AM_File_Formats_Comparison_Presentation.pptx

ssuserbebbf6 0 views 13 slides Oct 08, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 13
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13

About This Presentation

AM_File_Formats_Comparison_Presentation.pptx


Slide Content

3D Printing File Formats — Detailed Comparison and Applications

Overview • Purpose: Understanding major 3D printing file formats • Relation between model data and printing workflow • Comparison of STL, AMF, 3MF, OBJ, PLY, STEP, VRML, and G-code • Machine examples, suitability, and application areas

STL — Stereolithography • Stores triangulated mesh geometry • No color, texture, or unit info • Advantages: Simple, widely supported, light • Limitations: No units or material data, approximation errors • Use: General FDM printing, prototyping (e.g., Prusa, Creality, Ultimaker)

AMF — Additive Manufacturing File Format • XML-based (ISO/ASTM 52915) • Stores color, material, units, lattices • Advantages: Multi-material, metadata-rich • Limitations: Limited adoption • Use: Research & advanced AM workflows

3MF — 3D Manufacturing Format • XML + ZIP container, industry standard (3MF Consortium) • Includes geometry, color, material, units, metadata • Advantages: Compact, interoperable, full metadata • Use: HP Jet Fusion, Ultimaker, PrusaSlicer, Microsoft 3D Builder

OBJ & PLY Formats • OBJ: Supports textures via .mtl, used in graphics and 3D scanning • PLY: Polygon format with per-vertex color/normals (used in 3D scanning) • Use: Color/texture printing, scan-to-print workflows • Limitation: Larger files, limited metadata for AM

STEP Format (ISO 10303) • CAD exchange format — precise B-rep geometry • Includes tolerances, features, assemblies • Advantages: High accuracy, no tessellation errors • Use: CAD-to-AM workflows (e.g., Siemens NX, EOS, GE Additive)

VRML and G-code • VRML: Legacy color 3D printing format (used in binder jetting) • G-code: Machine-level printing instruction format • G-code defines toolpaths, temperatures, feed rates • Used by: Marlin, RepRap, and industrial AM systems

Format Comparison Summary STL: Universal, simple but limited metadata 3MF: Compact, metadata-rich, modern standard AMF: Research-oriented, less adopted OBJ/PLY: Texture & scan workflows STEP: CAD precision workflows VRML: Legacy color printing G-code: Final printer instructions

Suitability Study & Recommendations • STL: Best for general use and quick prototyping • 3MF: For color, material, and industrial workflows • STEP: For high-precision parts (engineering) • OBJ/PLY: For texture and scanning workflows • AMF: For multi-material/lattice research

Application Areas • Education/Prototyping: STL, OBJ • Full-color printing: 3MF, OBJ, VRML • Industrial Production: 3MF, STEP • Research: AMF, 3MF • Scan-to-print: PLY, OBJ • Printer Execution: G-code

Best Practices • Verify and preserve units (mm/inches) • Repair meshes before slicing • Use 3MF for metadata preservation • Archive STEP/CAD models for design retention • Balance tessellation quality and file size

References • 3MF Consortium (3mf.io) • ISO/ASTM 52915 (AMF) • Xometry, Prusa, Sculpteo technical blogs • Siemens NX Additive and HP Jet Fusion workflows
Tags