3ds Max, AutoCAD, badminton court, bus parking, ETABS, Lumion, multi-functional, planning, structural analysis, visualization.pptx

DESIGN OF A COMPREHENSIVE BUS PARKING SYSTEM AND BADMINTON COURT

1. DESIGN OF A COMPREHENSIVE BUS PARKING SYSTEM AND BADMINTON COURT PROJECT PHASE 2 1

2. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION LITERATURE REVIEW OBJECTIVES SOFTWARES USED METHODOLOGY SPECIFICATIONS AUTOCAD DRAWING STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS IN ETABS 2

3. 3D VIEW OF THE PROJECT LOAD DETAILS ANALYSIS STOREY RESPONSE PLOTS SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS 3D MODELLING WALKTHROUGH VIDEO FUTURE SCOPE CONCLUSION REFERENCES 3

4. INTRODUCTION In the daily hustle and bustle of college life, one challenge that often goes unnoticed is the absence of an effective bus parking system. The struggle to find a suitable and organized parking space for buses poses an inconvenience for students, faculties, and staffs. Also physical activities plays a crucial role in academic success. R ecreational spaces play an important role in promoting physical well-being, and creating a healthy community. 4

5. Taking the current scenario of our college bus parking it lacks a proper utilization of space, undefined entry and exit, and create confusion among students. Also there is no badminton court in our college. With this vision in mind, we would like to introduce an innovative project aimed at enhancing the infrastructure of our college campus - ‘A comprehensive Bus Parking System and Badminton Court Facility’. 5

6. LITERATURE REVIEW AUTHORS TITLE FINDINGS CH. Lokesh Nishanth et al. Analysis and design of commercial building with different slab arrangements using ETABS Studied about different slab arrangements Analyses the effects of seismic and wind forces Purpose of using the ETABS software in the analysis and design of the commercial building K. Surender Kumar et al. Analysis of residential building with STAAD. Pro & ETABS Analysis of a residential building using STAAD Pro and ETABS software. Focuses on reviewing the design check, structural detailing, and the failure of columns and beams. Based on a case study of an ongoing building project in Hyderabad, India. 6

7. Sanjaykumar M. Dave et al. Study on demand and characteristics of parking system in urban areas: A review. Discusses the demand and characteristics of parking systems in urban areas. Highlights the impact of land-use on parking demand. Josa et al. Multi-criteria decision-making model to assess the sustainability of girders and trusses: Case study for roofs of sports halls. Study proposes a multi-criteria decision-making model to assess the sustainability of girders and trusses in the context of sports hall roofs. Study finds that economically the best solution is the concrete truss, with steel alternatives slightly better. 7

8. Khaja Musab Manzoor et al. Analysis and design of buildings using Revit and ETABS software. Study aims to determine the best software for designing and estimating cost of low-medium scale RC buildings. Results include comparisons of shear forces, bending moments values, and reinforcement details. Sonia Jain et al. On campus physical activity programming for post-secondary student mental health: Examining effectiveness and acceptability. Examine the acceptability and effectiveness of a physical activity program in college campus. Surveys and questionnaires were conducted. Results provide implications for implementing on-campus physical activity programs 8

9. Jamshid Abdunazarov et al. Designing of Parking Spaces on Parking Taking into Account the Parameters of Design Vehicles. Discusses the issue of a lack of parking spaces in cities and the importance of designing parking spaces. Determine the optimal size of a parking space. Dimensions influence the size and layout of the parking space. Diagonal parking at angles ranging from 30° to 45° is often recommended to minimize turning maneuvers and optimize space utilization. 9

10. OBJECTIVES Proposal of bus parking system with a badminton court for our college campus. To draw the plan using AutoCAD software. To analyze the structure using ETABS software. To show the 3D model of the design using 3ds Max. To show the animated view of the project using Lumion. 10

11. SOFTWARES USED: AutoCAD: S tands for Computer-Aided Design F or creating 2D and 3D drawings and models that serve various purposes in industries such as architecture, engineering, and construction. Key features of AutoCAD include precision drawing tools, efficient drafting capabilities, and the ability to create detailed and accurate technical drawings. In addition to its core functionality, AutoCAD supports collaboration among multiple users. 11

12. ii. ETABS Extended Three-Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems T o perform comprehensive analysis, design, and detailing of various types of buildings. Has user-friendly interface. Fa cilitates the design of structural elements such as beams, columns, walls, and slabs. ETABS can be integrated with other software applications, such as SAP2000. 12

13. iii. 3ds Max: A professional 3d computer graphics program developed by Autodesk. P roduces realistic 3d images and animations. I ntegrates with other Autodesk software, such as Autodesk Revit and AutoCAD. Widely adopted in the entertainment industry in the production of video games, movies, and virtual reality experiences. 13

14. iv. Lumion: A powerful architectural visualization software that allows architects and designers to create stunning renderings and animations of their projects. O ffers real-time rendering capabilities. E asy-to-use interface. C omes with a vast library of high-quality assets, including trees, plants, buildings, people, and more . I ntegrates with popular CAD softwares. supports collaboration by enabling users to easily share their projects with clients and team members for feedback and review. 14

15. Fig no1. Interfaces of AutoCAD, ETABS, 3ds Max, Lumion 15

16. METHODOLOGY SITE SELECTION PROJECT INITIATION ASSESSMENT & PLANNING SURVEY DRAWING OF BUS PARKING SYSTEM DRAWING OF BADMINTON COURT STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 3D MODELLING 16 ANIMATED VIEW

17. Fig no 2. Selected site Fig no 3. Site plan 17

18. Fig no 4. Surveying 18

19. i . Site The site is approximately a square shaped plot. Sides measured = 78.9 m Total area of the site = 6225.21m 2 SPECIFICATIONS 19

20. ii. Badminton Court: O utlined by International S tandards. The overall dimensions of a standard badminton court are 13.4 meters in length and 6.1 meters in width. C ourt is divided into singles play, doubles play, service courts, and service boxes. The net height is set at 1.55 meters at the edges and 1.524 meters at the centre. Floor surface should be flat, even, and free from any obstruction. 20

21. Minimum ceiling height recommended is 9 meters. C ourt markings and colours should provide good visibility and contrast against the floor surface. A minimum clearance of 1.98 meters is provided. 21

22. iii. Bus Parking: Height = 4.57m Spacing between each bus = 3m Parking angle = 45⁰ No. of buses can be parked = 40 nos Clearance from boundary = 3m 22

23. AUTOCAD DRAWING Fig no 5. Project Plan 23

24. Fig no 6. Badminton court plan 24

25. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS IN ETABS 25 Fig no 7. Centerline Diagram

26. 26 Fig no 8. Material property of steel

27. 27 Fig no 9. Sectional property of steel

28. 28 Fig no 10. Sectional property of steel angle Fig no 11. Sectional property of steel tube

29. 3D VIEW OF THE PROJECT 29 Fig no 13. Rendered view of the project Fig no 12. 3D view of the project

30. 30 Fig no 14. Designing diagram

31. Dead load = 0.4 kN /m 2 Live load = 0.75 kN /m 2 Wind load : Windward coefficient = 0.8 Leeward coefficient = 0.5 Seismic zone factor = 0.1 31 LOAD DETAILS

32. 32 Fig no 15. Assigned loads

33. 33 Fig no 16. Wind load and Seismic load pattern

34. ANALYSIS 34 Fig no 17. Deformed structure

35. 35 Fig no 18. Axial force

36. 36 Fig no 19. Shear force

37. 37 Fig 20. Bending moment

38. 38 Fig no 21. Load applied diagram

39. STOREY RESPONSE PLOTS 39 Fig no 22. Max storey displacement Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir   m   mm mm Story4 9.09 Top 0.017 0.014 Story3 8.9 Top 0.022 0.016 Story2 8.26 Top 0.058 0.018 Story1 6.7 Top 0.108 0.022 Story6 5.35 Top 3.352 4.427 Story5 4.6 Top 3.213 3.281 Base Top Table 1. Storey response

40. 40 Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir   m   mm mm Story4 9.09 Top 0.017 0.014 Story3 8.9 Top 0.022 0.016 Story2 8.26 Top 0.058 0.018 Story1 6.7 Top 0.108 0.022 Story6 5.35 Top 3.352 4.427 Story5 4.6 Top 3.213 3.281 Base Top Fig no 23. Storey shears Table 2. Storey response

41. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS 41

42. 42

43. 3D MODELLING 43 Fig no 24. Front view of Badminton court

44. 44 Fig no 25. Bus parking and Badminton court

45. 45 Fig no 26. Back side view of Badminton court

46. 46 Fig 27. Back side view of the project

47. 47 Fig no 28. Entrance

48. WALKTHROUGH VIDEO 48 ..\ lumion \VIDEO.mp4

49. FUTURE SCOPE Advanced Technology Integration. Multifunctional Use Planning. Green Initiatives and Sustainability Upgrades. Educational Initiatives. Expansion Possibilities. 49

50. CONCLUSION This project represent a forward-thinking initiative aimed at enhancing both functional and recreational aspects of our academic environment. The fusion of transportation infrastructure with a dynamic sports facility provides well-being for students, faculty, and visitors. By utilizing a combination of different softwares, we ensured a comprehensive and cohesive design process from initial concept to visualization. AutoCAD software was used to visualize spatial arrangements and effectively utilize available land. 50

51. The analysis in ETABS showed that the bending moments, shear forces, and axial forces within the structures are within acceptable limits as prescribed by IS 800:2007. It is pivotal for the structural integrity and safety of the constructions, minimizing the risk of structural failures and ensures that they can withstand prescribed load conditions. 3ds Max allowed to visualize the architectural concepts in high-quality3D, providing a realistic representation of the project after completion. The incorporation of Lumion helps to create immersive animations, which effectively communicate the project's concept and design. 51

52. REFERENCES CH. Lokesh Nishanth, Y. Sai Swaroop, Durga Chaitanya Kumar Jagarapu , Pavan Kumar Jog (2020), Analysis and design of commercial building with different slab arrangements using ETABS, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.823. K. Surender Kumar, N. Lingeshwaran , Syed Hamim Jeelani (2020), Analysis of residential building with STAAD. Pro & ETABS, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.329 . Janak Parmar, Pritikana Das , Sanjaykumar M. Dave (2019), Study on demand and characteristics of parking system in urban areas: A review, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2019.09.003 Josa , O. Pons, A. de la Fuente , A. Aguado (2019), Multi-criteria decision-making model to assess the sustainability of girders and trusses: Case study for roofs of sports halls., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119312. 52

53. Ehtisham Uddin Syed, Khaja Musab Manzoor (2022), Analysis and design of buildings using Revit and ETABS software, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.463. Melissa L.  deJonge , Sonia Jain, Guy E. Faulkner, Catherine M.  Sabiston   (2021), On campus physical activity programming for post-secondary student mental health: Examining effectiveness and acceptability, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2021.100391. Miroslava Mikusova , Jamshid Abdunazarov , Joanna Zukowska and Juraj Jagelcak (2020), Designing of Parking Spaces on Parking Taking into Account the Parameters of Design Vehicles, doi:10.3390/computation8030071. Yasser Elgammal , Nourhan M. Abdel- Razek (2022), Architecture Design of Stadium Facilities Between Ancient Times and Today, https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/eijest.2022.104321.1107 53

54. R. Kavitha, M.C.  Sundarraja , M. Ram Vivekananthan , C.  Vinodhini , P.  Thiruvishnu , P. Deepan (2022), Seismic analysis and design of multilevel car parking using ETABS, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.212. Yu Li, Lingling Li, Pengyuan Shen( 2023), Probability based visual comfort assessment and optimization in national fitness halls under sports behavior uncertainty, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110596. Mirosław Siennicki , Marian Giżejowski (2021), Design of steel framed structure of sportshall , https: WUT90f9f98a38784ed29da1f70e3364309d. Melissa L.  deJonge   ,  Janine  Omran   ,  Guy E. Faulkner  ,  Catherine M.  Sabiston (2021) University students' and clinicians’ beliefs and attitudes towards physical activity for mental health, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2019.100316. 54

55. Miroslava Mikusova , Jamshid Abdunazarov , Joanna Zukowska (2019), Modelling of the movement of designed vehicles on parking space for designing parking, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-27547-1_15. Avishai   Ceder , Gali Israel (2019), Efficient Bus Operational Parking Model, https://doi.org/10.3141/2111-06. Yongjun He , Siyu Xiang ,D Xuhong Zhou (2023),A reinforcing protection for steel parking-structure column under vehicular impact and design method, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.110368. 55

56. THANK YOU 56