke’s aphasia Syndrome opposite to Broca aphasia. Expressive speech is fluent. The speech pattern is effortless and sometimes even excessively fluent ( logorrhea ). Neurolinguists refer to this pattern as paragrammatism . In milder cases, the intended meaning of an utterance may be discerned. Naming is deficient, often with bizarre, paraphasic substitutions for the correct name.

30. Wernicke’s aphasia Auditory comprehension is impaired, sometimes even for simple nonsense questions. Repetition is impaired. Reading comprehension is usually affected similarly to auditory comprehension, but occasional patients show greater deficit in one modality versus the other. Writing is also impaired. The patient usually has no hemiparesis and can grasp the pen. Written productions are even more abnormal than oral ones . Writing samples are especially useful in the detection of mild Wernicke aphasia .

31. Wernicke’s aphasia Associated signs are limited in Wernicke aphasia. Most patients have no elementary motor or sensory deficits . P artial or complete right homonymous hemianopia may be present . The psychiatric manifestations of Wernicke aphasia are quite different. Some patients become angry or paranoid about the inability of family members and medical staff to understand them . Lesion site - posterior portion of the superior temporal gyrus , sometimes extending into the inferior parietal lobule . In terms of vascular anatomy, the Wernicke area lies within the territory of the inferior division of the left middle cerebral artery

32. Bed side features of Wernick’s Aphasia

33. PURE WORD DEAFNESS Isolated loss of auditory comprehension and repetition, without any abnormality of speech, naming, reading, or writing. Hearing for pure tones and for nonverbal noises, such as animal cries, is intact. Classically , the anatomical substrate is a bilateral lesion, isolating Wernicke’s area from the primary auditory cortex, in the bilateral Heschl’s gyri . Pure word deafness is thus an example of a “disconnection syndrome,”

34. More Types of Fluent Aphasia Conduction aphasia –The main symptom of this type of aphasia is difficulty repeating something someone has just said –People with this condition have relatively good language comprehension and their conversational speech is only mildly impaired –This type of aphasia is produced by damage to the left temporoparietal region –It has been suggested that this type of aphasia could come about because of deficits in short term memory or phoneme selection

35. More Types of Fluent Aphasia Anomic aphasia –This aphasia is characterized by difficulty finding names and difficulty substituting indefinite nouns and pronouns with substantive words. For instance, people with this affliction will use words like, thing, stuff, or it instead of automobiles, groceries, or furniture. –There are very few cases of pure anomic aphasia and it is therefore difficult to find the area of the brain responsible –Some have suggested that it is a mild form of Wernicke’s aphasia

36. More Types of Fluent Aphasia Transcortical sensory aphasia –Symptoms of this type of aphasia are fluent speech with some anomia, poor language comprehension, and echolalia. –Echolalia is the tendency to repeat something someone has just said. For instance, if a person with this type of aphasia was asked, “What is your name?” they are predisposed to repeat the question over and over instead of answering it. –This aphasia may be caused by damage surrounding and including Wernicke’s area

37. Non-Fluent Aphasias Broca’s aphasia –This type of aphasia manifests with difficulties initiating well-articulated conversational speech –The language that is produced is slow, labored, and agrammatical, which means words like a, an, or the and verb tense is left out of their speech –This aphasia is produced by damage to Broca’s area of the brain

38. BROCA’S APHASIA Paul Broca, the French physician described in 1861. The speech pattern is non-fluent. If the maximum sentence length is fewer than seven words , then the patient is nonfluent. Patient speaks hesitantly, often producing the principal, meaning-containing nouns and verbs but omitting small grammatical words. An example is “wife come hospital.” “ Agrammatism ” or “telegraphic speech”. They make many phonemic errors, with substitution of phonemes usually differing only slightly from the correct target.

39. BROCA’S APHASIA Naming is deficient, but the patient often manifests a “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Auditory comprehension seems intact . Repetition is hesitant in these patients, resembling their spontaneous speech. Reading is often impaired despite relatively preserved auditory comprehension Benson termed this reading difficulty of Broca aphasics the “third alexia,” in distinction to the two classical types of alexia Writing is virtually always deficient in Broca aphasics

40. BROCA’S APHASIA Associated neurological deficits of Broca aphasia include right hemiparesis, hemisensory loss, apraxia of the oral apparatus and the nonparalyzed left limbs. An important clinical feature of Broca aphasia is its frequent association with depression. The lesions site - Broca area in the posterior part of the inferior frontal gyrus .

41. BED SIDE FEATURES OF BROCA’S APHASIA

42. More Types of Non-Fluent Aphasia’s Transcortical motor aphasia –People with this aphasia do not speak unless they are strongly encouraged to do so and when they do speak it is labored and non- fluent –Interestingly enough when these people are verbally presented with long complicated sentences they are able to repeat them fluently –This aphasia is produced by damage to the premotor c ortex anterior and superior to Broca’s area

43. More Types of Non-Fluent Aphasia’s Global aphasia Summation of the deficits of Broca aphasia and Wernicke aphasia. Speech is nonfluent or mute, but comprehension is also poor, as are naming, repetition, reading, and writing. Most patients have dense right hemiparesis, hemisensory loss, and often hemianopia . Lesion site: Inferior frontal and superior temporal regions, and often much of the parietal lobe in between. Left middle cerebral artery territory. Recovery in global aphasia may be prolonged. Global aphasics may recover more during the second 6 months than during the first 6 months after a stroke.

44. BED SIDE FEATURES OF GLOBAL APHASIA

45. APHEMIA A rare variant of Broca aphasia. Non fluent syndrome. Patient is initially mute and then able to speak with phoneme substitutions and pauses. All other language functions are intact, including writing. U sually transitory syndrome Results from small lesions of the Broca area or its sub cortical white matter or of the inferior pre central gyrus . B ecause written expression and auditory comprehension are normal, aphemia is not a true language disorder. A phemia may be equivalent to pure apraxia of speech .

46. PURE ALEXIA WITHOUT AGRAPHIA Alexia is an acquired inability to read . Patients can write but cannot read their own writing. Spontaneous speech, auditory comprehension, and repetition are normal. Naming may be deficient, especially for colors . Nearly always a stroke in the territory of the left posterior cerebral artery, with infarction of the medial occipital lobe, often the splenium of the corpus callosum and medial temporal lobe.

47. ALEXIA WITH AGRAPHIA Is an acquired illiteracy, in which a previously educated patient is rendered unable to read or write. Spontaneous speech, naming, auditory comprehension, and repetition are largely intact. but many cases manifest a fluent, paraphasic speech pattern with impaired naming. This syndrome thus overlaps with Wernicke aphasia Associated deficits include right hemi anopia and elements of Gerstmann syndrome. The lesions typically involve the inferior parietal lobule, especially the angular gyrus . Etiologies include strokes in the territory of the angular branch of the left middle cerebral artery or mass lesions in the same region.

48. SUB CORTICAL APHASIAS Defined by lesion localization in the basal ganglia or deep cerebral white matter. Two major groups: Aphasia with thalamic lesions Aphasia with lesions of the subcortical white matter and basal ganglia.

49. Aphasia with thalamic lesions Left thalamic haemorrhages frequently produce a Wernicke like fluent aphasia. better comprehension than cortical Wernicke aphasia. fluctuating or “dichotomous” state has been described. consists of alternating alert state and a drowsy state. some have attributed thalamic aphasia to pressure on adjacent structures and secondary effects on the cortex.

50. Thalamic aphasia also occurs with Small ischemic lesions Involving paramedian or anterior nuclei of the thalamus in the territory of the tubero thalamic artery Indicate that the thalamus and its connections play a definite role in language function

51. LESIONS OF THE LEFT BASAL GANGLIA AND DEEP WHITE MATTER F irst described in basal ganglia hemorrhages, especially those involving the putamen. Most commonly involve global or Wernicke like aphasia. Ischemic strokes have provided better localizing information. Posterior sub cortical aphasia syndrome Involving the posterior putamen and deep temporal white matter [temporal isthmus]. Fluent , paraphasic speech and impaired comprehension resembling Wernicke aphasia

52. Other Interesting Facts About Aphasia The handwriting of a person with an aphasia reflects their speech impediment. There was an experiment done where people with Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasias were presented with a picture and then asked to write down a description of what they say in the picture.

53. This is the picture

54. A patient with Broca’s aphasia wrote this Notice the use of very few words, but the words do make some sense

55. A patient with Wernicke’s aphasia wrote this Notice here that there are many, less forced, words, but they don’t make much sense. Also because they’re not struggling to find their words, the handwriting is better

56. Aprosodia Fundamental mechanisms of speech are undisturbed. Affective aspects of language are impaired. Normal prosody or emotional intonation of speech is lost. Motor aprosodia Involves loss of expressive emotion with preservation of emotional comprehension . sensory aprosodia Involves loss of comprehension of affective language. Also called affective agnosia . In other words, right hemisphere-damaged patients understand what is said, but not how it is said.

57. LANGUAGE IN DEMENTING DISEASES Alzheimer disease (AD): Patients with early AD have anomic aphasia. In later stages, language functions become more obviously impaired. Reading and writing the last learned language functions are among the first to decline. Auditory comprehension later becomes deficient, whereas repetition and articulation remain normal. The language profile may then resemble that of transcortical sensory or Wernicke aphasia . In terminal stages, speech is reduced to the expression of simple biological wants. eventually, even muteness can develop.

58. Primary progressive aphasia (PPA): Variant of fronto temporal dementia (FTD). Fronto temporal dementia is now divided into four subgroups: Behavioral variant FTD P rogressive nonfluent aphasia S emantic dementia L ogopenic primary progressive aphasia

59. Progressive non fluent aphasia: Broca-like pattern of aphasia involving agrammatism and apraxia of speech. Usually reflects a “ tauopathy ”. Mutations in familial cases found in the tau gene on Ch 17 . Semantic dementia: Progressive fluent aphasia with impaired naming and loss of understanding of even single words. In reading, they may have a surface alexia pattern. Not a tauopathy Progranulin mutation on Ch 17 with production of an abnormal protein called TDP-43.

60. Logopenic primary progressive aphasia : Involves anomia and some repetition difficulty, with intact single word comprehension. MRI - different patterns of atrophy. Progressive non fluent aphasia → left frontal and insular atrophy . Semantic dementia → bilateral anterior temporal atrophy . Logopenic progressive aphasia → posterior temporal and inferior parietal atrophy

61. Cortico basal degeneration can also present with language abnormalities. Isolated aphasia secondary to Creutzfeldt – Jakob disease have been reported, but these usually progress to dementia over a period of months.

62. INVESTIGATION OF THE APHASIC PATIENT The bedside language examination is useful in forming a preliminary impression of the type of aphasia and the localization of the causative lesion. large number of standardized aphasia test batteries have been published. They have the advantage of quantitation and standardization, permitting comparison over time. most helpful battery is the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, or its Canadian adaptation, the Western Aphasia Battery.

63. INVESTIGATION OF THE APHASIC PATIENT Further diagnosis of the aphasic patient rests on the confirmation of a brain lesion by neuro imaging. MRI is the better modality than CT. In preparation for epilepsy surgery, the Wada test, or infusion of amobarbital through an arterial catheter, is useful in the determination of language dominance. Single-photon emission CT (SPECT), PET, and functional MRI are contributing greatly to the study of language.

64. INVESTIGATION OF THE APHASIC PATIENT fMRI study showed Hypo metabolism in the language cortex shortly after an ischemic insult. followed by increased activation of homologous areas in the contra lateral hemisphere. then a shift back to the more normal pattern of left hemisphere activation.

65. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS 1.Ischemic strokes: bedside aphasia examination is helpful in delineating the Vascular territory affected. Wernicke aphasia → inferior division of the left MCA. Global aphasia → left MCA stem / ICA. Trans cortical motor aphasia → left ACA territory. Pure alexia without agraphia → left PCA territory . 2.Hemorrhagic strokes: Most commonly the basal ganglionic hemorrhages. Recovery was better with hemorragic strokes.

66. 3.Traumatic brain injury: Cerebral contusions, depressed skull fractures, and hematomas of the intra cerebral, subdural, and epidural spaces all cause aphasia when they disrupt or compress left hemisphere language structures . 4.Tumors of the left hemisphere: onset of the aphasia is gradual. other cognitive deficits may be associated because of edema and mass effect . 5.Degenerative diseases: Alzheimer disease / FTD Cortico basal degeneration

67. 6.Infections : Brain abscesses can mimic tumors in every respect. Chronic infections, such as tuberculosis or syphilis, can result in focal abnormalities. Herpes simplex encephalitis has a predilection for the temporal lobe and orbital frontal cortex and aphasia can be an early symptom. AIDS - Opportunistic infections / AIDS dementia complex. 7.Seizures : Associated with aphasia in children as part of the Landau– Kleffner syndrome or in adults as either an ictal or post ictal Todd phenomenon. Epileptic aphasia is important to recognize because anticonvulsant drug therapy can prevent the episodes 8.Migraine : Another transitory cause of aphasia. Wernicke aphasia may be seen in a migraine attack, usually with complete recovery over a few hours. 9.Psychogenic : often associated with stuttering or stammering.

68. RECOVERY AND REHABILITATION OF APHASIA Patients with aphasia from acute disorders, such as stroke, generally show spontaneous improvement over days, weeks and months. In general, the greatest recovery occurs during the first 3 months, but improvement may continue over a prolonged period, especially in young patients and in global aphasics The aphasia type often changes during recovery . Global aphasia evolves into Broca aphasia, and Wernicke aphasia into conduction or anomic aphasia

69. Language recovery may be mediated by shifting of functions to the right hemisphere or to adjacent left hemisphere regions. aphasia recovers best when left hemisphere areas, recover function. Right hemisphere activation seems to be a “second best” type of recovery. Speech therapy, provided by speech-language pathologists, attempts to facilitate language recovery by a variety of techniques.

70. Repeated practice in articulation and comprehension tasks has traditionally been used to stimulate improvement. Other techniques include melodic intonation therapy → which uses melody to involve the right hemisphere in speech production. visual action therapy → which uses gestural expression. Two other therapeutic techniques are functional communication therapy →takes advantage of extra linguistic communication cVIC or Lingraphica → a computer program originally developed for primate communication.

71. Speech therapy has remained somewhat controversial, but evidence of efficacy is actually better for speech therapy than for many drugs. A new approach to language rehabilitation is the use of pharmacological agents to improve speech. first reported that the dopaminergic drug bromocriptine promotes spontaneous speech output in transcortical motor aphasia. Stimulant drugs are also being tested in aphasia rehabilitation . Finally , stimulation techniques such as trans cranial magnetic stimulation and direct cortical stimulation are being applied to patients with aphasia. These techniques await validation by larger clinical trials.