Annex C-3_PMES Tool for Highly Proficient Teachers (MTI-MTII).pdf

SPMES TOOLS Source: DepEd

1. PMES TOOL FOR
HIGHLY PROFICIENT
TEACHERS (MASTER TEACHERS I-II)
S.Y. 2025-2026

2. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
1. Modeled
effective
applications of
content knowledge
within and across
curriculum
teaching areas.
(PPST 1.1.3)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheets and proof
of attendance of
colleague/s
Quality Demonstrated
Level 8 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheets
presented
Demonstrated
Level 7 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in COT
rating sheets
presented
Demonstrated
Level 6 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheets
presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheets
presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheets
presented
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

3. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
2. Evaluated
with colleagues
the
effectiveness of
teaching
strategies that
promote
learner
achievement in
literacy and
numeracy.
(PPST 1.4.3)
For classroom observable
practice:
Classroom Observation
Tool (COT) Rating Sheet
and proof of attendance of
colleague/s
For non-classroom
observable practice, any
one (1) of the following
documents:
1.Performance
Monitoring and
Coaching Form
(PMCF)
2.Minutes of the
discussion highlighting
qualitative feedback
based on classroom
observations and
quantitative feedback
based on Literacy and
Numeracy
Assessment Results
3.Minutes of the
discussion highlighting
recommendations for
refinement of
strategies based on
the results of
evaluation
4.Approved Action Plan
highlighting the
utilization/adoption of
refined/enhanced
strategies
Quality
(Classroom
Observable
Practice)
Demonstrated
Level 8 in
the PPST Indicator
as shown in the
COT rating sheets
presented
Demonstrated
Level 7 in
the PPST Indicator
as shown in the
COT rating sheets
presented
Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the COT
rating sheets
presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST Indicator as
shown in the COT
rating sheets
presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in
the PPST Indicator
as shown in the
COT rating sheets
presented
or
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Quality
(Non-
Classroom
Observable
Practice)
Led the
utilization/
adoption of
refined/ enhanced
strategies that
promote learner
achievement in
Literacy and
Numeracy as
evidenced
by MOV 4
Guided colleagues
in refining/
enhancing
teaching strategies
that promote
learner
achievement in
literacy and
numeracy based
on the evaluation
results as
evidenced
by MOV 3
Evaluated
with colleagues
the effectiveness
of teaching
strategies that
promote learner
achievement in
literacy and
numeracy as
evidenced by
MOV 2
Monitored consistent
use of teaching
strategies that
promote learner
achievement in
literacy and numeracy
to gather baseline
data and establish a
starting point of
comparison for
evaluation of its
effectiveness as
evidenced by MOV 1
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 2)

4. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
3. Developed and
applied
effective teaching
strategies to
promote critical
and creative
thinking, as well as
other higher-order
thinking skills.
(PPST 1.5.3)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheets and proof
of attendance of
colleague/s
Quality Demonstrated
Level 8 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheets
presented
Demonstrated
Level 7 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheets
presented
Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheets
presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheets
presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheets
presented
or
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

5. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
4. Worked with
colleagues to
model and share
effective
techniques in the
management of
classroom
structure to
engage learners,
individually or in
groups, in
meaningful
exploration,
discovery and
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments
(PPST 2.3.3)
1.Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheet and proof
of attendance of
colleague/s
2.LAC Plan and
Accomplishment
Report
3.Minutes of
meeting/FGD/me
ntoring and
coaching
sessions
4.Performance
Monitoring and
Coaching Form
(PMCF)
Quality
(Classroom
Observable
Practice)
Demonstrated
Level 8 in
the PPST Indicator as
shown in the COT
rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 7 in
the PPST Indicator as
shown in the COT
rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST Indicator as
shown in the COT
rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST Indicator as
shown in the COT
rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in
the PPST Indicator as
shown in the COT
rating sheet
presented
or
No acceptable
evidence was shown
Quality
(Non-
Classroom
Observable
Practice)
Monitored the
application of
effective techniques
in the management of
classroom structure
to engage learners,
individually or in
groups, in meaningful
exploration,
discovery, and hands-
on activities within a
range of physical
learning
environments, as
evidenced by MOV 4
Guided colleague/s
in applying effective
techniques in the
management of
classroom structure
to engage learners,
individually or in
groups, in meaningful
exploration,
discovery, and hands-
on activities within a
range of physical
learning
environments, as
evidenced by MOV 3
Worked
collaboratively with
colleagues to
determine
demonstrated
effective classroom
structure techniques
that promote learner
engagement—both
individually and in
groups—through
meaningful, hands-on
exploration across
various physical
learning
environments, as
evidenced by MOV 2
Demonstrated to
colleague/s effective
techniques in the
management of
classroom structure
to engage learners,
individually or in
groups, in meaningful
exploration,
discovery, and hands-
on activities within a
range of physical
learning
environments, as
evidenced by MOV 1
No acceptable
evidence was shown.
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 2: Learning Environment
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 2)

6. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
5. Exhibit effective
and constructive
behavior
management skills
by applying
positive and non-
violent discipline
to ensure learning-
focused
environments.
(PPST 2.6.3)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheet and proof
of attendance of
colleague/s
Quality Demonstrated
Level 8 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 7 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in COT
rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 6 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet
presented
or
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 2: Learning Environment
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

7. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
6. Work with
colleagues to
share
differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate
opportunities to
address
learners'
differences in
gender,
needs, strengths,
interests and
experiences
(PPST 3.1.3)
For non-classroom
observable practice:
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating Sheet
and proof of
attendance of
colleague/s
For classroom
observable practice,
any one (1) of the
following:
1.Approved LAC
Plan/Action Plan
outlining scheduled
collegial discussions to
share differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate strategies
2.Minutes or
documented notes
highlighting the
sharing of
differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate strategies
3.Minutes of LAC
sessions and other
collegial discussions
highlighting
synthesized insights
and best practices
shared
4.Performance
Monitoring and
Coaching Form
(PMCF) with
annotations showing
how the teacher
guided colleague
Quality
(Classroom
Observable
Practice)
Demonstrated
Level 8 in
the PPST Indicator as
shown in the COT
rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 7 in
the PPST Indicator as
shown in the COT
rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST Indicator as
shown in the COT
rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST Indicator as
shown in the COT
rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in
the PPST Indicator as
shown in the COT
rating sheet
presented
or
No acceptable
evidence was shown
Quality
(Non-
Classroom
Observable
Practice)
Guided
colleagues in
implementing best
practices in
differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate
opportunities to
address learners’
differences in gender,
needs, strengths,
interests, and
experiences during
coaching
and mentoring
sessions/
meetings/LAC
sessions /
other collegial
discussions as
evidenced by MOV 4
Synthesized insights
and/or best practices
shared from collegial
discussions on
implementing
differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate
opportunities to
address learners’
diverse gender
identities, needs,
strengths, interests,
and experiences, as
evidenced by MOV 3
Conducted
coaching and
mentoring
sessions/
meetings/LAC
sessions /
other collegial
discussions to share
differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate
opportunities to
address learner’s
differences in gender,
needs, strengths,
interests, and
experiences as
evidenced by MOV 2
Planned for the
conduct of
coaching and
mentoring sessions/
meetings/LAC
sessions /
other collegial
discussions to share
differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate
opportunities to
address learners’
differences in
gender, needs,
strengths, interests,
and experiences by
MOV 1
No acceptable
evidence was shown.
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 3: Diversity of Learners
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 2)

8. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
7. Develop and
apply effective
strategies in the
planning and
management of
developmentally
sequenced
teaching and
learning processes
to meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts
(PPST 4.1.3)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheet and proof
of attendance of
colleague/s
Quality Demonstrated
Level 8 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 7 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet
presented
or
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 4: Curriculum and Planning
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

9. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
8. Reviewed
with colleagues,
teacher and
learner
feedback to
plan, facilitate,
and enrich
teaching
practice
(PPST 4.4.3)
Any of the following
documents:
1.Consolidated teacher
and learner feedback
obtained through
observations,
interviews or other
data gathering
mechanisms, signed
by the school head
2.Approved LAC Plan or
Instructional
Supervisory Plan and
accomplishment
report/minutes of LAC
session or other
collegial discussions,
highlighting teacher
and learner feedback
used to enrich the
teaching practice
3.Summary of
agreements and
recommendations
from the conducted
LAC sessions or other
collegial discussions
signed by the school
head
4.Accomplished
Performance
Monitoring and
Coaching Forms,
highlighting the use of
teacher and learner
feedback in enriching
the teaching practice
Quality Guided
colleagues in
planning,
facilitating and
enriching
teaching practice
through the
teacher and
learner feedback
reviewed during
LAC sessions/
meetings/other
collegial
discussions, as
evidenced by
MOV 4
Synthesized
agreements and
recommendation
s on the use of
teacher and
learner feedback
obtained from
the conducted
LAC
sessions/
meetings/other
collegial
discussions to
plan, facilitate,
and enrich
teaching
practice, as
evidenced by
MOV 3
Led the review of
teacher and
learner feedback
to
plan, facilitate,
and enrich
teaching practice
through LAC
sessions/
meetings/other
collegial
discussions,
as evidenced by
MOV 2
Gathered teacher
and learner
feedback to
plan, facilitate,
and enrich
teaching
practice, as
evidenced by
MOV 1
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Timeliness Facilitated LAC
sessions/
meetings/other
collegial
discussions on
reviewing
teacher and
learner feedback
across 4 quarters
Facilitated LAC
sessions/
meetings/other
collegial
discussions on
reviewing
teacher and
learner feedback
across 3 quarters
Facilitated LAC
sessions/
meetings/other
collegial
discussions on
reviewing
teacher and
learner feedback
across 2 quarters
Facilitated a LAC
session/
meeting/other
collegial
discussion on
reviewing
teacher and
learner feedback
in only 1 quarter
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 4: Curriculum and Planning
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 4)

10. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
9. Advised and
guided
colleagues in the
selection,
organization,
development and
use of
appropriate
teaching and
learning
resources,
including ICT, to
address specific
learning goals
(PPST 4.5.3)
1.Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet
and proof of
attendance of
colleague/s
2.Approved LAC Plan or
Instructional
Supervisory Plan and
accomplishment
report/minutes of LAC
session or other
collegial discussions,
highlighting practices
in the selection,
organization,
development and use
of appropriate
teaching and learning
resources, including
ICT, to address
specific learning goals
3.Lesson plan or other
teaching and learning
resources of
colleagues with
attached PMCF,
highlighting feedback
and recommendations
on the application of a
professional practice
related to the indicator
4.Accomplished PMCF,
highlighting the
colleagues’ progress
in the application of a
professional practice
related to the indicator
Quality
(Classroom
Observable
Practice)
Demonstrated
Level 8 in
the PPST Indicator
as shown in the
COT rating sheet /
inter-observer
agreement form
presented
Demonstrated
Level 7 in
the PPST Indicator
as shown in COT
rating sheet / inter-
observer agreement
form presented
Demonstrated Level
6 in the PPST
Indicator as shown
in COT rating sheet
/ inter-observer
agreement form
presented
Demonstrated Level
5 in the PPST
Indicator as shown
in COT rating sheet
/ inter-observer
agreement form
presented
Demonstrated Level
4 in the PPST
Indicator as shown
in COT rating sheet
/ inter-observer
agreement form
presented
or
No acceptable
evidence was shown
Quality
(Non-
Classroom
Observable
Practice)
Monitored
colleagues’
individual practices
in selecting,
organizing,
developing and
using appropriate
teaching and
learning resources,
including ICT, to
address specific
learning goals, as
evidenced by
MOV 4
Guided colleagues
individually in
selecting,
organizing,
developing and
using appropriate
teaching and
learning resources,
including ICT, to
address specific
learning goals, as
evidenced by
MOV 3
Advised and guided
colleagues in the
selection,
organization,
development and
use of appropriate
teaching and
learning resources,
including ICT, to
address specific
learning goals, as
evidenced by
MOV 2
Demonstrated to
colleague/s a
professional
practice in the
selection,
organization,
development and
use of appropriate
teaching and
learning resources,
including ICT, to
address specific
learning goals, as
evidenced by
MOV 1
No acceptable
evidence was
shown.
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 5: Assessment and Reporting
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 2)

11. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
10. Worked
collaboratively
with colleagues
to review the
design,
selection,
organization and
use of a range of
effective
diagnostic,
formative and
summative
assessment
strategies
consistent with
curriculum
requirements
(PPST 5.1.3)
For classroom observable
practice:
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet
and proof of
attendance of
colleague/s
For non-classroom
observable practice, any
(1) of the following
documents:
1.Approved LAC Plan or
Instructional
Supervisory Plan
2.Accomplishment
report/minutes of
LAC, FGD session or
other collegial
discussions
3.Summary of
agreements and
recommendations
from the conducted
LAC/ FGD sessions or
other collegial
discussions signed by
the school head
4.Accomplished
Performance
Monitoring and
Coaching Forms,
highlighting the
design, selection,
organization, and use
of a range of effective
diagnostic, formative,
and summative
assessment strategies
Quality
(Classroom
Observable
Practice)
Demonstrated
Level 8 in
the PPST Indicator
as shown in the
COT rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated
Level 7 in
the PPST Indicator
as shown in COT
rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated Level
6 in the PPST
Indicator as shown
in COT rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated Level
5 in the PPST
Indicator as shown
in COT rating sheet
presented
Demonstrated Level
4 in the PPST
Indicator as shown
in COT rating sheet
presented
or
No acceptable
evidence was shown
Quality
(Non-
Classroom
Observable
Practice)
Guided colleagues
in designing,
selecting,
organizing, and
using a range of
effective diagnostic,
formative, and
summative
assessment
strategies, as
evidenced by
MOV 4
Synthesized
agreements and
recommendations
on the design,
selection,
organization and
use of a range of
effective diagnostic,
formative and
summative
strategies,
as evidenced by
MOV 3
Led the review of
the design,
selection,
organization and
use of a range of
effective diagnostic,
formative and
summative
strategies,
as evidenced by
MOV 2
Planned the review
of the design,
selection,
organization and
use of a range of
effective diagnostic,
formative and
summative
strategies,
as evidenced by
MOV 1
No acceptable
evidence was shown
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 5: Assessment and Reporting
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 2)

12. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
11. Interpreted
collaboratively
monitoring and
evaluation
strategies of
attainment data
to support
learner
progress and
achievement
(PPST 5.2.3)
Any of the following
documents:
1.Approved
Instructional
Supervisory (IS)
Plan/ LAC Plan/
2.Minutes of LAC/
Coaching and
Mentoring
session, or other
meetings, with
proof of
attendance.
3.Performance
Monitoring and
Coaching Form
(PMCF)
Quality Guided
colleagues in
implementing
intervention
strategies to
support learner
progress and
achievement as
evidenced by
MOV no. 3,
highlighting the
implementation
of the
intervention of
the mentored
teacher
Guided
colleagues in
planning an
intervention
based on results
of the
interpretation of
monitoring and
evaluation
strategies as
evidenced by
MOV no. 3,
highlighting the
planning of
intervention of
the mentored
teacher
Conducted
collaborative
interpretation of
monitoring and
evaluation
strategies of
attainment of
data as
evidenced by
MOV no. 2
Planned the
conduct of
collaborative
interpretation of
monitoring and
evaluation
strategies of
attainment of
data as
evidenced by
MOV no. 1
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 5: Assessment and Reporting
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

13. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
12. Applied skills
in the effective
communication
of learner needs,
progress and
achievement to
key stakeholders,
including
parents/
guardians
(PPST 5.4.3)
Any of the following
documents:
Sample of learners’
test results signed
by parents and
corresponding
evidence of
improvement
Attendance
sheet/record of
dialogue/minutes of
parent-teacher
conference
Individualized
Learning Plan
signed by learner,
parents and
corresponding
evidence of
improvement
Signed report cards
of students at risk
with corresponding
evidence of
improvement
Modified
communication
tools/ forms/
templates
Others (Please
specify)
Quality Sustained the
implemented
strategies in
addressing the
identified learners
needs, and support
progress and
achievement
based on the
communicated
information, as
shown in the
MOV/s submitted
Implemented
steps to address
the identified
learners needs,
and support
progress and
achievement
based on the
communicated
information, as
shown in the
MOV/s submitted
Secured
commitment and
agreement from
key stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians, on the
communicated
learners needs,
progress, and
achievement, as
shown in the
MOV/s submitted
Communicated
promptly and
clearly and
solicited feedback
from key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians, on the
learners needs,
progress and
achievement, as
shown in the
MOV/s submitted
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency Presented 4
acceptable MOVs
Presented 3
acceptable MOVs
Presented 2
acceptable MOVs
Presented 1
acceptable MOV
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Timeliness Presented MOV/s
showing prompt
communication of
learners’ needs,
progress, and
achievement
across 4 quarters
Presented MOV/s
showing prompt
communication of
learners’ needs,
progress, and
achievement
across 4 quarters
Presented MOV/s
showing prompt
communication of
learners’ needs,
progress, and
achievement
across 3 quarters
Presented MOV/s
showing prompt
communication of
learners’ needs,
progress, and
achievement
across 2 quarters
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 5: Assessment and Reporting
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 4)

14. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTOR
Y
(2)
POOR
(1)
13. Manifested a
learner-centered
teaching
philosophy in
various
aspects of
practice and
support
colleagues in
enhancing their
own learner-
centered
teaching
philosophy
(PPST 7.1.3)
Any one (1) of the
following documents:
1.Lesson Plan or any
instructional material used
by the Highly Proficient
Teacher in actual teaching
2.Lesson Plan used by the
Proficient Teacher with
comments from the Highly
Proficient Teacher
3.Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form
4.Approved LAC plan, FGD
session/s or other
collegial discussions
5.Minutes of LAC/FGD
session/s or other
collegial discussions
about enhancing teachers'
learner-centered teaching
philosophy through lesson
planning
6.Enhanced instructional
material with annotations
related to a learner-
centered teaching
philosophy crafted by the
Proficient teachers,
resulting from the
coaching and mentoring,
and/or minutes of LAC
session/s
Quality Guided colleagues
in enhancing their
own learner-
centered approach
based on the
agreements and
recommendations,
as evidenced by
MOV 6
Synthesized
agreements and
recommendatio
ns in enhancing
colleagues’ own
learner-
centered
teaching
philosophy, as
evidenced by
MOV 5
Manifested a
learner-centered
teaching
philosophy in
various aspects
of practice and
supported
colleagues
in enhancing their
own learner-
centered
teaching
philosophy, as
evidenced by
MOV 3 or 4
Identified
learner-
centered
teaching
philosophies in
various aspects
of practice and
showed limited
support to
colleagues in
enhancing their
own learner-
centered
teaching
philosophy, as
evidenced by
MOV 1 or 2
No
acceptable
evidence was
shown
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 7: Personal Growth and Professional Development
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

15. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
14. Reflected on
the Philippine
Professional
Standards for
Teachers to plan
personal
professional
development
goals and assist
colleagues in
planning and
achieving
their own goals
(PPST 7.5.3)
Any of the following
documents:
1.Certification from the
ICT Coordinator / School
Head / Focal Person in
charge of e-SAT
2.IPCRF-DP
3.Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form
(PMCF)
4.Mid-year Review Form
(MRF)
5.Updated IPCRF-DP from
Phase II
Quality Updated
professional
development
goals during
Phase II of the
PMES Cycle as
evidenced by
MOV 5
Discussed
progress on
professional
development
goals with the
rater during the
mid-year review,
as evidenced by
MOV 4
Set professional
development goals
based on e-SAT
results
as evidenced by
MOV 2 or MOV 3
Accomplished the
e-SAT at the
beginning of the
school year, as
evidenced by MOV
1
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency Presented 4
acceptable MOVs
Presented 3
acceptable MOVs
Presented 2
acceptable MOVs
Presented 1
acceptable MOVs
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Timeliness All 4 presented
MOVs were
accomplished
within the
prescribed PMES
Phase
Three (3) of the
presented
MOVs were
accomplished
within the
prescribed
PMES Phase
Two (2) of the
presented MOVs
were accomplished
within the
prescribed PMES
Phase
Only 1 of the
presented MOVs
was accomplished
within the
prescribed PMES
Phase
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Highly Proficient Teacher
KRA 7: Personal Growth and Professional Development
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 4)