This study is based on survey data available in the three market hubs of three provinces in Nepal. The animals are raised by farmers but are shone to be underfed and supply of animal feed is not in a sustainable ways. There is need of highly established feed and fodder market and that are easy to ac...
This study is based on survey data available in the three market hubs of three provinces in Nepal. The animals are raised by farmers but are shone to be underfed and supply of animal feed is not in a sustainable ways. There is need of highly established feed and fodder market and that are easy to access and marketable.
This study focused on establishment of a feed market in the municipalities and would be lead by cooperatives.
Size: 455.74 KB
Language: en
Added: Jul 19, 2024
Slides: 25 pages
Slide Content
Mr. Devendra Prasad Yadav Dr. Sudarshan Prasad Regmi Prospectus and Status of Forage and Feed Marketing in Nepal
Introduction Deficiency in a balanced and nutritive feed supply has been blamed for the sub-optimum performances in improved livestock breeds in Nepal. About 35 per cent of productivity is estimated to have been constrained by the poor feeding system. increased the demand for livestock products which has led to increasing commercialization of livestock is due to Increased urbanization, Better mobility, increased flow of tourists have especially in the Terai . ( Devkota et al ., 1991), ( Rajbhandary and Shah, 1981).
Objectives of the study Major Objectives: To analyze present animal feeds’ situation for the sampled districts and their constraints To formulate recommendations for infrastructure development for feed storage, transportation and marketing. To evaluate potentials and constraints of existing laws, policy and programs in production, storage, transportation and marketing of feeds and Make Strategic Plan for Animal F eed M arketing .
Methodology Location of the study Three districts viz. Morang, Dhanusa , and Chitawan . Sampling Method and sample size The purposive sampling method was used with a randomized sample size of about 35-37 households. The household survey was conducted to the commercial and registered livestock farms of the districts.
Approaches Review of literature: Published papers Focus Group Discussion (FGD): The FGD will be conducted with the stakeholders related to manufacturers, production, marketing and utilization of Animal feed resources Key Informant Information (KII): the officials of DLS, DLSO, technical directorates, feed industries and progressive farmers. Primary HH survey: 3 representative districts (Morang, Dhanusa and Chitawan ) related to commercial farms
Balance sheet of TDN for ruminants (‘000 MT) Description High hills Mid hills Terai Nepal Requirements Cattle and Buffalo 999 4458 2864 8321 Sheep and Goat 240 718 340 1298 Total required 1239 5176 3204 9619 Available TDN Crop by-products 107 981 1783 2870 Non-cultivated 104 466 127 697 Forest, Grazing and Shrub land 700 1133 732 2565 Total available TDN 911 2580 2642 6132 Balance -328 -2596 -562 -3487 Deficit (%) - 26.5 - 50.2 - 17.54 - 36.24 ( Pariyar 2005
Animal Feed Deficit by Province, DM
Animal feed Balance sheet of 33 districts Feed Balance in 33 Districts DM Calculation example Morang
Agriculture perspective Plan (1995-2015) Agriculture Development Strategy (ADS, 2013) NARC Working Procedure ( under the Theme 2 of NARC Vision 2011-2030,) SPS (sanitary and phyto -sanitary) regulations Tariffs/barriers to feed imports Restrictions on exports दाना ऐन‐२०३३ पशु स्वास्थ्य तथा पशु सेवा ऐन २०५५ नियमावली २०५६ राष्ट्रिय कृषि नीति ‐ २०६१ राष्ट्रिय दुग्ध नीति ‐ २०६४ खर्क नीति‐ २०६८ पशु आहारा सम्बन्धित नीति , रणनीति तथा कार्यविधिहरु
पशु आहारा सम्बन्धित नीति ………. कृषि जैविक विविधता महासन्धि , १९९२ राष्ट्रिय जैविक विविधता रणनीति , २००२ राष्ट्रिय जैविक विविधता रणनीति तथा कार्यान्वयन योजना , २००६ कृषि जैविक विविधता नीति , २०६३ जडिबुटि एवंम गैह्रकाष्ठ वन पैदावार विकास नीति , २०६१ कृषि जैविक विविधता नीति, २०६३ (पहिलो संशोध २०७१ ) साईलोपिट निर्माण सम्बन्धि कार्यविधि-२०७३ खर्क सुधार कार्यक्रम संचालन कार्यविधि-२०७३ एक जिल्ला एक घांसेवाली स्रोतकेन्द्र स्थापना कार्यान्वयन कार्यविधि-२०७३ फरेज मिशन कार्यविधि २०७२ व्यवसायिक घाँसको बिउ कार्यविधि २०६९
Findings Particulars Value Percentage Cultivation of Grasses, No. of HH 35 94.6 Summer 28 75.7 Winter 33 89.2 Perennial 18 48.6 Own land, ha 1.811 100 Irrigated Land, ha 1.796 99.2 Area of forage Cultivation, ha 1.52 83.9 Farmers Irrigate to forage crops 34 91.9 Characteristics of Respondent
Source of Irrigation and production Sources of Irrigation 1. Boring with pump set 20 58.8 2. Boring with motor 7 20.6 3. Cannel 3 8.8 4. Cannel and boring 4 11.8 Number of fodder Nurseries 4 10.8 Forage Production, tons/year 69.1
Forage grass sufficiency and supply of G G and roughages Description Value Percent Forage grass Sufficiency period, Months 7.9 65.91 Deficit Supplied by 1. Buying Green grass 3 60.0 2. Silage making 1 20.0 3. Hay making 1 20.0 Roughage supply by 1. Own Straw 11 39.3 2. Buy from others 4 14.3 3. Both 13 46.4 Total 28 100.0 Annual supply of GG, Mt 52.4 35.1 Annual supply of Roughages, Mt 97.0 64.9 Total 149.4 100.0
Green grass Sales, mode of transport and marketing by HH Description Value Percentage Farmers involved in GG sale, No. 4 10.8 Average quantity of GG sold, Mt. 47200 Average price of GG, Rs. Per kg 9.98 Means of Transport Tractor 2 66.67 Pickup 1 33.33
Mode of Transport ownership Mode of Transport ownership Own Vehicle 5 18.52 Hired Vehicle 22 81.48 Marketing By door to door
Storage facilities, Con. Feed Sources, Outlets of Feeds Description Value Percentage Storage of Roughages Above roof and opened 19 67.86 On the ground and open 2 7.14 Under Tahara roof or store barn 7 25.00 Total 28 100.00 Con. Feed by himself 3 13.04 Buy outside 20 86.96 Total 23 100.00
Sources of Feed market outlets Sources Value Percentage 1. Agro vet 2 8.70 2. Agro vet and Coop 3 13.04 3. Agro vet and feed depose 3 13.04 4. Cooperative 5 21.74 5. Feed Depose 7 30.43 6. Feed Factory 2 8.70 7. Feed Factory and Organization 1 4.35 Total 23 100.00
Perception on Animal feed Market Possibility by respondents Descriptions Value Percentage Score Total Score Highly possibility 7 29.17 4 28 Moderate possible 7 29.17 3 21 Not so possible 7 29.17 2 14 Possible after 3to 4 years 3 12.50 1 3 Total 24 100.00 10 66 Average Score= 2.75
Annual Feed Production in Nepal, Mt Types of Feed Production Year Average Production, Mt. Proportion Feed 2070/ 071 2071/ 072 2072/ 073 2073/ 074 BPS or B 0 154 169 186 207 179 10.04 Broiler No. 1 440 484 532 590 512 28.69 Broiler No. 2 660 726 798 885 767 43.04 Broiler No. 3 286 315 346 354 325 18.23 Total of Broiler Feed 1540 1694 1862 2035 1783 100.00 Layers No. 1 110 121 133 148 128 17.08 Layers No. 2 154 170 446 384 288 38.50 Layers No. 3 286 315 346 384 332 44.41 Total of Broiler Feed 550 605.2 924.6 914.5 749 100.00 Cattle Feed 110 121 133 148 128 Total Feed 2200 2420.2 2919.6 3097 2659 % of Cattle Feed 5.0 5.0 4.6 4.8 4.8 Source: Nepal Feed Industry Association, Report 2074
Constrain and Suggetions Constrain Faced and Suggestions Made by Feed Industries and Suppliers Constrain Faced by Commercial farmers Suggestions made by Commercial farmers
Strategic Plan for Animal Feed Marketing
Kfz ' cfxf /f बाह्रै मास Kfz ' उत्पादन एकैनास जय पशुधन! wGoafb