Writing the Review of Related Literature.pptx

virgiereyvalenzuela 18 views 26 slides Feb 26, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 26
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26

About This Presentation

grade 11


Slide Content

Writing the Review of Related Literature

Research Process The R esearch Problem Formulation of research objectives Review of Related Literature Delimitation of Research Problem Formulation of testable Hypothesis Identification of Research Variables Construction of Research Design

Designing tools for Data Collection Designing Plan for Data Analysis Collection of Data Data Processing Data Analysis and Interpretation Drawing Conclusions and Recommendations Writing of Research Report Reporting of Research findings

Related Literature Composed of discussions of facts and principles to which the present study is related. Materials which are usually printed and found in books, encyclopedias, professional journals, magazines, newspapers, and other publications.

IMPORTANCE, PURPOSES, AND FUNCTIONS OF RELATED LITERATURE

1.It helps or guides the researcher in searching for or selecting a better research problem or topic 2. It helps the investigator understand his topic or research better. 3. It ensures that there will be no duplication or other studies.

4. It provides the conceptual or theoretical framework o the planned research. 5. It gives the researcher a feeling of confidence . 6. It provides information about the research methods used 7. It provides findings and conclusions of past investigations.

Characters of Related Literature Materials

1. The surveyed materials must be as recent as possible. 2. Materials reviewed must be objective and unbiased. 3. Materials surveyed must be relevant to the study.

4. Surveyed materials must have been based upon genuinely original and true facts or data to make them valid and reliable.

HOW TO CONDUCT THE REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Visit the school library or other libraries in the vicinity. Browse over books, magazines, journals, etc. be patient. Do a computer- aided search through an electronic database. - Google scholar - Website of journals; Botanicus Ask for reprints from experts

Take down notes on index card or research notebook. Begin organizing your notes by devising sections and headings such as: General Information Methods in other studies Support for Objectives 1 and 2. Results to compare with mine. Pros and cons of controversy.

Write all bibliographic information, i.e., author(s), complete title, publisher, date, and place of publication, and so on PARAPHRASE!

Do the accumulated literature indicate gaps and inconsistencies which you hope to fill? Are the variables adequately described? What data gathering instruments have been used?

4. Are the target and sampling populations presented? 5. Were the hypotheses tested and correctly interpreted? 6. Are the results logical? Are the conclusions and recommendations are data-based?

HOW TO WRITE THE REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Use headings arranged in logical order to indicate main points Avoid too long introduction to your main topic Include information that are directly related and relevant to your topic. A maximum of half-page (double space) must constitute one paragraph

Do not copy in toto the information from your source. No more than 10% of the entire paper is allowed for direct quotation. Give due credit to the real source of your data. Cite the authors at the end of the sentence. How?

Paraphrase using your own words and style the data gathered. Summarize important points from your sources and relate them to your topic. Reinforce your data with selected figures or statistics from your course.

A common problem in writing RRL is that it can turn onto a boring list of ideas in paragraph form.

How to avoid the previous Make subheads (not too many), transitional phrases and unifying ideas to make information flow smoothly.

How to avoid the previous Spice your writing with a variety. Keep your paper alive! Author A find out Author B find out Replace find out with: Demonstrates Presented evidence for Supported Observed Reported Examined Concluded

Early in the 1980’s, author A According to Author A,

What related literatures should be included in this problem? To investigate the histological effects of neem seed kernel extract on mouse testis

General objectives: To investigate the histological effects of neem seed kernel extract on mouse testis Specific Objectives: To identify the changes in testes histology due to neem seed kernel extract (NSKE) exposures. To determine the relationship between neem seed kernel extract (NSKE) and occurrence of abnormal sperm morphology. To provide a feasible physiological basis for the anti-libido property of neem extract.
Tags