This presentation includes brief introduction how the automobile take decision using reinforcement learning algorithms

Autonomous Driving Decision making Strategy using deep Reinforcement learning

1. DEEN DAYAL UPADHYAYA GORAKHPUR UNIVERSITY PRESENTED BY : SADANAND SINGH Autonomous Driving Decision-making Strategies Using Deep Reinforcement Learning

2. Content: Autonomous Driving Decision-making Strategies Using Deep Reinforcement Learning Introduction Autonomous Driving Systems Overview Traditional Rule-Based Systems Introduction to Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) Deep Q-Network (DQN) Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) The Reward Function Experimental Setup Results and Analysis Visual Results Conclusion and Future Work

3. Autonomous Driving Decision-making Strategies Using Deep Reinforcement Learning This presentation explores the application of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) in autonomous driving decision-making. We will delve into the complexities of autonomous driving, the limitations of traditional rule-based systems, and the benefits of DRL in tackling these challenges. We will analyze the performance of two popular DRL algorithms – Deep Q-Network (DQN) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) – and compare their effectiveness against traditional methods. SOURCE: Springerlink.com Image ADD: https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42154-020-00113-1/MediaObjects/42154_2020_113_Fig1_HTML.png

4. Introduction 1 Autonomous Driving: A Definition Autonomous driving refers to the capability of a vehicle to navigate and operate without human intervention, relying on a suite of sensors, algorithms, and control systems to make real-time decisions. 2 Decision-Making: The Core of Autonomy Decision-making is paramount in autonomous driving, as it governs the vehicle's actions in response to the dynamic and often unpredictable environment. Effective decision-making strategies are crucial for ensuring safe, lawful, and efficient operation. 3 Addressing Traffic Complexity Modern traffic scenarios are inherently complex, involving diverse traffic participants, changing road conditions, and potential unexpected events. Autonomous driving systems need to handle this complexity with robust and adaptable decision-making capabilities. 4 Traditional Methods: Their Limitations Traditional rule-based systems, often reliant on predefined rules and heuristics, struggle to adapt to the ever-changing dynamics of real-world scenarios. They lack the flexibility and learning ability required for optimal decision-making in complex environments.

5. Autonomous Driving Systems Overview Environmental Perception The foundation of autonomous driving lies in understanding the environment. Sensors such as lidar, radar, and cameras capture data about the surroundings, providing information on obstacles, traffic participants, and road conditions. Map Positioning and Trajectory Planning To navigate effectively, autonomous vehicles need precise localization and trajectory planning. By combining sensor data with high-definition maps, the system calculates the vehicle's position and determines the optimal path to follow. Control Execution The control system translates the decision-making output into physical actions. It manages the vehicle's dynamics, including steering, acceleration, and braking, to ensure safe and efficient movement.

6. Traditional Rule-Based Systems The Rule-Based Approach Traditional rule-based systems operate on a set of predefined rules and behaviors. These rules specify how the vehicle should react to different situations, such as stopping at red lights, yielding to pedestrians, and maintaining a safe distance. Limitations of Predefined Rules The limitations of rule-based systems lie in their inability to handle unexpected situations or adapt to unforeseen circumstances. They cannot learn from experience or generalize their knowledge to novel scenarios. Challenges in Handling Unexpected Participants For example, a rule-based system might struggle to handle unexpected behavior from other road users, such as a sudden lane change or a pedestrian jaywalking. These situations require flexible and adaptive decision-making capabilities that go beyond predefined rules.

7. Introduction to Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) 1 Definition: Learning from Interactions Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is a powerful machine learning technique that allows autonomous systems to learn from their interactions with the environment. By experimenting with different actions and receiving feedback in the form of rewards or penalties, DRL algorithms optimize their decision-making strategies. 2 Benefits of DRL in Autonomous Driving DRL offers several benefits for autonomous driving. It enables systems to learn complex patterns and adapt to dynamic environments, improving decision-making in challenging and unpredictable situations. DRL also allows for continuous improvement through experience and feedback, enhancing the system's performance over time. 3 DRL Models: DQN and PPO Two prominent DRL models, Deep Q-Network (DQN) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), are widely used in autonomous driving. Both algorithms leverage deep neural networks to learn optimal policies for navigating the complex and uncertain environment.

8. Deep Q-Network (DQN) Mechanism: Action-Value Function Approximation DQN uses a deep neural network to approximate the action-value function, Q(s, a), which estimates the expected long-term reward for taking action 'a' in state 's'. This function helps the algorithm select the optimal action that maximizes the cumulative reward. Features: Experience Replay and Target Networks DQN incorporates techniques like experience replay and target networks to improve stability and learning efficiency. Experience replay stores past interactions and randomly samples them for training, reducing correlation and improving generalization. Target networks provide a stable target for the Q-network updates, preventing oscillations and instability during learning. Strengths: Maximizing Long-Term Performance DQN is known for its ability to maximize long-term performance, considering the cumulative reward over a sequence of actions. By optimizing the action-value function, DQN learns to select actions that lead to the most favorable outcomes in the long run.

9. Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) Mechanism Optimizes the policy function for improved decision-making. The policy function determines the probability of taking a specific action in a given state. Features PPO uses a clipped objective function to prevent large policy updates, ensuring stability and reducing the risk of divergence. It also employs generalized advantage estimation (GAE) to efficiently compute the advantage of taking an action, considering the future rewards. Strengths PPO provides stable and reliable updates, making it suitable for complex environments. It balances exploration and exploitation, allowing the algorithm to learn new strategies while still maintaining a good level of performance. Source: Superagi.com

10. The Reward Function Safety Rewards Safety is paramount in autonomous driving. The reward function should heavily penalize risky actions that could lead to collisions or dangerous situations, encouraging the system to prioritize safety and avoid potential hazards. Comfort Rewards A comfortable driving experience is desirable. The reward function should minimize harsh braking, sudden accelerations, and abrupt maneuvers, promoting a smooth and pleasant ride for passengers. This ensures a more enjoyable and user-friendly experience. Efficiency Rewards Efficiency, including minimizing fuel consumption and optimizing speed, is another important consideration. The reward function should incentivize the system to drive efficiently, minimizing energy usage and maximizing fuel economy. Balanced Design: A Multifaceted Approach The reward function should strike a balance between safety, comfort, and efficiency. This requires careful weighting of different aspects, ensuring that the system prioritizes safety while also considering comfort and efficiency.

11. Experimental Setup To evaluate the performance of DRL algorithms, researchers use simulated environments that replicate real-world driving scenarios. These simulations allow for controlled experiments and efficient training of the models. Environment HighwayEnv Simulator DQN Settings Learning Rate: 0.001, Discount Factor: 0.99, Batch Size: 64 PPO Settings Two Fully Connected Layers, Learning Rates: 0.0003/0.001 Training Process 2048 Steps per Update, Optimized Over 10 Iterations

12. Results and Analysis After training, the performance of the DRL models (DQN and PPO) is evaluated in the simulated environment, comparing their performance to traditional rule-based systems. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of DRL in handling dynamic traffic scenarios and achieving superior performance. 1 DQN Performance The DQN model demonstrated a significant improvement in average return over the training rounds. The average return represents the cumulative reward received by the vehicle for each driving episode, indicating its overall performance in navigating the simulated environment. 2 PPO Performance PPO exhibited more stable decision-making behavior compared to DQN. This stability is attributed to its clipping mechanism, which prevents large updates to the policy and ensures more gradual and controlled learning. This leads to a more reliable and predictable performance in handling dynamic situations. 3 Comparison Both DQN and PPO consistently outperformed traditional rule-based systems in the simulations. Their ability to learn from experience and adapt to changing conditions enabled them to navigate complex traffic scenarios more effectively and achieve higher performance metrics, highlighting the advantages of DRL in autonomous driving.

13. Visual Results Visualizations of the vehicle's behavior during the simulations provide further insights into the effectiveness of the DRL models. These visualizations show how the DRL models navigate the highway scene, respond to other vehicles, and make lane changes or merge decisions based on their learned strategies. Path Visualization The visualized paths of the vehicle showcase the vehicle's lane changing and merging behavior. It demonstrates how the DRL models (DQN and PPO) identify opportunities for efficient lane changes and smoothly merge into traffic, based on their understanding of the environment and the surrounding vehicles. This behavior is consistent with safe and efficient driving practices. Failure Rate The failure rate of the DRL models is significantly lower compared to traditional rule-based systems. This is attributed to the DRL models' ability to adapt to unforeseen circumstances and avoid collisions. The simulations also show that DRL models achieve shorter durations for completing a given driving task, indicating their efficiency in navigating complex environments.

14. Conclusion and Future Work The research presented in this presentation demonstrates the effectiveness of DRL in enhancing autonomous driving decision-making. DRL models like DQN and PPO provide a significant improvement in performance and adaptability compared to traditional rule-based systems. 1 Summary The results demonstrate that DRL models effectively enhance autonomous driving decision-making in dynamic traffic scenarios. They learn from experience, adapt to unforeseen circumstances, and outperform traditional rule-based systems in terms of performance and reliability. 2 Potential for Real-World Application The successful application of DRL in simulated environments opens up possibilities for real-world implementations. DRL-based systems can create more robust, adaptable, and reliable autonomous driving systems that can handle the complexities of real-world traffic conditions and provide safer and more efficient transportation solutions. 3 Future Directions Future research focuses on further refining DRL models and reward functions for autonomous driving. This involves exploring new architectures, incorporating additional features, and designing more sophisticated reward structures that better capture the complex objectives of autonomous driving, such as safety, efficiency, and passenger comfort.

15. References Li, G., et al. "Decision making of autonomous vehicles in lane change scenarios: Deep reinforcement learning approaches with risk awareness." Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (2022): 103452.2. Mirchevska, B., et al. "High-level decision making for safe and reasonable autonomous lane changing using reinforcement learning." IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2018): 2156-2162 Zhu, Z., & Zhao, H. "A survey of deep RL and IL for autonomous driving policy learning." IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2021): 14043-14065 .

16. THANK YOU