The problem of scientific nature of philosophy.pptx

Jjj

1. The problem of scientific nature of philosophy

2. The problem of the scientific nature of philosophy centers on whether philosophy can be considered a science like physics or mathematics, or if it's a distinct intellectual activity

3. Arguments for Philosophy as a Science Philosophy has a systematic structure: it develops concepts, categories, and theories. It relies on logical reasoning and internal consistency, similar to mathematics. Some branches of philosophy (logic, epistemology, philosophy of science) are very close to scientific methodology. Philosophy historically gave birth to sciences (astronomy, physics, psychology, sociology).

4. Arguments Against Philosophy as a Science Philosophy does not have empirical verification in the same sense as natural sciences. Philosophical problems often remain unsolved for centuries, while sciences progress and accumulate concrete results. Philosophical theories are often pluralistic-different schools give different answers to the same question, unlike in science where consensus can usually be reached.

5. In a modern view, philosophy functions as a metascience that critically examines the underlying principles, practices, and philosophical assumptions of science, rather than being a science itself in the traditional empirical sense. This disciplinary distinction highlights philosophy's role in providing a higher-level, reflective understanding of scientific knowledge and its limitations, exploring its epistemological foundations, methodological implications, and metaphysical commitments.

6. Philosophy's "scientific nature" is problematic because it uses rational, systematic methods but differs from experimental science by relying on a priori knowledge, necessary truths, and conceptual clarification rather than empirical data and measurement