Guide Questions: How do we use these definitions and/or concepts to understand ‘the public ’ for whom we plan, as architects? What aspects of the field, social, public, or natural ‘settings’ are we to observe?
Book’s preface: Architecture's most significant impact is not its visual style, but its creation of space , which directly structures social life by dictating patterns of movement, encounter, and avoidance. This direct, material relationship between spatial organization and social relations is crucial but poorly understood , leading to problems like the "lifeless and deserted environments" of modern high- and low-rise housing.
Hillier & Hanson assert that resolving this issue requires a new theoretical approach. Traditional models fail because they view society as a-spatial and space as purely physical. They introduce "space syntax," a new theory and method that conceives of spatial order as restrictions on random processes and analyzes the social content of spatial patterning. Book’s preface:
This new framework deliberately departs from other theories by being distance-free and prioritizing morphology (complexes of relations) over location. By establishing a "spatial logic of society," this seeks to provide the necessary understanding for better architectural design. Book’s preface:
summary some societies seem to invest much less in spatial order than others, being content with random, or near-random arrangements, while others require complex, even geometric forms. Chapter 2 is all about: physical patterns of space arranged for human purposes. It is based on two premises: human spatial organisation , whether in the form of settlements or buildings, is the establishment of patterns of relationships composed essentially of boundaries and permeabilities of various kinds; although there are infinitely many different complexes of spatial relations possible in the real world, there are not infinitely many underlying sets of organizing principles for these patterns.