Surgical Management in Ulcerative Colitis

alshomimi 9,141 views 49 slides Dec 18, 2009
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 49
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49

About This Presentation

No description available for this slideshow.


Slide Content

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT
IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS

UC & CRC

INCIDENCE
CRC in UC appears at younger age than in
sporadic CRC (40-50 yrs old vs 60).
5-10% after 20 years.
12-20% after 30 years.

RISK FACTORS
Duration of the disease
Extent of the disease
UC complicated by primary sclerosing cholangitis
Presence of post-inflammatory pseudopolyp

CRC in UC…
Appears as:
Polypoid
Nodular
Ulcerated
Plaque like
Mostly adenocarcinoma.
Mostly located in the rectum and sigmoid
It arises from areas of dysplasia.

Dysplastic areas may appear flat or slightly raised
areas.
Dysplastic areas may occur within or near nodules,
masses, polyps or plaque like lesion.
N.B.: Diagnosis of dysplasia in Pre Op colonoscopy
has a:
 81% sensitivity
 79% specifty

Surgical management in UC

Indications for surgery in UC:
SURGICAL EMERGENCIES
Massive life threatening hemorrhage
Toxic megacolon with impending perforation
Fulminant colitis unresponsive to IV corticosteroids 
 Colonic perforation
 Total obstruction from stricture

Elective:
Intractability despite max therapy.
Mucosal dysplasia
Dysplasia-associated lesion or mass (DALM)
Intolerable side effects of medications
Patient with significant risk to develop CRC
Stricture formation without obstruction

Extraintestinal manifestations
Growth retardation, primarily in children and
adolescents

Surgical Options

Emergency operation:
Subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy
Proctocolectomy with end ileostomy
Blow-hole colostomy with end ileostomy

Subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy
Advantages : Allows option for IPAA; low risk
Disadvantages :
Requires second operation
may develop rectal recurrence of disease
Contraindication : Massive hemorrhage from colon and
rectum

Proctocolectomy with end ileostomy:
Advantages: Definitive treatment
Disadvantages :
No option for IPAA
moderate risk for perineal nerve damage
Contraindication : Severely toxic or unstable patient

Blow-hole colostomy with end ileostomy
Advantages: Short, simple decompression procedure
Disadvantages : Diseased colon and rectum retained

ELECTIVE PROCEDURES
Total proctocolectomy with Brooke ileostomy
Subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis
Total proctocolectomy with Kock pouch
Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and hand-sewn
IPAA with temporary diverting loop ileostomy (two-
stage operation)
Total proctocolectomy without mucosectomy and
stapled IPAA with temporary diverting loop ileostomy
(two-stage operation)

Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with or without
mucosectomy and IPAA

Total proctocolectomy with Brooke ileostomy
Indications : Patients wanting to avoid risks of IPAA; elderly;
poor sphincter function; rectal cancer
Contraindications :Patient aversion to permanent ileostomy;
obesity; life-threatening emergencies
Advantages: Eliminates all disease-bearing mucosa; single
operation
Disadvantages: Potential for nerve injury in the perineal and
pelvic dissection; permanent ileostomy; delayed perineal
wound healing; mechanical problems with stoma; high risk of
SBO

Subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis
Indications: No rectal involvement; avoid permanent
stoma and IPAA; young women of childbearing age to
preserve fertility
Contraindications : Poor sphincter tone or dysfunction;
active rectal or perianal disease; colonic or rectal
dysplasia; or frank cancer
Advantages: One-stage operation; complete
continence with good function; low risk of pelvic nerve
injury; eliminates stoma.

Disadvantages:
30% Recurrence rate requiring conversion to ileostomy
Risk of rectal cancer requiring lifelong surveillance

Total proctocolectomy with Kock pouch
Indications : Alternative to conventional ileostomy for
patients desiring to preserve continence; poor sphincter
tone; low rectal cancer; failed IPAA; conversion from
ileostomy
Contraindications : Possibility of Crohn's disease;
previous resection of small bowel; patients over 60
years old; obesity; coexisting medical illness

Advantages: Avoids ileostomy; patients remain
continent; good quality of live; improved body image
over ileostomy
Disadvantages: High reoperation rate (35%) due to
nipple valve dysfunction or failure; high fistula rate;
pouchitis

Total Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch–Anal
Anastomosis
Indications : Procedure of choice for ulcerative colitis;
colonic dysplasia or cancer; indeterminate colitis
Contraindications : Poor resting tone or anal sphincter
dysfunction; low rectal cancers
Advantages: Completely restorative; mucosectomy
eliminates all disease-bearing mucosa; no disease
recurrence; no cancer risk; good function, continence,
and quality of life.

Disadvantages:
Two-stage procedure
potential for nerve injury in the perineal and pelvic
dissection
reduced fertility in females
mucosectomy and hand-sewn IPAA are technically
demanding and difficult to learn
septic complications
pouchitis

Operative Techniques:
Stage I : abdominal colectomy, mucosal proctectomy,
endorectal IPAA, and diverting loop ileostomy
Stage II : clousre of ileostomy

preoperative work-up
anal manometry
Sigmoidoscopy
bowel preparation

The Lone Star retractor

construction of the ileal pouch

ileal J-pouch
faster
less tedious to create
use considerably less ileum
have similar or better functional results than other
pouch configurations.

Post-IPAA:
4 weeks after - barium radiographic study
8 weeks after - anal manometry + clousre of ileostomy
1 – 3 – 6 – 12 month F/U then every year
flexible fiberoptic pouchoscopy with surveillance
biopsies of the ileal pouch approximately every 5
years.

Complications
Pouch Failure
Pouchitis
Crohn's Disease
dysplasia and carcinoma of the ileal pouch

Pouch Failure
significant long-term complication of IPAA
Prior anal pathology
Abnormal anal manometry
Pouch-perineal or pouch-vaginal fistulae
Pelvic sepsis
Anastomotic stricture, and dehiscence
Brooke ileostomy or Kock pouch

Pouchitis
nonspecific, idiopathic inflammation of the ileal
pouch
most common and significant late, long-term
complication
> 50% of ulcerative colitis patients
Rare in IPAA for FAP

Presentation :
stool frequency
watery diarrhea
fecal urgency
Incontinence
abdominal cramping
fever, and malaise
flexible ileal pouchoscopy

the greatest risk for experiencing an episode is
during the initial 6-month period following closure
of the temporary diverting loop ileostomy.
Risk continues to rise steadily for the next 18–36
months before leveling off at around 4 years

Management :
Broad-spectrum antibiotics
Acute:
Ciprofloxacin 250 mg BID
Metronidazole 250 mg QID
Chronic: ( treatment for 3 months )
Ciprofloxacin 250 mg OD
Metronidazole 250 mg OD
topical anti-inflammatory agents, corticosteroids
Refractory :
undiagnosed Crohn's disease ?

Crohn's Disease
severe morbidity and a significant risk of pouch
excision
Predictors :
complex perianal or pouch fistulae
ileitis proximal to the pouch
Afferent limb ulcers
biological therapies

THANK YOU
Tags