Abstraction and problem of omnivory.pptx

Abstraction is simplifying complex systems by focusing on key components while ignoring less relevant details.

This helps ecologists study interactions within an ecosystem at different levels without being overwhelmed by every minor detail.

1. Abstraction, The Problem of Omnivory and Uses of Stable Isotope Tracers Dr. Vividha Raunekar

2. Abstraction is simplifying complex systems by focusing on key components while ignoring less relevant details. This helps ecologists study interactions within an ecosystem at different levels without being overwhelmed by every minor detail. For example, when studying a forest ecosystem, an ecologist might abstract different levels such as: Individual organisms (e.g., a deer) Populations (e.g., a herd of deer) Communities (e.g., deer, wolves, and trees interacting) Ecosystem processes (e.g., nutrient cycling, energy flow) By using abstraction, scientists can study patterns and interactions at a chosen level without getting lost in every tiny biological detail.

3. Levels of Abstraction in an Ecosystem Abstraction in an ecosystem can be categorized into different hierarchical levels: a) Organism Level Abstraction Focuses on a single organism’s role in an ecosystem. Example: A bee’s role in pollination, ignoring other species. b) Population Level Abstraction Studies groups of the same species in an ecosystem, ignoring individual differences. Example: Studying a wolf population’s impact on prey, ignoring individual wolf behaviors.

4. c) Community Level Abstraction Examines interactions between different species. Example: Predator-prey relationships, competition, mutualism. d) Ecosystem Level Abstraction Considers energy flow, nutrient cycling, and abiotic factors. Example: The role of decomposers in nutrient recycling, ignoring individual decomposer species. e) Biome and Biosphere Level Abstraction Studies large-scale ecological patterns, such as how rainforests store carbon. Example: The impact of deforestation on global carbon levels. Each level abstracts details from the lower levels to focus on broader trends and relationships.

5. Understanding Omnivory in Ecosystems Omnivory refers to organisms that consume both plant material (producers) and animal material (herbivores or other carnivores). This means they occupy multiple trophic levels , making food web dynamics more complex. Examples of Omnivores: Bears (eat fish, berries, and insects) Humans (consume plants and animals) Raccoons (scavenge and consume a variety of foods) Certain fish species like piranhas (eat both plants and animals)

6. The Problem of Omnivory in Ecological Studies Omnivory presents challenges for understanding and modeling ecosystems due to: (A) Trophic Level Ambiguity Traditional food webs assume discrete trophic levels (e.g., herbivore → carnivore). Omnivores blur these levels, making it difficult to assign their exact position in the food web. 🔹 Example: A fox eats both rabbits (herbivores) and berries (producers). Should it be classified as a secondary consumer or primary consumer? (B) Complex Energy Flow & Nutrient Cycling Energy and nutrient transfer pathways become more web-like rather than linear (food chains). Omnivores shift between plant-based and animal-based diets depending on seasonal availability . 🔹 Example: A grizzly bear primarily eats salmon during the spawning season but relies on berries and roots in other seasons.

7. (C) Food Web Stability and Ecosystem Dynamics Omnivory can increase food web stability by allowing flexibility in diet. However, it can also destabilize ecosystems by enabling omnivores to outcompete specialists or disrupt predator-prey relationships. 🔹 Example: If a generalist omnivore like a raccoon has access to a stable plant food source, it may increase in number, leading to higher predation pressure on small animals. (D) Difficulty in Quantifying Diet Contributions Since omnivores eat a mix of food sources, determining how much energy comes from plants vs. animals is challenging. Traditional observational studies fail to capture detailed dietary proportions. This is where stable isotope tracers become valuable.

8. How Stable Isotope Tracers Work What Are Stable Isotopes? Stable isotopes are naturally occurring, non-radioactive variations of elements with different atomic masses. The most commonly used isotopes in ecological studies include: Carbon Isotopes (¹³C/¹²C) – Food Source Identification Tells us where the food originates from (terrestrial vs. marine, C3 vs. C4 plants). Different plants and ecosystems have distinct carbon isotope signatures due to variations in photosynthesis. Example: C3 plants (trees, wheat, rice) → Lower δ¹³C values (~ -28‰) C4 plants (corn, sugarcane, grassland plants) → Higher δ¹³C values (~ -12‰) Marine ecosystems → Higher δ¹³C than terrestrial ecosystems 🔹 Use in Omnivory Studies: If an omnivore’s tissue has higher δ¹³C values , it suggests a diet rich in marine or C4-based foods. If an omnivore has lower δ¹³C values , it relies more on C3 plants or forest-based prey.

9. Nitrogen Isotopes (¹⁵N/¹⁴N) – Trophic Level Estimation Used to determine the trophic position of an organism. As organisms consume food, ¹⁵N accumulates in their tissues because nitrogen is fractionated during metabolism. The higher the δ¹⁵N value, the higher the trophic level the organism occupies. 🔹 Use in Omnivory Studies: Herbivores have lower δ¹⁵N values than carnivores. Omnivores show intermediate δ¹⁵N values , depending on their diet proportion (plant vs. animal). Seasonal or habitat-based shifts in trophic level can be detected. 🔹 Example: A bear that eats mostly salmon (high in nitrogen) will have a higher δ¹⁵N than a bear eating berries. A raccoon feeding on garbage (processed foods and meats) will have a higher δ¹⁵N than one relying on natural plants and insects.

10. Sulfur Isotopes (³⁴S/³²S) – Marine vs. Terrestrial Diet Used to distinguish between marine and freshwater/terrestrial food sources. Marine-derived foods have higher δ³⁴ S values compared to freshwater/terrestrial diets. 🔹 Use in Omnivory Studies: If an omnivore’s tissue has a high δ³⁴ S value , it suggests significant marine food consumption. If it has low δ³⁴ S , it primarily eats terrestrial or freshwater-based food sources. 🔹 Example: Coastal-dwelling omnivores (e.g., seagulls) might show a high δ³⁴ S signature, indicating marine reliance. Inland omnivores (e.g., coyotes) will have lower δ³⁴ S values, pointing to a land-based diet.

11. Applications of Stable Isotope Tracers in Omnivory Research- Identifying Diet Composition and Proportions 🔹 Problem: Traditional methods (e.g., stomach content analysis) only provide a short-term snapshot of diet. They fail to account for digested and assimilated food. 🔹 How Stable Isotope Analysis Helps: By analyzing δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N, researchers can quantify the proportion of different food sources in an omnivore’s diet. Isotope Mixing Models (e.g., Bayesian mixing models) help estimate how much energy comes from plants vs. animals. ✔ Example: A study on grizzly bears in Canada used isotope tracers to show that some populations rely 80% on salmon , while others depend mostly on berries.

12. Detecting Seasonal Dietary Shifts 🔹 Problem: Many omnivores shift their diets seasonally (e.g., bears switching from meat in summer to plants in autumn). Traditional methods fail to capture these long-term changes. 🔹 How Stable Isotope Analysis Helps: Hair, bone, or feather samples can reveal long-term dietary trends over different seasons. Tissues with different metabolic turnover rates allow for time-based dietary analysis (e.g., blood = recent diet, bone = long-term diet). ✔ Example: Feather analysis in birds showed that gulls switch from marine fish (high δ³⁴S) in summer to human trash (high δ¹³C) in winter .

13. Studying Trophic Position Changes Due to Human Activities 🔹 Problem: Urbanization and agriculture alter food availability, forcing omnivores to shift their diet. This can increase human-wildlife conflicts and disrupt ecosystems. 🔹 How Stable Isotope Analysis Helps: Omnivores that feed on human food sources tend to have higher δ¹³C values (processed foods) and higher δ¹⁵N values (protein-rich diets). ✔ Example: Urban coyotes show higher δ¹³C , indicating a shift toward anthropogenic (human-derived) food sources like trash and pet food. Farm-dwelling raccoons had increased δ¹⁵N, suggesting higher protein intake from chicken coops and livestock feed.

14. Tracking Omnivore Movements and Migration 🔹 Problem: Some omnivores migrate or change habitats, making it hard to track their diet across regions. 🔹 How Stable Isotope Analysis Helps: Isoscapes (isotope landscapes) allow researchers to map dietary patterns of migrating omnivores based on isotope signatures. ✔ Example: Monarch butterflies show different δ¹³C values depending on whether they feed on C3 plants (milkweed in the north) or C4 plants (in the south).

15. Case Studies: Real-World Examples of Isotope Analysis in Omnivores 📌 Case Study 1: Brown Bears in Alaska Used δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N to measure how much salmon vs. plant material bears consumed. Found that bears with more access to salmon grew larger and had higher reproductive success . 📌 Case Study 2: Urban vs. Rural Raccoons Urban raccoons showed higher δ¹³C values , proving reliance on human food waste. Rural raccoons had lower δ¹³C, indicating more natural plant and insect diets. 📌 Case Study 3: Sharks and Trophic Level Changes Used δ¹⁵N to show that overfishing reduced large prey availability, forcing sharks to consume lower trophic level fish .

16. Why Stable Isotope Analysis Is Crucial in Omnivory Studies ✔ Solves the problem of omnivory complexity by quantifying diet proportions. ✔ Tracks long-term dietary patterns and seasonal changes in omnivores. ✔ Helps understand human impacts on food webs and wildlife diets. ✔ Reveals migration patterns and habitat shifts in omnivorous species. Stable isotope analysis is an indispensable tool in modern ecology, allowing scientists to decode the complex dietary behaviors of omnivores and their role in ecosystems.

17. Thank you