Textbook of electroencephalography

10,988 views 190 slides Sep 12, 2012
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 190
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100
Slide 101
101
Slide 102
102
Slide 103
103
Slide 104
104
Slide 105
105
Slide 106
106
Slide 107
107
Slide 108
108
Slide 109
109
Slide 110
110
Slide 111
111
Slide 112
112
Slide 113
113
Slide 114
114
Slide 115
115
Slide 116
116
Slide 117
117
Slide 118
118
Slide 119
119
Slide 120
120
Slide 121
121
Slide 122
122
Slide 123
123
Slide 124
124
Slide 125
125
Slide 126
126
Slide 127
127
Slide 128
128
Slide 129
129
Slide 130
130
Slide 131
131
Slide 132
132
Slide 133
133
Slide 134
134
Slide 135
135
Slide 136
136
Slide 137
137
Slide 138
138
Slide 139
139
Slide 140
140
Slide 141
141
Slide 142
142
Slide 143
143
Slide 144
144
Slide 145
145
Slide 146
146
Slide 147
147
Slide 148
148
Slide 149
149
Slide 150
150
Slide 151
151
Slide 152
152
Slide 153
153
Slide 154
154
Slide 155
155
Slide 156
156
Slide 157
157
Slide 158
158
Slide 159
159
Slide 160
160
Slide 161
161
Slide 162
162
Slide 163
163
Slide 164
164
Slide 165
165
Slide 166
166
Slide 167
167
Slide 168
168
Slide 169
169
Slide 170
170
Slide 171
171
Slide 172
172
Slide 173
173
Slide 174
174
Slide 175
175
Slide 176
176
Slide 177
177
Slide 178
178
Slide 179
179
Slide 180
180
Slide 181
181
Slide 182
182
Slide 183
183
Slide 184
184
Slide 185
185
Slide 186
186
Slide 187
187
Slide 188
188
Slide 189
189
Slide 190
190

About This Presentation

Textbook of electroencephalography
http://yassermetwally.com
http://yassermetwally.net


Slide Content

INDEX| Preface | Web ste

thank of Bina Bachnenrootaluarapı

7

erictal epileptic activity

The interictal marker of a seizure focus is the spike or sharp wave. The distinction between
these two patterns has no etiologic : ce being one of EEG
pattern morphology. A s ed as being less than 70 milliseconds in duration, and a
sharp wave has a di seconds. The terms spike or sharp wave, while
having particular meaning to the electroencephalographer, are often used interchangeably.
Spikes and sharp waves are almost always of negative polarity at the sealp

epileptiform discharges may arise from any region of the cerebral hem

commonly are manifested in the anterior temporal, frontal, or centrotemporal regions.

nly associated with the occurrence of
‘seen on the EEG, the likelihood of the
er 90% onverse is not

of most patients w

poral discharges. Approximately 70-80% of individuals whose EEG.
demonstrates frontal spikes . Frontal spikes or sharp waves are more

ely to be associated wi a traumatic lesions, or congenital
cerebral malformations.

are often a marker for a particular epilepsy
syndrome of childhood known as benign rolandic epilepsy or benign focal epilepsy of
childhood wi . This isa disorder in which a child, typically aged 4.
12 years, develops focal seizures with sensory or motor seizures in the mouth or face
These children also may have generalized seizures; typically, these seizures are
The EEG pattern is unusual in that there is often a simultaneous negative
waveform in the centrotemporal region and a positive one in the frontal region. This
pattern of EEG polarity is virtually diagnostic of benign rolandic e

Epileptiform EEG patterns are seen less commonly in the occipital, central, or parietal
regions. Occipital spikes typically are seen in young children and may or may not be
associated with clinical seizures. Discharges in any of these regions may indicate the
presence of partial epilepsy.

4 sony

Polymorphic delta activity (PDA)

consists of arrhythmic slow waves that vary in frequency, amplitude
PDA can oceur in either ized distribution. Continuous Pi
of abnorm cortical white matter. One of the shortcor

ted. spatial resolution. Th
relationship of PDA to an underlying structural abnormality. Not only is th
localizing ability of the scalp El (ed, but also the PDA of a structural lesion is
referable not to the lesion itself but to the surrounding brain tissue. Because of this
limitation, the area of a lesion is indicated not by the maximal amplitude of PDA b
rather by a region of relatively low-an rather than
intermittent, PDA is associated with In

Persistent polymorphic delta activity ma

lesion, particularly since it presumably arises fro

lying on the margin of the destructive lesion. Pel
onspecifie and is seen in a vari

cluding neoplasms, infarctions, abscesses, trauma, and haemorrhage.
be seen in reversible processes such as focal ischemia in transient ischemic attacks or fo:
depression from a recent seizure.

[Rhythmic delta activity

consists of sinusoidal waveforms of approxi
EEG recording. It is most often symmetri

activity has a frontal pred (frontal

In children, it is maximal posteriorly. (occ

{OIRDAD. Intermittent rhythmic delta activity is associated wit siuctural ss, must
‘commonly diencephalic, orial or intraventric or with. diffuse
ne FIRB Al Goering pens Le euere
that the pattern is due to a structural lesion; when associated with EEG background
abnormalities, it is likely to be due to encephalopathy. In cases of encephalopathy with
FIRDA, the pathophysiologie processes are believed to involve cortical and subcortical
matter. OIRDA is associated with absence epilepsy ren aged 6-10 years

Is less likely to rı ral lesion than is focal delta. Theta is
commonly, 1 disturbance, such as epileptogenic
cortex, especially postictally mplitude suppression and focal delta have resolved. In
addition, localized theta isu perimposed on focal delta to some degre ive
proportion of del x severity of the underlying structural
or functor

PE parano ne men hr)
a Pomme rm)
CE rr li

det ro loco a ia

A BY Rien)

Tete dr anna
eS pote

Y

Grade amen om aa hm ve mia eta ET

Grade (ky abnermal Dominant theta background with some aba and della acia

5 eratelyabneemsl) Continuous dela activi predominates li acthiy ol faster fr

ade Y (extremely abrormat la” tracing or lecrocerebral inactivty

A
Alo en epee
à ql RN ph a
TN
Aa Ar

mer AA

sow.
DRE

Arnhem

am

PR Nef thilnae lt

Brain death should not be determined until at east 7 days of age
Seven days to 2 months: two examinations and two EEGs separated by at least 48
hours are required,
Two months to 1 year: two examina Gs separated by at least 24
hours are required.

Older than 1 year: a and at least 12 hours of

observation)

Tals a iain a

A winner

Fang nn u m ea

a A

AIN SIS EN

POT Gna

oa NY

re
Fremen nn pre

nee re
Py tn A cren
CE EN
Ter ten a

la

Mat

mn

FPA mure

FPeA
Ca

CES

men TS

m ee SET ES
\

cu ea A oc ae

AUS en
cd SE a A

RATTEN
AA
N
ENT
er AN an
AAN ce
EVA arial A
Na
niveau
MEN

bo A we
PRAY ¡Ad

An a ehe

Ay erent eet ya ey et oa Na be

Pra ata EN

NAN Pare

an RAR A ae El
Ron re
er ME

ST a ag LN ae aad
À ip

WN AN N Ny

Ponty

ty SINT aS
Mi ere at LEA

A toca e
ones 3
aa id
lemon,
ora EM hg NAL N

TEAL ee
A AS

nam er
me pen

ee eu (AA

AAA Ari
Aten RAN AE

rs nd ai A AN rra

ms yr ro MN ro

rms gore nro

en to cren Y Mineras
ott artes ne cero 1 eae
a llo lle
a yr TS
ma em try mn

mn ne ma ner

4 ene Sn (OT
M ses urn dase er A ws

E EZ

Deniston at teen cotton

ossi abnormal ba

a. Inactive (scelecuio E

1 Lowvoltage EEG
“ave paraystique eupsression burs)

8. Gross interremispharic aoynchrondasymmeiny
id oi und atv
immature fc

sleep states
cesse dscontinuty
cal abrormaliio
1, 2, excessive frontal Soning,
‘exomsive frontal or muliccal sharp lor CA, eos

mie acsvties, ete

pe

A sb

mas MA ar Ww À Man
SH PERTE tn ANSE BONN N AS e
reat A à er, WA
nu San Pele SR rave sash aa

at AA Ve IM

no ET ENTER Maitre) ae sh
ou ad PA VV Sette PA sii
cos eta Vea M je AN

as Mn nn nt a gen) Noe gue ge
Th MAL rt io o a A nl
as AA Ann ten than o
vss fes Ver MA ra an rs Ni
Ts Ne nt
HH Lane hier nt oi er ir]
OA Nr AA AN mn

os Ral Pen A y A na puni Ar

eee dhe areas darren seus ii cen
AU
Ps AA here nd cm A a ac a ina
A e ti ri dr
A e ern ci pe iii

ker ofa seizure focus is the spike or sharp wave. The distinction between

these two patterns has no etiologic significance, the only difference being one of EEG
pattern

o, while

used interchangeably.

Ip surface, These

spheres but most

spikes, an EEG is finding does not exclude a diagnosis of
epilepsy. Often, repeated EEG recordings or prolonged EEG

demonstrate the epileptiform pattern,

€ clinical seizures. Frontal spikes or sharp waves are more
likely to be associated with mass lesions such as neoplasms, traumatic lesions, or congenital
cerebral malforma

Centrotemporal or rolandic sharp waves are offen a marker for a particular epilepsy
syndrome of ch as benign rolandic epilepsy or benign focal epilepsy of

n which a child, typically aged 4
tor seizures in the mouth or face
ized seizures; typically, these seizures are
The EEG pa re is often a
in the centrotemporal r
attern of EEG polarity is virt

Epileptiform EEG patterns are seen less commonly in the occipital, central, or parietal
regions. Occipital spikes typically are seen in young children and may or may not be
assoc cal seizures. Discharges in e dicate the
presence of parti

In childhood, the occurrence of central-midtemporal (also parietal) spikes is associated
with over seizures in only 50-70% of the cases; this pertains mainly to the age from 3-12
x. In occipital spikes (mainly age 3-5 yr), the epileptogenicity is even lower
a (such as seen in benign Rolandic epilepsy) is seen, in
{synchronous bursts of spikes or
pike waves. In most children, the abnormalities disappear on follow up EGG studies and
the minority de rt clinical s
Both generalized synchronous (spike wave, polyspike wave) and Rolandic (centroparicto-
midtemporal) spikes in nonepileptic children suggest a genetic predisposition if no
elicit and no history of insult to the CNS are present.
In children, focal epileptiform discharges arising from the temporal region have the
greatest incidence of clinical seizures, ranging from 85 to 95 percent. T
incidence (70 to 75 percent is associated with frontal discharges. The central, parietal
and occipital regions have the lowest incidence of seizures related to epileptiform

When applied in the appropriate clinical setting, the EEG is useful in classifying the
scizure type, predicting the long-term outcome, and choosing the appropriate antiepileptic

medication
EEG has not proven to be a reliable 1001 in predicting whether a patients antiepileptic
medication can be di «1. The decision to discontinue an antiepileptic medication
in a patient with a seizure disorder should be based on the type, etiology and response 10
medications ofthe seizures and not on inerictal EEG findings.

NUMBER OF stoke [NEOPLASM

PATIENTS.

psy

[ASSOCIATED]
Iseızures

TI

ee

in

RE Dr Deer AA
E zz
Di

WA