Enhancement of Anaerobic Digestion Using Duckweed (Lemna minor) Enriched with Iron
Enrichment begins
15 '
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Day of experiment
Fig. 4. Daily gas production from semi-continuous
digesters using different hydraulic retention periods.
(Each enrichment equivalent
to 420 mg iron per litre)
compared to 27.9% in an identical duckweed-enriched
digester operating on a 16.6-day retention. This supports
the conclusion drawn from the batch experiments, i.e.
that the additional concentration of iron affects the rate
of gas production, and not the overall yield.
Inevitably, some of the additional gas will have
originated from the duckweed biomass itself as it
degrades. The authors concluded from a series of batch
digester experiments (as yet unpublished) that powdered
duckweed produces approximately
150 ml biogas per
gram dry weight. The duckweed added
to the semi-
continuous digesters therefore accounts for
less than
10% of the observed increase in gas yield. Measurement
of the quality of the biogas indicated that there was no
significant effect on its methane content following the
additions of duckweed.
Conclusions
1. The enhancement of biogas production in anaerobic
digesters is both a plausible and potentially valuable
strategy to pursue. Evidence from this research has
demonstrated that, with a consistent substrate such as
poultry manure, additions of an iron-rich biomass
supplement to the digester can yield substantial
increases in the rate of biogas production and a more
rapid stabilization
of the organic waste. Since the
methane content within the biogas remained
reasonably constant throughout the experiments, it
can be concluded that an increased rate of gas
production would be directly accompanied by an
enhanced rate of energy recovery.
2. Although it was not possible to make every parameter
directly comparable, the semi-continuous experi-
ments confirmed that the results from the batch-scale
experiments
could be repeated under more realistic
operational conditions. It is believed that the results
also demonstrate the potential savings which could
accrue in design. If hydraulic retention periods were
able to be reduced significantly without a loss of
recovered biogas, construction costs and land area
taken would be reduced.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their appreciation of the
financial support provided by the Science and Engin-
eering Research Council and the support and encourage-
ment given by staff in the Department of Civil and
Environmental Engineering, University of South-
ampton.
References
(1) SPEECE, R.E. Nutrient requirements. Anaerobic Digestion of Biomass.
(Chynoweth, D.P. and Isaacson, R. Eds.) Elsevier Applied Science,
London,
1987.
(2)
OLESKIEWICZ, J.A., AND SHARMA, V.K. Stimulation and inhibition of
anaerobic processes by heavy metals
- a review. Biol. Wastes, 1990,
31,4547,
(3)
CALLANDER, I.J., AND BARFORD, J.P. Precipitation, chelation, and the
availability
of metals as nutrients in anaerobic digestion. Part 1.
Methodology. Biotechnol. Bioengng, 1983,25,1947-1957.
(4)
WILKIE, A., et a/. Enhancement of anaerobic methanogenesis from
napiergrass by addition
of micronutrients. Biomass, 1986, 11,
135-1 46.
(5) STREICHER, C., eta/. Improvement of the anaerobic digestion of diluted
whey in afluidized bed by nutrientadditions.
€nvk Techno/,, 1990,12,
(6)
TIJERO, J., eta/. Effect of CuZt, NiZt, and ZnZt on an anaerobic digestion
system.
J.€nviL Sci. Hlth., 1991, A26, (6), 794-811,
(7)
MAHAOEVASWAMY, M., AND VENKATARAMAN, L.V. Bioconversion of poultry
droppings for biogas and algal production.
Agric. Wastes, 1986,18,
(8) JOURNEY, W.K., eta/. Duckweed Aquaculture - A New Aquatic Farming
Technique for Developing Countries. The World Bank, Agricultural
Division, Washington,
1990.
(9)
ORON, G., AND WILLERS, H. Effects of wastes quality on treatment
efficiency with duckweed.
Wat. Sci. Techno/., 1989,21,639-645.
(10)
ORON, G., PORATH, D., AND JANSEN, H. Performance of the duckweed
species
Lemna gibba on municipal wastewater effluent renovation and
protein production.
Biotechnol. Bioengng., 1987,29, 258-268.
(11)
JAIN, S.K., eta/. Production of biogas from Azolla pinnata R.Br. and
Lemna minor L: effect of heavy metal contamination. Bioresource
Techno/.,l992,41, 273-277.
(12)
MATA-ALVAREZ, J., eta/. A simple device to measure biogas production
in laboratory scale digesters.
Biotechnol. Letters, 1986, 8, (lo),
714-720.
(1 3)
NALLATHAMBI GUNASEELAN, V. Anaerobic digestion of G/jricj~ia leaves for
biogas and organic manure.
Biomass, 1988,17,1-11.
333-341.
93-1 01.
0 J.CIWEM,1996, 10, April 95