"eaten by ants", so it is a moot point whether the system was actually devised by
Jois and Krishnamacharia or whether it is truly a traditional system that had been
lost and that they rediscovered. Ultimately, this doesn't really matter. Because yoga
is a living thing, new systems and styles will come up, older ones will die or be
forgotten. Ashtanga viniyasa is a very powerful system, designed by people who
knew a lot about yoga.
In any case, all teachers of what's known in the west as ashtanga yoga are, directly
or indirectly, students of Krishnamacharya and of Patthabi Jois.
There are in Mysore two Indian teachers, BNS Iyengar and Chechadri, who teach
what they claim is the original Ashtanga Vinyasa system, which differs somewhat
from Patthabi Jois system (the first series is nearly the same, but second series is
quite different) . However, BNS Iyengar studied with Krishnamacharya and Patthabi
Jois (see www.ashtanga.org for more information) and Chechadri is one of his
student, so ultimately, it all comes from the same source.
What do you think about combining Iyengar with ashtanga.
Yoga is a living art, so anyone with a proper understanding of its basis is free to
adapt it to their own needs and call it whatever they want. It has been done before
(Iyengar, Power yoga, Jivamukti yoga, kripalu yoga...). In that particular case, both
styles complements each other well because ashtanga is often too fast and therefore lacks depth, but Iyengar, by discarding the vinyasas system, is sometimes
too static and has lost the connection with the breathing. Also both styles come from
the same source (the teaching of Krishnamacharia), so it works well and has often
been done.
I have been a trained fitness instructor for the past 20 years. I use to practice Yoga
in my 20's and I now have a great interest in it again. I know all about safe body alignment, I'm fairly strong, and I have great flexibility. I take Yoga from a trained
instructor and I read up on it a lot. I have no interest in the meditation, chanting etc..
or the dietary beliefs of the Indian practice. The fitness club I work for teaches
"Functional Yoga". I take my participants through Hatha type movements like
downward dog, upward dog, cat & dog, etc... What do you think of this type of
teaching?
Cindy
Unfortunately, because yoga is so much in fashion, they are many unqualified
instructors, with no interest in the spiritual side of yoga, teaching yoga postures.
Some of them, through a thorough knowledge of anatomy or of other western
systems of exercises, might have a very good understanding of the mechanics of
that they are teaching. However, what they are teaching is not yoga, more like
gymnastic.
While I have no problem with any yoga student showing little or no interest in the
bigger picture and seeing yoga simply as a set of physical exercises to help them stay in shape, I don't believe this is an acceptable attitude once someone starts
teaching. I believe that if it has no spiritual side, it shouldn't be called yoga, even if it
includes postures and exercises borrowed from it, because whatever we have done