Thinking Styles, Negotiation and Conflict Management.pptx

Thinking Styles, Negotiation and Conflict Management

1. THINKING STYLES, NEGOTIATION, AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT PRESENTED BY

2. Individual Thinking Styles Results Thinking Style Average Score Category Preferred? (Yes/No) Legislative 6 Very High YES Executive 4.9 High Middle YES Judicial 5.4 High YES Hierarchic 5.0 High Middle YES Anarchic 5.4 High YES Internal 4.6 High YES External 3.6 Low NO Liberal 4.5 Low Middle NO Conservative 3.5 Low Middle NO

3. High Legislative Thinking Tendency I got the highest score in legislative thinking style category which highlights strong legislative tendencies inside me. The legislatively minded student prefers work, projects, and scenarios that need the formation, formulation, and planning of concepts, strategies, and products, among other things. Rather than being told what to do and how to accomplish it, this type of person prefers to make their own decisions. The anarchic person prefers jobs, initiatives, and situations that allow for enormous flexibility in methods and the ability to attempt anything when, where, and the way he or she amuses.

4. Thinking Approach at Workplace Legislative reasoning is an important soft skill in the business. After all, legislative reasoning helps people solve challenges and cultivate tactics that help them execute better at work. As a result, organizations may seek workers with good legislative thinking aptitudes. Hierarchical structures offer employees options for advancement and advancement, which can inspire motivation and performance well and enhance job satisfaction. The judicial approach in the workplace is to guarantee the reign of law and legal security for employees. Administration and other forms of exercise of jurisdiction must be consistent and predictable as well as held to a high level.

5. Anarchic & Judicial Thinking Capability Anarchic thinking is sometimes referred to as overarching theoretical thinking, although it is actually the thinking that has “renounced the pretension to a binding theology.” To break the grip of specularity, recurrence, sameness, and univocity, we must do more than simply fight patriarchal thought on its own terms (though that strategy has its place). The authority of the administration to pass new regulation and recommend legitimate revisions stabilizes the judiciary's power. Legislators may also have the supremacy to confirm, appoint, or indict members of the jurisdictive branch.

6. Hierarchical System There's always someone higher up the ladder, whether it be a Fortune 500 firm, a three-generation family, or the military. Even modern flat businesses require some form of structure to function properly. I possess strong hierarchical thinking capacity. It is frequently used in the workplace to determine how to more efficiently motivate workers and ensure their needs are met. The hierarchy is occasionally portrayed as a pyramid to symbolize the obligation to complete the lower heights before moving up to the succeeding level. Without accomplishment on the level lower down the hierarchy, a person will be inept to grow because they will be deficient in ambition.

7. Internal Thinking My internal thinking tendency was also estimated to be good. Your 'internal dialogue' is nothing more than your notions. The small vocal sound in your head interprets on your life, whether it's what is going on all around you or what you're discerning explicitly or sub-consciously. If you are prone to anxiety, your internal conversation can amplify it. Some experts believe that anxiety might disrupt your mental conversation, producing a vicious cycle.

8. Future Career & Impact of Thinking Styles Legislation comes up in almost every career you want to pursue. As I am aiming to go in pharmaceutical sales department, legislation comes in handy there too. To ensure that patients receive pharmaceuticals of the required excellence, which have been observed and appraised for effectiveness and safety for their envisioned purpose, pharmaceutical legislation is required. Policies and rules are intended to be utilized in tandem to achieve their goals. In my career, this thinking style can help me achieve the required position and objectives. Other employees in the industry may possess different thinking styles. It is kind of beneficial as you come up with variety of skills and staff who can think out of the box. Every thinking style comes up with its pros. So, cooperation becomes a lot easier and the business can grow faster. I have also been working in a childcare center. Children learn what they see. A child's thinking style can impact how he prefers to study.

9. Is Thinking Style really important? Thinking styles are significant because if thinking variations are not addressed and spoken, communication and teamwork can be challenging. - as when I speak in parallel lines and you speak in spirals. To the contrary, the whole-brain approach strongly backs up the belief that both left-brain as well as right-brain thinking patterns are equally valid and beneficial. Both must be fostered at all levels of a company. Indeed, Harvard Business School study has shown that the higher you go in a company, the more vital it is to integrate right-brain perception with left-brain rationality.

10. External Thinking vs Internal Thinking External Internal Brainstorming workshops are your preferred meeting type since they allow you to go through your ideas. When you are anxious, you tend to discuss your emotions and thoughts in order to work things out. Even when no one is nearby, you may find yourself speaking aloud. You need time alone with your thoughts. Prefer to have time to organize your thoughts before a meeting. You would rather go for a solo walk to clear your mind than have a long talk with a trustworthy friend or colleague.

11. Scope of Thinking Style (Internal) The internal individual prefers tasks, initiatives, and situations that necessitate actions that enable one to function independently of others. This person would rather work alone, is normally introverted, and feels awkward in groups. Students are divided into External and Internal reasoning style groups based on the Scope of Thinking Styles. My scope was classified as internal. Internal thinkers process nearly anything in their own minds. They have their own secret dialogue in which they iron out all the intricacies before speaking. As a result, they are frequently slow to reply. External intellectuals discuss their ideas.

12. Negotiation and Thinking Style The worth of negotiation cannot be underlined. Negotiation is the fundamental to progressing in the job, settling discrepancies, and adding value to treaties. When disagreements arise in proficient or personal associations, it is enticing to avoid encounter in order to save the affiliation. Legislative thinking helps in negotiating whether at workplace or anywhere else. Nevertheless, unfriendly disagreements can be turned into fruitful dialogues while upholding good ties. The value of haggling skills in these situations cannot be exaggerated. Even the most seasoned negotiators may find it difficult to write a contract that not only encompasses the negotiated settlement but also integrates future elements such as the commercial relationship and the longevity of the agreement. As an internal thinker, you can think out of the box sitting independently. You can relate with things happening in the surroundings. Being introverted gives you time and space to comprehend with the situation swiftly. This helps in building your stance. Once your stance is build, negotiation becomes easy too.

13. References ALUAŞ, M., 2016. Ethical and legal considerations of healthcare informatics.  Applied Medical Informatics ,  38 (3-4), pp.91-98. Zhang, L.F. and Huang, J., 2001. Thinking styles and the five‐factor model of personality.  European Journal of Personality ,  15 (6), pp.465-476. Zhang, L.F., 2002. Thinking styles: Their relationships with modes of thinking and academic performance.  Educational psychology ,  22 (3), pp.331-348. Cudworth, E. and Hobden , S., 2010. Anarchy and anarchism: towards a theory of complex international systems.  Millennium ,  39 (2), pp.399-416. Zhang, L.F. and Higgins, P., 2008. The predictive power of socialization variables for thinking styles among adults in the workplace.  Learning and Individual Differences ,  18 (1), pp.11-18. Saini, G., Shabnam, Seema and Bhatnagar, V., 2022. The Pattern of Executive Professionals’ Thinking Styles in Relation to cognitive Styles and Metacognition Skills.  Cogent Psychology ,  9 (1), p.2068741.