pt,.,times,,
etther
_omitting
.
.
euerything,,
befuern
hnftoni,t,,<r,nd
Teaching.,'
or
in
the
foyn
"make"
disc{ples
of
oil
,;;;;';
in
mg
1ayerl,,
the
lyty
loym
being
the,more
freqlrint".,6eyihediatd
Religion
and
Erhics).
obviously'
Eusebius
did
not
recognize
the
current
form
of
Maflhew
z8:r9.
^Instead
of
quoting
the
phraie,
..in
the
name
of
the
f,utt
"r,
ura
of
the
Son,
and
of
the
{o]V
Slirit,,,he
most
often
used
thl
ptru.",
,.i"
My
Name,"
which
would
agree
with
ail
other
accounts
oriupiir-
i"
the
New
Testament.
The
'Encyclopedia
of
Religion
and
Ethics,,
p.
3go,
further
reveals
that
Justin
Martlr,
anothei
church
father,
*as
al-so
po..ibly
igrrorurt
of
the
present
form
of
Matthew
zg:19.
!-Jvstii.:.'tuIglfur
Aaole.+,1.a,rsAiry
91
Ue*;6,,,is.i:,piAOS;:qy,,thi
neqa-ss!,fg.,af-;repdneratioi;,bntfatLs
I;
B,upon''ahu,u.$e'if
iitdii,ana,
sposioltu
tradirioi
io
|yffi'thi
yra,
^i{6crprrr*i"i
iW,.*4af
the
triune
formula..This
iertainry
suggists'that
Justin
dii
not
kftow:'ih{tfeditioialtext
of
Mattt
Au
zditqr'
,
.r,.',r.,,:
.,.,..,
.'.,,:
The
second
passage
in
question
is:
"For
there
are
three
that
bear
record
in
heaven,
the
Father,
the
Word,
and
the
Holy
Ghost:
and
these
tn
i"
iri
ii:'
(t
John
S:Z
_
KJV)
Most
biblical
scholars
will
admit
that
1
John
5:7
was
a
later
addition
to
the
New
Testament.
In
other
words,
this
fassag"
i.
"oi
io""a
i"
the
oldest
Greek
New
Covenant
manuscripts.
Ngte
the
following
on
r
John
5:7:
"During
the
controuersy
of
yhg
4th
cent.
ouer
the
doctrine
of
the
'\1yiE
1
t1t4,
W.
*.as'.
oxb,erldea
-.
f*i
in
.,11ain,,ea:,,igor.,'on
i{,
tfran,
'taken,jn,;y!,,v&',":,.W.rha.
eirr'on:''rtii.ii].ara,ttiii,,tiiir,t
brar,
record
in
heauen,
the.
F.at!rcr,
the
Word,
and
the
HrtA-Siiit,
""a
:these,,;|ihlgg.,,tre.a:oie;t;,A,fei:,
,Grieitriiu"irscr",prc"r'd
in.ma,
::addirion.:'H.itnaa
if
rd
two;:
rhe,,
nii
attiadiriGiirat,
ed!:,&ns
an
d
:
tr,Ansiati
o
n.s,
of
,
the
lttr!,
inauai6t,6j;',,,.:
iiit;thu
,,inrerpqilation,,
cb.f
@
na
:parca*'
in
fu:e'
ie"t,iid,
misi'liiiuot,,.
ma.nuscripts
or
in
the
earty
cfu{ghfathers"
ehe
tnterpiiiei;i
or"-
.,falumo
C6;nmNararyin,lfu]Bj,bier,i
eon,ii;h;.g,L;i4r,.].:..,:
.
The
Jerusalem
Bible
note
on
r
John
5:7-B
says:
There
should
be
no
question
regarding
the
faulty
rendering
of
r
John
S:7-8.
Historically,
along
with
modern
scholarship,
it
is
freely
admitted
that
this
passage
is
a
later
addition
to
the
original
New
Testament
manuscripts.
This
passage,
along
with
Matthew
z9:tg,
cannot
be
used
to
establish
the
doctrine
of
the
Trinity.
Aside
from
these
two
questionable
texts,
let
us
examine
why
certain
words
were
translated
as
they
were,
leading
some
to
infer
that
the
Spirit
is
a
conscious,
individual
being.
TTY
IS
THE
SPIRIT
REFERRED
TO
AS
'fIE'
IN
THE
RENEWED
COVENANT?
This
problem
arises
from
the
mistaken
assumption
that
the
New
Testament
was
uritten
in
Greek.
It
can
be
shourn
that
this
is
definitely
not
the
case,
and
that
most,
if
not
all
the
Renewed
Covenant
was
originally
written
in
Hebrew
and
Aramaic
(see
chapter:
WAS
THE
NEW
TESTAMENT
WRITTEN
IN
GREEK).
This
is
important
because
of
the
fact
that
the
Hebrew
language
has
no
'it'
or
neuter
gender;
therefore
all
nouns
are
either
masculine
or
feminine.
e.g.
"And
he
made
the
uessels
which
u)ere
upon
the
table,
his
dishes,
and
his
spoons,
and
his
bowls,
and
his
couers
to
couer
taithal,
of
pure
gold."
(Exodus
3z:16.
-
KJV)
This
text
describing
the
utensils
of
the
table
in
the
Tabernacle
ought
to
read:
"And.
he
mad.e
the
ufensils
which
were
on
the
table,
its
dishes,
and
its
cups,
onri
its
bouls,
and
its
jars
for
pouring,
of
clean
gotd."
(Exodus
37:
16.
HalleluYah
Scriptures)
Because
the
Renewed
Covenant
was
originally
written
in
Hebrew
and
Aramaic,
that
explains
why
the
Rualr
ha'Qodesh
is
referred
to
by
the
masculine
pronoun
"he"
and
"him"
and
not
"it"
(John
t4:t7;
t5:.26;
16:13).
Paul,
a
Hebrew,
also
would
have
unitten
in
Hebrew
to
the
Hebrew-speaking
Jewish
believers
in
distant
places
like
Rome
and
Galatia
and
his
letters
therefore
reflect
the
same
use
of
the
masculine
pronoun.CONCLUSIONFrom
the
Word
of
Yahweh
supported
by
Scriptural
scholarship,
the
error
of
the
Trinity
is
exposed.
It
is
freely
admitted
through
historical
and
present
scholarship
that
the
Trinity
was
unheard
of
during
the
time
of
the
Apostles,
but
was
not
till
over
three
hundred
years
later
that
it
became
established.
This
occurred
at
a
time
when
ChristianiW
v\Wq,tqUtii,:?;B,.read,as,/o'ilo*ilthere,are,thrdeiafta)-
.+L'i
i7;iL*;.
LL
-.
irt.:.-
,r
-,
.'
r.
.,,.i.,
y.
alg,
:
d,,
rhe,,e,*1lg,
rra.yqlgryg*s,
o,,
rh
tL
it
:
WS
il;i;
ii;6
;;
itse$)
aieprutbablg:agloss.f&q{
hascreptinto,the1ert:t*,
'
,
,
,,,"
,
-
9o
I
97