Md. Sirajuddwla Vs. The State and Ors. [2016] 1LNJ(HCD)177.

SMAlamgirHossain3 8 views 9 slides Nov 02, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 9
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9

About This Presentation

The case involved Md. Sirajuddula as the accused-petitioner and Eastern Bank as the complainant
in all six cases. The accused had obtained credit facilities from Eastern Bank and, in order to
discharge his loan liability, had provided separate cheques to the bank. When these cheques were
presente...


Slide Content

Md. Sirajuddwla Vs. The State and Ors. [2016] 1LNJ(HCD)177. Prepared by: Prepared for: Mirza Farzana Iqbal Chowdhury \ Assistant Professor Department of Law, Green University of Bangladesh Syed Alamgir Hussain ID: 223011029 Department of Law, Green University of Bangladesh Course title: Law of Criminal Procedure-II Course code: LLBH 311

Facts of the Case Parties:  Md. Sirajuddula (accused) vs Eastern Bank (complainant) Transaction:  Accused obtained credit facilities from Eastern Bank Cheques:  Provided separate cheques to discharge loan liability Dishonour :  All cheques were dishonoured due to insufficient funds Criminal Cases:  Bank filed 6 cases under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Civil Suit:  Simultaneously filed Artha Rin Suit No. 90/2012 for Tk. 39,12,98,043.39 Challenge:  Accused sought quashing under Section 561A, CrPC

Party Arguments

CONSEQUENCES OF ADOPTION

Thank you! If you have any question, you may ask ? Contact: [email protected]