Virtual Screening
and
Hit Prioritization
Dr. PuneetKacker
Amity University Uttar [email protected]
Drug Discovery Process
http://www.lonza.com
What Medicinal Chemists Want?
Experiment Identification Binding
The Experimental Method
High-throughput screening (HTS)
ExpensiveTime ConsumingSkill Intensive
Why Computational Methods?
Accuracy as good as experimental (not
always!)
Can provide insights at molecular level
Fast
Easy to access
Can easily be automated
Economical
Computational Limitations
It only can simulate real conditions if
programmed
Larger systems are less accurate then
smaller systems
Need to be experimentally tested for
accuracy.
Does not look at the whole picture
VLS: alternative of HTS
V
L
S
Millions of Compounds
Few Potential Binders
The Detailed VLS Process
Select a Target
Select a Compound Library
Prepare Target
Prepare Ligandset
Select a Docking Engine
Analyze the Results
Target Selection
Take one Disease
Search Therapeutic
Targets known for
that particular
disease
1 2
LigandPreparation and VLS
Filters
Preparation
Assign charges
Generate possible Tautomersand
Stereoisomers(LigPrep)
Assign right protonation states
Filters
Physico- Chemical Filters (Lipinski Rule of
Five)
Similarity- based filters (take only diverse set
of compounds)
ArgusLabProcedure
Defining a Binding Site
Defining a Ligand
Running Docking Simulation
Pose Energy
1
2
3
4
Challenges
Receptor Flexibility can
be tackled effectively by
exploiting Multiple diverse
Conformations of proteins
Multiple ways to
construct the ensemble:
Multiple crystal entries
Snapshots taken from MD
simulations
Figure: Hong and Tang, Biochemistry, Vol. 43, No. 16, 2004
Checking the Novelty
Scifinder
Writing Manuscript/Report
Stand on the shoulders of giants
Take suggestions and ideas from experts
(poster presentation)
Check Consistency
Select an appropriate journal
“Copyright” does not mean “right to copy ”
(Check plagiarized material)
Reading Material
Journals Publishing Papers on
VLS
IF: 4.67IF: 1.79 IF:3.15 IF:5.25