7.4 Closed Circuit Television in Student Hous (1).pptx

IbrahimKashm 10 views 42 slides Jul 12, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 42
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42

About This Presentation

educative


Slide Content

Closed Circuit Television in Student Housing Big Brother or A Way of Life

CCTV/Security Cameras in Housing?

  P olicies Regarding CCTV/Security Cameras?

Security vs Privacy

1960s

Cameras to Combat Terrorism

Government Monitoring of Credit Card Sales to Track Terrorists  

Millennials accept loss of privacy – to a point

Big Brother ?

Last 20 Years

A Way of Life

CCTV in Housing? 75% Yes 25% No Yes No

Camera Locations - Housing Community Space 75% Exterior Doors 94% Elevator and Stairs 63% Floors w/ Community Bath 19% Floors w/ Private Bath 37.5%

Camera Locations – Non-Housing Admin Offices 55% Outdoors 82% Dining 55% Classrooms 18% Athletics 55%

Who owns the CCTV System? 56% Housing 38% Police 6% Housing Campus Police Other

How is CCTV Monitored? 25% Limited 24/7 75% Not actively monitored All cameras actively watched 24/7 Limited cameras actively watched 24/7 Not actively monitored

Video Retention 44% < 30 days 38% 30-60 days 19% > 60 Video retained < 30 days Video retained 30-60 days Video retained > 60 days

Housing CCTV Policy? 50% Yes 50% No Yes No

Institution CCTV Policy? 38% Yes 63% No Yes No

Occupancy/Camera Stats Occupancy – 248 to 9000 Camera counts - 8 to 2200 Occupants per camera – 2.72 to 200 Average 13.74

Training Content 12 % None 38% Policies 19% FERPA No training provided CCTV policies/procedures FERPA FOIA Software/Hardware specific 8 % FOIA 31% Software

Training Recurrence 19% Annually 6 % 80% No training recurrence Annually Training required every 2 years or more No training recurrence is required

Five Prepared Questions Asked of the Student Focus Group Participants Safety Privacy Security Accountability

“We’re used to cameras. We grew up with them.” “Safety blanket” “If we’re going to have cameras, let’s have the best ones.” “What’s the point of having a camera if it’s not doing its job? “We’re okay with Big Brother watching.” “Makes me feel safe and secure” “Genuinely cared for”

CCTV at the University of Arkansas 1990 1994 1995 3 key elements related to CCTV: Implementation Policies Training Conversations with Legal Counsel, UAPD, and Housing

Policy focused on expectations and responsibilities for CCTV use SOP outlines requesting camera access, approval process, training, and capturing video/stills Mandatory training for all users granted access Online refresher training E-mail listserve CCTV at the University of Arkansas

  Police logging in and notification         Number of cameras  Total  655 cameras  512 are analog and 170 are IP cameras  17 DVR  25 Avigilon Servers  119 Encoders  In October 2012 campus had a total of 1159 cameras  26 covered outdoor areas  Few buildings other than Housing facilities have more than basic coverage  At that time police could not access  most systems  Impact to budgets  Encoder  Camera  Server  Wiring  Traditionally funded through campus public safety budget  IT Budget  Auxiliary Number of cams Budget

Camera Overview DVR->Avigilon 655 cameras, 1159 campus total Analog->IP Police more involved Expect more IT involvement

CCTV Infrastructure Costs Server $2,000 +++ Camera $750 +++ Encoder $550 Cabling $25 to $1,600 Network Switches $3200 + 16 Camera System $17,600 to $42,800

University of Arkansas [5 mins] Felisha and Eric 1990 electronic card access starts – completed in 1994  1995 CCTV implementation starts  Remove student staff working at entry points in halls  What is comes down to is implementation, policies, training  How we implemented our policy  Did not have an official policy and SOP until April 2016  Spurred by request from outside  housing users to have access  Specifically UAPD and Dining  Most of what is in the policy was happening informally  Had process in place on who could review cameras  Had process in place for who could burn video  Had process in place on how to sign out video   Who was involved  Police  Legal  Housing  Chancellor Executive Committee presentation             How policy works  Requesting  Approval  Training  Documents  Police logging in and notification         Number of cameras  Total  655 cameras  512 are analog and 170 are IP cameras  17 DVR  25 Avigilon Servers  119 Encoders  In October 2012 campus had a total of 1159 cameras  26 covered outdoor areas  Few buildings other than Housing facilities have more than basic coverage  At that time police could not access  most systems  Impact to budgets  Encoder  Camera  Server  Wiring  Traditionally funded through campus public safety budget  IT Budget  Auxiliary

Preventing Big Brother

use  access   controls  location   monitoring     

retention training   review   auditing communication  

“I think there’s this perception that Millennials don’t care about privacy because we’re always on Twitter and Tumbler and Facebook talking about our lives with the world. But that’s not about privacy, that’s about a sense of self. ” Kristen Lim, 2011 William & Mary Graduate

REFERENCES     112 th Congress Public Law 265: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-112publ265/html/PLAW-112publ265.htm     Analysis of Ethical Management Policies for Use of CCTV on College Campuses: http://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1148&context=education_etd     Assessing the Impact of CCTV: http://www.popcenter.org/Responses/video_surveillance/PDFs/Gill&Spriggs_2005.pdf     CCTV Cameras and Your Privacy: http://www.yourprivacy.co.uk/cctvsystems.html     CCTV: Developing Privacy Best Practices: https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_rpt_cctv_2007.pdf     Look to Millennial Generation to Balance US Security Needs and Privacy Rights:  http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2013/0604/Look-to-Millennial-generation-to-balance-US-security-needs-and-privacy-rights    

REFERENCES Millennials Prefer Security to Privacy:   http://www.mikeandmorley.com/millennials_prefer_security_to_privacy     Privacy and CCTV: A Guide to the Privacy Act for Businesses, Agencies and Organisations : http://www.privacy.org.nz/assets/Files/Brochures-and-pamphlets-and-pubs/Privacy-and-CCTV-A-guide-October-2009.pdf      Public Video Surveillance: Is It an Effective Crime Prevention Tool?: https://www.library.ca.gov/crb/97/05/     Review of Studies on Surveillance Camera Effectiveness: https://privacysos.org/camera_studies/     Security Cameras In Schools: Protective Or Invasive?:   http://www.npr.org/2012/09/04/160551340/security-cameras-in-school-protective-or-invasive     State Surveillance and the Right to Privacy: http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles1/statesurv    

REFERENCES Study Shows Surveillance Cameras Reduce Crime, In Some Cases: http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/study-shows-surveillance-cameras-reduce-crime-some-cases Surveillance Studies Centre FAQs: http://www.sscqueens.org/projects/scan/faqs     The Effect of CCTV on Public Safety: Research Roundup: http://journalistsresource.org/studies/government/criminal-justice/surveillance-cameras-and-crime     Using Video Surveillance on College Campuses: http://www.securityinfowatch.com/article/10550786/using-video-surveillance-on-college-campuses     What Makes a Mass Shooting in America:  https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/12/03/what-makes-a-mass-shooting-in-america/?utm_term=.708eeed1689b  
Tags