YURY_CHEMERKIN_DeepIntel_2013_Conference.pdf

This presentation discusses cloud security compliance and transparency issues. It covers topics like cloud taxonomy, security standards like CSA and NIST, and comparisons between different cloud providers' approaches to compliance.

1. COMPLIANCE AND TRANSPARENCY OF CLOUD
FEATURES vs. SECURITY STANDARDS
YURY CHEMERKIN
DeepIntel2013

2. EXPERIENCED IN :
REVERSE ENGINEERING & AV
SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING & DOCUMENTATION
MOBILE SECURITY AND MDM
CYBER SECURITY & CLOUD SECURITY
COMPLIANCE & TRANSPARENCY
FORENSICS AND SECURITY WRITING
HAKIN9 / PENTEST / EFORENSICS MAGAZINE, GROTECK BUSINESS MEDIA
PARTICIPATION AT CONFERENCES
INFOSECURITYRUSSIA, NULLCON, ATHCON, CONFIDENCE, PHDAYS,
DEFCONMOSCOW, HACTIVITY, HACKFEST
CYBERCRIME FORUM, CYBER INTELLIGENCE EUROPE/INTELLIGENCE-SEC,
ICITST, CTICON (CYBERTIMES), ITA, I-SOCIETY
[ YURY CHEMERKIN ]
www.linkedin.com/in/yurychemerkinhttp://[email protected]

3. I. Opinions & Facts

4. Threats
Privacy
Compliance
Legal
Vendor lock-in
Open source / Open standards
Security
Abuse
IT governance
Ambiguity of terminology
Customization , security solutions
Crypto anarchism
CSA, ISO, PCI, SAS 70
Typically US Location
Platform, Data, Tools Lock-In
Top clouds are not open-source
Physical clouds more secured than Public
Botnets and Malware Infections/Misuse
Depends on organization needs
Reference to wide services, solutions, etc.
Cloud Issues
Known Issues Known Solutions/Opinions

5. TopcloudsarenotOpenSource
OpenStackisAPIscompatiblewithAmazonEC2
andAmazonS3andthusclientapplicationswritten
forAWScanbeusedwithOpenStackwithminimal
portingeffort,whileAzureisnot
Platformlock-in
ThereareImport/Exporttoolstomigratefrom/to
VMware,whileAzuredoesn’thave
DataLock-in
NativeAWSsolutionslinkedwithCiscoroutersto
upload,downloadandtunnelingaswellas3
rd
party
storagelikeSMEStorage(AWS,Azure,Dropbox,
Google,etc.)
ToolsLock-in
Longingforaninter-cloudmanagingtoolsthatare
industrialandbuiltwithcompliance
APIsLock-In
Longing for inter-cloud APIs, however there were
known inter-OS APIs for PC, MDM, Mobiles, etc.
NoTransparency
Weak compliance and transparency due to SAS 70
and NDA relationships between cloud vendor and
third party auditors and experts
Abuse
Abusing is not a new issue and is everywhere
AWS Vulnerability Bulletins as a kind of quick
response and stay tuned
What is about Public Clouds
Some known facts about AWS & Azurein order to issues mentioned above

6. "AllYourCloudsareBelongtous–SecurityAnalysisof
CloudManagementInterfaces",3rdCCSW,October2011
A black box analysis methodology of AWS control
interfaces compromised via the XSS techniques,
HTML injections, MITM
[AWS]::“ReportedSOAPRequestParsingVulnerabilities”
Utilizing the SSL/HTTPS only with certificate
validation and utilizing API access mechanisms
like REST/Query instead of SOAP
Activating access via MFA and creating IAM
accounts limited in access, AWS credentials
rotation enhanced with Key pairs and X.509
Limiting IP access enhanced with API/SDK & IAM
“Themostdangerouscodeintheworld:validatingSSL
certificatesinnon-browsersoftware”,19thACM
ConferenceonComputerandCommunicationsSecurity,
October2012
Incorrect behavior in the SSL certificate validation
mechanisms of AWS SDK for EC2, ELB, and FPS
[AWS]::“ReportedSSLCertificateValidationErrorsinAPI
ToolsandSDKs”
Despite of that, AWS has updated all SDK (for all
services) to redress it
Clouds: Public vs. Private
Known security issues of Public Cloudsand significant researches on it as a POC

7. [AWS]::“XenSecurityAdvisories”
There are known XEN attacks (Blue Pills, etc.)
No one XEN vulnerability was not applied to the
AWS, Azure or SaaS/PaaSservices
Very customized clouds
[CSA]::“CSATheNotoriousNineCloudComputingTop
Threatsin2013”
Replaced a document published in 2009
Such best practices provides a least security
No significant changes since 2009, even examples
TopThreatsExamples
“1.0. Threat: Data Breaches // Cross-VM Side
Channels and Their Use to Extract private Keys”,
“7.0. Threat: Abuse of Cloud Services // Cross-VM
Side Channels and Their Use to Extract private
Keys”
“4.0. Threat: Insecurity Interfaces and APIs”
BesidesofRealityofCSAThreats
1.0 & 7.0 cases highlight how the public clouds
e.g. AWS EC2 are vulnerable
1.0 & 7.0 cases are totally focused on a private
cloud case (VMware and XEN), while there is no a
known way to adopt it to AWS.
4.0 case presents issues raised by a SSO access
not related to public clouds (except Dropbox,
SkyDrive) and addressed to insecurity of APIs.
Clouds: Public vs. Private
It is generally known, that private clouds are most secureThere is no a POC to prove a statement on public clouds

8. II. CSA Framework

9. •Compliance
Model
•Enhanced
Security
Model
•Basic
Security
Model
•Cloud
Model
Cloud
CSA
CAIQ
Mapping
CSA
CMM

12. II. NIST Framework

14. The consolidated framework over all NIST documents
Logically clearly defined documents, e.g.
Categorization systems
Selecting control
FIPS
Forensics
Logging (SCAP)
Etc.
Complementarity
Interchangeability
Expansibility
Dependence
Mapping (NIST, ISO only)
NIST Framework

15. Complementarity
NIST Enhance Control
Your own security control
Interchangeability
Replacing basic controls by enhanced controls
Expansibility
impact or support the implementation of a particular security control or control enhancement
Your own way to improve a framework
Mapping (NIST, ISO only)
NIST->ISO
ISO->NIST
NIST->Common Criteria (rev4 only)
NIST Framework

16. Basic controls aren’t applicable in case of
Information systems need to communicate with other systems across different policy
APT
Insiders Threats
Mobility (mobile location, non-fixed)
Single-User operations
Interchangeability
Replacing basic controls by enhanced controls
Expansibility
impact or support the implementation of a particular security control or control enhancement
Your own way to improve a framework
Mapping (NIST, ISO only)
NIST->ISO
ISO->NIST
NIST->Common Criteria (rev4 only)
NIST Framework
Interchangeability

17. III. Clouds

18. Amazon Web Services
Generally IaaS
+SaaS, PaaS
Microsoft Azure
Generally PaaS
Recent changes –IaaS
BlackBerry Enterprise Service
Separated
Integrated with Office365
SaaS as a MDM solution
Clouds

21. •Office
•Office365
•Cisco/VoIP
•Android, iOS
•Unified
Management
•BlackBerry
4,5,6,7
•BlackBerry
Z10/Q10,
•Playbook
BES 10 BES 5
Office
integration
Unified
Device
Platform

22. IV. Cloud & Compliance Specific

23. There is no one “cloud”
There is no one “standard”
What vision is adopted by cloud vendors?
What vision is adopted by cloud operators
(3
rd
party)?
What is your way to use and manage cloud?
All of that reflected in the
There are many models and architectures
There are many ways to built cloud in
alignment to…
Virtualizing of anything able to be virtualized
Data distribution, service distribution, unified
management
Clear 
compliance requirements
Cloud & Compliance Specific

24. TheGoalisbringingatransparencyofcloudcontrolsand
features,especiallysecuritycontrolsandfeatures
Suchdocumentshaveaclaimtobeup-to-datewith
expert-levelunderstandingofsignificantthreatsand
vulnerabilities
Unifyingrecommendationsforallclouds
Uptonow,itisthe3
rd
revision
Allrecommendationsarelinkedwithotherstandards
PCI DSS, ISO, COBIT
NIST, FEDRAMP
CSA’ own vision how it must be referred
Topknowncloudvendorsannouncedtheyarein
compliancewithit
Someofreportsaregettingoldbynow
Customershavetocontroltheirenvironmentbytheir
needs
Customerswanttoknowwhetheritisincompliancein,
especiallylocalregulationsandhowfar
Customerswanttoknowwhetheritmakescloudsquite
transparencytolettobuildanappropriate
Cloud & Compliance Specific
There is no one “cloud”
There is no one “standard”
There are many models and architectures
There are many ways to built cloud in alignment to…

25. CAIQ/CCMprovidesequivalentofrecommendationsover
severalstandards,CAIQprovidesmoredetailsonsecurity
andprivacybutNISTmorespecific
CSArecommendationsarepurewithtechnicaldetails
It helps vendors not to have their solutions worked
out in details and/or badly documented
It helps them to put a lot of references on 3
rd
party
reviewers under NDA (SOC 1 or SAS 70)
Badideatoletvendorsfillssuchdocuments
They provide fewer public details
They take it to NDA reports
Vendorsgeneralexplanationsmultipliedbygeneral
standardsrecommendationsareextremelyfarawayfrom
transparency
Cloudscallforspecificlevelsofauditlogging,activity
reporting,securitycontrollinganddataretention
It is often not a part of SLA offered by providers
It is outside recommendations
AWSoftenfallsindetailswiththeirarchitecturedocuments
AWSsolutionsareverywelltobeincompliancewithold
standardsandspecificlocalregulations
NIST 800-53, or even Russian security standards
(however the Russian framework is out of cloud
framework)
Cloud & Compliance Specific
Compliance, Transparency, Elaboration

26. Compliance: from Cloud Vendor’s viewpoint
Compliance, Transparency, Elaboration
Description DIFFERENCE(AWS vs. AZURE)
ThirdPartyAudits AsopposedtoAWS,Azuredoesnothaveaclearlydefinedstatementwhethertheircustomersabletoperformtheirown
vulnerabilitytest
InformationSystemRegulatory
Mapping
AWSfallsindetailstocomplyitthatresultsofdifferencesbetweenCAIQandCMM
Handling/Labeling/SecurityPolicyAWSfallsindetailswhatcustomersareallowedtodoandhowexactlywhileAzuredoesnot
RetentionPolicy AWSpointstothecustomers’responsibilitytomanagedata,excludemovingbetweenAvailabilityZonesinsideoneregion;Azure
ensuresonvalidationandprocessingwithit,andindicateaboutdatahistoricalauto-backup
SecureDisposal Notseriously,AWSreliesonDoD5220.22additionallywhileAzuredoesNIST800-88only
InformationLeakage AWSreliesonAMIandEBSservices,whileAzuredoesonIntegritydata
Policy,UserAccess,MFA Nobothhave
BaselineRequirements AWSprovidesmorehighdetailedhow-todocsthanAzure,allowstoimporttrustedVMfromVMware,Azure
Encryption,Encryption Key
Management
AWSoffersencryptionfeaturesforVM,storage,DB,networkswhileAzuredoesforXStore(AzureStorage)
Vulnerability/PatchManagement AWSprovidestheircustomerstoaskfortheirownpentestwhileAzuredoesnot
NondisclosureAgreements,Third
PartyAgreements
AWShighlightsthattheydoesnotleverageany3
rd
partycloudproviderstodeliverAWSservicestothecustomers.Azurepointsto
theprocedures,NDAundergonewithISO
UserIDCredentials BesidestheAD(ActiveDirectory)AWSIAMsolutionarealignmentwithbothCAIQ,CMMrequirementswhileAzureaddressesto
theADtoperformtheseactions
(Non)Production environments,
NetworkSecurity
AWSprovidesmoredetailshow-todocumentstohavingacompliance
Segmentation Besidesvendorfeatures,AWSprovidesquitesimilarmechanisminalignmentCAIQ&CMM,whileAzurepointstofeaturesbuiltin
infrastructureonavendorside
MobileCode AWSpointstheirclientstoberesponsibletomeetsuchrequirements,whileAzurepointstobuildsolutionstrackedformobilecode

27. ConsumerRelationshiponly
Everything except SA-13 “Location-aware technologies may be used to validate connection
authentication integrity based on known equipment location”
VendorRelationshiponly
Requirements include technical and management solutions
ConsumerRelationshipsharedwithVendor
Include non-technical solutions only
Such policies, roles, procedures, training
AllrequirementscoverSaaS,PaaS,IaaScloudtypes
Generalrequirementsonly
Missingdetails(likeDoD)
Compliance: from CSA’s viewpoint
Examination of CSA

28. DataGovernance-InformationLeakage(DG-07).
Security mechanisms shall be implemented to prevent data leakage refer
AC-2 Account Management
AC-3 Access Enforcement
AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
AC-6 Least Privilege (the most correct reference)
AC-11 Session Lock General requirements only
Security mechanisms shall be implemented to prevent data leakagemissed in turn (no references at all)
AC-7 Unsuccessful Login Attempts
AC-8 System Use Notification
AC-9 Previous Logon (Access) Notification
AC-10 Concurrent Session Control
Compliance: from CSA’s viewpoint
Examination of CSA References NIST

29. DataGovernance-InformationLeakage(DG-07).
Security mechanisms shall be implemented to prevent data leakage also refers to ISO
A.10.6.2Security of network services
A.10.6.2 refers to NIST in turn
CA-3 Information System Connections
SA-9 External Information System Services
SC-8 Transmission Integrity
SC-9 Transmission Confidentiality
DG-07 should refer to PE-19 Information Leakage in fact
It could include the NIST requirement “AC-6. Least Privilege” too
A few of them applicable in case of Cloud MDM and should be extended by different toolkit
Compliance: from CSA’s viewpoint
Examination of CSA References ISO

30. DataGovernance
NIST :: access control, media
management, etc.
Ownership / Stewardship
Classification
Handling / Labeling / Security Policy
Retention Policy
Secure Disposal
Non-Production Data
Information Leakage
Risk Assessments
Azure’svision-Distributionofinformation
CSA , ISO is better applicable than NIST
NIST is applicable as a custom controls’ collection
Best way is adopt NIST enhancements with CSA
Need to remap CSA->NIST rev4
Technical / Access Control / Security
Attributes
Attribute Configuration
Permitted Attributes for Specified
InfoSystems
Permitted Values and Ranges for Attributes
Cloud & Compliance Specifics. Example
CSA Cloud :: Azure

31. AccessControl
Account, Session Management
Access / Information Flow Enforcement
Least Privilege, Security Attributes
Remote / Wireless Access
AWS’sVisionisnotDataDistribution
NIST is better applicable than CSA
NIST is applicable as a custom controls’ collection
There are many enhancements to include (rev4)
Dynamic Account Creation
Restrictions on Use of Shared Groups -
Accounts
Group Account Requests
Appovals/Renewals
Account Monitoring -Atypical Usage
e.g. :: log-delivery-write for S3
Cloud & Compliance Specifics. Example
NIST Cloud :: AWS

32. AWS’sVisionisnotDataDistribution,however
CSA::DataGovernanceisapplicablefromthe
resource-basedviewpoint
Resource based policy Attached to
resource
AWS’sVisionisnotDataDistribution,however
NIST::AccessControlisapplicablefromtheuser-
basedviewpoint
Account based policy Attached to users
define that policy for MDM users to
access internal network resources
Combine with a mobile policy
Cloud & Compliance Specifics. Example
CSA / NIST Cloud :: AWS

33. Device diversity
Configuration management
Software Distribution
Device policy compliance & enforcement
Enterprise Activation
Logging
Security Settings
Security Wipe, Lock
IAM
Make you sure to start managing security under
uncertain terms without AI 
Refers to NIST-800-53 and other
Sometimes missed requirements such as
locking device, however it is in NIST-800-53
A bit details than CSA
No statements on permission management
Make you sure to start managing security under
uncertain termswithout AI
COMPLIANCE AND MDM
CSA Mobile Device Management: Key ComponentsNIST-124

34. �=�∪�∪�∪??????, �⊂�, ??????⊆�, ??????⊂??????
�–set of OS permissions, �–set of device permissions, �–set
of MDM permissions, �–set of missed permissions (lack of
controls), ??????–set of rules are explicitly should be applied to gain
a compliance
�=�+�, �⊃�∪�
�–set of APIs , �–set of APIs that interact with sensitive data,
�–set of APIs that do not interact with sensitive data
To get a mobile security designed with full granularity the set�
should be empty set to get �⊇�∪�instead of �⊃�∪�, so
the matter how is it closer to empty. On another hand it should
find out whether assumptions ??????⊆�, ??????⊂??????are true and if it is
possible to get ⊆??????.
Set of permissions < Set of activities efficiency is
typical case < 100%,
ability to control each API = 100%
More than 1 permission per APIs >100%
lack of knowledge about possible attacks
improper granularity
[ DEVICE MANAGEMENT ]
Concurrency over native & additional security featuresThe situation is very serious MDM features
AV, MDM, DLP,
VPN
Non-app features
Permissions
Kernel protection

35. GOALS -MOBILE RESOURCES / AIM OF ATTACK
DEVICE RESOURCES
OUTSIDE-OF-DEVICE RESOURCES
ATTACKS –SET OF ACTIONS UNDER THE THREAT
APIs -RESOURCES WIDELY AVAILABLE TO CODERS
SECURITY FEATURES
KERNEL PROTECTION , NON-APP FEATURES
PERMISSIONS -EXPLICITLY CONFIGURED
3
RD
PARTY
AV, FIREWALL, VPN, MDM
COMPLIANCE -RULES TO DESIGN A MOBILE SECURITY
IN ALIGNMENT WITH COMPLIANCE TO…
[ DEVICE MANAGEMENT ]
APPLICATION LEVEL ATTACK’S VECTORAV, MDM,
DLP, VPN
Goals
Attacks
APIs
APIs
Permissions
Kernel
protection
Non-app
features
MDM features

36. [ BLACKBERRY. PERMISSIONS ]
BB 10 Cascades SDK BB 10 AIR SDK PB (NDK/AIR)
Background processing + +
BlackBerry Messenger - -
Calendar, Contacts + via invoke calls
Camera + +
Device identifying information + +
Email and PIN messages + via invoke calls
GPS location + +
Internet + +
Location + -
Microphone + +
Narrow swipe up - +
Notebooks + -
Notifications + +
Player - +
Phone + -
Push + -
Shared files + +
Text messages + -
Volume - +

37. [ iOS. Settings ]
Component Unit
Restrictions :: Native application
Safari
Camera, FaceTime
iTunes Store, iBookstore
Siri
Manage applications*
Restrictions :: 3
rd
application
Manage applications*
Explicit Language (Siri)
Privacy*, Accounts*
Content Type Restrictions*
Unit subcomponents
Privacy :: Location
Per each 3
rd
party app
For system services
Privacy :: Private Info
Contacts, Calendar, Reminders, Photos
Bluetooth Sharing
Twitter, Facebook
Accounts
Disables changes to Mail, Contacts, Calendars, iCloud, and Twitter accounts
Find My Friends
Volume limit
Content Type Restrictions
Ratings per country and region
Music and podcasts
Movies, Books, Apps, TV shows
In-app purchases
Require Passwords (in-app purchases)
Game Center
Multiplayer Games
Adding Friends (Game Center)
Manage applications
Installing Apps
Removing Apps

38. ACCESS_CHECKIN_PROPERTIES,ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION,
ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION,ACCESS_LOCATION_EXTRA_COMM
ANDS,ACCESS_MOCK_LOCATION,ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE,
ACCESS_SURFACE_FLINGER,ACCESS_WIFI_STATE,ACCOUNT_
MANAGER,ADD_VOICEMAIL,AUTHENTICATE_ACCOUNTS,BAT
TERY_STATS,BIND_ACCESSIBILITY_SERVICE,BIND_APPWIDGET
,BIND_DEVICE_ADMIN,BIND_INPUT_METHOD,BIND_REMOTE
VIEWS,BIND_TEXT_SERVICE,BIND_VPN_SERVICE,BIND_WALL
PAPER,BLUETOOTH,BLUETOOTH_ADMIN,BRICK,BROADCAST_
PACKAGE_REMOVED,BROADCAST_SMS,BROADCAST_STICKY,
BROADCAST_WAP_PUSH,CALL_PHONE,CALL_PRIVILEGED,CA
MERA,CHANGE_COMPONENT_ENABLED_STATE,CHANGE_CO
NFIGURATION,CHANGE_NETWORK_STATE,CHANGE_WIFI_M
ULTICAST_STATE,CHANGE_WIFI_STATE,CLEAR_APP_CACHE,C
LEAR_APP_USER_DATA,CONTROL_LOCATION_UPDATES,DELE
TE_CACHE_FILES,DELETE_PACKAGES,DEVICE_POWER,DIAGN
OSTIC,DISABLE_KEYGUARD,DUMP,EXPAND_STATUS_BAR,FAC
TORY_TEST,FLASHLIGHT,FORCE_BACK,GET_ACCOUNTS,GET_
PACKAGE_SIZE,GET_TASKS,GLOBAL_SEARCH,HARDWARE_TE
ST,INJECT_EVENTS,INSTALL_LOCATION_PROVIDER,INSTALL_P
ACKAGES,INTERNAL_SYSTEM_WINDOW,INTERNET,KILL_BACK
GROUND_PROCESSES,MANAGE_ACCOUNTS,MANAGE_APP_T
OKENS,MASTER_CLEAR,MODIFY_AUDIO_SETTINGS,MODIFY_
PHONE_STATE,MOUNT_FORMAT_FILESYSTEMS,MOUNT_UN
MOUNT_FILESYSTEMS,NFC,PERSISTENT_ACTIVITY,PROCESS_
OUTGOING_CALLS,READ_CALENDAR,READ_CALL_LOG,READ_
CONTACTS,READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE,READ_FRAME_BUFFE
R,READ_HISTORY_BOOKMARKS,READ_INPUT_STATE,READ_L
OGS,READ_PHONE_STATE,READ_PROFILE,READ_SMS,READ_
SOCIAL_STREAM,READ_SYNC_SETTINGS,READ_SYNC_STATS,
READ_USER_DICTIONARY,REBOOT,RECEIVE_BOOT_COMPLET
ED,RECEIVE_MMS,RECEIVE_SMS,RECEIVE_WAP_PUSH,RECO
RD_AUDIO,REORDER_TASKS,RESTART_PACKAGES,SEND_SMS
,SET_ACTIVITY_WATCHER,SET_ALARM,SET_ALWAYS_FINISH,
SET_ANIMATION_SCALE,SET_DEBUG_APP,SET_ORIENTATION
,SET_POINTER_SPEED,SET_PREFERRED_APPLICATIONS,SET_P
ROCESS_LIMIT,SET_TIME,SET_TIME_ZONE,SET_WALLPAPER,S
ET_WALLPAPER_HINTS,SIGNAL_PERSISTENT_PROCESSES,STA
TUS_BAR,SUBSCRIBED_FEEDS_READ,SUBSCRIBED_FEEDS_WR
ITE,SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW,UPDATE_DEVICE_STATS,USE_C
REDENTIALS,USE_SIP,VIBRATE,WAKE_LOCK,WRITE_APN_SET
TINGS,WRITE_CALENDAR,WRITE_CALL_LOG,WRITE_CONTAC
TS,WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE,WRITE_GSERVICES,WRITE_HI
STORY_BOOKMARKS,WRITE_PROFILE,WRITE_SECURE_SETTIN
GS,WRITE_SETTINGS,WRITE_SMS,WRITE_SOCIAL_STREAM,W
RITE_SYNC_SETTINGS,WRITE_USER_DICTIONARY,
[ Android. Permissions ]
List contains ~150 permissionsI have ever seen that on old BlackBerry devices

39. ACCOUNTS
AFFECTS_BATTERY
APP_INFO
AUDIO_SETTINGS
BLUETOOTH_NETWORK
BOOKMARKS
CALENDAR
CAMERA
COST_MONEY
DEVELOPMENT_TOOLS
DEVICE_ALARMS
DISPLAY
HARDWARE_CONTROLS
LOCATION
MESSAGES
MICROPHONE
NETWORK
PERSONAL_INFO
PHONE_CALLS
SCREENLOCK
SOCIAL_INFO
STATUS_BAR
STORAGE
SYNC_SETTINGS
SYSTEM_CLOCK
SYSTEM_TOOLS
USER_DICTIONARY
VOICEMAIL
WALLPAPER
WRITE_USER_DICTIONARY
[ Android. Permission Groups ]
But there only 30 permissions groupsI have ever seen that on old BlackBerry devices too

40. CAMERA AND VIDEO
HIDE THE DEFAULT CAMERA APPLICATION
PASSWORD
DEFINE PASSWORD PROPERTIES
REQUIRE LETTERS (incl. case)
REQUIRE NUMBERS
REQUIRE SPECIAL CHARACTERS
DELETE DATA AND APPLICATIONS FROM THE
DEVICE AFTER
INCORRECT PASSWORD ATTEMPTS
DEVICE PASSWORD
ENABLE AUTO-LOCK
LIMIT PASSWORD AGE
LIMIT PASSWORD HISTORY
RESTRICT PASSWORD LENGTH
MINIMUM LENGTH FOR THE DEVICE
PASSWORD THAT IS ALLOWED
ENCRYPTION
APPLY ENCRYPTION RULES
ENCRYPT INTERNAL DEVICE STORAGE
TOUCHDOWN SUPPORT
MICROSOFT EXCHANGE SYNCHRONIZATION
EMAIL PROFILES
ACTIVESYNC
MDM . Extend your device security capabilities
Android CONTROLLED FOUR GROUPS ONLY

41.  BROWSER
 DEFAULT APP,
 AUTOFILL, COOKIES, JAVASCRIPT, POPUPS
 CAMERA, VIDEO, VIDEO CONF
 OUTPUT, SCREEN CAPTURE, DEFAULT APP
 CERTIFICATES (UNTRUSTED CERTs)
 CLOUD SERVICES
 BACKUP / DOCUMENT / PICTURE / SHARING
 CONNECTIVITY
 NETWORK, WIRELESS, ROAMING
 DATA, VOICE WHEN ROAMING
 CONTENT
 CONTENT (incl. EXPLICIT)
 RATING FOR APPS/ MOVIES / TV SHOWS / REGIONS
 DIAGNOSTICS AND USAGE (SUBMISSION LOGS)
 MESSAGING (DEFAULT APP)
 BACKUP / DOCUMENT PICTURE / SHARING
 ONLINE STORE
 ONLINE STORES , PURCHASES, PASSWORD
 DEFAULT STORE / BOOK / MUSIC APP
 MESSAGING (DEFAULT APP)
 PASSWORD (THE SAME WITH ANDROID, NEW BLACKBERRY DEVICES)
 PHONE AND MESSAGING (VOICE DIALING)
 PROFILE & CERTs (INTERACTIVE INSTALLATION)
 SOCIAL (DEFAULT APP)
 SOCIAL APPS / GAMING / ADDING FRIENDS / MULTI-PLAYER
 DEFAULT SOCIAL-GAMING / SOCIAL-VIDEO APPS
 STORAGE AND BACKUP
 DEVICE BACKUP AND ENCRYPTION
 VOICE ASSISTANT (DEFAULT APP)
MDM . Extend your device security capabilities
iOS CONTROLLED 16 GROUPS ONLY

42.  GENERAL
 MOBILE HOTSPOT AND TETHERING
 PLANS APP, APPWORLD
 PASSWORD (THE SAME WITH ANDROID, iOS)
 BES MANAGEMENT (SMARTPHONES, TABLETS)
 SOFTWARE
 OPEN WORK EMAIL MESSAGES LINKS IN THE PERSONAL BROWSER
 TRANSFER THOUGH WORK PERIMETER TO SAME/ANOTHER DEVICE
 BBM VIDEO ACCESS TO WORK NETWORK
 VIDEO CHAT APP USES ORGANIZATION’S WI-FI/VPN NETWORK
 SECURITY
 WIPE WORK SPACE WITHOUT NETWORK, RESTRICT DEV. MODE
 VOICE CONTROL & DICTATION IN WORK & USER APPS
 BACKUP AND RESTORE (WORK) & DESKTOP SOFTWARE
 PC ACCESS TO WORK & PERSONAL SPACE (USB, BT)
 PERSONAL SPACE DATA ENCRYPTION
 NETWORK ACCESS CONTROL FOR WORK APPS
 PERSONAL APPS ACCESS TO WORK CONTACTS
 SHARE WORK DATA DURING BBM VIDEO SCREEN SHARING
 WORK DOMAINS, WORK NETWORK USAGE FOR PERSONAL APPS
 EMAIL PROFILES
 CERTIFICATES & CIPHERS & S/MIME
 HASH & ENCRYPTION ALGS AND KEY PARAMS
 TASK/MEMO/CALENDAR/CONTACT/DAYS SYNC
 WI-FI PROFILES
 ACCESS POINT, DEFAULT GATEWAY, DHCP, IPV6, SSID, IP ADDRESS
 PROXY PASSWORD/PORT/SERVER/SUBNET MASK
 VPN PROFILES
 PROXY, SCEP, AUTH PROFILE PARAMS
 TOKENS, IKE, IPSEC OTHER PARAMS
 PROXY PORTS, USERNAME, OTHER PARAMS
MDM . Extend your device security capabilities
BlackBerry (new, 10, qnx) CONTROLLED 7 GROUPS ONLY

43. THERE 55 GROUPS CONTROLLED IN ALL
EACH GROUP CONTAINSFROM 10 TO 30 UNITS
ARE CONTROLLED TOO
EACH UNIT IS UNDER A LOT OF FLEXIBLE PARAMs
INSTEADOF A WAY ‘DISABLE/ENABLED &
HIDE/UNHIDE’
EACH EVENT IS
CONTROLLED BY CERTAIN PERMISSION
ALLOWED TO CONTROL BY SIMILAR
PERMISSIONS TO BE MORE FLEXIBLE
DESCRIBED 360 PAGES IN ALL THAT IN FOUR TIME
MORE THAN OTHER DOCUMENTS
EACH UNIT CAN’T CONTROL ACTIVITY UNDER
ITSELF
‘CREATE, READ, WRITE/SAVE, SEND,
DELETE’ ACTIONS IN REGARDS TO
MESSAGES LEAD TO SPOOFING BY
REQUESTING A ‘MESSAGE’ PERMISSION
ONLY
SOME PERMISSIONS AREN’T REQUIRED (TO
DELETE ANY OTHER APP)
SOME PERMISSIONS ARE RELATED TO APP,
WHICH 3
RD
PARTY PLUGIN WAS EMBEDDED
IN, INSTEAD OF THAT PLUGIN
MDM . Extend your device security capabilities
Blackberry (old) Huge amount of permissions are MDM & device built-in

44. The best Security & Permissions ruled by AWS
Most cases are not clear in according to the roles
and responsibilities of cloud vendors & customers
May happen swapping responsibilities and shifting
the vendor job on to customer shoulders
Referring to independent audits reports under
NDA as many times as they can
CSA put the cross references to other standards
that impact on complexity & lack of clarity more
than NIST SP800-53
CONCLUSION
Select
Security
Controls
Check
Scope
CSA
Define
Granularity
Apply
CSA as
common
Remap
to NIST
Improve
basic
CSA
NIST
enhanc.
Combine
custom
sets

45. Q & A