Textbook of electroencephalography
http://yassermetwally.com
http://yassermetwally.net
Size: 10.32 MB
Language: en
Added: Sep 12, 2012
Slides: 190 pages
Slide Content
INDEX| Preface | Web ste
thank of Bina Bachnenrootaluarapı
7
erictal epileptic activity
The interictal marker of a seizure focus is the spike or sharp wave. The distinction between
these two patterns has no etiologic : ce being one of EEG
pattern morphology. A s ed as being less than 70 milliseconds in duration, and a
sharp wave has a di seconds. The terms spike or sharp wave, while
having particular meaning to the electroencephalographer, are often used interchangeably.
Spikes and sharp waves are almost always of negative polarity at the sealp
epileptiform discharges may arise from any region of the cerebral hem
commonly are manifested in the anterior temporal, frontal, or centrotemporal regions.
nly associated with the occurrence of
‘seen on the EEG, the likelihood of the
er 90% onverse is not
of most patients w
poral discharges. Approximately 70-80% of individuals whose EEG.
demonstrates frontal spikes . Frontal spikes or sharp waves are more
ely to be associated wi a traumatic lesions, or congenital
cerebral malformations.
are often a marker for a particular epilepsy
syndrome of childhood known as benign rolandic epilepsy or benign focal epilepsy of
childhood wi . This isa disorder in which a child, typically aged 4.
12 years, develops focal seizures with sensory or motor seizures in the mouth or face
These children also may have generalized seizures; typically, these seizures are
The EEG pattern is unusual in that there is often a simultaneous negative
waveform in the centrotemporal region and a positive one in the frontal region. This
pattern of EEG polarity is virtually diagnostic of benign rolandic e
Epileptiform EEG patterns are seen less commonly in the occipital, central, or parietal
regions. Occipital spikes typically are seen in young children and may or may not be
associated with clinical seizures. Discharges in any of these regions may indicate the
presence of partial epilepsy.
4 sony
Polymorphic delta activity (PDA)
consists of arrhythmic slow waves that vary in frequency, amplitude
PDA can oceur in either ized distribution. Continuous Pi
of abnorm cortical white matter. One of the shortcor
ted. spatial resolution. Th
relationship of PDA to an underlying structural abnormality. Not only is th
localizing ability of the scalp El (ed, but also the PDA of a structural lesion is
referable not to the lesion itself but to the surrounding brain tissue. Because of this
limitation, the area of a lesion is indicated not by the maximal amplitude of PDA b
rather by a region of relatively low-an rather than
intermittent, PDA is associated with In
Persistent polymorphic delta activity ma
lesion, particularly since it presumably arises fro
lying on the margin of the destructive lesion. Pel
onspecifie and is seen in a vari
cluding neoplasms, infarctions, abscesses, trauma, and haemorrhage.
be seen in reversible processes such as focal ischemia in transient ischemic attacks or fo:
depression from a recent seizure.
[Rhythmic delta activity
consists of sinusoidal waveforms of approxi
EEG recording. It is most often symmetri
activity has a frontal pred (frontal
In children, it is maximal posteriorly. (occ
{OIRDAD. Intermittent rhythmic delta activity is associated wit siuctural ss, must
‘commonly diencephalic, orial or intraventric or with. diffuse
ne FIRB Al Goering pens Le euere
that the pattern is due to a structural lesion; when associated with EEG background
abnormalities, it is likely to be due to encephalopathy. In cases of encephalopathy with
FIRDA, the pathophysiologie processes are believed to involve cortical and subcortical
matter. OIRDA is associated with absence epilepsy ren aged 6-10 years
Is less likely to rı ral lesion than is focal delta. Theta is
commonly, 1 disturbance, such as epileptogenic
cortex, especially postictally mplitude suppression and focal delta have resolved. In
addition, localized theta isu perimposed on focal delta to some degre ive
proportion of del x severity of the underlying structural
or functor
PE parano ne men hr)
a Pomme rm)
CE rr li
det ro loco a ia
A BY Rien)
Tete dr anna
eS pote
Y
Grade amen om aa hm ve mia eta ET
Grade (ky abnermal Dominant theta background with some aba and della acia
5 eratelyabneemsl) Continuous dela activi predominates li acthiy ol faster fr
ade Y (extremely abrormat la” tracing or lecrocerebral inactivty
A
Alo en epee
à ql RN ph a
TN
Aa Ar
mer AA
sow.
DRE
Arnhem
am
PR Nef thilnae lt
Brain death should not be determined until at east 7 days of age
Seven days to 2 months: two examinations and two EEGs separated by at least 48
hours are required,
Two months to 1 year: two examina Gs separated by at least 24
hours are required.
Older than 1 year: a and at least 12 hours of
observation)
Tals a iain a
A winner
Fang nn u m ea
a A
AIN SIS EN
POT Gna
oa NY
re
Fremen nn pre
nee re
Py tn A cren
CE EN
Ter ten a
la
Mat
mn
FPA mure
FPeA
Ca
CES
men TS
m ee SET ES
\
cu ea A oc ae
AUS en
cd SE a A
RATTEN
AA
N
ENT
er AN an
AAN ce
EVA arial A
Na
niveau
MEN
bo A we
PRAY ¡Ad
An a ehe
Ay erent eet ya ey et oa Na be
Pra ata EN
NAN Pare
an RAR A ae El
Ron re
er ME
ST a ag LN ae aad
À ip
WN AN N Ny
Ponty
ty SINT aS
Mi ere at LEA
A toca e
ones 3
aa id
lemon,
ora EM hg NAL N
TEAL ee
A AS
nam er
me pen
ee eu (AA
AAA Ari
Aten RAN AE
rs nd ai A AN rra
ms yr ro MN ro
rms gore nro
en to cren Y Mineras
ott artes ne cero 1 eae
a llo lle
a yr TS
ma em try mn
8. Gross interremispharic aoynchrondasymmeiny
id oi und atv
immature fc
sleep states
cesse dscontinuty
cal abrormaliio
1, 2, excessive frontal Soning,
‘exomsive frontal or muliccal sharp lor CA, eos
mie acsvties, ete
pe
A sb
mas MA ar Ww À Man
SH PERTE tn ANSE BONN N AS e
reat A à er, WA
nu San Pele SR rave sash aa
at AA Ve IM
no ET ENTER Maitre) ae sh
ou ad PA VV Sette PA sii
cos eta Vea M je AN
as Mn nn nt a gen) Noe gue ge
Th MAL rt io o a A nl
as AA Ann ten than o
vss fes Ver MA ra an rs Ni
Ts Ne nt
HH Lane hier nt oi er ir]
OA Nr AA AN mn
os Ral Pen A y A na puni Ar
eee dhe areas darren seus ii cen
AU
Ps AA here nd cm A a ac a ina
A e ti ri dr
A e ern ci pe iii
ker ofa seizure focus is the spike or sharp wave. The distinction between
these two patterns has no etiologic significance, the only difference being one of EEG
pattern
o, while
used interchangeably.
Ip surface, These
spheres but most
spikes, an EEG is finding does not exclude a diagnosis of
epilepsy. Often, repeated EEG recordings or prolonged EEG
demonstrate the epileptiform pattern,
€ clinical seizures. Frontal spikes or sharp waves are more
likely to be associated with mass lesions such as neoplasms, traumatic lesions, or congenital
cerebral malforma
Centrotemporal or rolandic sharp waves are offen a marker for a particular epilepsy
syndrome of ch as benign rolandic epilepsy or benign focal epilepsy of
n which a child, typically aged 4
tor seizures in the mouth or face
ized seizures; typically, these seizures are
The EEG pa re is often a
in the centrotemporal r
attern of EEG polarity is virt
Epileptiform EEG patterns are seen less commonly in the occipital, central, or parietal
regions. Occipital spikes typically are seen in young children and may or may not be
assoc cal seizures. Discharges in e dicate the
presence of parti
In childhood, the occurrence of central-midtemporal (also parietal) spikes is associated
with over seizures in only 50-70% of the cases; this pertains mainly to the age from 3-12
x. In occipital spikes (mainly age 3-5 yr), the epileptogenicity is even lower
a (such as seen in benign Rolandic epilepsy) is seen, in
{synchronous bursts of spikes or
pike waves. In most children, the abnormalities disappear on follow up EGG studies and
the minority de rt clinical s
Both generalized synchronous (spike wave, polyspike wave) and Rolandic (centroparicto-
midtemporal) spikes in nonepileptic children suggest a genetic predisposition if no
elicit and no history of insult to the CNS are present.
In children, focal epileptiform discharges arising from the temporal region have the
greatest incidence of clinical seizures, ranging from 85 to 95 percent. T
incidence (70 to 75 percent is associated with frontal discharges. The central, parietal
and occipital regions have the lowest incidence of seizures related to epileptiform
When applied in the appropriate clinical setting, the EEG is useful in classifying the
scizure type, predicting the long-term outcome, and choosing the appropriate antiepileptic
medication
EEG has not proven to be a reliable 1001 in predicting whether a patients antiepileptic
medication can be di «1. The decision to discontinue an antiepileptic medication
in a patient with a seizure disorder should be based on the type, etiology and response 10
medications ofthe seizures and not on inerictal EEG findings.