210447564-Final-Ppt-Brand-Valuations.ppt

Brand

1. BRAND VALUATION
PresentedBy:
PradeepChoudhary10
OmkarPalsuledesai44
VijayGopalakrishnan57

2. What is brand valuation ?
Brand valuation is the process used to
calculate the value of brands. Historically,
most of a company’s value was in tangible
assets such as property, stock, machinery or
land. This has now changed and the majority
of most company’s value is in intangible
assets, such as their brand name or names.

3. John Stuart, Chairman of Quaker said in about
1900, "If this business were split up, I would give
you the land and bricks and mortar, and I would
take the brands and trade marks, and I would
fare better than you."

4. Brand Elements
•Brand Name
•Brand Logos and Icons
–Colors
–Symbols
–Music/Earcons
•Celebrities or Personalities
•Advertising slogans and jingles
•Brand Alliances/Secondary Associations
–Co-branding
–Licensing
–Sponsorship
–Event Marketing
–Celebrity Endorsement
–Third-party Endorsements

5. BRAND VALUATION METHODS
These can be broadly classified into:
•Cost based
•Market based
•Economic-use approaches

6. COST BASED METHODS
•Brand Equity Based
on Accumulated
Costs
•Replacement value
•Using Conversion
Models

7. 1.Brand Equity Based on
Accumulated Costs
•Thebasisofthisapproachisthatitaggregatesallthe
historicalmarketingcostsasthevalue.
•Therealdifficultyhereisdeterminingthecorrect
classificationastowhatconstitutesamarketingcost
andwhatdoesnot.
–Bywayofanexample,ifanaccountantspends
twodaysamonthpreparingreportsforthe
marketingdepartment,isthatacostthatcanbe
capitalizedtothebrand?

8. 2. Replacement value method
•Replacement cost is the cost of launching a
new brand is divided by its probability of
success.
•The advantage of this approach is that it is
easy to calculate.
•One problem with this approach is that it
neglects to take into account the success of
established brands
–A brand may be worth a $100 million. However the cost of
launching a brand may be $5 million with a 10% success
rate and it therefore has a value of $50 million

9. 3. Using Conversion Models
•Inthismodelitestimatetheamountof
awarenessthatneedstobegeneratedin
ordertoachievethecurrentlevelofsales.
•Thisapproachwouldbebasedonconversion
models,i.e.,takingthelevelofawareness,
thatinducestrial,thatinducesregular
repurchase.
•Theoutputmaybeusedfortwopurposes:
oneistodeterminethecostofacquiringnew
customersandtheotherwouldbethe
replacementcostofbrandequity

10. MARKET BASED METHOD
•Also known as relative method
•Assumption is that other firms in industry
are comparable to firm being valued
•Standard parameters used like earnings,
profit, book value
•Adjustments made for variances from
standard firms, these can be negative or
positive

11. Applicability
•Simple and easy to
use
•Useful when data of
comparable firms and
assets are available
Limitations
•Easy to misuse
•Selection of
comparable can be
subjective
•Errors in comparable
firms get factored into
valuation model

12. •Comparable Approach
•The Use of Real Options in Brand Valuation
•The Residual Method

13. Comparable Approach
•This approach takes the premium (or some other
measure) that has been paid for similar brands
and applies this to brands that the company
owns.
•The advantage of this approach is that it is based
on what third parties are actually willing to pay
and it is easy to calculate.
•The shortcomings are that there is a lack of
detailed information on the purchase price of
brands and that two brands are seldom alike.

14. The Use of Real Options in Brand
Valuation
•The use of real options has been proposed for
the valuation of brand assets.
•The value of the brand is the value of the
underlying asset, and the cost of developing
the brand is the exercise price.
•This method may be useful in calculating the
potential value of line extensions

15. The Residual Method
•when the market capitalization is subtracted
from the net asset value, is equal to the value
of the "intangibles" one of which is the brand.
•There are two assumptions inherent in this
approach. The first is that the market is
efficient in the strong state (ie that ALL
information is included into the share price)
and the second, is that the assets are being
used to their full potential.

16. Economic-use approaches
•Royalty Relief Method
•Price Premium
•Brand Value based on Future Earnings

17. Royalty Relief Method
The Royalty Relief method is the most popular in
practice. It is premised on the royalty that a
company would have to pay for the use of the
trademark if they had to license it . The
methodology is as follows:
–Determine the underlining base for the calculation
(percentage of turnover, net sales or another base, or
number of units)
–Determine the appropriate royalty rate
–Determine a growth rate, expected life and discount
rate for the brand

18. Price Premium
•The premise of the price premium approach is that a
branded product should sell for a premium over a
generic product. The value of the brand is therefore the
discounted future sales premium.
•The major advantage of this approach is that it is
transparent and easy to understand. The relationship
between brand equity and price is easily explained.
•The disadvantages are where a branded product does
not command a price premium, the benefit arises on the
cost and market share dimensions.

19. Brand Value based on Future
Earnings
•In this approach the value attempts to determine
the earnings that arise from the brand.
•They would attempt to forecast the brand profit
and discount it back at an appropriate discount
rate
•The main drawback is trying to determine what
part of the profits are attributable to brand
equity and not other intangible factors.

21. EXAMPLES

22. 22
•Sintex Industries Ltd.
•Its 2010 annual report has a note that states:
•"In the year 2000-01, Sintex brand owned by the
company had been valued by Deloitte Haskins &
Sells, at a value as at the beginning of that year.
The value has been accounted for in the books by
debiting the Brand Value shown under the Fixed
Assets and by creating Brand Valuation Reserve
shown under Reserves and Surplus."
•The amount involved was Rs 165 crore.

23. 23
•Emami Ltd stated in its 2009 annual report
that intangible assets had been valued as
on March 31, 2009 by Ernst & Youngat Rs
423 crore. This included Rs 265 crore for
brands. "Based on the said valuation, the
company's brands were accounted for in
the books of accounts in the year 1999-
2000. The resulting amount was credited
to Revaluation Reserve," states Emami.

24. 24
•Kitply's annual report of 2009-2010 spoke
of brand valuation done in June 2005 by
Ernst & Young. "This has resulted in an
increase in the book value of the brand by
Rs 127.6 cr which was credited to
Revaluation Reserve Account in that year,"
it states.

25. CONCLUSION
No single approach will give all the answers to a correct
valuation. The starting point is to understand the
purpose of the valuation and what benefits the brand
delivers. Due to a lack of transparency of the workings
and the underlying assumptions, some managers are not
prepared to accept brand equity valuations. Provided
that information on the assumptions are made available
to managers, they can make their own judgments on
what the correct value should be. "Valuation is neither
the science that some of its proponents make it out to be
nor the objective search for true value that idealists
would like it to become. The models that we use in
valuation may be quantitative, but there is a great
reliance on subjective inputs and judgments. "Thus the
final value that we obtain from these models is coloured
by the bias that we bring into the process"

26. THANK YOU